Trends,patterns and determinants of research productivity at the Technical University of Kenya

Abstract

This paper explores the trends, patterns and determinants of research productivity at the Technical University of Kenya (TU-K). It analyses the research output of full-time academic staff collected from Google Scholar using Harzing’s “Publish or Perish” software. Further information was obtained from the top ten researchers based on productivity from the analysed research output. Additional information was obtained from purposively sampled officers of the university, including the Deputy Vice-Chancellor in charge of Academics, Research and Students; three executive deans of faculties; and the Director of Research and Knowledge Exchange. The study revealed gradual growth in research productivity at TU-K. The study also revealed that insufficient funding, lack of motivation, limited time and lack of equipment are some of the factors affecting research productivity at TU-K. Full implementation of performance contracting targets and establishment of the Directorate of Research and Knowledge Exchange are some of the strategies being implemented to increase research output, visibility and impact. The authors recommend that the university should nurture interest in, as well as enhance capability for inquiry and investigation to increase research productivity. The university should also create mechanisms for building intrinsic motivation and address the extrinsic factors in order to catapult research productivity.

Keywords

research productivity research impact research visibility lecturers Technical University of Kenya

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abd Aziz

N. A.

Janor

R. M.

Mahadi

(2013). Comparative departmental efficiency analysis within a university: A DEA approach. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90: 540–548.

Acharya

K. P.

Pathak

(2019). Applied research in low income countries: why and how? Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 4(3): 1–9.

Adoyo

A. C.

(2015). Factors influencing research outputs in Kenya: the case of selected public universities (masters’ dissertation). University of Nairobi, Nairobi Kenya.

Aithal

(2016). How to increase research productivity in higher educational institutions – Sims Model. International Journal of Scientific Research and Modern Education (IJSRME), 1(1): 2455–5630.

Ale Ebrahim

Salehi

Embi

M. A.

Habibi

Gholizadeh

Motahar

S. M.

Ordi

(2013). Effective strategies for increasing citation frequency. International Education Studies, 6(11): 93–99.

Allen

K. R.

(2012). Technology commercialization: have we learned anything. The Journal of Engineering and Entrepreneurship, 3(1): 1–22.

Al-Sultan

K. S.

Alzaharnah

I. T.

(2012). Academia-industry innovation linkages in the case of Saudi Arabia: Developing a university-industry triple-helix framework to promote research and development collaboration. Global Innovation Index (pp. 91). KFUPM, KSA: INSEAD.

Alzuman

(2015). Faculty Research Productivity in Saudi Arabian Public Universities: A Human Capital Investment Perspective (doctorial dissertation). Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, Virginia, United States.

Amanor-Boadu

Metla

C. M.

(2008). Research faculty, entrepreneurship and commercialization: the case of Kansas State University. Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting. (No. 1368-2016-108455).

10.

Anderson

(2012). Bury Your Writing – Why Do Academic Book Chapters Fail to Generate Citations? – The Scholarly Kitchen. Available at: https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2012/08/28/bury-your-writing-why-do-academic-book-chapters-fail-to-generate-citations/ (accessed 16 August 2018).

11.

Anninos

L. N.

(2014). Research performance evaluation: some critical thoughts on standard bibliometric indicators. Studies in Higher Education, 39(9): 1542–1561.

12.

Asekun-Olarinmoye

E. O.

(2015). The importance of research in university’s webometric ranking: UNIOSUN case study. Research Journal of Health Sciences, 3(3): 184–195.

13.

Bayissa

Zewdie

(2010). Academic staff reward system: a case of Jimma University. Ethiopian Journal of Education and Sciences, 6(1): 13-27.

14.

Bell

R. K.

Hill

Lehming

(2007). The changing research and publication environment in American research universities. Arlington, VA: Division of Science Resources Statistics, National Science Foundation.

15.

Bland

C. J.

Center

B. A.

Finstad

D. A.

Risbey

K. R.

Staples

J. G.

(2009). A theoretical, practical, predictive models of faculty and research department productivity. Academic Medicine, 80(3): 225–237.

16.

Blodel

J. R.

(2001). Judging research productivity on an entrepreneurial campus. Merrill Series on The Research Mission of Public Universities, 105: 81–84.

17.

Brown

(2017). Why should practitioners publish their research in journals? Available at: https://researchforevidence.fhi360.org/practitioners-publish-research-journals (accessed 5 January 2019).

18.

Brunn

S. D.

(2017). The Origin and Growth of Geography as a Discipline at South African Universities. The AAG Review of Books, 5(1), pp. 231–304.

19.

Chen

Gupta

Hoshower

(2006). Factors that motivate business faculty to conduct research: an expectancy theory analysis. Journal of Education for Business, 81(4): 179–189.

20.

Chinamasa

(2012). Factors influencing lecturer research output in new universities in Zimbabwe. Zimbabwe Journal of Educational Research, 24(2): 162–174.

21.

Collis

Hussey

(2014). Business research: a practical guide for undergraduate and postgraduate students. 4th ed. Palgrave, London: Macmillan.

22.

Cummings

W. K.

(2014). The research role in comparative perspective. In Shin

J. C.

Arimoto

Cummings

W. K.

Teichler

(eds). Teaching and research in contemporary higher education: systems, activities, and rewards. pp. 35–44. London: Springer.

23.

Garcia

Araújo

Mascarini

Santos

E. G.

Costa

A. R.

(2020). How long-term university-industry collaboration shapes the academic productivity of research groups. Innovation, 22(1): 56–57.

24.

Ghabban

Selamat

Ibrahim

Krejcar

Maresova

Herrera-Viedma

(2019). The influence of personal and organizational factors on researchers’ attitudes towards sustainable research productivity in Saudi universities. Sustainability, 11(4804): 1–28.

25.

Gibbs

G. R.

(2007). Thematic coding and categorizing. In Gibbs

G. R.

Qualitative Research kit: Analyzing qualitative data (pp. 38–55). London, England: SAGE Publications, Ltd doi: 10.4135/9781849208574

26.

Ginsburgh

(2012). Are leading papers in an issue of a journal of better “quality”?. Retrieved from https://voxeu.org/article/are-leading-academic-papers-really-better-quality

27.

Gonzalez-Brambila

Veloso

F. M.

(2007). The determinants of research output and impact: a study of Mexican researchers. Research Policy, 36(7): 1035–1051.

28.

Gregorutti

(2008). A mixed-method study of the environmental and personal factors that influence faculty research productivity at small-medium, private, doctorate-granting universities (doctoral dissertation), Andrews University, Michigan, United States.

29.

Gull

Arshad

(2018). Factors Affecting Research Productivity of Faculty in Higher Education Institutions. In ICPESS (International Congress on Politic, Economic and Social Studies) (No. 4). Available at: http://www.registericpess.org/index.php/ICPESS/article/view/1751 (accessed 23 November 2018).

30.

Hadjinicola

G. C.

Soteriou

A. C.

(2006). Factors affecting research productivity of production and operations management groups: an empirical study. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Decision Sciences, 1(2006): 1–16.

31.

Harzing

A. W.

(2007). Publish or perish. Available at: http://www.harzing.com/pop.html (accessed 9 February 2019).

32.

Huenneke

L. F.

Stearns

D. M.

Mart

J. D.

Laurila

(2017). Key strategies for building research capacity of university faculty members. Innovative Higher Education, 42: 421–435.

33.

Huu

(2015). Vietnamese students’ perception of English teacher qualities: implications for teacher professional development. International Journal of Academic Research in Education and Review, 3(1): 7–19.

34.

Imhonopi

Urim

U. M.

(2013). Factors affecting scholarly research output in Nigeria: perception of academics in South-Western universities. Unilag Sociological Review (USR), 10: 24–58.

35.

Ivey

Streete

Henry

Oliver

(2012). Evaluating the research performance of an emergent technological university. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 14(1): 132–136.

36.

Judger

(2016). The thematic analysis of interview data: an approach used to examine the influence of the market on curricular provision in Mongolian higher education institutions. University of Leeds. Available at: http://hpp.education.leeds.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/131/2016/02/HPP2016-3-Jugder.pdf (accessed 13 November 2017).

37.

Katz

J. S.

Martin

B. R.

(1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1): 1–18.

38.

Konstantin

Yana

Oksana

(2016). Determinants of research productivity: an individual-level lens. Journal of the National Research University Higher School of Economics, 10(2): 44–56.

39.

Kothari

C. R.

(2004). Research methodology: methods and techniques. New Delhi: New Age International.

40.

Kotrlik

J. W.

Bartlett

J. E.

Higgins

C. C.

Williams

H. A.

(2002). Factors associated with research productivity of agricultural education faculty. Journal of Agricultural Education, 43(3): 1–10.

41.

Kumwenda

El Hadji

A. N.

Orondo

P. W.

William

Oyinlola

Bongo

G. N.

Chiwona

(2017). Challenges facing young African scientists in their research careers: a qualitative exploratory study. Malawi Medical Journal, 29(1): 1–4.

42.

Kyvik

Aksnes

D. W.

(2015). Explaining the increase in publication productivity among academic staff: a generational perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 40(8): 1438–1453.

43.

Kyvik

Reymert

(2017). Research collaboration in groups and networks: differences across academic fields. Scientometrics, 113(2): 951–967.

44.

Larivière

Costas

(2016). How many is too many? On the relationship between research productivity and impact. PLOS ONE, 11(9), 1–10.

45.

Law

K. K.

Chan

Ozer

(2017). Towards an integrated framework of intrinsic motivators, extrinsic motivators and knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(6): 1486-1502.

46.

Lazaridis

(2010). Ranking university departments using the mean h-index. Scientometrics, 82(2): 211–216.

47.

Lee

Burnett

Vandegrift

Baeg

J. H.

Morris

(2015). Availability and accessibility in an open access institutional repository: a case study. Information Research: An International Electronic Journal, 20(1): 661.

48.

Lee

Bozeman

(2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5): 673–702.

49.

Magoha

(2006). 36th Graduation Ceremony of the University of Nairobi. Speech delivered by the Vice Chanceller. Available at: http://www.uonbi.ac.ke/node/63,P3-P4 (accessed 27 June 2018).

50.

Masango

C. A.

(2015). Combating inhibitors of quality research outputs at the University of Cape Town. Journal of Research Administration, 46(1): 11–24.

51.

Matthews

(2016). Academics shun books in favour of journal articles. Available at: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/academics-shun-books-in-favour-of-journal-articles (accessed 14 November 2018).

52.

Mburu

M. S.

(2014). Perceived effect of performance contracting on performance of Kenya Agricultural Research Institute (doctoral dissertation), University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.

53.

McCrea

Deyrup

(2016). The devil is in the details: A review of merit pay in higher education. In: Eastern Academy of Management annual conference, New Haven, CT.

54.

Meneses

Moreno

(2019). Factors influencing research productivity of Rizal Technological University: input to research capability development program. International Journal of Education and Research, 7(3): 85–110.

55.

Meo

S. A.

Hassan

Usmani

A. M.

(2013). Research progress and prospects of Saudi Arabia in global medical sciences. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, 17(24): 3265–3271.

56.

Migosi

J. A.

Migiro

S. O.

Ogula

(2011). Factors that motivate business faculty in Kenya to conduct research. International Journal of Education Administration and Policy Studies, 4(10): 198–204.

57.

Mishra

Smyth

(2013). Are more senior academics really more research productive than junior academics? Evidence from Australian law schools. Scientometrics, 96(2): 411–425.

58.

Morales

D. X.

Grineski

S. E.

Collins

T. W.

(2017). Increasing research productivity in undergraduate research experiences: exploring predictors of collaborative faculty–student publications. CBE Life Sciences Education, 16(3): 1–9.

59.

Muia

A. M.

Oringo

J. O.

(2016). Constraints on research productivity in Kenyan universities: case study of University of Nairobi, Kenya. International Journal of Recent Advances in Multidisciplinary Research, 6(1): 1785–1794.

60.

Mwanzu

Malesi

(2015). Assessment of the Impact of the USIU-Africa Digital Repository on Research Visibility and Webometric Ranking. East African Multidisciplinary Annual Research Conference (EAMARC). Available at: http://erepo.usiu.ac.ke/11732/2031 (accessed 2 February 2019).

61.

Mweru

(2010). Why Kenyan Academics do not Publish in International Refereed Journals Article published in the World Social Science Report 2010: Knowledge Divides (pp. 110–111). Paris, France: International Social Science Council/UNESCO

62.

Narayanan

V. K.

O’Connor

G. C.

(2010). Encyclopedia of technology and innovation management. West Sussex: John Wiley and Sons.

63.

Nganyi

J. E.

Shigogodi

J. M.

Owano

(2014). The effectiveness of performance contracting in service delivery in public universities in Kenya. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 4(10): 413–513.

64.

Nguyen

Q. H.

(2015). Factors Influencing the Research Productivity of Academics at the Research-Oriented University in Vietnam. Vietnam: Griffith Research Online. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10072/366248 (accessed 26 September 2020).

65.

Nundulall

Reddy

(2011). Mentorship as a strategy to improve research output at tertiary institutions: a case study of University of Johannesburg. South African Journal of Higher Education, 25(6): 1155–1177.

66.

Ocholla

D. N.

Ocholla

(2007). Research in library and information science in South Africa: an analysis of journal research output from 1993-2006. South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science, 73(2): 109–118.

67.

Ocholla

Onyancha

O. B.

(2013). Insight into research publication output of academic librarians in Southern African public universities from 2002 to 2011. African Journal of Library, Archives and Information Science, 23(1): 5–22

68.

Okendo

O. E.

(2018). Constraints of research productivity in universities in Tanzania: a case of Mwenge Catholic University, Tanzania. International Journal of Education and Research, 6(3): 201–210.

69.

Oluwasanu

M. M.

Atara

Balogun

Awolude

Kotila

Aniagwu

Ojengbede

(2019). Causes and remedies for low research productivity among postgraduate scholars and early career researchers on non-communicable diseases in Nigeria. BMC Research Notes volume, 12(403). Available at: DOI: 10.1186/s13104-019-4458-y.

70.

Onyancha

O. B.

(2018). Mapping collaboration and impact of library and information science research in sub-Saharan Africa, from 1995 to 2016. Library Management, 39(6-7): 349–363.

71.

Parker

L. D.

Guthrie

(2012). Accounting scholars and journals rating and benchmarking: risking academic research quality. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 26 (1): 4–15.

72.

Persson

Svenningsson

(2016). Librarians as advocates of social media for researchers: a social media project initiated by Linköping University library, Sweden. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 22(2-3): 304–314.

73.

Rotich

D. C.

(2010). The present and future growth of scholarly publishing in Africa. In: Demystifying and popularizing LIS research in modern times: proceedings of 11th DLIS Annual Conference. ( Ocholla

D.N.

Evans

, eds). pp. 44–51. Richards Bay: University of Zululand.

74.

Rush

S. C.

Wheeler

(2011). Enhancing junior faculty research productivity through multi-institution collaboration. Participants’ impressions of the school psychology research collaboration conference. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 26(3): 220–240.

75.

Sambunjak

Huić

Hren

Katić

Marušić

(2009). National vs. international journals: views of medical professionals in Croatia. Learned Publishing, 22(1): 57–70.

76.

Schemm

(2013). Africa doubles research output over past decade, moves towards a knowledge-based economy. Research Trends, 35(1): 11–12.

77.

Sitienei

C. G.

Ocholla

D. N.

(2010). Research and publication patterns and output amongst academic librarians in Eastern and Southern Africa. South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science, 1990-2006, 76(1): 36–48.

78.

Sooryamoorthy

(2009). Science and scientific collaboration in South Africa: apartheid and after. Scientometrics, 84(2): 373–390.

79.

Sorkness

C. A.

Pfund

Ofili

E. O.

Okuyemi

K. S.

Vishwanatha

J. K.

NRMN team Zavala

M. E.

Pesavento

Fernandez

Tissera

Deveci

Javier

Short

Cooper

Jones

Manson

Buchwald

Eide

Gouldy

Kelly

… Womack

(2017). A new approach to mentoring for research careers: the National Research Mentoring Network. BMC proceedings, 11 (Suppl 12), 22. DOI: 10.1186/s12919-017-0083-8.

80.

Stephens Balakrishnan

(2013). Methods to increase research output: some tips looking at the MENA region. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 8(3): 215–239.

81.

Sulo

Kendagor

Kosgei

Tuitoek

Chelangat

(2012). Factors affecting research productivity in public universities of Kenya: the case of Moi University, Eldoret. Journal of Emerging Trends in Economics and Management Sciences, 3(5): 475–484.

82.

The Technical University of Kenya. (2018). TU-K profile. The Technical University of Kenya. Available at: http://TUKenya.ac.ke/tu-k-profile (accessed 18 July 2018).

83.

The Technical University of Kenya. (2020). Directorate of research and knowledge exchange. The Technical University of Kenya. Available at: http://research.tukenya.ac.ke (16 September 2020).

84.

Victor

A. A.

Babatunde

E. G.

(2014). Motivation and effective performance of academic staff in higher education (case study of Adekunle Ajasin University, Ondo State, Nigeria). Online Submission, 1(2): 157–163.

85.

Vlăsceanu

Hâncean

M. G.

(2015). Policy incentives and research productivity in the Romanian higher education. An institutional approach. In: The European higher education area (pp. 185–203). Springer, Cham.

86.

Vuong

Q. H.

Napier

N. K.

T. M.

Nguyen

V. H.

Vuong

T. T.

Pham

H. H.

Nguyen

H. K. T.

(2018). Effects of work environment and collaboration on research productivity in Vietnamese social sciences: evidence from 2008 to 2017 Scopus data. Studies in Higher Education, 44(12): 2132–2147.

87.

Wadesango

(2014). Publish or perish: impediments to research output and publication. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 6(1): 57–63.

88.

White

K. E.

Robbins

Khan

Freyman

(2017). Science and Engineering Publication Output Trends: 2014 Shows Rise of Developing Country Output while Developed Countries Dominate Highly Cited Publications. National Science Foundation. Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences. Available at: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/ (accessed 30 November 2019).

89.

Wichian

S. N.

Wongwanich

Bowarnkitiwong

(2009). Factors affecting research productivity of faculty members in government universities: Lisrel and neural network analyses. Kasetsart Journal, 12(39): 67–78.

90.

Wills

Ridley

Mitev

(2013). Research productivity of accounting academics in changing and challenging times. Journal of Accounting and Organisational Change, 9(1): 4–25.

91.

Zhang

(2014). Factors that motivate academic staff to conduct research and influence research productivity in Chinese Project 211 universities (doctoral dissertation), University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia.