In India, men own around 70% of mobile phones, creating a gender digital divide for the most widely owned information and communication technology (ICT) in the world. This study investigates the factors responsible for the inability of 245 female slum-dwellers in India earning less than $2 a day to own a mobile phone. Open, axial and selective coding of survey responses shows that socio-cultural, economic, demographic, psychological, communication-related, and health related inequalities in the lives of the respondents create eight economic barriers precluding respondents from owning some of the least expensive mobile phones worth $15 or so on installments of $1 a month.
AnnafariMAxelssonABohlinE (2013) A socio-economic exploration of mobile phone service have-nots in Sweden. New Media & Society16(3): 415–433.
2.
Barzilai-NahonK (2006) Gaps and bits: Conceptualizing measurements for digital divide/s. The Information Society. 22(1): 269–278.
3.
BourdieuP (1986) The forms of capital. In: RichardsonJ. (ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Westport, CT: Greenwich Press.
4.
DijkJ (2005) The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the Information Society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
5.
DimaggioPCohenJ (2003) Information inequality and network externalities: A comparative study of the diffusion of television and the internet. Working Paper No. 31. Princeton, NJ: Center for Arts and Culture Policy Studies, Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University.
6.
European Commission (2005) Digital divide forum report: Broadband access and public support in under-served areas. Brussels: EC.
7.
FortunatiL (2002) The mobile phone: Towards new categories and social relations. Information, Communication & Society5(4): 513–528.
8.
HafkinNTaggartN (2001) Gender, Information Technology, and Developing Countries: An Analytic Study. Office of Women in Development, Bureau for Global Programs, Field Support and Research, United States Agency for International Development.
9.
HafkinNHuyerS (2008) Women and gender in ICT statistics and indicators for development, Information Technologies and International Development4(2): 25–41.
10.
HilbertM (2011) Digital gender divide or technologically empowered women in developing countries? A typical case of lies, damned lies, and statistics. Women’s Studies International Forum34(6): 479–489.
HuyerSSikoskaT (2003) Overcoming gender digital divide: Understanding ICTs and their potential for the empowerment of women. INSTRAW Research Paper Series; no 1.
13.
KhanFGhadiallyR (2009) Gender-differentiated impact on minority youth of basic computer education in Mumbai city. Gender, Technology and Development13(2): 245–269.
14.
MadianouMMillerD (2011) Mobile phone parenting: Reconfiguring relationships between Filipina mothers and their left-behind children. New Media and Society13(3): 457–470.
15.
MijumbiR (2002) ICT as a tool for economic empowerment of women: Experiences from the use of a CD ROM by rural women in Uganda. Paper presented at The United Nations Division for the Advancement of Women (DAW) Expert Group Meeting.
16.
MohanLPotnisDAlterS (2013) Information systems to support “door-step banking”: Enabling scalability of microfinance to serve more of the poor at the bottom of the pyramid. Communications of the Association of Information Systems33(1): 423–442.
17.
NorrisP (2001) Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
PatilDDhereAPawarC (2009) ICT and empowerment of rural and deprived women in Asia. Asia-Pacific Journal of Rural Development19(1): 1–22.
19.
PotnisD (2011) Cell-phone-enabled empowerment of women earning less than $1 per day. IEEE Technology & Society30(2): 39–45.
20.
PotnisD (2014) Managing gender-related challenges in ICT4D field research. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries65(2): 1–26.
21.
PotnisD (2015) Beyond access to information: Understanding the use of information by poor female mobile users in rural India. The Information Society31(1): 83–93.
22.
QureshiS (2008) Assessing the effects of information and communication technologies on development. Information Technology for Development14(4): 259–261.
23.
RiceRKatzJ (2003) Comparing internet and mobile phone usage: Digital divides of usage, adoption, and dropouts. Telecommunications Policy27(8-9): 597–623.
24.
SharmaBGuptaM (2013) Gender based violence in India: A never-ending phenomenon. Journal of International Women’s Studies6(1): 114–123.
25.
StraussACorbinJ (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (2014) Telecom subscription data.
27.
Vodafone India Group (2011) Mobiles can save India’s poor women.
28.
WarschauerM (2003) Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29.
ZainudeenAIqbalTSamarajivaR (2010) Who’s got the phone? Gender and the use of the telephone at the bottom of the pyramid. New Media and Society12(3): 549–566.
