This article examines the impact of corruption on entrepreneurship in transition economies. Utilising in-depth interviews with entrepreneurs in Sofia, Bulgaria, and Bucharest, Romania, the article finds that despite economic reforms, corruption occupies a pervasive space which impacts entrepreneurial strategy. In both countries, entrepreneurs operate within a ‘devil’s circle’, in which they are unable to operate entirely independent of corruption. This is caused by a combination of weak formal institutions and a weak entrepreneurial culture leading to entrepreneurs either seeking to avoid the attention of government officials by hiding some or all of their activities with little prospect of sanction, limiting their growth aspirations, or engaging in corruption as a way of furthering their activities. The research contributes to understandings of corruption and its impact on entrepreneur strategies to avoid, minimise or benefit from it.
AhlstromDBrutonGD (2002) An institutional perspective on the role of culture in shaping strategic actions by technology-focused entrepreneurial firms in China. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice26(4): 53–70.
AidisRMickiewiczT (2006) Entrepreneurs, expectations and business expansion: Lessons from Lithuania. Europe-Asia Studies58(6): 855–880.
4.
AidisREstrinSMickiewiczT (2008) Institutions and entrepreneurship development in Russia: A comparative perspective. Journal of Business Venturing23: 656–672.
5.
AidtTS (2009) Corruption, institutions and economic development. Oxford Review of Economic Policy25: 271–291.
6.
AndvigJMoeneKO (1990) How corruptionmaycorrupt. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization3: 63–76.
7.
AndvigJC (1991) The economics of corruption: A survey. Studi Economici46: 57–94.
8.
AnokhinSAcarW (2012) Corruption and the ethical context of country-level entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing4: 391–408.
9.
AnokhinSSchulzeWS (2009) Entrepreneurship, innovation and corruption. Journal of Business Venturing24: 465–476.
10.
AroraAGambardellaA (2006) From Underdogs to Tigers: The Rise and Growth of the Software Industry in Brazil, China, India, Ireland, and Israel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
BatemanM (2000a) Business support centres in the transition economies - progress with the wrong model. Small Enterprise Development11(2): 50–59.
12.
BatemanM (2000b) Neo-liberalism, SME development and the role of business support centres in the transition economies of Central and Eastern Europe. Small Business Economics14(4): 275–98.
13.
BatjargalB (2010) The effects of network’s structural holes: Polycentric institutions, product portfolio, and new venture creation in China and Russia. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal4: 146–163.
14.
BaumolWJ (1990) Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive and destructive. Journal of Political Economy98: 892–921.
15.
BeckerGS (1968) Crime and punishment: An economic approach. The Journal of Political Economy76: 169–217.
16.
BrymanA (2012) Social Research Methods (4th edn). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
BudakJRajhE (2014) Corruption as an obstacle for doing business in the Western Balkans: A business sector perspective. International Small Business Journal32(2): 140–157.
BusenitzLWGomezCSpencerJW (2000) Country institutional profiles: Unlocking entrepreneurial phenomena. Academy of Management Journal43: 994–1003.
20.
De SotoH (2002) The Other Path: The Economic Answer to Terrorism. New York: Basic Books.
21.
DjankovSMurrelP (2002) Enterprise restructuring in transition: A quantitative survey. Journal of Economic Literature40(3): 739–792.
22.
DoernR (2009) Investigating barriers to SME growth and development in transition environments: A critique and suggestions for developing the methodology. International Small Business Journal27: 275–305.
23.
DoernRGossD (2013) The role of negative emotions in the social processes of entrepreneurship: Power rituals and shame-related appeasement behaviors. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. Epub ahead of print 22March. DOI: 10.1111/etap.12026.
24.
DreherAGassebnerM (2013) Greasing the wheels? The impact of regulations and corruption on firm entry. Public Choice155: 413–432.
25.
EstrinSMickiewiczT (2011) Entrepreneurship in transition economies: The role of institutions and generational change. In: MinnitiM (ed.) The Dynamics of Entrepreneurship. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.181–208.
26.
EstrinSBasuSSvejnarJ (2005) Employment determination in enterprises under communism and in transition: Evidence from Central Europe. Industrial and Labor Relations Review58: 353–369.
27.
EstrinSKorostelevaJMickiewiczT (2013) Which institutions encourage entrepreneurial growth aspirations?Journal of Business Venturing28: 564–580.
28.
EstrinSMeyerKEBytchkovaM (2006) Entrepreneurship in transition economies. In: CassonMYeungBBasuA. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Entrepreneurship. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.693–725.
29.
European Commission (2010) Examining the Links between Organised Crime and Corruption. Brussels: European Commission.
30.
European Commission (2015) Flash Barometer 406: The Co-Operation and Verification Mechanism for Bulgaria and Romania. Second Wave. Brussels: European Commission.
31.
GranovetterM (2004) The social construction of corruption. In:The norms, beliefs and institutions of 21st century capitalism: Celebrating the 100th anniversary of Max Weber’s the protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism, 8–9October, Cornell University. Available at: http://fsi-media.stanford.edu/evnts/4117/The_Social_Construction_of_Corruption_Oct04.pdf
32.
GriffithsMDKickulJCarsrudAL (2009) Government bureaucracy, transactional impediments, and entrepreneurial intentions. International Small Business Journal27(5): 626–645.
33.
HashiIKrasniqiB (2011) Entrepreneurship and SME growth: Evidence from advanced and laggard transition economies. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research17: 456–487.
34.
HauserCHogenackerJ (2014) Do firms proactively take measures to prevent corruption in their international operations?European Management Review11(3–4): 223–237.
35.
HellmanJSchankermanM (2000) Intervention, corruption and capture. The nexus between enterprises and the state. Economics of Transition8(3): 545–576.
36.
HellmanJJonesGKaufmannD (2002) Far from home: Do transnationals import better governance in the transition economies? Working Paper, August. Washington, DC: World Bank.
37.
HellmanJSJonesGKaufmannD (2003) Seize the state, seize the day: State capture and influence in transition economies. Journal of Comparative Economics31: 751–773.
38.
HellmanJSJonesGKaufmanD. (2000) Measuring governance, corruption and state capture: How firms and bureaucrats shape the business environment in transition economies. World Bank Policy Research Working Papers 2312, April. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
39.
HerbaneB (2010) Small business research: Time for a crisis-based view. International Small Business Journal28(1): 43–64.
40.
HugginsRStrakovaL (2012) Knowledge-based economic development in emerging regions: Policy issues and implications in the Balkan Peninsula. Regional Studies46: 961–975.
41.
JackSLAndersonAR (2002) The effects of embeddedness on the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing17: 467–487.
42.
JeppersonRL (1991) Chapter 6: Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism. In: PowellWDimaggioP (eds) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp.143–163.
43.
KirznerIM (1973) Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
44.
LambsdorffJG (2006) Consequences and causes of corruption – What do we know from a cross-section of countries? In: Rose-AckermanS (ed.) International Handbook on the Economics of Corruption. London: Edward Elgar, pp.3–52.
45.
ManevIMManolovaTSHarkinsJA. (2014) Are pure or hybrid strategies right for new ventures in transition economies?International Small Business Journal. Epub ahead of print 6October. DOI: 10.1177/0266242614550322.
46.
ManolovaTSYanA (2002) Institutional constraints and strategic responses of new and small firms in a transforming economy: The case of Bulgaria. International Small Business Journal20: 163–184.
47.
ManolovaTSEunniRVGyoshevBS (2008) Institutional environments for entrepreneurship: Evidence from emerging economies in Eastern Europe. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice32: 203–218.
48.
ManolovaTSManevIMGyoshevBS (2013) Friends with money? Owner’s financial network and new venture internationalization in a transition economy. International Small Business Journal. Epub ahead of print 8April. DOI: 10.1177/0266242613482482.
49.
MegginsonWLNetterJM (2001) From state to market: A survey of empirical studies on privatization. Journal of Economic Literature39(2): 321–389.
50.
OvaskaTSobelR (2005) Entrepreneurship in post-socialist economies. Journal of Private EnterpriseXXI: 8–28.
51.
PufferSMMcCarthyDJBoisotM (2010) Entrepreneurship in Russia and China: The impact of formal institutional voids. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice34: 441–467.
52.
RoundJWilliamsCC (2010) Coping with the social costs of ‘transition’: Everyday life in post-Soviet Russia and Ukraine. European Urban and Regional Studies17(2): 183–196.
53.
SautetF (2013) Local and systemic entrepreneurship: Solving the puzzle of entrepreneurship and economic development. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice37(2): 387–402.
54.
SchumpeterJA (1934) The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
55.
ShleiferA (1998) State versus private ownership. Journal of Economic Perspectives12(4): 133–151.
56.
ShleiferAVishnyR (1994) Politicians and firms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics109(4): 995–1025.
57.
ShleiferAVishnyRW (1993) Corruption. The Quarterly Journal of Economics108: 599–617.
SmallboneDWelterF (2001) The distinctiveness of entrepreneurship in transition economies. Small Business Economics16: 249–262.
60.
SmallboneDWelterFAteljevicJ (2014) Entrepreneurship in emerging market economies: Contemporary issues and perspectives. International Small Business Journal32(2): 113–116.
61.
SpicerA (2009) The normalization of corrupt business practices: Implications for Integrative Social Contracts Theory (ISCT). Journal of Business Ethics88: 833–840.
62.
StenholmPAcsZJWuebkerR (2013) Exploring country-level institutional arrangements on the rate and type of entrepreneurial activity. Journal of Business Venturing28(1): 176–193.
63.
SteyaertCBouwenR (1997) Telling stories of entrepreneurship – towards a contextual epistemology for entrepreneurial studies. In: DonckelsRMiettenA (eds.) Entrepreneurship and SME Research: On Its Way to the Next Millennium. London: Ashgate Publishing, pp. 47–62.
64.
TiessenJH (1997) Individualism, collectivism and entrepreneurship: A framework for international comparative research. Journal of Business Venturing12: 367–384.
65.
TonoyanVStrohmeyerRHabibM. (2010) Corruption and entrepreneurship: How formal and informal institutions shape small firm behavior in transition and mature market economies. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice34: 803–831.
66.
Transparency International (2012) Money, Politics and Power: Corruption Risks in Europe. Berlin: Transparency International.
67.
Transparency International (2014) Corruption Perceptions Index 2013. Berlin: Transparency International.
68.
TreismanD (2000) The causes of corruption: A cross-national study. Journal of Public Economics76: 399–457.
69.
WelterF (2011) Contextualising entrepreneurship: Conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice35: 165–184.
70.
WelterFSmallboneD (2011) Institutional perspectives on entrepreneurial behaviour in challenging environments. Journal of Small Business Management49: 107–125.
71.
WilliamsNVorleyT (2014) Institutional asymmetry: How formal and informal institutions affect entrepreneurship in Bulgaria. International Small Business Journal. Epub ahead of print 11June. DOI: 10.1177/0266242614534280.
72.
WilliamsNVorleyT (2015) The impact of institutional change on entrepreneurship in a crisis-hit economy: The case of Greece. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development27(1–2): 28–49.
73.
WilsonNOchotnickyPKacerM (2014) Creation and destruction in transition economies: The SME sector in Slovakia. International Small Business Journal. Epub ahead of print 9December. DOI: 10.1177/0266242614558892.
74.
World Bank (2015) Doing Business 2015. Washington, DC: World Bank.
75.
World Economic Forum (WEF) (2014) The Global Competitiveness Report 2014–2015. Geneva: WEF.
76.
XhenetiMSmallboneDWelterF (2012) EU enlargement effects on cross-border informal entrepreneurial activities. European Urban and Regional Studies20(3): 314–328.
77.
ZahraSAWelterF (2008) Entrepreneurship education for central, eastern and southeastern Europe. In: PotterJ (ed.) Entrepreneurship and Higher Education. Paris: OECD Publishing, pp.165–192.
