This study investigates the roles of academic libraries in propagating Open Science. The study is a qualitative survey based on literature review. Various definitions of open science from different scholars and schools of thought were examined. Research articles on the effects of open science on research and the place of academic libraries in scientific research were reviewed. Open science enhances collaborations and sharing of resources among researchers. Metadata related activities are more prevalent due to open science. Open science has increased the relevance of science to our environment and world issues like privacy and the rightful author of scientific data are still some of the challenges facing open science. Academic libraries continue to take steps to be involved as key players in the propagation of open science through advocacy, building of institutional data repositories and serving as hubs for scientific collaboration among others. Academic libraries have to do more in the area of advocacy and provision of data repositories.
BankierJPercialiI (2008) The Institutional repository rediscovered: What can a university do for open access publishing?Serials Review34(1): 21–26.
4.
BaileyCW (2005) The role of reference librarians in institutional repositories. Reference Services Review33(3): 259–267.
5.
BraseJ (2009) DataCite - a global registration agency for research data. Cooperation and Promotion of Information Resources in Science and Technology. Available athttp://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl(accessed on 13 April 2016)
6.
ChangSH (2003) Institutional repositories: the library’s new role. OCLC Systems & Services19(3): 77–79.
CostasRZahediZWoutersP (2015) Do “altmetrics” correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology66(10): 2003–2019.
9.
CribbJSariT (2010) Open Science: Sharing Knowledge in the Global Century. Collingwood: CSIRO Publishing.
10.
CzarnitzkiDGrimpeCTooleA (2015) Delay and secrecy: does industry sponsorship jeopardize disclosure of academic research?Industrial and Corporate Change24(1): 251–279.
11.
DavidPA (2005) The economic logic of ‘open science’ and the balance between private property rights and the public domain in scientific data and information: a primer. Working Paper 02-0330. Stanford, CA, SIEPR: Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.
12.
DavidPA (2004) Understanding the emergence of ‘open science’ institutions: functionalist economics in historical context. Industrial and Corporate Change13(4): 571–589.
FecherBFriesikeS (2014) Open science: one term, five schools of thought. In: SBartlingSFriesike (eds.) Opening Science: The Evolving Guide on How the Internet is Changing Research, Collaboration and Scholarly Publishing. Heidelberg, Springer. (pp.17–45).
GoldA (2007) Libraries and the data challenge: roles and actions for libraries. D-Lib Magazine13(9): 1–10.
19.
GrovesTMoherDSHoey J SchulzKFAltmanDG (2010) A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research. European Journal of Clinical Investigations40(1): 35–53.
JankowskiNW. (2012) Enhancing scholarly publications: developing hybrid monographs in the humanities and social sciences. SSRN Electronic Journal. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1982380(accessed on 31March 2016)
KinikinJHenchK (2005) Follow-up survey of GIS at smaller academic libraries. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianshipn. 43. Available athttp://www.istl.org/05summer/article1.html(accessed on 11 April 2016)
MartellC (2008) The absent user: physical use of academic library collections and services continues to decline 1995–2006. Journal of Academic Librarianship34(5): 400–407.
OgungbeniJISulaimanMAAdekanyeEA (2015) Overcoming the challenges of digitization in Nigerian university libraries. Delta Library Journal9(2): 28–32.
30.
PampelHDallmeier-TiessenS (2014) Open research data: from vision to practice. In: SBartlingSFriesike (eds.) Opening Science: The Evolving Guide on How the Internet is Changing Research, Collaboration and Scholarly Publishing. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 213–224.
TackeO (2010) Open Science 2.0: how research and education can benefit from open innovation and Web 2.0. In TJBastiaensUBaumölBJKrämer (eds.). On Collective Intelligence. Berlin: Springer, pp. 37–48.
35.
UhlirPE (2012) For Attribution: Developing Data Attribution and Citation Practices and Standards: Summary of an International Workshop. Available at: https://books.google.com.ng/books(accessed on 12 April 2016)
36.
WigboldusDHDotschR (2015) Encourage playing with data and discourage questionable reporting practices. Psychometrika1–6.
