In the face of escalating climate pressures and accelerating digital transformation, construction small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in emerging economies confront the dual challenge of advancing sustainability while maintaining competitiveness. This study investigates how financial resources, green product innovation, artificial intelligence (AI) adoption and institutional support interact to shape sustainable competitive advantage (SCA) in Pakistan’s construction sector. Guided by an integrated framework, the resource-based view and natural resource-based view explain the role of resources and environmental capabilities; Dynamic Capabilities Theory (DCT) captures adaptive innovation processes; Socio-Technical Systems theory frames the human–technology interface in AI adoption; and Institutional Theory situates these dynamics within policy and regulatory contexts. Using survey data from 228 construction SMEs and analysing results through partial least squares structural equation modelling, the study finds that green product innovation fully mediates the relationship between financial resources and SCA. AI adoption, particularly in project design and logistics, strengthens this pathway, with greater effects in technology-mature SMEs. Institutional support significantly enhances the resource-to-innovation link, with regulatory clarity proving more influential than financial incentives alone. The findings highlight that sustainable advantage arises not from isolated capabilities but from their coordinated activation through innovation, targeted digital adoption and supportive institutional environments. This research offers a context-specific, theoretically integrated model and practical guidance for SME leaders and policymakers seeking to accelerate sustainability transitions in construction.
AbdelfattahF., SalahM., DahleezK., DarwazehR., & Al HalbusiH. (2024). The future of competitive advantage in Oman: Integrating green product innovation, AI, and intellectual capital in business strategies. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 8(2), 154–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2024.02.001
2.
AbdelfattahF., SalahM., DahleezK., DarwazehR., & Al HalbusiH. (2025). Public policy and sustainability: How green core competence, government trust, and policy satisfaction influence green R&D investments in the private sector. Sustainable Futures, 9, 100461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100461
3.
AbdelwahedN. A. A., SoomroF. A., BanoS., AldoghanM. A., ElrayahM., & SoomroB. A. (2025). Enabling sustainable futures: Examining organizational dynamics and technology platforms in digital transformation to achieve firm sustainability. International Journal of Innovation Science, 17(4), 1023–1049. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-05-2024-0117
4.
AbdissaG., AyalewA., DunayA., & Bálint IllésC. (2022). Determinants of sustainable growth of SMEs in developing countries: The case of Ethiopia. Economies, 10(8), 189. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10080189
5.
AbidN., DowlingM., CeciF., & AftabJ. (2023). Does resource bricolage foster SMEs’ competitive advantage and financial performance? A resource-based perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(8), 5833–5853. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3451
6.
AbidS. K., Al-WathinaniA. M., & GoniewiczK. (2025). Strategies for crisis and risk management in sustainable construction: Communication and green culture in Pakistan. Environmental Research Communications, 7(3), 035012. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/adbba2
7.
AboelmagedM., & HashemG. (2019). Absorptive capacity and green innovation adoption in SMEs: The mediating effects of sustainable organisational capabilities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 220, 853–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.024
8.
AcemogluD., & RestrepoP. (2022). Tasks, automation, and the rise in US wage inequality. Econometrica, 90(5), 1973–2016. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA19815
9.
AdebowaleO. J., & AgumbaJ. N. (2023). A meta-analysis of factors affecting labour productivity of construction SMEs in developing countries. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 21(5), 1441–1460. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-05-2021-0277
10.
AgbajorF. D., & MewomoM. C. (2024). Green building research in South Africa: A scoping review and future roadmaps. Energy and Built Environment, 5(2), 316–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbenv.2022.11.001
11.
AgrawalR., AgrawalS., SamadhiyaA., KumarA., LuthraS., & JainV. (2024). Adoption of green finance and green innovation for achieving circularity: An exploratory review and future directions. Geoscience Frontiers, 15(4), 101669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101669
12.
AlamM. C., SetiawanB., ToibaH., MaulidahS., & RahmanM. S. (2025). Supply chain management practices of SMEs in developing countries: Bibliometric and systematic reviews. Agricultural Economics, 71(2), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.17221/290/2024-AGRICECON
13.
AlfariziM., NgatindriatunN., & FirmansyahY. W. (2024). Green nexus womenpreneurs: Harnessing internal-external capabilities for sustainable MSMEs fashion. Research Journal of Textile and Apparel, 29(4), 957–978. https://doi.org/10.1108/RJTA-05-2024-0067
14.
AliW., WenJ., HussainH., KhanN. A., YounasM. W., & JamilI. (2021). Does green intellectual capital matter for green innovation adoption? Evidence from the manufacturing SMEs of Pakistan. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22(5), 868–888. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-06-2020-0204
15.
AlwakidW. N., & DahriN. A. (2025). Harnessing AI capabilities and green entrepreneurial orientation for sustainable SME performance using SEM analysis approach. Technology in Society, 83, 103007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103007
16.
AlzaghalQ. K., SalahO. H., & AyyashM. M. (2024). Leveraging artificial intelligence for SMEs’ sustainable competitive advantage: The moderating role of managers’ digital literacy. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 102(21), 7731–7748.
17.
AndersénJ. (2021). A relational natural-resource-based view on product innovation: The influence of green product innovation and green suppliers on differentiation advantage in small manufacturing firms. Technovation, 104, 102254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102254
18.
AppiahL. O., EssumanD., ForsonC. A., BosoN., & AnnanJ. (2025). Green process innovation and financial performance in small and medium-sized enterprises in a developing country: Role of resource orchestration. Journal of Business Research, 189, 115210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115210
19.
ArmstrongJ. S., & OvertonT. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224377701400320
20.
AslamR., RehmanS., & NasirA. (2023). Investigating the relationship between government support and SMEs’ sustainability through financial and green lenses. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 38(11), 2379–2389. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-05-2022-0191
21.
AzharA., RehmanN., AlyasT., & MakkiB. I. (2025). AI adoption for green performance: An understanding of moderated mediation model. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 129, 104191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2025.104191
22.
BalzanoM., MarziG., & TurzoT. (2025). SMEs and institutional theory: Major inroads and opportunities ahead. Management Decision, 63(13), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2023-0734
23.
BarneyJ. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
24.
BefortN., AyoubM., & MattM. (2025). The role of dynamic capabilities in the development of eco-innovations. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 53, 101031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2025.101031
ButlerT., & MurphyC. (2005). Integrating dynamic capability and commitment theory for research on IT capabilities and resources. In Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2005), Regensburg, Germany.
27.
ButlerT., & MurphyC. (2009). Researching IT capabilities and resources: An integrative theory of dynamic capabilities and institutional commitments. InKhosrow-PourM.(Ed.), Handbook of research on contemporary theoretical models in information systems (15 pp.). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-659-4.ch020
28.
ButtP., KamranM., AfzalF., & MukitM. M. H. (2021). Being agile in market orientation to enhance firm performance: The role of green supply chain management. International Journal of Agile Systems and Management, 14(4), 517–542. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJASM.2021.120237
29.
CarayannisE. G., DumitrescuR., FalkowskiT., PapamichailG., & ZotaN.-R. (2025). Enhancing SME resilience through artificial intelligence and strategic foresight: A framework for sustainable competitiveness. Technology in Society, 81, 102835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102835
30.
ChenH., LiL., & ChenY. (2020). Explore success factors that impact artificial intelligence adoption on telecom industry in China. Journal of Management Analytics, 8(1), 36–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/23270012.2020.1852895
31.
ChiouT.-Y., ChanH., LetticeF., & ChungS.-H. (2011). The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 47(6), 822–836.
32.
DahriA. S., SaraihU. N. B., RehmanJ., SalamehA. A., & NamisangoF. (2025). Deriving green competitive advantage in the SMEs: A sustainable firm performance perspective. Sustainable Futures, 9, 100618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100618
33.
DangC. N., WipulanusatW., NuaklongP., & WitchayangkoonB. (2025). Assessing green innovation practices in construction firms: A developing-country perspective. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 32(5), 3104–3131. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-08-2023-0788
34.
DauthW., FindeisenS., SüdekumJ., & WoessnerN. (2021). The adjustment of labor markets to robots. Journal of the European Economic Association, 19(6), 3104–3153. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvab012
35.
DickJ., & PayneD. (2005). Regional sectoral support: A review of the construction industry, SMEs and regional innovation strategies across Europe. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 9(2), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/1648715X.2005.9637527
36.
DixitS., JugranS., NizamuddinM., NaiduG. M., & RajuY. K. (2025). Lean construction and building information modeling (BIM) in SMEs: An in-depth study with comparative analysis. AIP Conference Proceedings, 3157(1), 140020. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0271001
37.
DurraniN., RaziqA., MahmoodT., & KhanM. R. (2024). Barriers to adaptation of environmental sustainability in SMEs: A qualitative study. PLoS One, 19(5), e0298580. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298580
38.
EbekozienA., AigbavboaC., SamsurijanM. S., AmadiG. C., & DuruO. D. S. (2023). Moderating effect of Nigerian government policy support on the relationship between project management framework and emerging construction contractors’ sustainability. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 41(6), 269–289. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-01-2023-0007
39.
EtheringtonT. R. (2021). Mahalanobis distances for ecological niche modelling and outlier detection: Implications of sample size, error, and bias for selecting and parameterising a multivariate location and scatter method. PeerJ, 9, e11436. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11436
40.
FarmaneshP., Solati DehkordiN., VehbiA., & ChavaliK. (2025). Artificial intelligence and green innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises and competitive-advantage drive toward achieving Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability, 17(5), 2162. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17052162
41.
FarrukhA., & SajjadA. (2024). Drivers for and barriers to circular economy transition in the textile industry: A developing economy perspective. Sustainable Development, 32(6), 7309–7329. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3088
42.
FengF., LiJ., ZhangF., & SunJ. (2024). The impact of artificial intelligence on green innovation efficiency: Moderating role of dynamic capability. International Review of Economics & Finance, 96, 103649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.103649
43.
GallottaB., BaranovaP., & PatersonF. (2023). Pro-environmental enterprise support: Developing a framework to unlock the potential of SMEs in sustainability transitions. Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit, 38(6), 582–605. https://doi.org/10.1177/02690942241237977
44.
GuoY. (2023). External knowledge acquisition and green innovation in Chinese firms: Unveiling the impact of green dynamic capabilities. SAGE Open, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231185093
45.
HaN. M., NguyenP. A., LuanN. V., & TamN. M. (2024). Impact of green innovation on environmental performance and financial performance. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26, 17083–17104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03328-4
46.
HairJ. F., RisherJ. J., SarstedtM., & RingleC. M. (2021). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24.
47.
HaqF. U., & SukiN. M. (2024). Mediating role of AI adoption between the relationship of leadership vision, change management capability, competitive pressure, trading partnerships, and SME performance. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 18(4), 872–892. https://hdl.handle.net/10419/308827
48.
HartO. (1995). Corporate governance: Some theory and implications. The Economic Journal, 105(430), 678–698. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2235027
49.
HartS. L., & DowellG. (2011a). A natural-resource-based view of the firm: Fifteen years after. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1464–1479. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310390219
50.
HartS. L., & DowellG. (2011b). Invited editorial: A natural-resource-based view of the firm: Fifteen years after. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1464–1479. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310390219
51.
HenselerJ., & SchuberthF. (2020). Using confirmatory composite analysis to assess emergent variables in business research. Journal of Business Research, 120, 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.07.026
52.
HenselerJ., RingleC. M., & SarstedtM. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
53.
HernandezA. A., CaballeroA. R., AlbinaE. M., BalmesI. L., & NiguidulaJ. D. (2023). Artificial intelligence for sustainability: Evidence from select small and medium enterprises in the Philippines. In Proceedings of the 2023 8th International Conference on Business and Industrial Research (ICBIR) (pp. 818–823). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBIR57571.2023.10147579
54.
HossainM. A., AgnihotriR., RushanM. R. I., RahmanM. S., & SumiS. F. (2022). Marketing analytics capability, artificial intelligence adoption, and firms’ competitive advantage: Evidence from the manufacturing industry. Industrial Marketing Management, 106, 240–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.08.017
55.
HuangY.-C., & ChenC.-T. (2023). Institutional pressure, firm’s green resources and green product innovation: Evidence from Taiwan’s electrical and electronics sector. European Journal of Innovation Management, 26(3), 636–664. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-04-2021-0217
56.
HuongD. T., NhungN. H., & AnhN. H. (2025). Stakeholder pressure and green innovation: Pathways to competitive advantage in Vietnamese manufacturing SMEs. International Journal of Innovation and Research in Social Sciences, 8(1), 1549–1561. https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v8i1.4700
57.
HussainM., YangS., MaqsoodU. S., & ZahidR. M. A. (2024). Tapping into the green potential: The power of artificial intelligence adoption in corporate green innovation drive. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(5), 4375–4396. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3710
58.
HwangB. N., JitanugoonS., & PunthaP. (2025). AI integration in service delivery: Enhancing business and sustainability performance amid challenges. Journal of Services Marketing, 40(2), 263–281. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-10-2024-0511
59.
IlgP. (2019). How to foster green product innovation in an inert sector. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 4(2), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2017.12.009
60.
IqbalM., MaJ., AhmadN., HussainK., UsmaniM. S., & AhmadM. (2021). Sustainable construction through energy management practices in developing economies: An analysis of barriers in the construction sector. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(26), 34793–34823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12917-7
61.
IsmailI. J. (2022). Entrepreneurs’ dynamic capabilities, financial resource development and financial performance among small and medium enterprises in emerging markets: Experience from Tanzania. InMugovaS., AkandeJ. O., & OlarewajuO. M.(Eds), Corporate finance and financial development (pp. 17–35). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04980-4_2
62.
JohnI. B., AdekunleS. A., & AigbavboaC. O. (2023). Adoption of circular economy by construction industry SMEs: Organisational growth transition study. Sustainability, 15(4), 3441. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043441
63.
KellardN. M., KontonikasA., LamlaM. J., MaianiS., & WoodG. (2023). Institutional settings and financing green innovation. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 89, 101853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2023.101853
64.
KeroC. A., & BogaleA. T. (2023). A systematic review of resource-based view and dynamic capabilities of firms and future research avenues. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 18(10), 3137–3154. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.181016
65.
KhanR. U., ArifH., SaharN. E., AliA., & AbbasiM. A. (2022). The role of financial resources in SMEs’ financial and environmental performance: The mediating role of green innovation. Green Finance, 4(1), 36–53. https://doi.org/10.3934/GF.2022002
66.
KhanS. A. R., AhmadZ., SheikhA. A., & YuZ. (2024). Green technology adoption paving the way toward sustainable performance in circular economy: A case of Pakistani small and medium enterprises. International Journal of Innovation Science, 16(5), 801–822. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-10-2022-0199
67.
KockN. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101
68.
KumarJ., RaniV., RaniM., & RaniG. (2025). Linking green intellectual capital and firm performance through green innovation and environmental performance in small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 26(3), 670–690. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-10-2024-0345
69.
LabaranY. H., MusaA. A., MathurV. S., & SainiG. (2024). Exploring the carbon footprint of Nigeria’s construction sector: A quantitative insight. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 28, 3537–3562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-05111-5
70.
LeT. T., & IkramM. (2022). Do sustainability innovation and firm competitiveness help improve firm performance? Evidence from the SME sector in Vietnam. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 29, 588–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.11.008
71.
LiH. (2022). Green innovation, green dynamic capability, and enterprise performance: Evidence from heavy polluting manufacturing enterprises in China. Complexity, 2022, 7755964. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7755964
72.
LiaoJ., KickulJ. R., & MaH. (2009). Organizational dynamic capability and innovation: An empirical examination of internet firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(3), 263–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2009.00271.x
73.
LoosemoreM., & ForsytheP. (2019). Sustainable construction technology adoption. InTamV. W. Y. & LeK. N.(Eds), Sustainable construction technologies (pp. 299–316). Butterworth-Heinemann. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811749-1.00009-2
74.
LuhY.-P., ChuC.-H., & PanC.-C. (2010). Data management of green product development with generic modularized product architecture. Computers in Industry, 61(3), 223–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2009.09.002
75.
MaL., AliA., ShahzadM., & KhanA. (2025). Factors of green innovation: The role of dynamic capabilities and knowledge sharing through green creativity. Kybernetes, 54(1), 54–70. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-06-2022-0911
76.
MadyK., BattourM., ElhabonyI., ElsheikhT., RashidM. M., & SulubM. A. (2023). Integration of eco-innovation drivers and their role in sustainable competitive advantage in SMEs: A proposed conceptual model. InHamdanA., HarrafA., BuallayA., AroraP., & AlsabatinH.(Eds), From Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0: Mapping the transitions (pp. 313–322). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28314-7_26
77.
MahboobA., RathnasingheA., EkanayakeA., & TennakoonP. (2024). Evaluating BIM’s role in transforming cash flow forecasting among construction SMEs: A Saudi Arabian narrative. Sustainability, 16(11), 4532. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114532
78.
MansourH., AminudinE., MansourT., AbidinN. I. A. B., & LouE. (2022). Resource-based view in construction project management research: A meta-analysis. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1067, 012057. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1067/1/012057
79.
McDougallN., WagnerB., & MacBrydeJ. (2016). Exploring dynamic natural-resource-based capabilities for sustainable agri-food chains. InSetchiR., LiuY., TheobaldP., HowlettR. J., & HowlettR. J.(Eds), Sustainable design and manufacturing 2016. Smart innovation, systems and technologies (Vol. 52, pp. 455–465). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32098-4_39
80.
McEwanM., ShiY., & Van ToornC. (2021). Business Analytics (BA)-powered transformation for environmental and social sustainability in organisations: A dynamic capabilities perspective. In ACIS 2021 Proceedings (Paper 88). Association for Information Systems. https://aisel.aisnet.org/acis2021/88
81.
MerA., & VirdiA. S. (2024). Decoding the challenges and skill gaps in small- and medium-sized enterprises in emerging economies: A review and research agenda. InThakeA. M., SoodK., ÖzenE., & GrimaS.(Eds), Contemporary challenges in social science management: Skills gaps and shortages in the labour market (Contemporary Studies in Economic and Financial Analysis, Vol. 112, pp. 115–134). Emerald Group Publishing.
82.
MubeenA., NisarQ. A., PatwaryA. K., RehmanS., & AhmadW. (2024). Greening your business: Nexus of green dynamic capabilities, green innovation and sustainable performance. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26, 22747–22773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03574-6
83.
NguyenX. H., NguyenK. L., NguyenT. V. H., NguyenT. T. H., & TaV. L. (2023). The impact of green organizational capabilities on competitive advantage of construction enterprises in Vietnam: The mediating role of green innovation. Sustainability, 15(16), 12371. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612371
84.
OsticD., SaeedU. F., TwumA. K., & ChibsahR. (2025). Transition toward a sustainable circular economy: A perspective on green innovation and governance policy using a novel MMQR approach. Sustainable Development, 33(4), 5719–5741. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3410
85.
PatrícioV., CostaR. L., CarvalhoH., PereiraL., DiasÁ., & GonçalvesR. (2022). Investigation model of sensing, seizing and reconfiguring capabilities. International Journal of Value Chain Management, 13(4), 395–421. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJVCM.2022.127846
86.
PodsakoffP. M., MacKenzieS. B., LeeJ.-Y., & PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
87.
PutriA. N. A., HermawanP., MirzantiI. R., MeadowsM., & SadraeiR. (2025). Exploring green growth in SMEs: Global trends, challenges, and future directions. Foresight and STI Governance, 19(1), 16–31. https://doi.org/10.17323/fstig.2025.23708
88.
QiuL., JieX., WangY., & ZhaoM. (2020). Green product innovation, green dynamic capability, and competitive advantage: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(1), 146–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1780
89.
RajM., & SeamansR. (2019). Primer on artificial intelligence and robotics. Journal of Organization Design, 8(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41469-019-0050-0
90.
RasdiM. R., & BakiN. U. (2025). Navigating the AI landscape in SMEs: Overcoming internal challenges and external obstacles for effective integration. PLoS One, 20(5), e0323249. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323249
91.
ReniatiR., & FaisalF. (2024). Development of green SMEs: Integrating green entrepreneurship and innovation for environmental sustainability. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1419(1), 012055. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1419/1/012055
92.
RibeiroO., & Steiner NetoP. (2021). Sustainable competitive advantage and green innovation: A review of joint scale propositions. Gestão & Produção, 28(3), e5669. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9649-2021v28e5669
93.
RingleC. M., SarstedtM., SinkovicsN., & SinkovicsR. R. (2023). A perspective on using partial least squares structural equation modelling in data articles. Data in Brief, 48, Article 109074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2023.109074
94.
RizwanA., NaveedS., MustafaF., HanifM. S., KhurshidA., & KhanT. Z. A. (2024). Prospects for institutionalization of crowdfunding: A developing country perspective. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, 13(4), 566–598. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEPP-09-2023-0086
95.
Rojas-CabezasG., Mora-EsquivelR., MárquezN., Chacón-EspejoS., Nocetti-NúñezV., & LeivaJ. C. (2024). The influence of institutional context in the relationship between green management, perceived barriers to sustainability and innovation performance in SMEs. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 37(4), 654–679. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARLA-07-2024-0158
96.
SahaK., MalesiosC., ChowdhuryS., & DeyP. K. (2023). Impact of institutional voids on the performance of small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Strategy and Management, 16(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-07-2021-0155
97.
SakaA. B., ChanD. W. M., & SiuF. M. F. (2020). Drivers of sustainable adoption of building information modelling (BIM) in the Nigerian construction SMEs. Sustainability, 12(14), 5867. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145867
98.
SalehzadehR., JavaniM., & EsmailianH. (2024). Leveraging green artificial intelligence for green competitive advantage: Testing a mediated moderation model. The TQM Journal, 38(2), 356–382. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-04-2024-0152
99.
SarvariH., AsaadsamaniP., OlawumiT. O., ChanD. W. M., RashidiA., & BeerM. (2024). Perceived barriers to implementing building information modeling in Iranian small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): A Delphi survey of construction experts. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 20(3), 673–693. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2024.2329687
100.
ScottW. R. (2001). Institutions and organizations (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
101.
ShahbazM. H., AhmadS., & MalikS. A. (2025). Green intellectual capital heading towards green innovation and environmental performance: Assessing the moderating effect of green creativity in SMEs of Pakistan. International Journal of Innovation Science, 17(3), 683–704. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-08-2023-0169
102.
ShuC., ZhaoM., LiuJ., & LindsayW. (2020). Why firms go green and how green impacts financial and innovation performance differently: An awareness-motivation-capability perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 37(3), 795–821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-018-9630-8
103.
SiddiquiF. H., AbdekhodaeeA., & ThaheemM. J. (2025). Transforming the construction industry of Pakistan to Industry 4.0: What do we have and need?InSutrisnaM., JelodarM. B., PotangaroaR., AtapattuC., & SamarasingheD. A. S.(Eds), Creating capacity and capability: Embracing advanced technologies and innovations for a sustainable future in building education and practice (Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, Vol. 562). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-1181-2_15
104.
SohuJ. M., HongyunT., JunejoI., AkhtarS., EjazF., DunayA., & HossainM. B. (2024). Driving sustainable competitiveness: Unveiling the nexus of green intellectual capital and environmental regulations on greening SME performance. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 12, 1348994. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1348994
105.
SolaroN., BarbieroA., ManziG., & FerrariP. A. (2018). A simulation comparison of imputation methods for quantitative data in the presence of multiple data patterns. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 88(18), 3588–3619. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2018.1530773
106.
SoomroR. B., Al-RahmiW. M., DahriN. A., AlmuqrenL., Al-MogrenA. S., & AldaijyA. (2025). A SEM–ANN analysis to examine impact of artificial intelligence technologies on sustainable performance of SMEs. Scientific Reports, 15, 5438. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-86464-3
107.
SrivastavaA., DeyD. K., & BalajiM. S. (2020). Drivers of brand credibility in consumer evaluation of global brands and domestic brands in an emerging market context. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 29(7), 849–861. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-03-2018-1782
108.
SulaimanM. A. B. A. (2025). Green product innovation as a mediator between green market orientation and sustainable performance of SMEs. Sustainability, 17(4), 1628. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17041628
109.
SuryantiniN. P. S., MoeljadiA., AisjahS., & RatnawatiK. (2023). The sustainable competitive advantage of SMEs towards intellectual capital: The role of technology adoption and strategic flexibility. Intellectual Economics, 17(1), 30–56. https://doi.org/10.13165/IE-23-17-1-02
ThompsonD., ChilesheN., CogginsJ., & StevelsA. (2025). COVID-19 challenges on construction-related SMEs and response strategies: A scoping review. International Journal of Construction Management, 25(14), 1649–1659. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2025.2460349
112.
UllahS., AhmadN., KhanF. U., & BadulescuD. (2021). Mapping interactions among green innovations barriers in manufacturing industry using hybrid methodology: Insights from a developing country. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), 1929. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041929
113.
UllahR., AhmadH., RehmanF. U., & FawadA. (2023). Green innovation and sustainable development goals in SMEs: The moderating role of government incentives. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 39(4), 830–846. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEAS-07-2021-0122
114.
UllahR., AhmadH., RizwanS., & KhattakM. S. (2024). Financial resource and green business strategy: The mediating role of competitive business strategy. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 14(2), 410–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2022.2031850
115.
UllahS., BarykinS., JianfuM., SaifuddinT., KhanM. A., & KazaryanR. (2023). Green practices in mega development projects of China–Pakistan Economic Corridor. Sustainability, 15(7), 5870. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075870
116.
Ur RahmanA., & AmjadF. (2024). The role of green finance, infrastructure, and technological capabilities in enhancing competitiveness resilience of Pakistani manufacturing firms: A sequential mediation–moderation analysis. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 26, 4289–4304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-024-02837-8
117.
van DijkJ. A. G. M. (2020). The digital divide. Polity Press.
118.
WanQ., QianJ., BaghirliA., & AghayevA. (2022). Green finance and carbon reduction: Implications for green recovery. Economic Analysis and Policy, 76, 901–913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2022.09.022
119.
WangS., & ZhangH. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence and internationalization green innovation: Roles of supply chain innovations and AI regulation for SMEs. Technology in Society, 82, 102898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102898
120.
WangC., ShanW., ZhangQ., & TangF. (2025). Driving sustainable business success: The interplay of corporate social responsibility, green innovation and institutional support. Baltic Journal of Management, 20(2), 210–229. https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-10-2024-0607
121.
WaqarA., HoudaM., KhanA. M., & ElmaziG. (2024). Sustainable leadership practices in construction: Building a resilient society. Environmental Challenges, 14, 100841.
122.
WuS., ChengP., & YangF. (2024). Study on the impact of digital transformation on green competitive advantage: The role of green innovation and government regulation. PLoS One, 19(8), e0306603. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306603
123.
YangJ., ZhangF., JiangX., & SunW. (2015). Strategic flexibility, green management, and firm competitiveness in an emerging economy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 101, 347–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.07.014
124.
YiY. J., LeongL. W., FeranitaF., RathakrishnanT., & ChiehC. C. W. (2024). Leveraging green human resource management and green innovation into sustainable competitive advantage for small and medium enterprises. InYuslizaM. Y. & RenwickD.(Eds), Green human resource management. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7104-6_16
125.
YuanB., & CaoX. (2022). Do corporate social responsibility practices contribute to green innovation? The mediating role of green dynamic capability. Technology in Society, 68, 101868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101868
126.
ZhangZ., LiP., HuangL., & KangY. (2024). The impact of artificial intelligence on green transformation of manufacturing enterprises: Evidence from China. Economic Change and Restructuring, 57(4), 146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-024-09656-3
127.
ZhaoS., ZhangR., & FanQ. (2024). The impact of heterogeneous environmental regulation on firms’ green innovation: Empirical evidence from China’s manufacturing industry. International Journal of Innovation Management, 28(3/4). https://doi.org/10.1142/S136391962450018X
128.
ZhongK., & SongL. (2025). Artificial intelligence adoption and corporate green innovation capability. Finance Research Letters, 72, 106480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.106480
129.
ZhouM. (2024). Visualization technology of building structure simulation analysis based on computer vision. In Proceedings of the 2024 Asia-Pacific Conference on Software Engineering, Social Network Analysis and Intelligent Computing (SSAIC) (pp. 211–214). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SSAIC61213.2024.00046
130.
ZhuL., SindakisS., & ShowkatS. (2024). Analyzing the influence of knowledge-based strategies of Chinese multinational contractors on the performance of the construction industry in Southern African countries. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15, 8968–9000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01440-4
