This article examines the role of top managers in shaping the innovation investment actions of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in India. Survey responses from 477 top managers of Indian SMEs suggest that investment in innovation is influenced by top manager perceptions of innovation opportunity attractiveness, as well as ability to appropriate innovation investment value. Specifically, the results indicate an inverted U-shaped relationship between top manager entrepreneurial orientation and firm investment in innovation. They also suggest that top manager perceptions of environmental munificence, firm resource management capabilities, and organizational controls are positively related to firm investment in innovation.
BakerTGedajlovicELubatkinM (2005) A framework for comparing entrepreneurship processes across nations. Journal of International Business Studies36(5): 492–504.
4.
BamiatziVCKirchmaierT (2014) Strategies for superior performance under adverse conditions: A focus on small and medium-sized high-growth firms. International Small Business Journal32(3): 259–284.
5.
BanduraA (1986) Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
6.
BantelKAJacksonSE (1989) Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference?Strategic Management Journal. 10(S1): 107–124.
7.
BaronRA (2004) The cognitive perspective: A valuable tool for answering entrepreneurship’s basic ‘why’ questions. Journal of Business Venturing19(2): 221–239.
8.
BaumolW (1990) Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive. Journal of Political Economy98(5): 893–921.
9.
BehrensJErnstHShepherdDA (2014) The decision to exploit an R&D project: Divergent thinking across middle and senior managers. Journal of Product Innovation Management31(1): 144–158.
10.
BjörkmanILuY (1999) A corporate perspective on the management of human resources in China. Journal of World Business34(1): 16–25.
11.
BoalKB (2000) Strategic leadership research: Moving on. Leadership Quarterly11(4): 515–549.
12.
BoekerW (1989) Strategic change: The effects of founding and history. Academy of Management Journal32(3): 489–515.
13.
BorchOJHuseMSennesethK (1999) Resource configuration, competitive strategies, and corporate entrepreneurship: An empirical examination of small firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice24(1): 51–72.
14.
BosoNCadoganJWStoryVM (2012) Entrepreneurial orientation and market orientation as drivers of product innovation success: A study of exporters from a developing economy. International Small Business Journal31(1): 57–81.
15.
BourgeoisLJ (1980) Strategy and environment: A conceptual integration. Academy of Management Review5(1): 25–39.
16.
BrownTEDavidssonPWiklundJ (2001) An operationalization of Stevenson’s conceptualization of entrepreneurship as opportunity-based firm behavior. Strategic Management Journal22(10): 953–968.
17.
BrutonGDAhlstromDOblojK (2008) Entrepreneurship in emerging economies: Where are we today and where should the research go in the future?Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice32(1): 1–14.
18.
BrutonGDLauCM (2008) Asian management research: Status today and future outlook. Journal of Management Studies45(3): 636–659.
19.
BurgelmanRA (1983) A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm. Administrative Science Quarterly28(2): 223–244.
20.
BurgersJHJansenJJPVan Den BoschFAJ. (2009) Structural differentiation and corporate venturing: The moderating role of formal and informal integration mechanisms. Journal of Business Venturing24(3): 206–220.
21.
CarpenterMAGoldenBR (1997) Perceived managerial discretion: A study of cause and effect. Strategic Management Journal18(3): 187–206.
22.
CefisEMarsiliO (2006) Survivor: The role of innovation in firms’ survival. Research Policy35(5): 626–641.
23.
ChrismanJJBauerschmidtAHoferCW (1998) The determinants of new venture performance: An extended model. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice23(1): 5–29.
24.
CollinsJDUhlenbruckKRodriguezP (2009) Why firms engage in corruption: A top management perspective. Journal of Business Ethics87: 89–108.
CoshAFuXHughesA (2012) Organisation structure and innovation performance in different environments. Small Business Economics39(2): 301–317.
27.
CovielloNEJonesMV (2004) Methodological issues in international entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing19(4): 458–508.
28.
CovinJG (1991) Entrepreneurial versus conservative firms: A comparison of strategies and performance. Journal of Management Studies28(5): 439–462.
29.
CovinJGSlevinD (1989) Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal10(1): 75–87.
30.
CovinJGSlevinDP (1991) A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice16(1): 7–25.
31.
CovinJGGreenKMSlevinDP (2006) Strategic process effects on the entrepreneurial orientation–sales growth rate relationship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice30(1): 57–81.
32.
DamanpourF (1991) Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal34: 555–590.
33.
DamanpourFSchneiderM (2006) Phases of the adoption of innovation in organizations: Effects of environment, organization and top managers. British Journal of Management17(3): 215–236.
34.
DessGGLumpkinGTCovinJG (1997) Entrepreneurial strategy making and firm performance: Tests of contingency and configurational models. Strategic Management Journal18: 677–695.
35.
DuttaSNarasimhanORajivS (2005) Conceptualizing and measuring capabilities: Methodology and empirical application. Strategic Management Journal26(3): 277–285.
36.
EisenhardtKMSchoonhovenCB (1990) Organizational growth: Linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among U.S. semiconductor ventures, 1978–1988. Administrative Science Quarterly35: 504–529.
37.
FinkelsteinSBoydBK (1998) How much does the CEO matter? The role of managerial discretion in the setting of CEO compensation. Academy of Management Journal41(2): 179–199.
38.
FinkelsteinSHambrickDC (1990) Top management team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly35: 484–503.
39.
FinkelsteinSHambrickDCCannellaAAJr (2009) Strategic Leadership: Theory and Research on Executives, Top Management Teams and Boards. New York: Oxford University Press.
40.
GalunicDCRodanS (1998) Resource recombinations in the firm: Knowledge structures and the potential for Schumpeterian. Strategic Management Journal19(12): 1193–1201.
41.
GatignonHXuerebJ (1997) Strategic orientation of the firm and new product performance. Journal of Marketing Research34(1): 77–90.
42.
GeroskiPMachinSReenenJV (1993) The profitability of innovating firms. The RAND Journal of Economics24(2): 198–211.
43.
GnyawaliDFogelD (1994) Environments for entrepreneurship development: Key dimensions and research implications. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice18(4): 43–63.
44.
HadjimanolisA (1999) Barriers to innovation for SMEs in a small less developed country (Cyprus). Technovation19: 561–570.
45.
HambrickDCFinkelsteinS (1987) Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views of organizations. In: CummingsLLStawBM (eds) Research in Organizational Behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp.369–406.
46.
HambrickDCMasonPA (1984) Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review9(2): 193–206.
47.
HambrickDCHumphreySEGuptaA (2015) Structural interdependence within top management teams: A key moderator of upper echelons predictions. Strategic Management Journal36(3): 449–461.
48.
HaynieJMShepherdDAMcMullenJS (2009) An opportunity for me? The role of resources in opportunity evaluation decisions. Journal of Management Studies46(3): 337–361.
49.
HittMAHo-UkLYucelE (2002) The importance of social capital to the management of multinational enterprises: Relational networks among Asian and Western firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Management19(2–3): 253–372.
50.
HobsbawmEJ (1969) Industry and Empire from 1750 to the Present Day. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
51.
HoferCWSandbergWR (1987) Improving new venture performance: Some guidelines for success. American Journal of Small Business12(1): 11–25.
52.
HowellJMHigginsCA (1990) Champions of technological innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly35(2): 317–341.
53.
HuangXSoutarGNBrownA (2002) New product development processes in small and medium-sized enterprises: Some Australian evidence. Journal of Small Business Management40(1): 27–42.
54.
JoardarAWuS (2011) Examining the dual forces of individual entrepreneurial orientation and liability of foreignness on international entrepreneurs. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences28(3): 328–340.
55.
JonesAPJohnsonLAButlerMC. (1983) Apples and oranges: An empirical comparison of commonly used indices of inter-rater agreement. Academy of Management Journal26: 507–519.
KirkmanBLawK (2005) International management research in AMJ: Our past, present, and future. Academy of Management Journal48(3): 377–386.
58.
KirznerIM (1979) Perception, Opportunity, and Profit. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
59.
KostovaT (1997) Country institutional profiles: Concept and measurement. In: Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings the Academy of Management, pp.180–184.
60.
KruegerN (1993) The impact of prior entrepreneurial exposure on perceptions of new venture feasibility and desirability. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice18(1): 5–21.
61.
LechnerCGudmundssonSV (2014) Entrepreneurial orientation, firm strategy and small firm performance. International Small Business Journal32(1): 36–60.
62.
LeibleinMJ (2007) Environment, organization, and innovation: How entrepreneurial decisions affect innovative success. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal1: 141–144.
63.
LeiponenAHelfatCE (2010) Innovation objectives, knowledge sources, and the benefits of breadth. Strategic Management Journal31(2): 224–236.
64.
LesterRHCertoSTDaltonCM. (2006) Initial public offering investor valuations: An examination of top management team prestige and environmental uncertainty. Journal of Small Business Management44(1): 1–26.
65.
LevinthalDAMarchJG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal14: 95–112.
66.
LiHAtuahene-GimaK (2001) Product innovation strategy and performance of new technology ventures in China. Academy of Management Journal44(6): 1123–1134.
67.
LinXGermainR (2003) Organizational structure, context, customer orientation, and performance: Lessons from Chinese state-owned enterprises. Strategic Management Journal24(11): 1131–1151.
LovelaceKShapiroDLWeingartLR (2001) Maximizing cross-functional new product teams’ innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. Academy of Management Journal44(4): 779–793.
70.
LøwendahlB (2005) Strategic Management of Professional Service Firms. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.
71.
LumpkinGDessG (1996) Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review21(1): 135–172.
72.
LumpkinGDessG (2001) Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycles. Journal of Business Venturing16(5): 429–451.
73.
McAdamRMoffettSHazlettSA. (2010) Developing a model of innovation implementation for UK SMEs: A path analysis and explanatory case analysis. International Small Business Journal28(3): 195–215.
74.
McDougallPPRobinsonRBDeNisiAS (1992) Modeling new venture performance: An analysis of new venture strategy, industry structure, and venture origin. Journal of Business Venturing7(4): 267–289.
75.
McEvilySEisenhardtKPrescottJ (2004) The global acquisition, leverage, and protection of technological competencies. Strategic Management Journal25(8–9): 713–722.
76.
MaesJSelsL (2014) SMEs’ radical product innovation: The role of internally and externally oriented knowledge capabilities. Journal of Small Business Management52(1): 141–163.
77.
MeziasSJGlynnMA (1993) The three faces of corporate renewal: Institution, revolution, and evolution. Strategic Management Journal14: 77–101.
78.
MillerD (1983) The correlates of entrepreneurship in the three types of firms. Management Science29(7): 770–791.
79.
MillerDFriesenPH (1982) Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: Two models of strategic momentum. Strategic Management Journal3(1): 1–25.
80.
MorrisMHKuratkoDFCovinJG (2008) Corporate Entrepreneurship and Innovation: Entrepreneurial Development within Organizations. Mason, OH: Thomson/South-Western.
81.
MudambiRTreichelMZ (2005) Cash crisis in newly public Internet-based firms: An empirical analysis. Journal of Business Venturing20(4): 543–571.
82.
NahapietJGhoshalS (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review23(2): 242–266.
83.
O’CassASokP (2014) The role of intellectual resources, product innovation capability, reputational resources and marketing capability combinations in firm growth. International Small Business Journal32(8): 996–1018.
84.
OzgenEBaronRA (2007) Social sources of information in opportunity recognition: Effects of mentors, industry networks and professional forums. Journal of Business Venturing22(2): 174–192.
85.
PelledLHEisenhardtKMXinKR (1999) Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly44(1): 1–28.
86.
PettigrewAWoodmanRCameronK (2001) Studying organizational change and development: Challenges for future research. Academy of Management Journal44(4): 697–713.
87.
PriemRLLyonDWDessGG (1999) Inherent limitations of demographic proxies in top management team heterogeneity research. Journal of Management25(6): 935–953.
88.
RandolphWADessGG (1984) The congruence perspective of organization design: A conceptual model and multivariate research approach. Academy of Management Review9(1): 114–127.
89.
SalavouHLioukasS (2003) Radical product innovations in SMEs: The dominance of entrepreneurial orientation. Creativity and Innovation Management12(2): 94–108.
90.
SandbergWRHoferCW (1987) Improving new venture performance: The role of strategy, industry structure, and the entrepreneur. Journal of Business Venturing2(1): 5–29.
91.
SchumpeterJA (1934) The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
92.
ShaneS (2003) A General Theory of Entrepreneurship: The Individual-Opportunity Nexus. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
93.
ShaneSVenkataramanS (2000) The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review25(1): 217–226.
94.
ShaperoA (1984) The entrepreneurial event. In: KentCA (eds) Environment for Entrepreneurship. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath, pp.21–40.
95.
SheehanM (2014) Human resource management and performance: Evidence from small and medium-sized firms. International Small Business Journal32(5): 545–570.
96.
ShortJCKetchenDJJrShookCL. (2010) The concept of ‘opportunity’ in entrepreneurship research: Past accomplishments and future challenges. Journal of Management36(1): 40–65.
97.
SiegelRSiegelEMacMillanIC (1993) Characteristics distinguishing high-growth ventures. Journal of Business Venturing8(2): 169–180.
98.
SirmonDGHittMAIrelandRD (2007) Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. Academy of Management Review32(1): 273–292.
99.
StinchcombeAL (1965) Social structure and organizations. In: MarchJG (ed.) Handbook of Organizations. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally, pp.153–193.
100.
TanJ (2007) Phase transitions and emergence of entrepreneurship: The transformation of Chinese SOEs over time. Journal of Business Venturing22(1): 77–96.
101.
TanJJLitschertRJ (1994) Environment-strategy relationship and its performance implications: An empirical analysis of the Chinese electronics industry. Strategic Management Journal15(1): 1–20.
102.
TangJ (2008) Environmental munificence for entrepreneurs: Entrepreneurial alertness and commitment. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior14(3): 128–151.
103.
TangJTangZMarinoLDZhangYLiQ (2008). Exploring an inverted u-shape relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and performance in Chinese ventures. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice32(1): 219–239.
104.
ThaiMChongL (2008) Born-global: The case of four Vietnamese SMEs. Journal of International Entrepreneurship6(2): 72–100.
105.
ThompsonB (2002) What future quantitative social science research could look like. Educational Researcher31(3): 24–31.
106.
TjosvoldDLawKSSunH (2006) Effectiveness of Chinese teams: The role of conflict types and conflict management approaches. Management and Organization Review2(2): 231–252.
UhlenbruckKRodriguezPDohJ. (2006) The impact of corruption on entry strategy: Evidence from telecommunication projects in emerging economies. Organization Science17(3): 402–414.
109.
Van de VenAH (1986) Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science32: 590–607.
110.
WeaverKMDicksonPHGibsonB. (2002) Being uncertain: The relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and environmental uncertainty. Journal of Enterprising Culture10(2): 87–105.
111.
WhittakerDHFathBPFiedlerA (2016) Assembling capabilities for innovation: Evidence from New Zealand SMEs. International Small Business Journal34(1): 123–143.
112.
WiersemaMFBantelKA (1992) Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Academy of Management Journal35(1): 91–121.
113.
WiersemaMFBantelKA (1993) Top management team turnover as an adaptation mechanism – The role of the environment. Strategic Management Journal14(7): 485–504.
114.
WiklundJShepherdD (2005) Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: A configurational approach. Journal of Business Venturing20(1): 71–91.
115.
WithersMCDrnevichPLMarinoL (2011) Doing more with less: The disordinal implications of firm age for leveraging capabilities for innovation activity. Journal of Small Business Management49(4): 515–536.
116.
WolffJAPettTL (2006) Small-firm performance: Modeling the role of product and process improvements. Journal of Small Business Management44(2): 268–284.
117.
World Competitiveness Yearbook (2012) Lausanne: IMD International.
118.
YadavMSPrabhuJCChandyRK (2007) Managing the future: CEO attention and innovation outcomes. Journal of Marketing71(4): 84–101.
119.
ZhuYWittmannXPengM (2012) Institution-based barriers to innovation in SMEs in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management29(4): 1131–1142.
120.
ZottC (2003) Dynamic capabilities and the emergence of intra-industry differential firm performance: Insights from a simulation study. Strategic Management Journal24(2): 97–125.
