This article proposes an assessment model for the evaluation and improvement of the service performance of academic libraries. It presents a Service Performance Control Matrix (SPCM), an instrument to report the level of service performance and to simultaneously provide strategic directions to sustain, improve or recover service quality. SPCM also provides a guideline for determining the order of improvement for service. The model is applied to five public university libraries in Bangladesh, using a modified version of the SERVQUAL questionnaire. This questionnaire asks students to indicate their opinions on desired, minimum, and actual service performance by the university library on a 7-point Likert scale. The results of this study indicate the applicability of the SPCM model in determining the service quality of academic libraries. With more research effort, we expect this model to be evolved as a practical solution to assessing library service performance worldwide.
AhmedSMZShoebMZH (2009) Measuring service quality of a public university library in Bangladesh using SERVQUAL. Performance Measurement and Metrics10(1): 17–32.
2.
AndaleebSSSimmondsPL (1998) Explaining user satisfaction with academic libraries: Strategic implication. College & Research Libraries59(2): 156–167.
3.
BawdenDPetuchovaiteRVilarP (2005) Are we effective? How would we know? Approaches to the evaluation of library services in Lithuania, Slovenia and the United Kingdom. New Library World106(1216/1217): 454–463.
4.
BowerTDennisB (2007) How to get more from your quantitative LibQUAL+TM dataset: Making results practical. Performance Measurement and Metrics8(2): 110–126.
5.
ChenSH (2012) Integrating service quality model in quality improvement: An empirical study of employees satisfaction for hot spring industry. Information Technology Journal11(5): 658–665.
ChenSHYangCCShiauJYWangHH (2006) The development of an employee satisfaction model for higher education. TQM Magazine18(5): 484–500.
8.
ChenSHYehTMChenCC (2011) Integration SERVQUAL model and performance control matrix to improve service quality for the hot spring industry. African Journal of Business Management5(13): 5378–5387.
9.
ChengYCTamWM (1997) Multi-models of quality in education. Quality Assurance in Education5: 22–31.
10.
CroninJJTaylorSA (1992) Measuring service quality: A re-examination and extension. Journal of Marketing56(3): 55–68.
11.
CullenR (2001) Perspectives on user satisfaction surveys: Academic libraries. Library Trends49(4): 662–686.
12.
DuffyJAKetchardAA (1998) Examining the role of service quality in overall satisfaction. Journal of Managerial Issues10(2): 240–255.
13.
GoodmanJA (2009) Strategic Customer Service: Managing the Customer Experience to Increase Positive Word of Mouth, Build Loyalty, and Maximize Profits (1st edn). New York, NY: American Management Association.
14.
HalsteadDHartmanDSchmidtSL (1994) Multisource effects on the satisfaction formation process. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science22(2): 114–129.
15.
HernonPAltmanE (1996) Service Quality in Academic Libraries. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
16.
HernonPNiteckiDAAltmanE (1999) Service quality and customer satisfaction: An assessment and future directions. Journal of Academic Librarianship25(1): 9–17.
17.
HungYHHuangMLChenKS (2003) Service quality evaluation by service quality performance matrix. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence14(1): 79–89.
18.
JohnsonMD (1998) Customer Orientation and Market Action. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
19.
LinWTChenSCChenKS (2005) Evaluation of performance in introducing CE marking on the European market to the machinery industry in Taiwan. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management22(5): 503–517.
20.
LinWTChenSCJangHFWuHH (2006) Performance evaluation of introducing QS-9000 to the Taiwanese semiconductor industry. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology27(9/10): 1011–1020.
21.
MillerREJonesTWWinickL (2007) Proceedings of the Second Midwest United States Association for Information Systems. Springfield, IL (18–19May).
22.
NadiriHMayboudiSMA (2010) Diagnosing university students’ zone of tolerance from university library services. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science15(1): 1–21.
23.
NagataHSatohYGerrardSKytomakiP (2004) The dimensions that construct the evaluation of service quality in academic libraries. Performance Measurement and Metrics5(2): 53–65.
24.
NunnallyJCBernsteinIH (1994) Psychometric Theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
25.
ParasuramanA (1986) Customer-orientated organizational culture: A key to successful services marketing. In: VenkatesanMSchmalenseeDMMarshallC (eds) Creativity in Services Marketing: What’s New, What Works, What’s Developing. Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association, pp. 73–77.
26.
ParasuramanABerryLLZeithamlVA (1991) Refinement and reassessment of SERVQUAL scale. Journal of Retailing67(4): 420–450.
27.
ParasuramanAZeithamlVABerryLL (1985) A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing49(Fall): 41–50.
28.
ParasuramanAZeithamlVABerryLL (1988) SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing64(1): 12–40.
29.
ParasuramanAZeithamlVABerryLL (1994) Reassessment of expectations as a comparison standard in measuring service quality: Implications for future research. Journal of Marketing58: 111–124.
30.
PattersonPGJohnsonLW (1993) Disconfirmation of expectations and the gap model of service quality: An integrated paradigm. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior6: 90–99.
31.
PindlowaW (2002) High-quality information services to users as the fundamental necessity for building a modern information society in the European Union. In: EBIB Electronic Information Bulletin for Librarians (No. 2). Available at: http://ebib.oss.wroc.pl/english/grant/pindlowa.php (accessed 20 May 2005).
32.
SatohYNagataHKytomakiPGerrardS (2005) Evaluation of the university library service quality: Analysis through focus group interview. Performance Measurement and Metrics6(3): 183–193.
33.
ShoebMZH (2011) Identifying service superiority, zone of tolerance and underlying dimensions: Service quality attributes in a private university library in Bangladesh. Library Review60(4): 293–311.
34.
SimmondsPLAndaleebSS (2001) Usage of academic libraries: The role of service quality, resources, and user characteristics. Library Trends49(4): 626–634.
35.
TurkN (2007) Building a culture of quality assurance in the libraries of the University of Ljubljana. New Library World108(3/4): 177–182.
36.
Van DykeTKappelmanLPrybutokV (1997) Measuring information systems service quality: Concerns on the use of the SERVQUAL questionnaire. Management Information Systems (MIS) Quarterly21(2): 195–208.
37.
YangCC (2003) Improvement actions based on the customers’ satisfaction survey. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence14(8): 919–930.
38.
YangCC (2007) A systems approach to service development in a concurrent engineering environment. Service Industries Journal27(5): 635–652.
39.
ZeithamlVAParasuramanABerryLL (1990) Delivering Quality Service: Balancing Customer Perceptions and Expectations. New York, NY: Free Press.
