This research examines the impact of perceived AI literacy on task performance, with a focus on creativity as a mediating factor. A quantitative survey was administered to 120 head library professionals in medical institutions recognized by the PMDC (Pakistan Medical and Dental Council) and HEC (Higher Education Commission) in Pakistan. Findings showed that these professionals displayed satisfactory levels of perceived AI literacy, creativity, and task performance. Path analyses confirmed a positive and significant effect of AI literacy on both creativity and task performance. Additionally, it was found that creativity had a positive association with task performance and served as a significant mediator between AI literacy and task performance. Theoretically, the findings of this research addressed the knowledge and population gap in the available research. From practical perspectives, these findings offer valuable insights for medical governing bodies, AI developers, IT administrators, and information management professionals, underscoring the importance of AI literacy in promoting sustainable creativity and efficient task performance, ultimately enhancing information management and advancing medical education and practices in Pakistan.
AbayomiOKAdenekanFNAbayomiAOlatejuAjayiTAAderonkeAO (2021) Awareness and perception of the artificial intelligence in the management of university libraries in Nigeria. Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Electronic Reserve29(1-2): 13–28.
2.
AdebimpeOFalolaA (2020) Promoting creativity, innovation and entrepreneurship education in library and information science: a veritable tool for sustainable development in Nigeria. In: Achieving Sustainable Development in Nigeria through Innovation, Creativity and Entrepreneurial Education, pp.124–135.
3.
AkwangNE (2016) Creativity and innovation in management: imperatives for academic librarians. AKSU Journal of Management Sciences1(2): 82–90.
4.
AlamAFSubaveerapandiyanAMvulaDTiwaryN (2024) AI literacy and Zambian librarians: a study of perceptions and applications. Open Information Science8(1): 20220166.
5.
AliMYNaeemSBBhattiRRichardsonJ (2024) Artificial intelligence application in university libraries of Pakistan: SWOT analysis and implications. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication73(1/2): 219–234.
6.
AmabileT (1996) Creativity in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity. Westview Press.
7.
AmabileT (2011) Componential theory of creativity. Harvard Business School, Boston, MA.
8.
AsimMArifMRafiqMAhmadR (2023) Investigating applications of artificial intelligence in university libraries of Pakistan: An empirical study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship49(6): 102803.
9.
BodenMA (2004) The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms. Routledge.
10.
BonnardelNZenasniF (2010) The impact of technology on creativity in design: an enhancement?Creativity and Innovation Management19(2): 180–191.
11.
Botega LF deCda SilvaJC (2020) An artificial intelligence approach to support knowledge management on the selection of creativity and innovation techniques. Journal of Knowledge Management24(5): 1107–1130.
12.
BrownMWilliamsL (2023) Innovations in academic libraries: Adapting to a digital age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
ByeonH-KChoH-Y (2014) A study on influence factors of the task performance with utilizing SNS by school librarians. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science48(4): 71–90.
14.
ByrneBM (2013) Structural Equation Modeling with EQS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Routledge.
15.
CampbellJPMcHenryJJWiseLL (1990) Modeling job performance in a population of jobs. Personnel Psychology43(2): 313–575.
16.
Casal-OteroLCatalaAFernández-MoranteCTaboadaMCebreiroBBarroS (2023) AI literacy in K-12: a systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education10(1): 29.
17.
ChenMShenC-W (2020) The correlation analysis between the service quality of intelligent library and the behavioral intention of users. The Electronic Library38(1): 95–112.
18.
ChiuTKAhmadZIsmailovMSanusiIT (2024) What are artificial intelligence literacy and competency? A comprehensive framework to support them. Computers and Education Open6: 100171.
19.
CoveneyBCH (2008) Assessing the organisational climate for creativity in a UK public library service: a case study. Library and Information Research32(102): 38–56.
OyedipeWJ (2020) Demographics, information and communication technology skills, access and use as factors influencing task performance of library personnel in public universities in southwestern Nigeria. Doctoral dissertation, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.
22.
DewettT (2003) Understanding the relationship between information technology and creativity in organizations. Creativity Research Journal15(2–3): 167–182.
23.
DharanikotaSMarakasGM (2021) Does AI reliance lead to performance? a task-technology fit theory perspective. In: AMCIS 2021 Proceedings. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354794916.
24.
DikmenMBurnsC (2022) The effects of domain knowledge on trust in explainable AI and task performance: A case of peer-to-peer lending. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies162: 102792.
25.
DiseiyeOUkubeyinjeSEOladokunBDKakwaghVV (2024) Emerging technologies: leveraging digital literacy for self-sufficiency among library professionals. Metaverse Basic and Applied Research3: 59.
26.
DobreO-I (2013) Employee motivation and organizational performance. Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research5(1): 53–60.
27.
EiriemiokhaleKASulymanAS (2023) Awareness and perceptions of artificial intelligence among librarians in university libraries in Kwara state, Nigeria. Indonesian Journal of Librarianship5(2): 107–118.
28.
FornellCLarckerDF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research18(1): 39–50.
29.
García-MachadoJJJachowiczA (2019) Assessing overall fit and invariance in a PLS model of pigs and V4 countries’ financial systems. In: Gil-LafuenteJMarinoDMorabitoF (eds) Economy,Business and Uncertainty: New Ideas for a Euro-Mediterranean Industrial Policy. AEDEM 2017. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 180. Cham: Springer, pp. 45–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00677-8_3
30.
GaringanDPickardAJ (2021) Artificial intelligence in legal practice: Exploring theoretical frameworks for algorithmic literacy in the legal information profession. Legal Information Management21(2): 97–117.
31.
GarsonGD (2013) Validity and reliability. Asheboro, NC: Statistical Associates Publishers, pp. 9–28.
32.
GongYHuangJ-CFarhJ-L (2009) Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Academy of Management Journal52(4): 765–778.
33.
GoodhueDLThompsonRL (1995) Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly19(2): 213–236.
34.
HairJFRisherJJSarstedtMRingleCM (2019) When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review31(1): 2–24.
35.
HamadFAl-FadelMFakhouriH (2021) The effect of librarians’ digital skills on technology acceptance in academic libraries in Jordan. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science53(4): 589–600.
36.
HarisantyDAnnaNEVPutriTEFirdausAANoor AziziNA (2024) Leaders, practitioners and scientists’ awareness of artificial intelligence in libraries: A pilot study. Library Hi Tech42(3): 809–825.
37.
HemmerPWestphalMSchemmerMVetterSVössingMSatzgerG (2023, March) Human-AI collaboration: The effect of AI delegation on human task performance and task satisfaction. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Sydney, Australia, 27–30 March 2023, pp. 453–463.
38.
HenselerJDijkstraTKSarstedtMRingleCMDiamantopoulosAStraubDWet al. (2014) Common beliefs and reality about PLS: Comments on Rönkkö and Evermann (2013). Organizational Research Methods17(2): 182–209.
39.
HeyderT.PoseggaO. (2021). Extending the foundations of AI literacy. In ICIS.
40.
HurW-MMoonTRheeS-Y (2016) Exploring the relationships between compassion at work, the evaluative perspective of positive work-related identity, service employee creativity, and job performance. Journal of Services Marketing30(1): 103–114.
41.
IbegbulamIEzeJUAkpomCC (2017) Investigating the organizational climate for creativity/innovation among librarians in Academic libraries in South East Nigeria. Libri67(1): 65–74.
42.
JanSUKhanMSAKhanAS (2024) Organizational readiness to adopt artificial intelligence in the library and information sector of Pakistan. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice19(1): 58–76.
43.
JohnsonP (2021) Artificial intelligence and information literacy in healthcare. Journal of Medical Librarianship47(3): 210–225.
44.
KarkRVan DijkDVashdiDR (2018) Motivated or demotivated to be creative: The role of self-regulatory focus in transformational and transactional leadership processes. Applied Psychology67(1): 186–224.
45.
KimJY (2019) The relationship between creativity and salespersons’ work performance: Depending on the classification of sales work and the industrial category. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association19(2): 305–316.
46.
KimYSongHKangJHongA (2024) The effect of PBL-based AI convergence education programs on AI literacy and creative problem-solving skills of elementary school students. ICERI2024 Proceedings: 9137–9137.
47.
KockFBerbekovaAAssafAG (2021) Understanding and managing the threat of common method bias: Detection, prevention and control. Tourism Management86: 104330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104330.
48.
KongS-CCheungWM-YZhangG (2021) Evaluation of an artificial intelligence literacy course for university students with diverse study backgrounds. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence2: 100026.
49.
KoopmansLBernaardsCMHildebrandtVHDe VetHCVan Der BeekAJ (2014) Construct validity of the individual work performance questionnaire. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine56(3): 331–337.
50.
LakshmiVCorbettJ (2020) How artificial intelligence improves agricultural productivity and sustainability: A global thematic analysis. In: Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, Hawaii, 7–10 January 2020, pp. 5202–5211.
51.
LaupichlerMCAsterASchirchJRaupachT (2022) Artificial intelligence literacy in higher and adult education: A scoping literature review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence3: 100101.
52.
LeeSKimH (2022) AI literacy for medical librarians: Trends and implications. Information Science Journal35(4): 78–92.
53.
LoLS (2024, in press) Evaluating AI literacy in academic libraries: A survey study with a focus on US employees. College and Research Libraries.
54.
LongDMagerkoB (2020, April) What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. In: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Honolulu, Hawaii,25–30April 2020, pp.1–16.
55.
LundBDOmameITijaniSAgbajiD (2020) Perceptions toward artificial intelligence among academic library employees and alignment with the diffusion of innovations’ adopter categories. College & Research Libraries81(5): 865–882.
56.
MadukomaEBamideleIAAllisonGO (2021) Survey of innovation and creativity practices among librarians in Nigeria. Jewel Journal of Librarianship16(1): 146–154.
57.
MansourE (2017) A survey of digital information literacy (DIL) among academic library and information professionals. Digital Library Perspectives33(2): 166–188.
58.
MiddletonLHallH (2021) Workplace information literacy: A bridge to the development of innovative work behaviour. Journal of Documentation77(6): 1343–1363.
59.
MorSGuptaG (2021) Artificial intelligence and technical efficiency: The case of Indian commercial banks. Strategic Change30(3): 235–245.
60.
MotowidloSJBormanWCSchmitMJ (2014) A theory of individual differences in task and contextual performance. In: Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Contextual Performance. Psychology Press, pp. 71–83.
61.
MughariSNaveedMARafiqueGM (2023) Effect of information literacy on academic performance of business students in Pakistan. Libri73(4): 355–368.
62.
MughariSRafiqueGMAliMA (2024) Effect of AI literacy on work performance among medical librarians in Pakistan. The Journal of Academic Librarianship50(5): 102918.
63.
Muñoz-DoyagueMFGonzález-ÁlvarezNNietoM (2008) An examination of individual factors and employees’ creativity: The case of Spain. Creativity Research Journal20(1): 21–33.
64.
NaveedMAIqbalJAsgharMZShaukatRKishwerR (2023) How information literacy influences creative skills among medical students? The mediating role of lifelong learning. Medical Education Online28(1): 2176734. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2023.2176734.
65.
NaveedMAIqbalJAsgharMZShaukatRSeitamaa-HakkarainenP (2022) Information literacy as a predictor of work performance: The mediating role of lifelong learning and creativity. Behavioral Sciences13(1): 1–17.
66.
NayerNJookarA (2012) The relationship between knowledge management and creativity among the librarians of Shiraz University libraries, Iran. Health Information Management9(2): 232–243.
67.
NgDTKLeungJKLChuKWSQiaoMS (2021a) AI literacy: Definition, teaching, evaluation and ethical issues. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology58(1): 504–509.
68.
NgDTKLeungJKLChuSKWQiaoMS (2021b) Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence2: 100041.
69.
NgoLVNguyenNPLeeJAndonopoulosV (2020) Mindfulness and job performance: Does creativity matter?Australasian Marketing Journal28(3): 117–123.
OdugbesanJAAghazadehSAl QarallehRESogekeOS (2023) Green talent management and employees’ innovative work behavior: The roles of artificial intelligence and transformational leadership. Journal of Knowledge Management27(3): 696–716.
72.
OkikiOCDurodoluOO (2018) Enhancing job performance of librarians in academic libraries through technological change. University of Ibadan Journal of Library and Information Science1(1): 62–74.
73.
OmameIMAlex-NmechaJC (2020) Artificial intelligence in libraries. In: Managing and adapting library information services for future users, IGI Global, pp. 120–144.
74.
OnuohaCOAnyanwuEUOssai-OnahOVAmaechiNM (2015) Challenges of promoting innovation and creativity among library and information science professionals in Nigeria: The experience of selected libraries in Imo State, Nigeria. Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences6(1): 25–30.
75.
OyedipeJWPopoolaSO (2018) ICT skills, use and task performance among library personnel in public university libraries. Information Impact: Journal of Information and Knowledge Management9(2): 82–97.
76.
OyedipeWPopoolaSO (2019) Educational status, work experience, accessibility to ICT and use as predictors of task performance among library personnel. KIIT Journal of Library and Information Management6(2): 176–188.
77.
OyedipeWJPopoolaSO (2019) Influence of age, job status, ICT literacy skills and ICT use on task performance of library personnel in public universities. International Journal of Knowledge Content Development & Technology9(3): 43–61.
78.
PaladhiMMMaruthaveeranV (2024) Evaluating AI literacy proficiency among LIS researchers in ASEAN. Library Hi Tech News41(4): 6–8.
79.
PengY-P (2014) Job satisfaction and job performance of university librarians: A disaggregated examination. Library & Information Science Research36(1): 74–82.
80.
PuLLiangJWangJZhangNZhongW (2024) Impact of AI-based learning, digital literacy, and information stewardship on learning outcomes. Profesional de la Información33(5):1–13.
81.
RamayahTYeapJAhmadNHHalimHARahmanSA (2017) Testing a confirmatory model of Facebook usage in SmartPLS using consistent PLS. International Journal of Business and Innovation3(2): 1–14.
SaadiaHNaveedMA (2024) Effect of information literacy on lifelong learning, creativity, and work performance among journalists. Online Information Review48(2): 257–276.
84.
SalARajaM (2016) The impact of training and development on employees’ performance and productivity. International Journal of Management Sciences and Business Research5(7): 36–70.
85.
SarstedtMHairJFPickMDLiengaardBDRadomirLRingleCM (2022) Progress in partial least squares structural equation modeling use in marketing research in the last decade. Psychology & Marketing39(5): 1035–1064.
86.
SarstedtMRingleCMHairJF (2021) Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In: Handbook of market research. Springer, pp. 587–632.
87.
SchlösserTDunningDJohnsonKLKrugerJ (2013) How unaware are the unskilled? Empirical tests of the “signal extraction” counterexplanation for the Dunning–Kruger effect in self-evaluation of performance. Journal of Economic Psychology39: 85–100.
88.
ShahzadKKhanSAIqbalAShabbirO (2023) Effects of motivational and behavioral factors on job productivity: An empirical investigation from academic librarians in Pakistan. Behavioral Sciences13(1): 1–16.
89.
SidraSMasonC (2024) Reconceptualizing AI literacy: The importance of metacognitive thinking in an artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled workforce. In2024IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence (CAI):1181–1186.
90.
SlaterSFHultGTMOlsonEM (2010) Factors influencing the relative importance of marketing strategy creativity and marketing strategy implementation effectiveness. Industrial Marketing Management39(4): 551–559.
91.
SmithR (2022) The evolving role of academic libraries in the 21st century. Library Trends60(2): 123–139.
92.
SturmTPetersF (2020) The impact of artificial intelligence on individual performance: Exploring the fit between task, data, and technology. Available at: https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2020_rp/200.
93.
SuJNgDTKChuSKW (2023) Artificial intelligence (AI) literacy in early childhood education: The challenges and opportunities. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence4: 100124.
94.
SubaveerapandiyanASunanthiniCAmeesM (2023) A study on the knowledge and perception of artificial intelligence. IFLA Journal49(3): 503–513.
95.
TredinnickL (2017) Artificial intelligence and professional roles. Business Information Review34(1): 37–41.
96.
UkachiNBOnuohaU (2013) Training the creative librarian in the age of technological advancement. Information Management and Business Review5(6): 306–312.
97.
UllahYUllahHJanS (2022) The mediating role of employee creativity between knowledge sharing and innovative performance: Empirical evidence from manufacturing firms in emerging markets. Management Research Review45(1): 86–100.
98.
VermaSSinghV (2022) Impact of artificial intelligence-enabled job characteristics and perceived substitution crisis on innovative work behavior of employees from high-tech firms. Computers in Human Behavior131: 107215.
99.
WilliamsRAliSAlcantaraRBurghlehTAlghowinemSBreazealC (2024) Doodlebot: An educational robot for creativity and AI literacy. In Proceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction: 772–780.
100.
WuM-S (2019) Information literacy, creativity and work performance. Information Development35(5): 676–687.
101.
YakubuASYaganaAAUmarS (2023) Investigating librarians’ intention to use artificial intelligence for effective library service delivery: A partial least square-structural equation modeling-based approach. Dutse Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences9: 1–14.
102.
YiY (2021) Establishing the concept of AI literacy. Jahr–European Journal of Bioethics12(2): 353–368.
103.
YuKGongRSunLJiangC (2019) The application of artificial intelligence in smart library. In: 2019 International Conference on Organizational Innovation (ICOI 2019), Atlantis Press, pp. 708–713.
