The study examines the current state of compliance with existing local and international disability laws and the level of inclusivity practices in university libraries across the United Arab Emirates, focusing on digital and physical accessibility, policy compliance, staff competence, and the challenges associated with it. The study employs a quantitative approach, utilizing a structured survey that involves 68 library professionals from university libraries across the UAE. The study's findings suggest that university libraries in the UAE demonstrate strong compliance with both national and international disability laws. The libraries scored high in physical accessibility features such as elevators and ramps (M = 4.16, SD = 0.84), accessible parking (M = 4.19, SD = 0.82), and restrooms (M = 4.00, SD = 0.96), indicating that more than 80% libraries showed compliance. However, several gaps were also identified in the area related to the provision of alternative formats for users with sensory disabilities and designated spaces for special needs users. Digital accessibility showed moderate advancement with an average mean score of 3.63 and 72.6% compliance observed with the presence of accessible digital content and platforms, but inconsistent availability of assistive tools and technologies for users. The study also found that there is a moderate level, with an average mean score of 3.44 and 68.8% of competency level among library and information science professionals observed while serving users with disabilities. The most significant challenge was the shortage of specialized staff, and there was a need for specialized training to cater to the needs of users with disabilities, while funding was at a moderate level. Other challenges identified included problems related to outreach and collaboration, and a lack of awareness among users about disability related library services. The findings of this study have implications for policymakers, librarians, and education administrators as they can identify the key gaps and address them. Regular policy reviews, increased investment in assistive technologies, enhanced collaboration with special needs organizations, and systematic staff development can ensure inclusive services and provide better services to users with disabilities.
AbdelrahmanOH (2016) Use of library technology and services by the visually-impaired and the blind in the university of Khartoum, Sudan. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology36(2): 93–97.
2.
AlhammadiM (2016) Educational rights for learners with vision impairment in UAE higher education institutions: Addressing the gap between Federal Law No. (29), 2006, and the reality of practice. British Journal of Visual Impairment34(2): 156–166.
3.
Al-HarrasiATahaA (2019) Networked library access and services delivery for the blind and visually impaired university students: Evidence from the UAE. Information Discovery and Delivery47(3): 117–124.
4.
AliAKhusroSAlahmadiTJ (2024) Accessible interactive learning of mathematical expressions for school students with visual disabilities. PeerJ Computer Science10: e2599.
5.
AliMASMAli Al-AjamiM (2021) Academic library services for individuals with mobility disabilities in Kuwait. Journal of Faculty of Education—Assiut University37(7): 21–60.
6.
Al-MansourN (2010) Developing Accessibility for Persons with Disability in Public Places and Transport. Available at: https://trid.trb.org/view/1127307
7.
AlqodsiEMAljahooriSA (2023) Legal protection of the right to education for people with special needs. In: Efthymiou E (ed.) Inclusive Phygital Learning Approaches and Strategies for Students With Special Needs. London: IGI Global Scientific Publishing, pp.199–213. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-8504-0.ch010.
8.
AluAAKingL (2024) Disability policies to guide the provision of facilities, services, and resources to students with disabilities: The case of ten Ghanaian academic libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship50(6): 102970.
9.
AriyaPYensathitYThongthipP, et al. (2024) Assisting hearing and physically impaired students in navigating immersive virtual reality for library orientation. Technologies13(1): 2.
10.
Atha DifaSRidwanA (2023) Disability justice and libraries: An Indonesian experience. Knowledge Garden1(1): 57–72.
11.
AtkinsonMTDhiensaJ (2007) Improving library services to people with print disabilities: The role of technology in public libraries. In: Deines-Jones C (ed.) Improving Library Services to People with Disabilities. Oxford: Chandos Publishing, pp.1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-84334-286-1.50001-8
12.
BonkAENurdianiNKatarinaW (2021) The application of accessibility in public library building design in Jakarta, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science794(1): 012163.
13.
CamulliJEGuohuiX (2019) The employment continuum: A framework for hiring people with disabilities in Dubai, UAE. Asian Journal of Interdisciplinary Research: 56–75. https://doi.org/10.34256/ajir1936.
14.
CassnerMMaxey-HarrisCAnayaT (2011) Differently able: A review of academic library websites for people with disabilities. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian30(1): 33–51.
15.
ChauhanSPS (2024) Enhancing Accessibility in Special Libraries: A Study on AI-Powered Assistive Technologies for Patrons with Disabilities. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.06970.
16.
ClarkJ (2020) A coordinated effort: Cultural and policy requirements for digital accessibility. College & Undergraduate Libraries27(2–4): 265–280.
17.
de Perio WittmanJ (2023) Moving beyond the basics of the ADA and section 504: Opportunities for equitable and inclusive access to law libraries, collections, and services. Legal Reference Services Quarterly42(3–4): 272–298.
18.
DoerrD (1994) Compliance. Public Library Quarterly14(1): 25–28.
19.
EcheverríaGFinotelliC (2024) Inclusion and exclusion. In: Sciortino G, Cvajner M and Kivisto PJ (eds) Research Handbook on the Sociology of Migration. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp.156–166. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839105463.00020
20.
EneyaDDAdesinaAO (2025) Library service provision for students with disabilities in academic libraries: A literature review. In: Ocholla D, Onyancha OB and Adesina AO (eds) Information, Knowledge, and Technology for Teaching and Research in Africa. London: Springer, pp.85–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65745-0_4
21.
FalloonK (2015) A case study in practice: Providing accessibility for persons with disabilities at the college of staten island library. In: Wentz B, Jaeger PT and Bertot JC (eds) Accessibility for Persons with Disabilities and the Inclusive Future of Libraries. London: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp.89–107. https://doi.org/10.1108/s0065283020150000040014
22.
FoleyAFerriBA (2012) Technology for people, not disabilities: Ensuring access and inclusion. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs12(4): 192–200.
23.
FrankJL (2023) Improving library accessibility webpages with secondary feedback from users with disabilities. Journal of Web Librarianship17(3): 59–70.
24.
Frank J, Salsbury M, McKelvey H, et al. (2021) Digital equity & inclusion strategies for libraries. The International Journal of Information, Diversity, & Inclusion5(3): 185–205.
25.
GaadE (2017) Three birds with one stone: Empower, include, and sustain the Emirati community program; kayani. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Educational Studies12(1): 1–13.
26.
GrassiR (2018) Building inclusive communities: Teens with disabilities in libraries. Reference Services Review46(3): 364–378.
27.
GreenRA (2009) Assistive technology and academic libraries: Legal issues and problem resolution. Journal of Access Services6(1–2): 36–47.
28.
GreenRABlairV (2011) Keep It Simple: A Guide to Assistive Technologies. Bloomsbury.
29.
HamamyH (2013) Community genetic services in Arab countries. Middle East Journal of Medical Genetics2(1): 6–10.
30.
JaegerPTWentzBBertotJC (2015) Accessibility, inclusion, and the roles of libraries. In: Wentz B, Jaeger PT and Bertot JC (eds) Accessibility for Persons with Disabilities and the Inclusive Future of Libraries, London: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. pp.1–8. https://doi.org/10.1108/s0065-283020150000040008
31.
JasminH (2024) Training for academic librarians in assistive technologies (AT) requires higher priority and targeted funding. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice19(1): 138–140.
32.
KulikauskienėKLiukinevičienėL (2020) Legal and administrative environment of inclusive libraries for people with disabilities in Lithuania. Informacijos Mokslai88: 120–141.
33.
MaddisettyB (2024) Robotic library services in the context of persons with disabilities. Annals of Library and Information Studies71(02). https://doi.org/10.56042/alis.v71i2.7545.
34.
MahmoodPRuffingJIlozumbaO, et al. (2024) Bridging the gap: Challenges and opportunities of assistive technology loan library systems for individuals with intellectual disabilities in the United States. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology20(3): 611–620.
35.
MarcaccioAClarkeSWetheralA (2022) Learning about real experiences from real users: A blueprint for participatory accessibility testing. Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research17(1): 1–21.
36.
MarteCVanderheidenG (2025) Improving assistive technology access for library computing. In: Baker D and Ellis L (eds) Encyclopedia of Libraries, Librarianship, and Information Science. Amsterdam: Academic Press, pp.561–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-95689-5.00200-5
37.
MarwiyahMZainLChasanawatiAY, et al. (2024) Accessibility of UIN Sunan Kalijaga library for students with disabilities: An evaluation. University Library at a New Stage of Social Communications Development. Conference Proceedings9: 157–173.
38.
MatsumuraTOchiaiY (2023) A comparison of digital libraries for the visually impaired in the United States and Japan. In: Stephanidis C, Antona M, Ntoa S, et al. (eds) HCI International 2023 Posters. HCII 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1833.London: Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35992-7_47
MorganC (2021) The experiences of disabled people in the United Arab Emirates: Barriers to participation in higher education and employment. Disability & Society38(3): 421–444.
41.
MountapmbemeAOkaforOLudiS (2022) Accessible blockly: An accessible block-based programming library for people with visual impairments. In: Proceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, pp.1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3517428.3544806
42.
Nandi A and Mohapatra PK (2005) Extending library facilities to physically challenged-case of IIT Kharagpur. ICMIT 2005: 54.
43.
NazimMBegASarkarM (2021) Access to library facilities and services for users with disabilities: A study of Aligarh Muslim University in India. Journal of Access Services18(1): 30–49.
44.
OdigieIOOkubeN (2021) The place of assistive technologies in the service delivery of special need users in academic libraries of Kogi state. Library Philosophy and Practice(e-Journal) 6076. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/6076.
45.
OnchagwaDMWambiriD (2022) Strategies for implementation of disability mainstreaming policies in public libraries, in reference to Kenya national libraries, Meru, Kisumu, and Nakuru branches. International Journal of Current Aspects6(1): 111–124.
46.
OstergaardK (2015) Accessibility from scratch: One library’s journey to prioritize the accessibility of electronic information resources. The Serials Librarian69(2): 155–168.
47.
OswalSK (2020) Institutional, legal, and attitudinal barriers to the accessibility of university digital libraries: Implications for retention of disabled students. In: Management Association I (ed.) Digital Libraries and Institutional Repositories. London: IGI Global Scientific Publishing, pp.123–141. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2463-3.ch009
48.
PatelDRBrownKA (2017) An overview of the conceptual framework and definitions of disability. International Journal of Child Health and Human Development10(3): 247–252.
49.
PhukubjeJNgoepeM (2016) Convenience and accessibility of library services to students with disabilities at the university of Limpopo in South Africa. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science49(2): 180–190.
Pionke JJ (2017) Beyond ADA compliance: The library as a place for all. Urban Library Journal 23(1): 3.
52.
PomputiusA (2020) Assistive technology and software to support accessibility. Medical Reference Services Quarterly39(2): 203–210.
53.
PotnisDMallaryK (2021) Analyzing service divide in academic libraries for better serving disabled patrons using assistive technologies. College & Research Libraries82(6). https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.82.6.879.
54.
SamsonS (2011) Best practices for serving students with disabilities. Reference Services Review39(2): 260–277.
55.
SchalockRLBorthwick-DuffySABradleyVJ, et al. (2010) Intellectual Disability: Definition, Classification, and Systems of Supports. Washington, DC: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
56.
SchulzeFBergetG (2024) Inclusive public libraries: how to adequately identify accessibility barriers? Universal Design 2024: Shaping a Sustainable, Equitable and Resilient Future for All. https://doi.org/10.3233/shti240995
57.
ShouaibMAlabdouliEA (2023) The rights of persons with disabilities in the United Arab Emirates in the light of national and international legislation. Arab Law Quarterly39(1–2): 168–190.
58.
SmallRVMyhillWNHerring-HarringtonL (2015) Developing accessible libraries and inclusive librarians in the 21st century: Examples from practice. In: Wentz B, Jaeger PT and Bertot JC (eds) Accessibility for Persons with Disabilities and the Inclusive Future of Libraries. London: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp.73–88. https://doi.org/10.1108/s0065-283020150000040013
59.
TatomirJTatomirJC (2012) Collection accessibility: A best practices guide for libraries and librarians. Library Technology Reports48: 36.
60.
TimonyP (2015) Accessibility and the maker movement: A case study of the adaptive technology program at district of Columbia public library. In: Wentz B, Jaeger PT and Bertot JC (eds) Accessibility for Persons with Disabilities and the Inclusive Future of Libraries. London: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp.51–58. https://doi.org/10.1108/s0065-283020150000040011
61.
TiurkedzhyNSDavydovaIOMarinaOY, et al. (2022) Accessibility analysis of digital libraries and specialized library resources. University Library at a New Stage of Social Communications Development. Conference Proceedings7: 218–231.
62.
TripathiMShuklaA (2014) Use of assistive technologies in academic libraries: A survey. Assistive Technology26(2): 105–118.
UNESCO (2023) Inclusion in education. United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. Available at: https://www.unesco.org/en/inclusion-education (accessed 06/08/2025).
65.
VandenbarkRT (2010) Tending a wild garden: Library web design for persons with disabilities. Information Technology and Libraries29(1): 23–29.
66.
WentzBJaegerPTLazarJ (2011) Retrofitting accessibility: The legal inequality of after-the-fact online access for persons with disabilities in the United States. First Monday. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v16i11.3666.
67.
WillisSKO’ReillyF (2018) Enhancing visibility of vendor accessibility documentation. Information Technology and Libraries37(3): 12–28.
68.
YoonHY (2020) A study on the main body and content of state-led library service for persons with disabilities by continent. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society51(3): 1–25.
69.
YoonHYKimSY (2016) A study of collection development policy to strengthen South Korea’s library services for persons with disabilities/Une étude des politiques de développement des collections pour renforcer les services en bibliothèque pour personnes handicapées en Corée du Sud. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science40(2): 162–185.
