The role played by representations in the lives of cities endows the study of their production and distribution in various media with importance. Today, the Internet, that amorphous network linking much of the world, is a powerful new media for the imagination of city spaces and hence in need of investigation. In this article, I focus on the online encyclopaedia Wikipedia, one of the most popular websites on the Internet. My aim is to explore the representations of two of the largest sub-Saharan African cities, Lagos and Kinshasa, in their respective Wikipedia articles. Wikipedia has been described as the encyclopaedia anyone can edit, suggesting that it is open to multiple perspectives on any particular topic. Given the history of how Africa in general has been either marginalized or conjured as an exotic or miserable “other” by much media work this potential for wider range of representations should not be overlooked. Does Wikipedia live up to its reputation in the case of Kinshasa and Lagos?
BarlowJP (1998) Africa rising: everything you know about Africa is wrong. Wired, January 1. Available at: https://www.wired.com/1998/01/barlow-2/(accessed September 9, 2017).
3.
BassilN (2011) The roots of Afro-pessimism: the British invention of the ‘dark continent’. Critical Arts25 (3): 377–396.
4.
DaviesM (2006). Planet of slums. London: Verso.
5.
De BoeckF (2011) Inhabiting ocular ground: Kinshasa’s future in the light of Congo’s spectral urban politics. Cultural Anthropology26 (2): 263–286.
6.
DonaldJ (1992) Metropolis: the city as text. In: BocockRThompsonK (eds) Social and cultural forms of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 418–459.
GreenburgM (2000) Branding cities: a social history of the urban lifestyle magazine. Urban Affairs Review36 (2): 228–263.
12.
KoolhausR (2002) Fragments of a lecture on Lagos. Documenta 11 Platform 4: 173–184.
13.
LuytB (2010) Improving Wikipedia’s credibility: references and citations in a sample of history articles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology61 (4): 715–722.
14.
LuytB (2012) The inclusivity of Wikipedia and the drawing of expert boundaries: an examination of talk pages and reference lists. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology63 (9): 1868–1878.
15.
MudimbeVY (1988) The invention of Africa. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
16.
NothiasT (2014) ‘Rising’, ‘hopeful’, ‘new’: visualizing Africa in the age of globalization. Visual Communication13 (3): 323–339.
RobinsonJ (2002) Global and world cities: a view from off the map. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research26 (3): 531–554.
20.
RobinsonJ (2010) Living in dystopia. In: PrakashG (ed) Noir urbanisms: dystopic images of the modern city. Princeton University Press, pp.218–240.
21.
RoyA (2011) Slumdog cities: rethinking subaltern urbanism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research35 (2): 223–238.
22.
ShieldsR (1996) A guide to urban representation and what to do about it. In: KingA (ed) Re-presenting the city: ethnicity, capital and culture in the twenty-first centry metropolis. London: Macmillan, pp.227–252.
23.
SimoneA (2001) Straddling the divide: remaking associational life in the informal African city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research25 (1): 102–117.
24.
SimoneA (2004) People as infrastructure: intersecting fragments in Johannesburg. Public Culture16 (3): 407–429.
25.
SimoneA (2006) Pirate towns: reworking social and symbolic infrastructure. Urban Studies43 (2): 357–370.
26.
SmithM (1998) The global city – whose social construct is it anyway? A comment on White. Urban Affairs Review33 (4): 482–488.
27.
UrbanF (2002) Small town, big website? Cities and their representation on the Internet. Cities19 (1): 49–59.
