This study explores how digital technologies can benefit older adults’ cognitive health. The need for cognition (NFC) refers to an individual’s tendency to engage in and enjoy cognitive endeavors and is an explanatory variable for behavioral outcomes. To date, little scholarly literature has examined how NFC can be affected by our behavior; therefore, this study explored whether practicing digital skills can help to improve or maintain NFC. Utilizing age as an instrumental variable, we analyzed data from 8,824 respondents (mean age = 49.43) to the 2015 Korea Media Panel survey and discovered that enhanced digital skills led to stronger NFC. This causal effect was stronger for the older cohort (baby boomers and older, who were born before 1963). These findings suggest that older adults’ NFC may not necessarily decline with age if they practice more digital skills. This study could ultimately contribute to the transformation of the older population from a digital minority to a digital beneficiary.
AllcottHGentzkowM (2017) Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives31: 211–236. doi: 10.1257/jep.31.2.211.
2.
Amichai-HamburgerYKaynarOFineA (2007) The effects of need for cognition on Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior23: 880–891. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.03.002.
3.
Amichai-HamburgerYKaynarOFineA (2008) The effects of need for cognition on Internet use revisited. Computers in Human Behavior24: 361–371. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2007.01.033.
4.
AnSKangHChungS (2019) An exploratory study on Barriers and promotion to older adults’ online use for health information search and health management. Journal of the Korean Gerontological Society39(1): 109–125. doi: 10.31888/JKGS.2019.39.1.109.
5.
AngristJDPischkeJS (2009) Mostly Harmless Econometrics. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
6.
BernerJMRennermarkC.JogréusPAnderbergASköldungerMWahlbergSElmståhlBerglundJ (2015) Factors influencing Internet usage in older adults (65 years and above) living in rural and urban Sweden. Health Informatics Journal21(3): 237–249. doi: 10.1177/1460458214521226.
7.
CacioppoJTPettyRE (1982) The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology42(1): 116–131. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.42.1.116.
8.
CacioppoJTPettyREFeinsteinJAJarvisWB (1996) Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin119(2): 197–253. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.197.
9.
CacioppoJTPettyREKaoCF (1984) The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment48(3): 306–307. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_13.
10.
CacioppoJTPettyREKaoCFRodrigurezR (1986). Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: An individual difference perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51: 1032–1043. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.51.5.1032.
11.
CarnevaleJJInbarYLernerJS (2011) Individual difference in need for cognition and decision-making competence among leaders. Personality and Individual Differences51: 274–278. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.07.002.
12.
ChenKChanAHS (2014) Gerontechnology acceptance by elderly Hong Kong Chinese: A senior technology acceptance model (STAM). Ergonomics57(5): 635–652. DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2014.895855.
13.
ChenYPerssonA (2002) Internet use among young and older adults: Relation to psychological well-being. Educational Gerontology28: 731–744.
14.
ChoHParkB (2013) Testing the moderating role of need for cognition in smartphone adoption. Behaviour & Information Technology33(7): 704–715. doi:10.1080/0144929x.2013.825643.
15.
ChopikWJRikardRVCottonSR (2017) Individual difference predictors of ICT use in older adulthood: A study of Candidate characteristics. Computers in Human Behavior76: 526–533. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.014.
16.
CoutinhoSAWooleryLM (2004) The need for cognition and life satisfaction among college students. College Student Journal28(2): 203–206.
17.
DearyIJDerG (2005) Reaction time, age, and cognitive ability: Longitudinal findings from age 16 to 63 years in representative population samples. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition12(2): 187–215. doi: 10.1080/13825580590969235.
18.
DiMaggioPHargittaiE (2001) From the ‘Digital Divide’ to ‘Digital Inequality’: Studying Internet use as penetration increases. Working papers 47, Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies. Available at: https://ideas.repec.org/p/pri/cpanda/workpap15.html.html(accessed 18 July, 2019).
19.
FleischhauerMEngeSBrockeBUllrichJStrobelAStrobelA (2010) Same or different? Clarifying the relationship of need for cognition to personality and intelligence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin36(1): 82–96. doi:10.1177/0146167209351886.
20.
FolsteinMFFolsteinSEMcHughPR (1975) Mini-Mental State. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research12: 189–198. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6.
21.
FurnhamAThorneJD (2013) Need for cognition: Its dimensionality and personality and intelligence correlates. Journal of Individual Differences34(4): 230–240. doi:10.1027/1614-0001/a000119.
22.
GonzálezARamírezMPViadelV (2015) ICT learning by older adults and their attitudes toward computer use. Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research2015. doi:10.1155/2015/849308.
23.
Government of the Republic of Korea (2015) 2016-2020 Plan for Ageing Society and Population. Report for Bridge Plan. Report no. 11-1352000-001539-13. 31 December.
24.
HoferMHargittaiEBüchiMSeifertA (2019) Older adults’ online information seeking and subjective well-being: The moderating role of Internet skills. International Journal of Communication13(2019): 4426–4443. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12074.
25.
JayawardenaCKuoIHUngerU, et al. (2010) Deployment of a service robot to help older people. In: 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Taipei, Taiwan, 18–22 October, 2010, IEEE. doi: 10.1109/IROS.2010.5649910.
26.
JungEJOhHH (2016). Policy direction for aging society through science and technology: Focus on Japanese case. Korea Institute of Science & Technology Evaluation and Planning Issue Paper2016–19.
27.
KimWS (1994) Korean version of need for cognition scale. Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology7(1): 87–101.
28.
KimWS (2007) The efficient assessment of need for cognition: K-NFC-S. The Korean Journal of Consumer and Advertising Psychology8(1): 127–133. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_13.
29.
LeeEJJangYJ (2010) What do others’ reactions to news on Internet portal sites tell us? Effects of presentation format and readers’ need for cognition on reality perception. Communication Research37(6): 825–846. doi: 10.1177/0093650210376189.
30.
MihailidisPViottyS (2017) Spreadable spectacle in digital culture: Civic expression, fake news, and the role of media literacy in ‘Post-Fact’ society.”American Behavioral Scientist61(4): 441–454. doi: 10.1177/0002764217701217.
31.
NairKURamnarayanS (2000) Individual differences in need for cognition and complex problem solving. Journal of Research in Personality34: 305–208. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1999.2274.
SalthouseTA (2009) When does age-related cognitive decline begin?Neurobiology of Aging30(4): 507–514. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.09.023.
34.
ShapiraNBarakAGalI (2007) Promoting older adults’ well-being through Internet training and use. Aging & Mental Health11: 447–484.
35.
ShinHW (2009) Study on Integrative Development of the Contents for Play Therapy for Elderly. PhD Thesis., Korea University, South Korea.
36.
SpottsH (1994) Evidence of a relationship between need for cognition and chronological age: Implications for persuasion in consumer research. In: AllenCTJohnDR (eds) North American Advances in Consumer Research. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 21: 238–243.
37.
SullyJ (1884) Outlines of Psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
38.
Van DeursenAVan DijkJ (2010) Internet skills and the digital divide. New Media & Society13(6): 893–911. doi: 10.1177/1461444810386774.
