Through social media and digital platforms, fake news and both professional as well as non-professional news sources are increasingly circulated, thus having a greater impact on people's lives and society. As a result, evaluating news has emerged as a crucial skill. However, it is yet unclear what variables contribute to this increase. To offer more insights, this study attempts to investigate through political news accessibility the factors influencing political news assessment of university students in Northeast Thailand. This study was a quantitative research, and the theory underlying it was news literacy. 1200 samples from undergraduate students from state, private, and autonomous universities were obtained through a multi-stage sampling. 400 questionnaires, utilized as a research tool, were distributed to each type of university for data collection. In order to examine the reliability of the research instrument, Cronbach's alpha was also used in a pre-test stage along with a content validity analysis of the questionnaire. For all elements, the alpha coefficient was 0.93. The findings demonstrated that political news assessment was most influenced by political news accessibility, which is the intervening variable (Beta = 0.265); followed by political news exposure from social media (Beta = 0.217); inner drives for the follow-up of political news (Beta = 0.190); influence of groups and social networks (Beta = 0.170); specific characteristics of the Internet (Beta = 0.151); importance of political news (Beta = 0.147); political news exposure from websites (Beta = 0.099); benefits of political news (Beta = 0.075); and political news exposure from print media (Beta = 0.042). The student characteristic factor, motivation for political news exposure factor, and political news exposure factor accounted for 67.45 percent of the variance in explaining political news evaluation among Thai students, through political news accessibility (R2 = 0.6745). Consequently, improving these elements will lead to better political news evaluation.
AhmadiMWohnDY (2018) The antecedents of incidental news exposure on social media. Social Media + Society4(2): 1–8.
2.
AshleySMakslACraftS (2017) News media literacy and political engagement: What’s the connection?Journal of Media Literacy Education9(1): 79–98.
3.
BarnidgeMXenosMA (2021) Social media news deserts: Digital inequalities and incidental news exposure on social media platforms. New Media and Society: 1–21.
4.
BenklerY (2006) The Wealth of Network: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
5.
BergströmABelfrageJ (2018) News in social media: Incidental consumption and the role of opinion leaders. Digital Journalism6(5): 583–598.
6.
BrundidgeJ (2010) Encountering difference in the contemporary public sphere: The contribution of the internet to the heterogeneity of political discussion networks. Journal of Communication60: 680–700.
7.
BulutZADoğanO (2017) The ABCD typology: Profile and motivations of Turkish social network site users. Computers in Human Behavior67: 73–83.
8.
ChoiJ (2016) Why do people use news differently on SNSs? An investigation of the role of motivations, media repertoires, and technology cluster on citizens’ news-related activities. Computers in Human Behavior54: 249–256.
9.
CohenMMcIntyreKSemujjuB, et al. (2022) Demographic differences in digital news literacy in East Africa. African Journalism Studies43(3): 51–67.
10.
CookeN (2017) Post-truth, truthiness, and alternative facts: Information behavior and critical information consumption for a new age. The Library Quarterly87: 211–221.
11.
de VreeseCHNeijensP (2016) Measuring media exposure in a changing communications environment. Communication Methods and Measures10(2-3): 69–80.
12.
DeVitoMGergleDBirnholtzJ (2017) Algorithms ruin everything: #RIPTwitter folk theories and resistance to algorithmic change in social media. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Denver, CO, 6–11 May, pp.3163–3174. Denver, CO: ACM.
13.
DiddiALaRoseR (2006) Gettting hooked on news: Uses and gratifications and the formation of news habits among college students in an internet environment. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media50(2): 193–210.
14.
EdgerlySKjerstinTEstherT, et al. (2017) Do parents still model news consumption? Socializing news use among adolescents in a multi-device world. New Media & Society20(4): 1263–1281.
15.
EdgerlySVragaE (2020) Deciding what’s news: News-ness as an audience concept for the hybrid media environment. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly97(2): 416–434.
FlemingJ (2014) Media literacy, news literacy, or news appreciation? A case study of the news literacy program at Stony Brook University. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator69(2): 146–165.
18.
FletcherRNielsenRK (2018) Are people incidentally exposed to news on social media? A comparative analysis. New Media & Society20(7): 2450–2468.
19.
Gil de ZúñigaGZichengC (2021) Origin and evolution of the news finds me perception: Review of theory and effects. El Profesional de la INformación30930: e300321.
20.
Gil de ZúñigaHHuberBStraußN (2018) Social media and democracy. El Profesional de la Información27(6): 1172–1180.
IntyaswatiDMaryaniESugianaD, et al. (2021) Social media as an information source of political learning in online education. SAGE Open 11(2): 1–8.
23.
JunN (2012) Contribution of internet news use to reducing the influence of selective online exposure on political diversity. Computers in Human Behavior28(2012): 1450–1457.
24.
KahneJBowyerB (2019) Can media literacy education increase digital engagement in politics?Learning, Media and Technology44(2): 211–224.
25.
KendrickAFullertonJ (2019) Dimensions of news media literacy among US advertising students. Journal of Advertising Education23(1): 7–21.
26.
KesiciA (2018) Do social students use social media more often?Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education20(2): 121–133.
27.
KleemansMEgginkG (2016) Understanding news: The impact of media literacy education on teenagers’ news literacy. Journalism Education5(1): 74–88.
28.
Ku KellyYLKongQSongY, et al. (2019) What predicts adolescents’ critical thinking about real-life news? The role of social media news consumption and news media literacy. Thinking Skills and Creativity33: 1–12.
29.
LeeJKKimE (2017) Incidental exposure to news: Predictors in the social media setting and effects on information gain online. Computers in Human Behavior75: 1008–1015.
30.
LeederC (2019) How college students evaluate and share fake news stories. Library & Information Science Research41(3): 1–11.
31.
MakslAAshleySCraftS (2015) Measuring news media literacy. Journal of Media Literacy Education6(3): 29–45.
32.
MartensH (2010) Evaluating media literacy education: Concepts, theories and future directions. Journal of Media Literacy Education2(1): 1–22.
33.
MeijerICKormelinkTG (2015) Checking, sharing, clicking and linking. Digital Journalism3(5): 664–679.
34.
MihailidisP (2014) Media Literacy and the Emerging Citizen: Youth, Engagement and Participatton in Digital Culture. New York: Peter Lang.
35.
MihailidisP (2018) Civic media literacies: Re-imagining engagement for civic intentionality. Learning, Media and Technology43(2): 152–164.
36.
Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation (2018) Report of Higher Education, Science, Research, and Innovation. Bangkok: Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation.
37.
MolyneuxL (2018) Mobile news consumption. Digital Journalism6(5): 634–650.
38.
National Statistical Office (2021) Children and Youth's Use of ICT in 2021. Bangkok: Forecasting Statistics Division National Statistical Office.
39.
NeubergerC (2014) The journalistic quality of internet formats and services. Digital Journalism2(3): 419–433.
40.
Office of the Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation (2020) Student number classified by provinces/regions. Available at: https://info.mhesi.go.th/homestat_std.php (accessed 2 September 2022).
41.
Office of the Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation (2021) Student information. Available at: http://www.info.mhesi.go.th/newinfo/homestat_std.php (accessed 2 September 2022).
42.
OhmeJMothesC (2020) What affects first- and second-level selective exposure to journalistic news? A social media online experiment. Journalism Studies21(9): 1220–1242.
PaisanaMPinto-MartinhoACardosoG (2020) Trust and fake news: Exploratory analysis of the impact of news literacy on the relationship with news content in Portugal. Communication & Society33(2): 105–117.
45.
PankaewA (2020) Attitudes toward democracy and politics of first-time voters. King Prajadhipok’s Institute Journal17(2): 5–19.
46.
ParmeleeJHPerkinsSC (2012) Exploring social and psychological factors that influence the gathering of political information online. Telematics and Informatics29: 90–98.
47.
PotterW (2019) Seven Skills of Media Literacy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48.
PotterWJ (2018) Media Literacy, 9th ed.Thousands Oak, CA: Sage.
49.
RobinsonLChenWSchulzJ, et al. (2018) Digital inequality across major life realms. American Behavioral Scientist62(9): 1159–1166.
50.
RyanRMDeciEL (2000) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology25(1): 54–67.
51.
SarawanawongJFyetedKNgernpoolsapD, et al. (2017) Online social media usage behaviors of undergraduate student, Kasetsart University. Journal of Library and Information Science Srinakharinwirot University10(2): 16–31. http://ejournals.swu.ac.th/index.php/jlis/article/view/9954.
52.
SchwaigerLVoglerDEiseneggerM (2022) Change in news access, change in expectations? How young social media users in Switzerland evaluate the functions and quality of news. The International Journal of Press/Politics27(3): 609–628.
53.
SiverblattA (2018) Media literacy and critical thinking. International Journal of Media and Information Literacy3(2): 66–71.
54.
SteppatDHerreroLCEsserF (2020) New media performance evaluated by national audience: How media environments and user preference matter. Media and Communication8(3): 321–334.
55.
StockdaleLACoyneSM (2020) Bored and online: Reasons for using social media, problematic social networking site use, and behavioral outcomes across the transition from adolescence to emerging adulthood. Journal of Adolescence79: 173–183.
56.
SveningssonM (2015) It's only a pastime, really: Young people's experiences of social media as a source of news about public affairs. Social Media + Society1(2): 1–11.
57.
SwartJ (2021) Tactics of news literacy: How young people access, evaluate, and engage with news on social media. New Media and Society25(3): 1–17.
58.
TamboerSLKleemansMMolenaarI, et al. (2023) Developing a model of news literacy in early adolescents: A survey study. Mass Communication and Society26(1): 74–98.
59.
TasenteT (2020) The elements of political communication on Facebook. Technium Social Sciences Journal4(1): 50–54.
ThorsonKWellsCF (2015) Curated flows: A framework for mapping media exposure in the digital age. Communication Theory: 1–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12087.
62.
ThrouvalaMAGriffithsMDRennoldsonM, et al. (2019) Motivational processes and dysfunctional mechanisms of social media use among adolescents: A qualitative focus group study. Computers in Human Behavior93: 164–175.
63.
TullyMVragaEKSmithsonAB (2020) News media literacy, perceptions of bias, and interpretation of news. Journalism Theory, Practice, and Criticism21(2): 209–226.
64.
VragaETullyM (2021) News literacy social media behaviors and skepticism toward information on social media. Information, Communication & Society24(2): 150–166.
65.
WeeksBELaneDS (2020) The ecology of incidental exposure to news in digital media environments. Journalism21(8): 1119–1135.
66.
WojcieszakMCasasAYuX, et al. (2022) Most users do not follow political elites on Twitter; those who do show overwhelming preferences for ideological congruity. Science Avances8(39): 1–10.
67.
YamaneT (1973) Statistics: An Introductory Analysis, 3rd ed.New York: Harper.
68.
YangaTMajó-VázquezbSNielsenbRK, et al. (2020) Exposure to news grows less fragmented with an increase in mobile access. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences117(46): 28678–28683.
