Research on trolls is scarce, but their activities challenge online communities; one of the main challenges of the Wikipedia community is to fight against vandalism and trolls. This study identifies Wikipedia trolls’ behaviours and motivations, and compares and contrasts hackers with trolls; it extends our knowledge about this type of vandalism and concludes that Wikipedia trolls are one type of hacker. This study reports that boredom, attention seeking, and revenge motivate trolls; they regard Wikipedia as an entertainment venue, and find pleasure from causing damage to the community and other people. Findings also suggest that trolls’ behaviours are characterized as repetitive, intentional, and harmful actions that are undertaken in isolation and under hidden virtual identities, involving violations of Wikipedia policies, and consisting of destructive participation in the community.
J. Surowiecki , The Wisdom of Crowds (New York, NY, Doubleday, 2004).
2.
Wikipedia, Wikipedia: List of Wikipedias (2009). Available at: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/List_of_Wikipedias (accessed 3 August 2009).
3.
D. Riehle, How and why Wikipedia works: an interview with Angela Beesley, Elisabeth Bauer, and Kizu Naoko. In Proceedings of the 2006 International Symposium on Wikis, Available at: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1149453.1149456 (accessed 29 September 2006).
4.
M. Schwartz, The trolls among us, The Times Magazine August (2008). Available at: www.nytimes.com/2008/08/03/magazine/03trolls-t.html?pagewanted=1&_r=2&th&emc=th (accessed 3 August 2008).
5.
S.C. Herring , K. Job-Sluder, R. Scheckler and S. Barab, Searching for safety online: managing ‘trolling’ in a feminist forum, The Information Society18(5) (2002) 371-383.
6.
J.S. Donath, Identity and deception in the virtual community. In: M.A. Smith and P. Kollock (eds), Communities in Cyberspace (London, Routledge, 1996) 29-59.
7.
A. Lih, Wikipedia as participatory journalism: reliable sources? metrics for evaluating collaborative media as a news resource, paper presented at 5th International Symposium on Online Journalism, 16-17 April 2004.
8.
E. Raymond , The cathedral and the bazaar, First Monday3(3) (1998). Available at: www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue3_3/raymond/ (accessed 20 October 2006).
9.
J. Giles, Internet encyclopedias go head to head, Nature (2005). Available at: www.nature.com/news/2005/051212/full/438900a.html (accessed October 2006).
10.
R. Rosenzweig , Can history be open source? Wikipedia and the future of the past, Journal of American History93(1) (2006) 117-146.
11.
B. Stvilia, M.B. Twidale, L. Gasser and L.C. Smith, Information quality in a community-based encyclopedia. In: S. Hawamdeh (ed.), Knowledge Management: Nurturing Culture, Innovation, and Technology - Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Knowledge Management ( Charlotte, NC, World Scientific Publishing Company ) 101-113.
12.
B. Stvilia , M. Twidale, L.C. Smith and L. Gasser, Information quality work organization in Wikipedia, Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology59(6) (2008) 983-1001.
13.
F. Viegas , M. Wattenberg and K. Dave, Studying cooperation and conflict between authors with history flow visualizations. In: Proceedings of the Computer-Human Interaction 20046(1) (2004) 575-582.
14.
T. Holloway , M. Božicevic and K. Börner, Analyzing and visualizing the semantic coverage of wikipedia and its authors, Complexity12(3) (2007) 30-40.
15.
A. Ardichvili , V. Page and T. Wentling, Motivation and barriers to participation in online knowledge-sharing communities of practice, Journal of Knowledge Management7(1) (2003) 64-77.
16.
S. Bryant, A. Forte and A. Bruckman, Becoming Wikipedian: transformation of participation in a collaborative online encyclopedia. In: Proceedings of the 2005 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, Available at: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1099203.1099205 (accessed 25 April 2007).
17.
A. Forte and A. Bruckman, From Wikipedia to the classroom: exploring online publication and learning. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Learning Sciences (2006) 182-188. Available at: http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1150061 (accessed 25 April 2007).
18.
M. Poe, The hive, The Atlantic Monthly (2006). Available at: www.theatlantic.com/doc/200609/wikipedia (accessed 25 October 2007).
19.
H. Nissenbaum , Hackers and the contested ontology of cyberspace , New Media & Society6(2) (2004) 195-217.
20.
J. Thomas , The moral ambiguity of social control in cyberspace: a retro-assessment of the ‘golden age’ of hacking, New Media & Society7(5) (2005) 599-624.
21.
C. Falk, Ethics and hacking: the general and the specific, Norwich University Journal of Information Assurance1(1) (2005). Available at: http://journals.sfu.ca/nujia/index.php/nujia/article/view/3/7 (accessed 15 June 2008).
22.
T. Mulhall , Where have all the hackers gone? Part 3 - motivation and deterrence, Computers & Security16 (1997) 291-297.
23.
L. Rennie and M. Shore, An advanced model of hacking, Security Journal20 (2007) 236-251.
24.
O. Turgeman-Goldschmidt , Hackers’ accounts: hacking as a social entertainment, Social Science Computer Review23(1) (2005) 8-23.
25.
A.E. Voiskounsky and O.V. Smyslova, Flow-based model of computer hackers’ motivation, CyberPsychology & Behavior6(2) (2003) 171-180.
26.
R. Gazan, Understanding the rough user. In: Diane Nahl and Dania Bilal (eds), Information and Emotion: The Emergent Affective Paradigm in Information Behavior Research and Theory (Medford, NJ, Information Today, 2007) 177-185.
27.
M.B. Miles and M. Huberman, Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (2nd edition) ( Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1994).
28.
U. Pfeil, P. Zaphiris and C.S. Ang, Cultural differences in collaborative authoring of Wikipedia, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication12(1) (2006) article 5. Available at: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue1/pfeil.html (accessed 21 January 2007).
29.
S. Utz, Type of deception and underlying motivations: what people think, Social Science Computer Review23(1) (2005) 49-56.
30.
M. Yar, Computer hacking: just another case of juvenile delinquency?, The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice44(4) (2005) 387-399.
