The adoption of social media by Thai university students

Abstract

The purposes of this research are to explain why Thai university students use social media and how differences between groups of respondents moderate the structure of relationships. Four core latent constructs were investigated in this study: behavioural intention (BI), subjective norms (SN), perceived ease of use (PEOU), and perceived usefulness (PU). Two moderating variables, gender and age, were employed to answer the research questions. Respondents (n = 600) in three universities in Bangkok, Thailand, were selected and Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) was employed to analyse the data. The results show that behavioural intention is influenced by perceived ease of use, subjective norm, and perceived usefulness respectively. Perceived usefulness is also influenced by perceived ease of use. Moreover, our study affirms that the path from subjective norm to behavioural intention is moderated by age. This path is stronger for older people than for younger people. Discussions, limitations, and recommendations for future research are addressed.

Keywords

social media user studies university students Thailand

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ajzen

(1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50(2): 179–211.

Alsajjan

Dennis

(2010) Internet banking acceptance model: Cross-market examination. Journal of Business Research 63(9-10): 957–963.

Bangkokpost.com (2011) Floods: Facebook helps Nakhon Sawan. Available at: http://www.bangkokpost.com/learning/learning-from-news/269901/floods-facebook-helps-nakhon-sawan (accessed 29 March 2012).

Bangkokpost.com (2012) Social media' push youth to alcohol'. Available at: http://www.bangkokpost.com/news/local/280207/social-media-push-youth-to-alcohol (accessed 10 April 2012).

Benbasat

Barki

(2007) Quo vadis, TAM? Journal of the Association for Information Systems 8(4): 211–218.

Brown

Venkatesh

(2005) Model of adoption of technology in households: A baseline model test and extension incorporating household life cycle. MIS Quarterly 29(3): 399–426.

Bueno

Salmeron

(2008) TAM-based success modeling in ERP. Interacting with Computers 20(6): 515–523.

Burke

Marlow

Lento

(2009) Feed me: motivating newcomer contribution in social network sites. In: 27th international conference on human factors in computing systems. Boston, MA, USA: ACM.

Chen

L-d

Gillenson

Sherrell

(2002) Enticing online consumers: an extended technology acceptance perspective. Information & Management 39(8): 705–719.

10.

Chen

L-D

Tan

(2004) Technology adaptation in e-commerce: key determinants of virtual stores acceptance. European Management Journal 22(1): 74–86.

11.

Chung

Park

Wang

. (2010) Age differences in perceptions of online community participation among non-users: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. Computers in Human Behavior 26(6): 1674–1684.

12.

Classen

Lopez

Winter

. (2007) Population-based health promotion perspective for older driver safety: Conceptual framework to intervention plan. Clinical Interventions in Aging 2(4): 677–693.

13.

Click

Petit

(2010) Social networking and Web 2.0 in information literacy. The International Information & Library Review 42(2): 137–142.

14.

Cohen

(1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences Hillsdate, NJ.: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

15.

Dabner

(2012) ‘Breaking Ground' in the use of social media: A case study of a university earthquake response to inform educational design with Facebook. The Internet and Higher Education 15(1): 69–78.

16.

Davis

(1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13: 319–340.

17.

Davis

(1993) User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 38(3): 475–487.

18.

Davis

Bagozzi

Warshaw

(1989) User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 35(8): 982–1003.

19.

Deci

Ryan

(2000) The ‘what' and ‘why' of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry 11(4): 227–268.

20.

Dishaw

Strong

(1999) Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs. Information & Management 36(1): 9–21.

21.

Dyba

Moe

Arisholm

(2005) Measuring software methodology usage: challenges of conceptualization and operationalization. In: International symposium on empirical software engineering, 2005.

22.

Facebook.com (2010) Statistics. Available at: http://www.facebook.com/press/info.php?statistics (accessed 14 November 2010).

23.

Facebook.com (2011) Statistics. Available at: http://www.facebook.com/press/info.php?statistics (accessed 23 December 2011).

24.

Facebook.com (2012) Newsroom. Available at: http://newsroom.fb.com/content/default.aspx?NewsAreaId=22 (accessed 26 October 2012).

25.

Featherman

Fuller

(2003) Applying TAM to e-services adoption: the moderating role of perceived risk. In: 36th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, 2003.

26.

Fife

Pereira

Vladar

. (2008) The Diffusion of Mobile Data Services in the United States and Korea. In: 7th International Conference on Mobile Business (ICMB '08) pp.112–125.

27.

Findthebest.com (2012) Compare social networking. Available at: http://social-networking.findthebest.com/ (accessed 1 November 2012).

28.

Fishbein

Ajzen

(1975) Belief, Attitude, Intention, And Behavior: An Introduction To Theory And Research, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

29.

Fishbein

Ajzen

(2010) Predicting And Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach, New York: Psychology Press.

30.

Google.com (2011) The 100 most-visited sites: Thailand. Available at: http://www.google.com/adplanner/static/top100countries/th.html (accessed 28 February 2011).

31.

Hair

Black

Babin

. (2010) Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

32.

Hasan

Ahmed

(2007) Effects of interface style on user perceptions and behavioral intention to use computer systems. Computers in Human Behavior 23(6): 3025–3037.

33.

Hernandez

Jimenez

Martin

(2008) Extending the technology acceptance model to include the IT decision-maker: A study of business management software. Technovation 28(3): 112–121.

34.

Hossain

de Silva

(2009) Exploring user acceptance of technology using social networks. The Journal of High Technology Management Research 20(1): 1–18.

35.

Hung

S-Y

Durcikova

Lai

H-M

. (2011) The influence of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on individuals' knowledge sharing behavior. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 69(6): 415–427.

36.

Hussain

(2012) A study to evaluate the social media trends among university students. In: 12 th international educational technology conference - IETC 2012. pp. 639–645.

37.

Hong

Kang

(2011) An international comparison of technology adoption: Testing the UTAUT model. Information & Management 48(1): 1–8.

38.

Kaenprakob

(2010) Determinants of user acceptance of wikipedia. Chulalongkorn Review 87(5): 68–90.

39.

Kelloway

(1998) Using LISREL for Structural Equation Modeling: A Researcher's Guide, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

40.

Kwon

Wen

(2010) An empirical study of the factors affecting social network service use. Computers in Human Behavior 26(2): 254–263.

41.

Lampel

Bhalla

(2007) The role of status seeking in online communities: Giving the gift of experience. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12(2).

42.

Lee

Kim

Song

(2011) Analyzing moderating effects of WiBro user experiences. KSII Transactions on Internet & Information Systems 5: 177–190.

43.

Lee

(2011) News sharing in social media: The effect of gratifications and prior experience. Computers in Human Behavior 28(2): 331–339.

44.

Legris

Ingham

Collerette

(2003) Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management 40(3): 191–204.

45.

Lin

K-Y

H-P

(2011) Why people use social networking sites: An empirical study integrating network externalities and motivation theory. Computers in Human Behavior 27(3): 1152–1161.

46.

Malhotra

Galletta

(1999) Extending the technology acceptance model to account for social influence: Theoretical base and empirical validation. In: 32nd Hawaii international conference on system sciences. Hawaii: IEEE.

47.

Malhotra

Galletta

Kirsch

(2008) How endogenous motivations influence user intentions: beyond the dichotomy of extrinsic and intrinsic user motivations. Journal of Management Information Systems 25: 267–299.

48.

Maranto

Barton

(2010) Paradox and promise: MySpace, Facebook, and the sociopolitics of social networking in the writing classroom. Computers and Composition 27(1): 36–47.

49.

Park

Roman

Lee

. (2009) User acceptance of a digital library system in developing countries: An application of the Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Information Management 29(3): 196–209.

50.

Prasith-rathsint

Sookasame

Pongsaree

. (2008) Structural Equation Modeling Using LISREL, PRELIS and SIMPLIS, Bangkok: Samlada Part., Limited.

51.

Robbins

(2005) Organizational Behavior, Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education, Inc.

52.

Rogers

(1983) Diffusion of Innovations, New York: The Free Press.

53.

Ryan

Deci

(2000) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology 25: 54–67.

54.

Shaheen

(2008) Use of social networks and information seeking behavior of students during political crises in Pakistan: A case study. The International Information & Library Review 40(3): 142–147.

55.

Shin

D-H

(2010) The effects of trust, security and privacy in social networking: A security-based approach to understand the pattern of adoption. Interacting with Computers 22(5): 428–438.

56.

Shin

D-H

Shin

Y-J

(2010) Why do people play social network games? Computers in Human Behavior 27(2): 852–861.

57.

Smarkola

(2008) Efficacy of a planned behavior model: Beliefs that contribute to computer usage intentions of student teachers and experienced teachers. Computers in Human Behavior 24(3): 1196–1215.

58.

Soper

(2012) A-Priori sample size calculator for structural equation models. Available at: http://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc3/calc.aspx?id=89 (accessed 13 October 2012).

59.

Teo

Lee

Chai

. (2009) Assessing the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers in Singapore and Malaysia: A multigroup invariance analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Computers & Education 53(3): 1000–1009.

60.

Turner

Kitchenham

Brereton

. (2010) Does the technology acceptance model predict actual use? A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology 52(5): 463–479.

61.

Van Eecke

Truyens

(2010) Privacy and social networks. Computer Law & Security Review 26(5): 535–546.

62.

Vannoy

Palvia

(2010) The social influence model of technology adoption. Communications of the ACM 53(6): 149–153.

63.

Venkatesh

Bala

(2008) Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences 39(2): 273–315.

64.

Venkatesh

Davis

(2000) A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science 46(2): 186–240.

65.

Venkatesh

Thong

(2012) Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly 36(1): 157–178.

66.

Venkatesh

Morris

Davis

. (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27(3): 425–478.

67.

Vrocharidou

Efthymiou

(2012) Computer mediated communication for social and academic purposes: Profiles of use and university students' gratifications. Computers & Education 58(1): 609–616.

68.

Wall Street Journal (2011) Thais turn to social media for flood updates. Available at: http://blogs.wsj.com/searealtime/2011/11/02/thais-turn-to-social-media-for-flood-updates/ (accessed 29 March 2012).

69.

Westland

(2010) Lower bounds on sample size in structural equation modelling Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 9(6): 476–487.

70.

Wodzicki

Schwämmlein

Moskaliuk

(2012) “Actually, I wanted to learn”: Study-related knowledge exchange on social networking sites. The Internet and Higher Education 15(1): 9–14.

71.

Woodside

(2011) Responding to the severe limitations of cross-sectional surveys: Commenting on Rong and Wilkinson's perspectives. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ) 19(3): 153–156.

72.

J-H

Wang

S-C

(2005) What drives mobile commerce?: An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Information & Management 42(5): 719–729.

73.

Yang

H-d

Yoo

(2004) It's all about attitude: revisiting the technology acceptance model. Decision Support Systems 38(1): 19–31.