Usability of University Library Home Pages in Southern Africa: a case study

Abstract

This is a case study of eight Southern African university library home pages. Its purpose is to trace usability from the 1990s in the context of limited information and computer literacy and English skills. Using the Wayback Machine, WAVE, version 4.0 and Readability test tools and manual checks, the evaluative criteria included accessibility, readability, library-user interaction facilities, currency and visual appeal and innovativeness. The main hurdles established are: (i) lack of alternative texts for images, (ii) use of terminology likely to be misunderstood and availability of content not understandable to all users, (iii) invisibility of cutting edge resources and services and (iv) outdated information and use of strenuous color schemes. Usability improvements included online forms to ease library-user communication and increasing adoption of attractive resources and services. The study concludes that the usability of the home pages beyond 2008 depends on rigorous implementation of usability standards and giving prominence to innovative resources and services.

Keywords

accessibility usability readability library home pages university libraries Southern Africa

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Chisenga, J. (1998) A study of university libraries' home pages in Sub-Saharan Africa. Libri, vol. 48, pp. 49-57.

Chisholm, W., G. Vanderheiden and I. Jacobs (eds) (1999) Web content accessibility guidelines 1.0. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). Available from: http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/ (accessed 23 August 2008)

Consortium of National and University Libraries ( 2005) Researchers, information and libraries: national research support survey. CONUL, Dublin, Ireland. Available from: http://www.conul.ie/news/documents/CONUL%20Digest%20(27.3.06)1.pdf (Accessed 28 October 2008)

De Rosa, C. , J. Cantrell , A. Havens , J. Hawk , L. Jenkins. (2007) Sharing, privacy and trust in our networked world: a report to the OCLC membership. OCLC, Dublin, Ohio. Available from: http://www.oclc.org/reports/pdfs/sharing.pdf (Accessed 28 October 2008)

Hackett, S. and B. Parmanto. (2005) A longitudinal evaluation of accessibility: higher education web sites. Internet Research, vol. 15, no.3, pp. 281-294.

Housewright, R. and R. Schonfeld. (2008) Ithaka's 2006 studies of key stakeholders in the digital transformation in higher education. Available from: http://www.ithaka.org/research/Ithakas%202006%20Studies%20of%20Key%20Stakeholders%20in%20the%20Digital%20Transformation%20in%20Higher%20Education.pdf (Accessed 28 October 2008)

Internet Archive. Wayback Machine. Internet Archive, The Presidio of San Francisco. Available from: http://www.archive.org/index.php (Accessed 29 October 2008)

Juicy Studio. (2008) Readability test. Gez Lemon, Juicy Studio, UK. Available from: http://juicystudio.com/services/readability.php (Accessed 29 October 2008)

Kupersmith, J. (2008) Library terms that users understand. John Kupersmith . Available from: http://www.jkup.net/terms.html (Accessed 28 October 2008)

10.

Nomensa. (2006) United Nations global audit of web accessibility. Nomensa , Bristol. Available from: http://www.nomensa.com/resources/research/united-nations-global-audit-of-accessibility.html (Accessed 15 November 2008)

11.

Ocholla, D. and T. Bothma. (2007) Trends, challenges and opportunities for LIS education and training in Eastern and Southern Africa. New Library World, vol. 108, no. 1/2, pp. 55-78.

12.

Perry, Z. (2007) Recommended website color schemes. Associated Content . Available from: http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/368475/recommended_website_color_schemes.html?cat=15 (Accessed 28 October 2008)

13.

Smith, J. (2008) Updated help page. 19 August 2008. Jared Smith. Blog. Available from: http://wave.webaim.org/blog/ (Accessed 28 October 2008)

14.

WebAIM. ( 2008) WAVE, version 4.0. WebAIM, Center for Persons with Disabilities, Utah State University. Available from: http://wave.webaim.org/ (Accessed 29 October 2008)

15.

Williams, Q. and M. Pistorius. (2007) Southern Africa office strategy: the W3C and Southern Africa. Meraka Institute, Pretoria. Available from: http://www.w3c.org.za/presentations/W3C_Southern_Africa_Office_Strategy.html#(1) (Accessed 2 September 2008)