This article draws on quantitative survey evidence to explore the role of dynamic capabilities in a post-disaster environment, that of Christchurch in New Zealand after the 2010 and 2011 series of major earthquakes. We develop a model to examine the relationship between dynamic capabilities, disaster-related changes to the firm’s resource base and its performance. The hypotheses are tested using a sample of 545 small firms that have been affected by the earthquakes. Results highlight the importance of a firm’s proactive posture and capability to integrate resources in recognising new opportunities in an environment characterised by high volatility and increased uncertainty. These findings offer important theoretical and practical implications.
AldrichHEAusterE (1986) Even dwarfs started small: Liabilities of size and age and their strategic implications. Research in Organizational Behavior8: 165–198.
2.
AmbrosiniVBowmanC (2009) What are dynamic capabilities and are they a useful construct in strategic management?International Journal of Management Reviews11(1): 29–49.
3.
AmbrosiniVBowmanCCollierN (2009) Dynamic capabilities: An exploration of how firms renew their resource base. British Journal of Management20(1): 9–24.
4.
AndersonARJackSL (2002) The articulation of social capital in entrepreneurial networks: A glue or a lubricant?Entrepreneurship and Regional Development14(3): 193–210.
5.
AndersonJGerbingD (1988) Structural equation modelling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin103(3): 411–423.
6.
Aragon-CorreaJASharmaS (2003) A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. Academy of Management Review28(1): 71–88.
7.
ArmstrongJSOvertonTS (1977) Estimating non-response bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research14: 396–402.
BamiatziVCKirchmaierT (2014) Strategies for superior performance under adverse conditions: A focus on small and medium-sized high-growth firms. International Small Business Journal32(3): 259–284.
10.
BarneyJB (1986) Organizational culture: Can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage?Academy of Management Review11(3): 656–665.
11.
BarneyJB (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management17(1): 99–120.
12.
BarronDNWestEHannanMT (1994) A time to grow and a time to die: Growth and mortality of credit unions in New York City 1914–1990. American Journal of Sociology100: 381–421.
13.
BartholomewSSmithAD (2006) Improving survey response rates from chief executive officers in small firms: The importance of social networks. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice30(1): 83–96.
14.
BowmanCAmbrosiniV (2003) How the resource-based and the dynamic capability views of the firm inform corporate-level strategy. British Journal of Management14: 289–303.
CameronAMasseyC (1999) Small and Medium Sized Enterprises: A New Zealand Perspective. Auckland, New Zealand: Pearson Education.
17.
Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority (CERA) (2012) Earthquake Recovery Update – April 2012. Christchurch, New Zealand: CERA.
18.
Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority (CERA) (2013) Canterbury Economic Indicators – August 2013. Christchurch, New Zealand: CERA.
19.
ChangSEFalit-BaiamonteA (2002) Disaster vulnerability of businesses in the 2001Nisqually Earthquake. Environmental Hazards4: 59–71.
20.
CochraneH (2004) Economic loss: Myth and measurement. Disaster Prevention and Management13(4): 290–296.
21.
CollisDJ (1994) Research note: How valuable are organizational capabilities?Strategic Management Journal15(1): 143–152.
22.
CowlingMLiuWLedgerA. (2015) What really happens to small and medium-sized enterprises in a global economic recession? UK evidence on sales and job dynamics. International Small Business Journal33(5): 488–513.
23.
DahlesHSusilowatiTP (2015) Business resilience in times of growth and crisis. Annals of Tourism Research51: 34–50.
24.
DarrochJ (2005) Knowledge management, innovation and firm performance. Journal of Knowledge Management9(3): 101–115.
25.
DeitchECoreyC (2011) Predicting long-term business recovery four years after Hurricane Katrina. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management19(3): 169–181.
26.
DillmanDA (2007) Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
27.
DolfmanMLWasserSFBergmanB (2007) The effects of Hurricane Katrina on the New Orleans Economy. Monthly Labor Review130(3): 3–18.
28.
EisenhardtKMMartinJA (2000) Dynamic capabilities: What are they?Strategic Management Journal21(10–11): 1105–1121.
29.
ErikssonT (2014) Processes, antecedents and outcomes of dynamic capabilities. Scandinavian Journal of Management30(1): 65–82.
30.
FornellCLarckerFD (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research18(1): 39–50.
31.
FraccastoroKA (2008) Entrepreneurial recovery from natural disaster: A consideration of influential factors. Journal of Business and Economics Research6(12): 1–8.
32.
HarmanHH (1976) Modern Factor Analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
33.
HelfatCEMartinJA (2015) Dynamic managerial capabilities review and assessment of managerial impact on strategic change. Journal of Management41(5): 1281–1312.
HelfatCEPeterafMA (2015) Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal36(6): 831–850.
HerbaneB (2010) Small business research: Time for a crisis-based view. International Small Business Journal28(1): 43–64.
38.
HerbaneB (2013) Exploring crisis management in UK small- and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management21(2): 82–95.
39.
Inland Revenue (2012) Exploring the Impact of Adverse Events on SME Tax Compliance Behaviour: A Longitudinal Study. Wellington, New Zealand: Colmar Brunton.
40.
KockN (2011) WarpPLS 2.0 User Manual. Laredo, TX: ScriptWarp Systems.
41.
KoryakOMoleKFLockettA. (2015) Entrepreneurial leadership, capabilities and firm growth. International Small Business Journal33(1): 89–105.
42.
KrollCALandisJDShenQ. (1990) The economic impacts of the Loma Prieta earthquake: A focus on small business. Berkeley Planning Journal5(1): 39–58.
43.
LarsonMDFowlerK (2009) Anticipation is in the eye of the beholder: Top-level managers see things differently when it comes to crises preparedness. Journal of Business and Management15(2): 129–142.
44.
LeeAVVargoJSevilleE (2013) Developing a tool to measure and compare organizations’ resilience. Natural Hazards Review14(1): 29–41.
McGrathRG (2013) The End of Competitive Advantage: How to Keep Your Strategy Moving as Fast as Your Business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
47.
McKelvieADavidsonP (2009) From resource base to dynamic capabilities: An investigation of new firms. British Journal of Management20: 63–80.
48.
McManusSSevilleEVargoJ. (2008) Facilitated process for improving organizational resilience. Natural Hazards Review9(2): 81–90.
49.
MakkonenHPohjolaMOlkkonenR. (2014) Dynamic capabilities and firm performance in a financial crisis. Journal of Business Research67(1): 2707–2719.
50.
Ministry of Economic Development (2011) SMEs in New Zealand: Structure and Dynamics 2011. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Economic Development.
51.
MintzbergH (1978) Patterns in strategy formation. Management Science24(9): 934–948.
52.
NahapietJGhoshalS (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review23(2): 242–266.
53.
NeefAPanyakotkaewAElstnerP (2015) Post-Tsunami recovery and rehabilitation of small enterprises in Phang Nga Province, Southern Thailand. In: ShawR (ed.) Recovery from the Indian Ocean Tsunami: A Ten-Year Journey. New York: Springer, pp.487–503.
54.
NelsonRRWinterSG (2002) Evolutionary theorizing in economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives16(2): 23–46.
55.
ÖzsomerACalantoneRJDi BonettoA (1997) What makes firms more innovative? A look at organizational and environmental factors. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing12(6): 400–416.
56.
ParkerCFSternEKPagliaE. (2009) Preventable catastrophe? The hurricane Katrina disaster revisited. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management17(4): 206–220.
57.
ParkerMSteenkampD (2012) The economic impact of the Canterbury earthquakes. Reserve Bank of New Zealand Bulletin75(3): 13–25.
58.
PorterME (1985) Competitive Advantage. New York: The Free Press.
59.
PotterSHBeckerJSJohnstonDM. (2015) An overview of the impacts of the 2010–2011 Canterbury earthquakes. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. Epub ahead of print 11March. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.01.014.
60.
Ranger-MooreJ (1997) Bigger may be better, but is older wiser? Organizational age and size in the New York life insurance industry. American Sociological Review62: 903–920.
61.
SchumpeterJ (1994) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: Routledge.
62.
SmallboneDDeakinsDBattistiM. (2012) Small business responses to a major economic downturn: Empirical perspectives from New Zealand and the United Kingdom. International Small Business Journal30(7): 754–777.
63.
Statistics New Zealand (2013) Christchurch’s Population Loss Slows. Wellington, New Zealand: Statistics New Zealand.
64.
StephensonAVargoJSevilleE (2010) Measuring and comparing organisational resilience in Auckland. Australian Journal of Emergency Management25(2): 27.
65.
SternE (1997) Crisis and learning: A conceptual balance sheet. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management5(2): 69–86.
66.
StoreyDJ (1994) Understanding the Small Business Sector. London: Thomson.
67.
Sullivan-TaylorBBranickiL (2011) Creating resilient SMEs: Why one size might not fit all. International Journal of Production Research49(18): 5565–5579.
ThornhillSAmitR (2003) Learning about failure: Bankruptcy, firm age, and the resource-based view. Organization Science14(5): 497–509.
74.
TierneyKJ (1997) Business impacts of the Northridge earthquake. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management5(2): 87–97.
75.
TierneyKJ (2007) Businesses and disasters: Vulnerability, impacts, and recovery. In: RodríguezHQuarantelliELDynesRR (eds) Handbook of Disaster Research. New York: Springer, pp.275–296.
76.
VargoJSevilleE (2011) Crisis strategic planning for SMEs: Finding the silver lining. International Journal of Production Research49(18): 5619–5635.
77.
VoudourisILioukasSIatrelliM. (2012) Effectiveness of technology investment: Impact of internal technological capability, networking and investment’s strategic importance. Technovation32(6): 400–414.
78.
WangCHanY (2011) Linking properties of knowledge with innovation performance: The moderate role of absorptive capacity. Journal of Knowledge Management15(5): 802–819.
79.
WebbGRTierneyKJDahlhamerJM (2000) Businesses and disasters: Empirical patterns and unanswered questions. Natural Hazards Review1(2): 83–90.
80.
WebbGRTierneyKJDahlhamerJM (2002) Predicting long-term business recovery from disaster: A comparison of the Loma Prieta earthquake and Hurricane Andrew. Global Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards4(2): 45–58.
81.
WeickKESutcliffeKM (2011) Managing the Unexpected: Resilient Performance in an Age of Uncertainty. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
82.
WilliamsNVorleyT (2014) Economic resilience and entrepreneurship: Lessons from the Sheffield City region. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development26(3–4): 257–281.
ZahraSAGeorgeG (2002) Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization and extension. Academy of Management Review27(2): 185–203.
85.
ZahraSASapienzaHDavidsonP (2006) Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: A review, model and research agenda. Journal of Management Studies43(4): 917–955.
86.
ZhangYLindellMKPraterCS (2009) Vulnerability of community businesses to environmental disasters. Disasters33(1): 38–57.
87.
ZolloMWinterSG (2002) Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science13(3): 339–351.
