This article explores the activities involved in embedding a small firm in its industrial context. Inductive analysis of longitudinal, case study data collected from a small firm in the creative industries highlights the use of networks and networking as embedding mechanisms. Key emergent themes include the impacts of pre-embeddedness (defined as the sum of all cultural, social and symbolic capital accessible to the founding team prior to business start-up), the vision and network orientation of the founding team and their strategic use of networking. The interplay between these conditions and activities is revealed as important in building legitimacy, which is critical for embedding a firm in its industrial context. This article extends knowledge of embedding beyond the initial phase of new venture creation and highlights the emergent and evolving dynamics behind this process.
AarstadJHauglandSAGreveA (2010) Performance spillover effects in entrepreneurial networks: Assessing a dyadic theory of social capital. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice34(5): 1003–1019.
2.
AdlerPSKwonS-W (2002) Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review27(1): 17–40.
3.
AhujaGSodaGZaheerA (2012) The genesis and dynamics of organizational networks. Organization Science23(2): 434–448.
4.
Al-DajaniHCarterSShawE. (2015) Entrepreneurship among the displaced and dispossessed: Exploring the limits of emancipatory entrepreneuring. British Journal of Management26(4): 713–730.
5.
AldrichHEKimPH (2007) Small worlds, infinite possibilities? How social networks affect entrepreneurial team formation and search. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal1(1–2): 147–165.
6.
AldrichHEZimmerC (1986) Entrepreneurship through social networks. In: SextonDLSmilorRW (eds) The Art and Science of Entrepreneurship. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, pp.3–23.
7.
AndersonARDrakopoulou DoddSJackSL (2010) Network practices and entrepreneurial growth. Scandinavian Journal of Management26(2): 121–133.
8.
AntcliffVSaundryRStuartM (2007) Networks and social capital in the UK television industry: The weakness of weak ties. Human Relations60(2): 371–393.
9.
BatjargalB (2003) Social capital and entrepreneurial performance in Russia: A longitudinal study. Organization Studies24(4): 535–556.
10.
BeckerGS (1964) Human Capital: A Theoretical Analysis with Special Reference to Education. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
11.
BerglundH (2015) Between cognition and discourse: Phenomenology and the study of entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research21(3): 472–488.
12.
BirleyS (1985) The role of networks in the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing1(1): 107–117.
13.
BirleySCromieSMyersA (1991) Entrepreneurial networks: Their emergence in Ireland and overseas. International Small Business Journal9(4): 56–74.
14.
BourdieuP (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
15.
BourdieuP (1986) The forms of capital. In: RichardsonJG (ed.) The Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood Press, pp.241–258.
16.
BrüderlJPreisendörferP (1998) Network support and the success of newly founded businesses. Small Business Economics10(3): 213–225.
17.
BurtRS (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18.
CassonMDella GiustaM (2007) Entrepreneurship and social capital: Analysing the impact of social networks on entrepreneurial activity from a rational action perspective. International Small Business Journal25(3): 220–244.
19.
ChalmersDMShawE (2015) The endogenous construction of entrepreneurial contexts: A practice-based perspective. International Small Business Journal. Epub ahead of print 21September. DOI: 10.1177/0266242615589768.
20.
ChettySKPartanenJRasmussenES. (2014) Contextualising case studies in entrepreneurship: A tandem approach to conducting a longitudinal cross-country case study. International Small Business Journal32(7): 818–829.
21.
CopeJ (2005) Researching entrepreneurship through phenomenological inquiry: Philosophical and methodological issues. International Small Business Journal23(2): 163–189.
22.
CopeJ (2011) Entrepreneurial learning from failure: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Journal of Business Venturing26(6): 604–623.
23.
DavidssonPHonigB (2003) The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing18(3): 301–331.
24.
De ClercqDVoronovM (2009) Toward a practice perspective of entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial legitimacy as habitus. International Small Business Journal27(4): 395–419.
25.
Department for Culture, Media and Sport (2016) Creative Industries Economic Estimates January 2016 (Report). London: Department for Culture, Media & Sport.
26.
Drakopoulou DoddS (2014) Roots radical – Place, power and practice in punk entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development26(1–2): 165–205.
27.
Drakopoulou DoddSPretTShawE (2016) Advancing understanding of entrepreneurial embeddedness: Forms of capital, social contexts and time. In: WelterFGartnerWB (eds) A Research Agenda for Entrepreneurship and Context. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp.120–133.
28.
DubiniPAldrichH (1991) Personal and extended networks are central to the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing6(5): 305–313.
29.
EdmondsonACMcManusSE (2007) Methodological fit in management field research. Academy of Management Review32(4): 1155–1179.
30.
ElfringTHulsinkW (2007) Networking by entrepreneurs: Patterns of tie-formation in emerging organizations. Organization Studies28(12): 1849–1872.
31.
GartnerWB (2007) Entrepreneurial narrative and a science of the imagination. Journal of Business Venturing22(5): 613–627.
32.
GiddensA (1984) Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
33.
GranovetterM (1973) The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology78(6): 1360–1380.
34.
GranovetterM (1985) Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology91(3): 481–510.
35.
GreveASalaffJW (2003) Social networks and entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice28(1): 1–22.
36.
GrossmanEBYli-RenkoHJanakiramanR (2012) Resource search, interpersonal similarity, and network tie valuation in nascent entrepreneurs’ emerging networks. Journal of Management38(6): 1760–1787.
37.
HallenBLEisenhardtKM (2012) Catalyzing strategies and efficient tie formation: How entrepreneurial firms obtain investment ties. Academy of Management Journal55(1): 35–70.
38.
HannaVWalshK (2008) Interfirm cooperation among small manufacturing firms. International Small Business Journal26(3): 299–321.
39.
HiteJM (2005) Evolutionary processes and paths of relationally embedded network ties in emerging entrepreneurial firms. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice29(1): 113–144.
40.
HiteJMHesterlyWS (2001) The evolution of firm networks: From emergence to early growth of the firm. Strategic Management Journal22(3): 275–286.
41.
HoangHAntoncicB (2003) Network-based research in entrepreneurship: A critical review. Journal of Business Venturing18(2): 165–187.
42.
JackSL (2005) The role, use and activation of strong and weak network ties: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Management Studies42(6): 1233–1259.
43.
JackSL (2010) Approaches to studying networks: Implications and outcomes. Journal of Business Venturing25(1): 120–137.
44.
JackSLAndersonAR (2002) The effects of embeddedness on the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing17(5): 467–487.
45.
JackSLMoultSAndersonAR. (2010) An entrepreneurial network evolving: Patterns of change. International Small Business Journal28(4): 315–337.
46.
JayawarnaDJonesOMacphersonA (2014) Entrepreneurial potential: The role of human and cultural capitals. International Small Business Journal32(8): 918–943.
47.
JohannissonBRamírez-PasillasMKarlssonG (2002) The institutional embeddedness of local inter-firm networks: A leverage for business creation. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development14(4): 297–315.
48.
Karataş-ÖzkanM (2011) Understanding relational qualities of entrepreneurial learning: Towards a multi-layered approach. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development23(9–10): 877–906.
49.
Karataş-ÖzkanMChellE (2010) Nascent Entrepreneurship and Learning. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
50.
KeatingAGeigerSMcLoughlinD (2014) Riding the practice waves: Social resourcing practices during new venture development. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice38(5): 1207–1235.
51.
KilduffMBrassDJ (2010) Organizational social network research: Core ideas and key debates. The Academy of Management Annals4(1): 317–357.
52.
KorsgaardSFergusonRGaddeforsJ (2015) The best of both worlds: How rural entrepreneurs use placial embeddedness and strategic networks to create opportunities. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development27(9–10): 574–598.
53.
LamWHarkerMJ (2015) Marketing and entrepreneurship: An integrated view from the entrepreneur’s perspective. International Small Business Journal33(3): 321–348.
54.
LarsonA (1992) Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: A study of the governance of exchange processes. Administrative Science Quarterly37(1): 76–104.
55.
LarsonAStarrJA (1993) A network model of organization formation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice17(2): 5–15.
56.
LechnerCDowlingM (2003) Firm networks: External relationships as sources for the growth and competitiveness of entrepreneurial firms. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development15(1): 1–26.
57.
LechnerCFrankenbergerKFloydSW (2010) Task contingencies in the curvilinear relationships between intergroup networks and initiative performance. Academy of Management Journal53(4): 865–889.
58.
LeeRJonesO (2008) Networks, communication and learning during business start-up: The creation of cognitive social capital. International Small Business Journal26(5): 559–594.
59.
LeeRShawE (2016) Bourdieu’s non-material forms of capital: Implications for start-up policy. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. Epub ahead of print 27April. DOI: 10.1177/0263774x16638850.
60.
LeitchCMHillFMHarrisonRT (2010) The philosophy and practice of interpretivist research in entrepreneurship: Quality, validation, and trust. Organizational Research Methods13(1): 67–84.
61.
LewisKV (2015) Enacting entrepreneurship and leadership: A longitudinal exploration of gendered identity work. Journal of Small Business Management53(3): 662–682.
62.
LincolnYSGubaEG (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
63.
LounsburyMGlynnMA (2001) Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management Journal22(6–7): 545–564.
64.
McAdamMMcAdamRDunnA. (2014) Development of small and medium-sized enterprise horizontal innovation networks: UK agri-food sector study. International Small Business Journal32(7): 830–853.
65.
McKeeverEJackSLAndersonAR (2015) Embedded entrepreneurship in the creative re-construction of place. Journal of Business Venturing30(1): 50–65.
66.
McLeodCO’DonohoeSTownleyB (2009) The elephant in the room? Class and creative careers in British advertising agencies. Human Relations62(7): 1011–1039.
67.
McPhersonMSmith-LovinLCookJM (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology27(1): 415–444.
68.
ManningS (2010) The strategic formation of project networks: A relational practice perspective. Human Relations63(4): 551–573.
69.
MarlowSMcAdamM (2015) Incubation or induction? Gendered identity work in the context of technology business incubation. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice39(4): 791–816.
70.
MaurerIEbersM (2006) Dynamics of social capital and their performance implications: Lessons from biotechnology start-ups. Administrative Science Quarterly51(2): 262–292.
71.
MillerNJBesserTMalsheA (2007) Strategic networking among small businesses in small US communities. International Small Business Journal25(6): 631–665.
72.
MitchellJC (1969) The concept and use of social networks. In: MitchellJC (ed.) Social Networks in Urban Situations: Analyses of Personal Relationships in Central African Towns. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp.1–50.
73.
NahapietJGhoshalS (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review23(2): 242–266.
74.
ObstfeldD (2005) Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly50(1): 100–130.
75.
OzcanPEisenhardtKM (2009) Origin of alliance portfolios: Entrepreneurs, network strategies, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal52(2): 246–279.
76.
ParkinsonCHoworthCSouthernA (2016) The crafting of an (un)enterprising community: Context and the social practice of talk. International Small Business Journal. Epub ahead of print 15January. DOI: 10.1177/0266242615621123.
77.
PattonMQ (2002) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
78.
PhillipsNTraceyPKarraN (2013) Building entrepreneurial tie portfolios through strategic homophily: The role of narrative identity work in venture creation and early growth. Journal of Business Venturing28(1): 134–150.
79.
PretTShawEDrakopoulou DoddS (2015) Painting the full picture: The conversion of economic, cultural, social and symbolic capital. International Small Business Journal. Epub ahead of print 27July. DOI: 10.1177/0266242615595450.
80.
RamMTheodorakopoulosNJonesT (2008) Forms of capital, mixed embeddedness and Somali enterprise. Work, Employment & Society22(3): 427–446.
81.
RuefMAldrichHECarterNM (2003) The structure of founding teams: Homophily, strong ties, and isolation among U.S. entrepreneurs. American Sociological Review68(2): 195–222.
82.
SalancikGR (1995) Wanted: A good networking theory of organization. Administrative Science Quarterly40(2): 345–349.
83.
SchatzkiT (2002) The Site of the Social: A Philosophical Account of Social Life and Change. University Park, PA: The University of Pennsylvania State University Press.
84.
SchutjensVStamE (2003) The evolution and nature of young firm networks: A longitudinal perspective. Small Business Economics21(2): 115–134.
85.
ShawE (2006) Small firm networking: An insight into contents and motivating factors. International Small Business Journal24(1): 5–29.
86.
ShawEGordonJHarveyC. (2013) Exploring contemporary entrepreneurial philanthropy. International Small Business Journal31(5): 580–599.
Slotte-KockSCovielloN (2010) Entrepreneurship research on network processes: A review and ways forward. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice34(1): 31–57.
89.
SpigelB (2016) Bourdieu, culture, and the economic geography of practice: Entrepreneurial mentorship in Ottawa and Waterloo, Canada. Journal of Economic Geography. Epub ahead of print 17July. DOI: 10.1093/jeg/lbw019.
90.
StakeR (2000) Case studies. In: DenzinNKLincolnYS (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp.435–454.
91.
StamW (2010) Industry event participation and network brokerage among entrepreneurial ventures. Journal of Management Studies47(4): 625–653.
92.
StamWArzlanianSElfringT (2014) Social capital of entrepreneurs and small firm performance: A meta-analysis of contextual and methodological moderators. Journal of Business Venturing29(1): 152–173.
93.
SteierLGreenwoodR (2000) Entrepreneurship and the evolution of angel financial networks. Organization Studies21(1): 163–192.
94.
SteyaertCLandströmH (2011) Enacting entrepreneurship research in pioneering, provocative and participative way: On the work of Bengt Johannisson. Small Business Economics36(2): 123–134.
95.
StringfellowLMacleanM (2014) ‘Space of possibles’? Legitimacy, industry maturity, and organizational foresight. Strategic Change23(3–4): 171–183.
96.
StringfellowLShawEMacleanM (2014) Apostasy versus legitimacy: Relational dynamics and routes to resource acquisition in entrepreneurial ventures. International Small Business Journal32(5): 571–592.
97.
SuchmanMC (1995) Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review20(3): 571–610.
98.
SuddabyRBrutonGDSiSX (2015) Entrepreneurship through a qualitative lens: Insights on the construction and/or discovery of entrepreneurial opportunity. Journal of Business Venturing30(1): 1–10.
99.
SullivanDMFordCM (2014) How entrepreneurs use networks to address changing resource requirements during early venture development. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice38(3): 551–574.
100.
SullivanDMMarvelM (2011) How entrepreneurs’ knowledge and network ties relate to the number of employees in new SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management49(2): 185–206.
101.
TerjesenSElamAB (2009) Transnational entrepreneurs’ venture internationalization strategies: A practice theory approach. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice33(5): 1093–1120.
102.
TownleyBBeechNMcKinlayA (2009) Managing in the creative industries: Managing the motley crew. Human Relations62(7): 939–962.
103.
United Nations Development Programme (2013) Creative Economy Report 2013 Special Edition (Report). New York: United Nations Development Programme.
104.
UzziB (1997) Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly42(1): 35–67.
105.
UzziBGillespieJJ (2002) Knowledge spillover in corporate financing networks: Embeddedness and the firm’s debt performance. Strategic Management Journal23(7): 595–618.
106.
VardamanJMAmisJMDysonBP. (2012) Interpreting change as controllable: The role of network centrality and self-efficacy. Human Relations65(7): 835–859.
107.
VincentS (2005) Really dealing: A critical perspective on inter-organizational exchange networks. Work, Employment & Society19(1): 47–65.
108.
WelterF (2011) Contextualizing entrepreneurship – Conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice35(1): 165–184.
109.
WilsonJArshedNShawEPretT (2016) Expanding the domain of festival research: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews. Epub ahead of print 15 February. DOI: 10.1111/ijmr.12093.
110.
WittP (2004) Entrepreneurs’ networks and the success of start-ups. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development16(5): 391–412.
111.
WongS-SBohWF (2010) Leveraging the ties of others to build a reputation for trustworthiness among their peers. Academy of Management Journal53(1): 129–148.
112.
ZahraSAWrightMAbdelgawadSG (2014) Contextualization and the advancement of entrepreneurship research. International Small Business Journal32(5): 479–500.
113.
ZimmermanMAZeitzGJ (2002) Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review27(3): 414–431.
114.
ZottCHuyQN (2007) How entrepreneurs use symbolic management to acquire resources. Administrative Science Quarterly52(1): 70–105.
115.
ZouHChenXLamLWR. (2016) Psychological capital and conflict management in the entrepreneur–venture capitalist relationship in China: The entrepreneur perspective. International Small Business Journal34(4): 446–467.
