This study explores the perceptions, effectiveness, and ethical implications of AI tools in academic writing among PhD scholars in India. It evaluates the comparative effectiveness of AI tools versus traditional methods for paraphrasing, plagiarism detection, and citation improvement. The research also investigates user confidence in AI tools’ adaptability to various academic disciplines and their potential to support critical thinking and academic integrity. A structured quantitative approach was employed, utilizing validated surveys with 184 respondents from the University of Mumbai. Findings indicate that while AI tools enhance clarity, flow, and efficiency, they raise concerns about over-reliance, originality, and ethical transparency. Advanced-year scholars valued citation improvements but were critical of originality-related functions. The study emphasizes responsible AI use, advocating for its role as a complementary, supportive tool to foster creativity and intellectual rigor. These findings contribute to the ongoing discourse on integrating AI responsibly into academic practices.
Abd-ElsalamKAAbdel-MomenSM (2023) Artificial intelligence’s development and challenges in scientific writing. Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research101(3): 714–717.
2.
AlharbiW (2023) AI in the foreign language classroom: A pedagogical overview of automated writing assistance tools. Education Research International2023: e4253331.
3.
BaldassarreMGiganteDKalinowskiM, et al. (2024) POLARIS: A framework to guide the development of Trustworthy AI systems. In: International conference on AI engineering – Software engineering for AI (CAIN), Lisbon, Portugal, 14 April 2024, pp.1–11: researchr.org.
4.
BenmamounM (2025) Generative AI in international business research: A guide to ethical and responsible application. Thunderbird International Business Review67(1): 139–146.
5.
BolañosFSalatinoAOsborneF, et al. (2024) Artificial intelligence for literature reviews: Opportunities and challenges. arXiv:2402.08565. arXiv. Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.08565 (accessed 21 January 2025).
6.
CardonPFleischmannCAritzJ, et al. (2023) The challenges and opportunities of AI-assisted writing: Developing AI literacy for the AI age. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly86(3): 257–295.
7.
ChiuTKF (2024) The impact of Generative AI (GenAI) on practices, policies and research direction in education: A case of ChatGPT and Midjourney. Interactive Learning Environments32(10): 6187–6203.
8.
ChiuTKFMoorhouseBLChaiCS, et al. (2023) Teacher support and student motivation to learn with Artificial Intelligence (AI) based chatbot. Interactive Learning Environments: 1–17.
9.
CondeJReviriegoPSalvachúaJ, et al. (2024) Understanding the impact of artificial intelligence in academic writing: Metadata to the rescue. Computer57(1): 105–109.
10.
DuBoseJMarshallD (2023) AI In academic writing: Tool or invader. Public Services Quarterly19(2): 125–130.
11.
DwivediYKHughesLIsmagilovaE, et al. (2021) Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management57: 101994.
12.
DwivediYKKshetriNHughesL, et al. (2023) Opinion paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management71: 102642.
13.
FakfarePManosuthiNLeeJ-S, et al. (2025) Customer word-of-mouth for generative AI: Innovation and adoption in hospitality and tourism. International Journal of Hospitality Management126: 104070.
14.
FathiJRahimiMDerakhshanA (2024) Improving EFL learners’ speaking skills and willingness to communicate via artificial intelligence-mediated interactions. System121: 103254.
15.
Godwin-JonesR (2022) Partnering with AI: Intelligent writing assistance & instructed language learning. Language Learning & Technology26(2): 5–24.
16.
GrassiniS (2023) Development and validation of the AI attitude scale (AIAS-4): A brief measure of general attitude toward artificial intelligence. Frontiers in Psychology14: 1191628.
17.
HossainZBiswasMDSKhanG (2025) AI Literacy of library and information science students: A study of Bangladesh, India and Pakistan. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science: 09610006241309323.
18.
HutsonJ (2024) Rethinking plagiarism in the era of generative AI. Journal of Intelligent Communication4(1): 20–31.
19.
JiangTSunZFuS, et al. (2024) Human-AI interaction research agenda: A user-centered perspective. Data and Information Management8(4): 100078.
20.
KaruppalR (2025) The impact of artificial intelligence on medical article writing: A boon or a bane?Journal of Orthopaedics63: 98–100.
21.
KhalifaMAlbadawyM (2024) Using artificial intelligence in academic writing and research: An essential productivity tool. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Update5: 100145.
22.
KharlamovaGStavytskyyA (2023) The use of artificial intelligence in academic publishing: Preliminary remarks and perspectives. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe6(1): 1–12.
23.
KnowlesAM (2024) Machine-in-the-loop writing: Optimizing the rhetorical load. Computers and Composition71: 102826.
24.
KrajkaJOlszakI (2024a) “AI, will you help?” How learners use artificial intelligence when writing. XLinguae17(1): 34–48.
25.
KrajkaJOlszakI (2024b) Artificial intelligence tools in academic writing instruction: Exploring the potential of on-demand AI assistance in the writing process. Roczniki Humanistyczne72(6): 123–140.
26.
MalikARPratiwiYAndajaniK, et al. (2023) Exploring artificial intelligence in academic essay: Higher education student’s perspective. International Journal of Educational Research Open5: 100296.
27.
NguyenAHongYDangB, et al. (2024) Human-AI collaboration patterns in AI-assisted academic writing. Studies in Higher Education49(5): 847–864.
28.
PinzolitsR (2024) AI In academia: An overview of selected tools and their areas of application. MAP Education and Humanities4: 37–50.
29.
RahmanMdMWatanobeY (2023) ChatGPT for education and research: Opportunities, threats, and strategies. Applied Sciences13(9): 5783.
30.
RusmiyantoRHuriatiNFitrianiN, et al. (2023) The role of artificial intelligence (AI) in developing English language learner’s communication skills. Journal on Education6(1): 750–757.
31.
SaygınDAKabakçıADA (2023) The use of controlled artificial intelligence as a co-author in academic article writing. European Journal of Therapeutics29(4): 990–991.
32.
ShenZAugustTSiangliulueP, et al. (2023) Beyond summarization: Designing AI support for real-world expository writing tasks. arXiv:2304.02623. arXiv. Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.02623 (accessed 16 May 2024).
33.
StroblCAilhaudEBenetosK, et al. (2019) Digital support for academic writing: A review of technologies and pedagogies. Computers & Education131: 33–48.
34.
TranTTH (2024) AI tools in teaching and learning English academic writing skills. Proceedings of the AsiaCALL International Conference4: 170–187.
35.
VelezMRisterA (2025) Beyond academic integrity: Navigating institutional and disciplinary anxieties about AI-assisted authorship in technical and professional communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication39(1): 115–132.
36.
ZhangWXLinJJHHsuY (2025) AI-assisted assessment of inquiry skills in socioscientific issue contexts. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning41(1): e13102.
