The objective of this study is to explore preprint sharing in the context of quick sharing of scientific papers through the lens of knowledge sharing, which is largely overlooked by the previous literature. In this study, we developed a research model from the perspectives of motivation and trust basing on the Theory of Reasoned Action. We carried out an online survey of authors who had contributed their preprints to the Chinese preprint system, Sciencepaper Online. The results showed that trust is the key determinant of Attitude towards preprint sharing, while Anticipated Extrinsic Reward impacts both Image and Sense of Self-Worth which further impact Attitude. Attitude and Subjective Norm both impact Intention. These findings and their implications for theory and practice are discussed. We believe that the current research usefully contributes to the theoretical development of the structural model concerning quick sharing of preprints both in the specific context of Sciencepaper Online and other quick sharing platforms more generally, and also provide useful insights into and helpful suggestions for Chinese preprint sharing practice.
AdlerPS (2001) Market, hierarchy and trust: The knowledge economy and the future of capitalism. Organization Science12(2): 215–235.
2.
AlaviMLeidnerDE (2001) Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly25(1):107–36.
3.
AlanS (1997) Journal and the electronic programme of the Institute of Physics. The Serials Librarian30(3–4): 149–161.
4.
ArdichviliA (2008) Learning and knowledge sharing in virtual communities of practice: motivators, barriers, and enablers. Advances in Developing Human Resources10(4): 541–554.
5.
ArdichviliAPageVWentlingT (2003) Motivations and barriers to participating in virtual knowledge sharing communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management7(1): 64–77.
6.
BaSStallaertJWhinstonAB (2001) Research commentary: Introducing a third dimension in information systems design – the case for incentive alignment. Information Systems Research12(3): 225–239.
7.
BanduraA (1982) Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist37(2): 122–147.
8.
BaronRKennyD (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51 (6): 1173–1182.
9.
BoasSBobertHJMichaelAB (1993) The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science4(4): 577–594.
10.
BockGWZmudRWKimYGLeeJN (2005) Behavioural intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly29(1): 87–111.
11.
CalderBJStawBM (1975) Self-perception of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology31(4): 599–605.
12.
ChinWWMarcolinBLNewstedPR (2003) A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion adoption study. Information Systems Research14(2): 189–217.
13.
ChiuCMWangEG (2011) Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of expectancy disconfirmation and justice theories. Online Information Review35(1) 134–153.
14.
ConstantDKieslerSSproullL (1994) What's mine is ours or is it? A study of attitudes about information sharing. Information Systems Research5(4): 400–421.
15.
ConstantDSproullLKieslerS (1996) The kindness of strangers: The usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice. Organization Science7(2): 119–135.
16.
FishbeinMAjzenI (1975) Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
17.
GanleyD (2011) Social motivations to pay for services: lessons from virtual communities. Electronic Markets21(3): 177–184.
18.
GecasV (1971) Parental behaviour and dimensions of adolescent self-evaluation. Sociometry34(4): 466–482.
19.
GefenDKarahannaEStraubDW (2003) Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model. MIS Quarterly27 (1): 51–90.
20.
GoodhueD (1997) The model underlying the measurement of the impacts of the IIC on the end-users. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology48(5): 449–453.
21.
GreenGI (1989) Perceived importance of systems analyst's job skills, roles and non-salary incentives. MIS Quarterly13(2): 115–133.
22.
HsuMHJuTLYenCHChangCM (2007) Knowledge sharing behaviour in virtual communities: The relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies65(2): 153–169.
23.
JamaliHRNicholasD (2009) E-print depositing behavior of physicists and astronomers: An intradisciplinary study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship35(2): 117–125.
24.
KankanhalliATanBYWeiKK (2005) Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: an empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly29 (1): 113–143.
25.
KeltonKFleischmannKRWallaceWA (2008) Trust in digital information. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology59(3): 363–374.
26.
KloppingIMcKinneyE (2004) Extending the technology acceptance model and the task-technology fit model to consumer e-commerce. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal22 (1): 35–48.
27.
LeeEJJangJW (2010) Profiling good Samaritans in online knowledge forums: Effects of affiliative tendency, self-esteem, and public individuation on knowledge sharing. Computers in Human Behavior26(6): 1336–1344.
28.
LiXHessTJValacichJS (2008) Why do we trust new technology? A study of initial trust formation with organizational information systems. Journal of Strategic Information Systems17(1): 39–71.
29.
LinHF (2007) Effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on employee knowledge sharing intentions. Journal of Information Science33(2): 135–149.
30.
McKnightDHChervanyNL (2001) Conceptualizing trust: A typology and e-commerce customer relationships model. In: Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-34): Maui, Hawaii, 3–6 January 2001. pp.7022–7032. California: IEEE Computer Society Press.
31.
MooreGCBenbasatI (1991) Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research2(3): 192–222.
32.
O'DellCGraysonCJ (1998) If only we knew what we know: Identification and transfer of internal best practices. California Management Review40(3): 154–174.
PavlouPAGefenD (2004) Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust. Information Systems Research15(1): 37–60.
35.
PhillipsEMSchneiderJCMercerGR (2004) Motivating elders to initiate and maintain exercise. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation85, Supplement 3, 52–57.
ProsserDC (2003) Institutional repositories and open access: The future of scholarly communication. Information Services & Use23(3): 167–170.
38.
RaiABajwaDS (1997) An empirical investigation into factors relating the adoption of executive information systems: An analysis of EIS for collaboration and decision support. Decision Sciences28(4): 939–974.
39.
RogersEM (1983) Diffusion of Innovations(Third Ed.). New York: The Free Press.
40.
RyanMJ (1982) Behavioural intention formation: The interdependency of attitudinal and social influence variables. Journal of Consumer Research9(3): 263–278.
41.
StraubDWBoudreauMCGefenD (2004) Validation guidelines for IS positivist research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems13(1): 380–427.
42.
SunHPLiuXY (2006) Determinants of knowledge sharing intention in organization: A social capital perspective. In: Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference of Asia Pacific Decision Sciences Institute, China, Hong Kong, 14–18 June 2006. pp.258–262.
43.
TaylorSToddP (1995) Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience. MIS Quarterly19(4): 561–570.
44.
TiwanaABushAA (2005) Continuance in expertise-sharing networks: a social perspective. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management52 (1): 85–101.
45.
WaskoMMFarajS (2000) It is what one does: Why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems9(2–3): 155–173.
46.
WaskoMMFarajS (2005) Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly29(1): 35–57.
47.
WertmanER (1999) Electronic preprint distribution: a case study of physicists and chemists at the University of Maryland. MS Thesis. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, USA.
48.
WetzelsMSchroderGOOppenCV (2009) Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Quarterly33(1): 177–195.
49.
WileyC (1997) What motivates employees according to over 40 years of motivation surveys. International Journal of Manpower18(3): 263–280.
50.
XieYPengSQ (2009) How to repair customer trust after negative publicity: The roles of competence, integrity, benevolence, and forgiveness. Psychology & Marketing26(7): 572–589.
51.
YanYLDavisonRM (2011) Using decision support systems in Chinese enterprises: a study of managerial information behaviour. Information Development27(1): 15–31.
52.
YangHLLaiCY (2010) Motivations of Wikipedia content contributors. Computers in Human Behaviour26(6): 1377–1383.
53.
YangTMMaxwellTA (2011) Information-sharing in public organizations: A literature review of interpersonal, intra-organizational and inter-organizational success factors. Government Information Quarterly28(2): 164–175.
54.
ZhouT (2011) The effect of initial trust on user adoption of mobile payment. Information Development27(4): 290–300.
