This article investigates the role of digitalisation in bolstering small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) during crises. Drawing on data from 245 North American SMEs, we examine the impact of digital technology adoption on firm resilience. The findings reveal nuanced relationships: both the depth (Digital Depth) and scope (Digital Scope) of digitalisation exhibit curvilinear associations with resilience (Profit Outlook), suggesting optimal levels for maximum benefits. Moreover, digital depth moderates the relationship between digital scope and resilience, highlighting their interactive role in enhancing adaptive capacities. This research employs a quantitative approach to explore how SMEs can leverage digital tools for resilience. Notably, it highlights the importance of strategic digital investments tailored to industry dynamics for resilience enhancement illustrating the study underscores the practical significance of digital integration for SMEs, indicating its potential to not only restore pre-crisis performance but also foster sustainable growth in the aftermath of disruption.
AbedSS (2020) Social commerce adoption using TOE framework: An empirical investigation of Saudi Arabian SMEs. International Journal of Information Management53: 102118. DOI: 10.1016/J.IJINFOMGT.2020.102118.
2.
AininSParveenFMoghavvemiS, et al (2015) Factors influencing the use of social media by SMEs and its performance outcomes. Industrial Management and Data Systems115: 570–588. DOI: 10.1108/IMDS-07-2014-0205/FULL/HTML.
3.
AkpanISoopramanienDKwakD (2021) Cutting-edge technologies for small business and innovation in the era of COVID-19 global health pandemic. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship33: 607–617. DOI: 10.1080/08276331.2020.1799294.
4.
ArchibugiDFilippettiAFrenzM (2013) Economic crisis and innovation: Is destruction prevailing over accumulation?Research Policy42: 303–314. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.07.002.
5.
ArditoL (2023) The influence of firm digitalization on sustainable innovation performance and the moderating role of corporate sustainability practices: An empirical investigation. Business Strategy and the Environment32: 5252–5272. DOI: 10.1002/BSE.3415.
6.
ArditoLPetruzzelliAM (2017) Breadth of external knowledge sourcing and product innovation: The moderating role of strategic human resource practices. European Management Journal35: 261–272.
7.
ArditoLRabySAlbinoV, et al (2021) The duality of digital and environmental orientations in the context of SMEs: Implications for innovation performance. Journal of Business Research123: 44–56. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.022.
8.
ArundelASmithK (2013) History of the community innovation survey. In: GaultF (ed.) Handbook of Innovation Indicators and Measurement. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, pp.60–67.
9.
AudretschDBBelitskiM (2021) Knowledge complexity and firm performance: Evidence from the European SMEs. Journal of Knowledge Management25: 693–713.
10.
AudretschDBBelitskiMCaiazzaR, et al (2024) Resilience and digitally-advanced entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development36: 1–9. DOI: 10.1080/08985626.2023.2275193.
11.
BamiatziVCKirchmaierT (2014) Strategies for superior performance under adverse conditions: A focus on small and medium-sized high-growth firms. International Small Business Journal32: 259–284. DOI: 10.1177/0266242612459534.
12.
BanalievaERDhanarajC (2019) Digital platform-based ecosystem governance: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management45: 228–258.
13.
BartikAWBertrandMCullenZB, et al (2020) How are small businesses adjusting to COVID-19? Early evidence from a survey (w26989). Available at: https://www.nber.org/papers/w26989 (accessed 15 April 2024).
14.
BelitskiMGuentherCKritikosAS, et al (2022) Economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on entrepreneurship and small businesses. Small Business Economics58: 593–609. DOI: 10.1007/S11187-021-00544-Y/FIGURES/3.
15.
BlichfeldtHFaullantR (2021) Performance effects of digital technology adoption and product & service innovation – A process-industry perspective. Technovation105: 102275. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102275.
16.
BodrožićZAdlerPS (2022) Alternative futures for the digital transformation: A macro-level Schumpeterian perspective. Organization Science33: 105–125. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2021.1558.
17.
BohWFEvaristoROuderkirkA (2014) Balancing breadth and depth of expertise for innovation: A 3M story. Research Policy43: 349–366.
18.
BosmanLHartmanNSutherlandJ (2020) How manufacturing firm characteristics can influence decision making for investing in Industry 4.0 technologies. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management31: 1117–1141.
19.
BrañaFJ (2019) A fourth industrial revolution? Digital transformation, labor and work organization: A view from Spain. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics46: 415–430. DOI: 10.1007/S40812-019-00122-0.
20.
BranickiLJSullivan-TaylorBLivschitzSR (2018) How entrepreneurial resilience generates resilient SMEs. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research24: 1244–1263. DOI: 10.1108/IJEBR-11-2016-0396/FULL/HTML.
21.
BroekhuizenTBroekhuisMGijsenbergMJ, et al (2021) Introduction to the special issue–Digital business models: A multi-disciplinary and multi-stakeholder perspective. Journal of Business Research122: 847–852.
22.
BrunoRLKorostelevaJOsaulenkoK, et al (2024) Sectoral digital capabilities and complementarities in shaping young firm growth: evidence from Europe. Entrepreneurship &Regional Development36: 115–135. DOI: 10.1080/08985626.2023.2218314.
23.
BüchiGCugnoMCastagnoliR (2020) Smart factory performance and Industry 4.0. Technological Forecasting and Social Change150: 119790. DOI: 10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2019.119790.
24.
BürgelTRHieblMRWPielstickerDI (2023) Digitalization and entrepreneurial firms’ resilience to pandemic crises: Evidence from COVID-19 and the German Mittelstand. Technological Forecasting and Social Change186: 122135. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122135.
25.
ChauNTDengHTayR (2020) Critical determinants for mobile commerce adoption in Vietnamese small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Marketing Management36: 456–487. DOI: 10.1080/0267257X.2020.1719187.
26.
CireraXCominDACruzM, et al (2022) Technology and Resilience. Washington, DC: World Bank.
27.
ClassenNVan GilsABammensY, et al (2012) Accessing resources from innovation partners: The search breadth of family SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management50: 191–215.
28.
CollinsD (2003) Pretesting survey instruments: An overview of cognitive methods. Quality of Life Research12: 229–238.
29.
CoutuD (2002) How resilience works. Harvard Business Review80: 46–56.
30.
CulotGNassimbeniGOrzesG, et al. (2020) Behind the definition of Industry 4.0: Analysis and open questions. International Journal of Production Economics226: 107617.
31.
DąbrowskaJAlmpanopoulouABremA, et al (2022) Digital transformation, for better or worse: A critical multi-level research agenda. R&D Management52: 930–954. DOI: 10.1111/RADM.12531.
32.
DahlesHSusilowatiT (2015) Business resilience in times of growth and crisis. Annals of Tourism Research51: 34–50.
33.
DoernR (2016) Entrepreneurship and crisis management: The experiences of small businesses during the London 2011 riots. International Small Business Journal34: 276–302. DOI: 10.1177/0266242614553863.
34.
DoernRWilliamsNVorleyT (2019) Special issue on entrepreneurship and crises: Business as usual? An introduction and review of the literature. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development31: 400–412. DOI: 10.1080/08985626.2018.1541590.
35.
EdvardssonBTronvollB (2022) Crisis behaviors as drivers of value co-creation transformation. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences14: 1–15. DOI: 10.1108/IJQSS-01-2021-0001/FULL/HTML.
36.
EggersF (2020) Masters of disasters? Challenges and opportunities for SMEs in times of crisis. Journal of Business Research116: 199–208. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.025.
37.
EliaGMargheritaAPassianteG (2020) Digital entrepreneurship ecosystem: How digital technologies and collective intelligence are reshaping the entrepreneurial process. Technological Forecasting and Social Change150: 119791.
38.
EllerRAlfordPKallmünzerA, et al (2020) Antecedents, consequences, and challenges of small and medium-sized enterprise digitalization. Journal of Business Research112: 119–127. DOI: 10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2020.03.004.
39.
FauziAAShengML (2022) The digitalization of micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs): An institutional theory perspective. Journal of Small Business Management60: 1288–1313. DOI: 10.1080/00472778.2020.1745536.
40.
GarcíaJGómezMMolinaA (2012) A destination-branding model: An empirical analysis based on stakeholders. Tourism Management33: 646–661.
GkeredakisMLifshitz-AssafHBarrettM (2021) Crisis as opportunity, disruption and exposure: Exploring emergent responses to crisis through digital technology. Information and Organization31: 100344. DOI: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2021.100344.
43.
GoduscheitRCFaullantR (2018) Digital transformation and the redefinition of markets. Journal of Business Research88: 1–8.
44.
GoldmanSLNagelRNPreissK (1995) Agile competitors and virtual organizations. Manufacturing Review8: 59–67.
45.
GuoHYangZHuangR, et al (2020) The digitalization and public crisis responses of small and medium enterprises: Implications from a COVID-19 survey. Frontiers of Business Research in China14: 19.
46.
GuoLXuL (2021) The effects of digital transformation on firm performance: Evidence from China’s manufacturing sector. Sustainability13: 12844. DOI: 10.3390/SU132212844.
47.
HaansRFJPietersCHeZL (2016) Thinking about U: Theorizing and testing U- and inverted U-shaped relationships in strategy research. Strategic Management Journal37: 1177–1195. DOI: 10.1002/SMJ.2399.
48.
HartmannSBackmannJNewmanA, et al (2022) Psychological resilience of entrepreneurs: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Small Business Management60: 1041–1079. DOI: 10.1080/00472778.2021.2024216.
49.
HerbaneB (2019) Rethinking organizational resilience and strategic renewal in SMEs. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development31: 476–495. DOI: 10.1080/08985626.2018.1541594.
50.
HillmannJGuentherE (2021) Organizational resilience: A valuable construct for management research?International Journal of Management Reviews23: 7–44. DOI: 10.1111/IJMR.12239.
51.
IborraMSafónVDolzC (2020) What explains the resilience of SMEs? Ambidexterity capability and strategic consistency. Long Range Planning53: 101947.
52.
KimSKMinS (2015) Business model innovation performance: When does adding a new business model benefit an incumbent?Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal9: 34–57.
53.
KlyverKNielsenS (2021) Which crisis strategies are (expectedly) effective among SMEs during COVID-19?Journal of Business Venturing Insights16: e00273.
54.
KohtamäkiMParidaVPatelPC, et al (2020) The relationship between digitalization and servitization: The role of servitization in capturing the financial potential of digitalization. Technological Forecasting and Social Change151: 119804. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119804.
55.
KolbergDZühlkeD (2015) Lean Automation enabled by Industry 4.0 technologies. IFAC-PapersOnLine28: 1870–1875. DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.359.
56.
KorberSMcNaughtonRB (2018) Resilience and entrepreneurship: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research24: 1129–1154. DOI: 10.1108/IJEBR-10-2016-0356/FULL/XML.
57.
KrausSClaussTBreierM, et al (2020) The economics of COVID-19: Initial empirical evidence on how family firms in five European countries cope with the corona crisis. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research26: 1067–1092. DOI: 10.1108/IJEBR-04-2020-0214/FULL/.
58.
KrausSPalmerCKailerN, et al (2019a) Digital entrepreneurship: A research agenda on new business models for the twenty-first century. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research25: 353–375. DOI: 10.1108/IJEBR-06-2018-0425/FULL/HTML.
59.
KrausSRoig-TiernoNBounckenRB (2019b) Digital innovation and venturing: An introduction into the digitalization of entrepreneurship. Review of Managerial Science13: 519–528. DOI: 10.1007/S11846-019-00333-8.
60.
KuckertzABrändleL (2022) Creative reconstruction: A structured literature review of the early empirical research on the COVID-19 crisis and entrepreneurship. Management Review Quarterly72: 281–307.
LanzollaGLorenzAMiron-SpektorE, et al (2020) Digital transformation: What is new if anything? Emerging patterns and management research. Academy of Management Discoveries6: 341–350. DOI: 10.5465/AMD.2020.0144.
63.
LaursenKSalterA (2006) Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal27: 131–150.
64.
LeiponenA (2012) The benefits of R&D and breadth in innovation strategies: a comparison of Finnish service and manufacturing firms. Industrial and Corporate Change21: 1255–1281.
65.
LiL (2022) Digital transformation and sustainable performance: The moderating role of market turbulence. Industrial Marketing Management104: 28–37. DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.04.007.
66.
LindeJFossNJPedersenT (2021) Digitalization and the commodity trap: The case of the global shipping industry. Journal of International Business Studies52: 347–367.
67.
LinnenlueckeMK (2017) Resilience in business and management research: A review of influential publications and a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews19: 4–30. DOI: 10.1111/IJMR.12076.
68.
Lopez-VegaHMoodyssonJ (2023) Digital transformation of the automotive industry: An integrating framework to analyse technological novelty and breadth. Industry and Innovation30: 67–102. DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2022.2151873.
69.
LuY (2017) Industry 4.0: A survey on technologies, applications and open research issues. Journal of Industrial Information Integration6: 1–10. DOI: 10.1016/j.jii.2017.04.005.
70.
LundmarkECoadAFrankishJS, et al (2020) The liability of volatility and how it changes over time among new ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice44: 933–963.
71.
LuthansFAveyJBAvolioBJ, et al (2006) Psychological capital development: Toward a micro-intervention. Journal of Organizational Behavior27: 387–393. DOI: 10.1002/JOB.373.
72.
MarsdenPKokkorisI (2010) The role of competition and state aid policy in financial and monetary law. Journal of International Economic Law13: 875–892.
73.
MasudaYWhangS (2021) Digitization and profitability. Information Systems and e-Business Management19: 389–403. DOI: 10.1007/S10257-019-00458-Z.
74.
McNaughtonRBGrayB (2017) Entrepreneurship and resilient communities – Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy11: 2–19.
75.
MeroJTarkiainenATobonJ (2020) Effectual and causal reasoning in the adoption of marketing automation. Industrial Marketing Management86: 212–222.
76.
MeyerA (1982) Adapting to environmental jolts. Administrative Science Quarterly27: 515–537.
77.
NambisanS (2017) Digital entrepreneurship: Toward a digital technology perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice41: 1029–1055. DOI: 10.1111/ETAP.12254.
78.
NambisanSWrightMPolicyMF-R, et al (2019) The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes. Research Policy48: 103773.
79.
NasiriMUkkoJSaunilaM, et al (2020) Managing the digital supply chain: The role of smart technologies. Technovation96: 102121.
80.
NeirottiPPesceF (2019) Digital transformation and hypercompetition: Are SMEs catching up or falling behind?Journal of Bournusiness Research96: 365–380.
81.
NewmanAObschonkaMBlockJ (2022) Small businesses and entrepreneurship in times of crises: the renaissance of entrepreneur-focused micro perspectives. International Small Business Journal40: 119–129.
82.
OcasioWKelloggJL (1997) Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal18: 187–206. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199707)18:1.
83.
OECD (2015) Entrepreneurship at a Glance 2015. Paris: OECD Publishing.
84.
OECD (2021) Understanding Firm Growth: Helping SMEs ScaleUp. OECD Studies on SMEs and Entrepreneurship. Paris: OECD Publishing.
85.
Ortiz-de-MandojanaNBansalP (2016) The long-term benefits of organizational resilience through sustainable business practices. Strategic Management Journal37: 1615–1631. DOI: 10.1002/SMJ.2410.
86.
OsiyevskyyORadnejadABSinhaKK (2020) Dynamic responses to disruptive business model innovations: Rational, behavioral, and normative perspectives. In: DasTK (ed.) Entrepreneurship and Behavioral Strategy. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, pp.113–146.
87.
PapadopoulosTBaltasKNBaltaME (2020) The use of digital technologies by small and medium enterprises during COVID-19: Implications for theory and practice. International Journal of Information Management55: 102192. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102192.
88.
PearsonCMClairJA (1998) Reframing crisis management. Academy of Management Review23: 59–76. DOI: 10.5465/AMR.1998.192960.
89.
PetrouAHadjieliasEThanosI (2020) Strategic decision-making processes, international environmental munificence and the accelerated internationalization of SMEs. International Business Review29: 101735.
90.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBLeeJY, et al (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology88: 879.
91.
PrauseM (2019) Challenges of Industry 4.0 technology adoption for SMEs: The case of Japan. Sustainability (Switzerland)11: 5807. DOI: 10.3390/SU11205807.
92.
PuthusserryPKingTMillerK, et al (2022) A Typology of emerging market SMEs’ COVID-19 response strategies: The role of TMTs and organizational design. British Journal of Management33: 603–633. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8551.12591.
QuintonSCanhotoAMolinilloS, et al (2018) Conceptualising a digital orientation: Antecedents of supporting SME performance in the digital economy. Journal of Strategic Marketing26: 427–439. DOI: 10.1080/0965254X.2016.1258004.
95.
RamdaniBRajaSKayumovaM (2022) Digital innovation in SMEs: a systematic review, synthesis and research agenda. Information Technology for Development28: 56–80. DOI: 10.1080/02681102.2021.1893148.
96.
RanjayGNitinNFranzW (2010) Roaring out of recession. Harvard Business Review88: 62–69.
SaarikkoTWestergrenUHBlomquistT (2020) Digital transformation: Five recommendations for the digitally conscious firm. Business Horizons63: 825–839. DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2020.07.005.
99.
SalariTMurphyWH (2023) Light at the end of a very dark tunnel: An examination of the survival and recovery strategies of Iranian tourist accommodation businesses during the Covid-19 pandemic. Tourism and Hospitality Research23: 184–199. DOI: 10.1177/14673584221095176.
100.
SeegerMWUlmerRRNovakJM, et al (2005) Post-crisis discourse and organizational change, failure and renewal. Journal of Organizational Change Management18: 78–95. DOI: 10.1108/09534810510579869/FULL/HTML.
101.
SinhaKKSaundersCRabyS, et al (2022) The moderating role of previous venture experience on breadth of learning and innovation and the impacts on SME performance. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research28: 346–367. DOI: 10.1108/IJEBR-02-2021-0159.
102.
SmallboneDDeakinsDBattistiM, et al (2012) Small business responses to a major economic downturn: Empirical perspectives from New Zealand and the United Kingdom. International Small Business Journal30: 754–777. DOI: 10.1177/0266242612448077.
103.
SommerL (2015) Industrial revolution – industry 4.0: Are German manufacturing SMEs the first victims of this revolution?Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management8: 1512–1532. DOI: 10.3926/jiem.1470.
StawBSandelandsLDuttonJ (1981) Threat rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly26: 501–524.
106.
TamakhinaAYMezhovSIYungblyudtSV. (2020) Digital Workforce for the “Green” Economy “Smart” Enterprises: Training and Management Features. In: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. Cham: Springer, pp.345–353.
107.
ThorgrenSWilliamsT (2020) Staying alive during an unfolding crisis: How SMEs ward off impending disaster. Journal of Business Venturing Insights14: e00187.
108.
TorresPAugustoMMatosM (2019) Antecedents and outcomes of digital influencer endorsement: An exploratory study. Psychology and Marketing36: 1267–1276. DOI: 10.1002/MAR.21274.
109.
TorresPGodinhoP (2022) Levels of necessity of entrepreneurial ecosystems elements. Small Business Economics59: 29–45. DOI: 10.1007/S11187-021-00515-3.
110.
UrbanoDAparicioSScottS, et al (2024) Inside out: The interplay between institutions and digital technologies for SMEs performance. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development36: 162–181. DOI: 10.1080/08985626.2023.2208555.
111.
VerhoefPBroekhuizenTBartY, et al (2021) Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research122: 889–901.
112.
VogusTSutcliffeK (2007) Organizational resilience: Towards a theory and research agenda. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics3418–3422.
113.
WapshottRMallettO (2021) HRM in small and medium sized enterprises. In: WilkinsonADundonTRedmanT (eds.) Contemporary Human Resource Management: Text and Cases. Sage, pp.469–485.
114.
WilliamsTAGruberDASutcliffeKM, et al (2017) Organizational response to adversity: Fusing crisis management and resilience research streams. Academy of Management Annals11: 733–769. DOI: 10.5465/ANNALS.2015.0134.
115.
WinarsihMIFuadK (2021) Impact of Covid-19 on digital transformation and sustainability in small and medium enterprises (SMEs): A conceptual framework. In: BarolliLPoniszewska-MarandaAEnokidoT (eds) In Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems (CISIS-2020). Springer Nature, pp.471–476.
116.
WishartM (2018) Business Resilience in an SME Context: A Literature Review. Coventry: Enterprise Research Centre and Warwick Business School.
117.
XueYLiangXBoultonWR (2013) Digital ecosystems: Challenges and opportunities. Communications of the ACM56: 68–75.
