This paper reviews and analyzes the development of Multipurpose Community Telecenters (MCTs) in rural Bangladesh. The core of the paper builds on bringing together relevant literature review and field study. The findings of the paper suggest that the development of telecenters in Bangladesh is still in its formative stage. MCTs have fared well in improving rural people’s livelihood at large, and the emerging middle class have been the major beneficiaries. Evidence suggests that the telecenters did not work much for the hardcore poor. The paper argues that MCTs as knowledge hubs have facilitated not only narrowing the digital divide but also contributing to the socio-economic development of rural Bangladesh.
AshrafMHanischJSwatmanP (2009) ICT intervention in the “Chandanbari” village of Bangladesh: results from a field study. Information System Frontiers11(2): 155–166.
2.
BailurS (2006) Using stakeholder theory to analyze telecenter projects. Information Technologies and International Development3(3): 61–80.
3.
BailurS (2007) The complexities of community participation in rural information systems projects: the case of “Our Voices”. IFIP 9.4 Social Implications of Computers in Developing Countries, Taking Stock of E-Development, Sao Paulo, Brasil, May.
4.
Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS) (2010) Statistical Yearbook 2010. Dhaka: BBS.
5.
BarazaJ (1999) Creating affordable link. A paper presented at the Kenya Library Association Annual Conference, Nairobi, Kenya, November27–31.
6.
BenjaminPDahmsM (1999) Background paper on universal service and universal access issues. Paper prepared for theTelia Telecommunications in Society Seminar, Sweden.
CastellsM (1996) The information age: the rise of the network society. Oxford: Blackwell.
10.
ChambersR (1983) Rural development: putting the last first. Essex: Longman.
11.
ChatawayJWieldD (2000) Industrialization, innovation, and development: what does knowledge management change?Journal of International Development12: 803–824.
12.
ClarkMGomezR (2011) The negligible role of fees as a barrier to public access computing in developing countries. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries (EJISDC)46(1): 1–14.
ConçeiçãoPHeitorMVGibsonDVShariqSS (1998) The emerging importance of knowledge for development: implications for technology policy and innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change58(3): 181–202.
15.
DeyBLNewmanDR (2010) Ethnographic approach to user-centred evaluation of telecentres. International Journal of Innovation in the Digital Economy (IJIDE)1(3): 22–39.
16.
EijkmanFKendallJIgnacioM (2010) Bridges to cash: the retail end of M-PESA. The challenge of maintaining liquidity for M-PESA agent networks. Available athttp://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1655248 (accessed on April 11, 2012).
17.
FreedomHouse (2011) Freedom in the World 2011. Washington DC: Freedom House.
18.
GamagePHalpinEF (2007) E-Sri Lanka: bridging the digital divide. The Electronic Library25(6): 693–710.
19.
GomezRBaron-PorrasL (2011) Does public access computing really contribute to community development? Lessons from libraries, telecenters and cybercafés in Colombia. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries (EJISDC). 49(2): 1–11.
20.
GomezR (2011) Success factors in public access computing for development. International Journal of Information and Communication Technologies for Human Development (IJICTHD)3(2): 19–37.
21.
GomezRAmbikarRCowardC (2009) Libraries, telecenters and cybercafes: an international study of public access information venues. Performance measurement and metrics. The International Journal for Library and Information Services10(1): 33–48.
22.
GopalakrishnanTR (2005) Exploring old terrains with new technologies: making ICT services and applications work for the poor. Paper presented atIFIP WG 9.2 Conference on Landscapes of ICT and Social Accountability held at University of Turku, Turku, Finland (June 27–29).
23.
GoyalA (2009) Information technology and rural markets: theory and evidence from a unique intervention in central India. Mimeo. University of Maryland.
HeeksR (2002) i-development not e-development. Journal of International Development14(1): 1–11.
28.
International Telecommunication Union (ITU) (2003) World Telecommunication Report 2003: access indicators for the information society. Geneva: ITU.
29.
International Telecommunication Union (ITU) (2011) Measuring the information society. Geneva: ITU.
30.
IslamSHasanMN (2009) Multipurpose community telecenters in Bangladesh: problems and prospects. Electronic Library27(3): 537–553.
31.
JensenR (2007) The digital provide: information (technology), market performance, and welfare in the South Indian fisheries sector. The Quarterly Journal of Economics122 (3): 879–924.
32.
KhanNSBawdenD (2005) Community informatics in libraries in Pakistan: current status and future prospects. New Library World106(1218/1219): 532–540.
33.
KiplangatJ (2001) Telecentres in the provision of agricultural information for rural development in Sub-Saharan Africa. IAALD Quarterly Bulletin46(3/4): 81–87.
34.
LeveyLAYoungS (eds.) (2002) Rowing upstream: snapshots of pioneers of the information age in Africa. Johannesburg: Sharp Sharp Media.
35.
MadonSReinhardNRoodeDWalshamG (2009) Digital inclusion projects in developing countries: processes of institutionalization. Information Technology for Development15(2): 95–107.
36.
MansellRWehnU (1998) Knowledge societies: information technology for sustainable development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37.
MbitiIWeilDN (2011) Mobile banking: the impact of M-Pesa in Kenya. NBER Working Paper No. 17129. Available atwww.nber.org/paper/w17129 (accessed April 25, 2013).
RogersEM (1995) Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
40.
RogersEMShuklaP (2001) The role of telecenters in development communication and the digital divide. Journal of Development Communication12(2): 1–6.
41.
RomanR (2003) Diffusion of innovation as theoretical framework for telecenters. Information Technologies and International Development1(2): 53–66.
42.
SanjayAKGuptaV (2003) Gyandoot: trying to improve government services for rural citizens in India. eTransparency case study no. 11. eGovernment for Development Information Exchange. Manchester: University of Manchester. Available atwww.egov4dev.org/gyandoot.htm (accessed on May 2, 2011).
43.
SeinMKAhmadIHarindranathG (2008) Sustaining ICT for development projects: the case of Grameenphone CIC. Telektronikk104(2): 16–24.
Transparency International (2012) Corruption perception index 2012. Berlin: Transparency International.
49.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) (2010) Information economy report 2010: ICTs, enterprises and poverty alleviation. New York and Geneva: UNCTAD.
50.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) (2011) Information economy report 2011: ICTs as an enabler for private sector development. New York and Geneva: UNCTAD.
51.
United Nations Development Report (UNDP) (2011) Human Development Report 2011. New York: Oxford University Press.
