This article explores the trust relations between managing directors (MDs) and non-executive directors (NEDs) within small- and medium-sized enterprises. Complex mechanisms are revealed within repeated cycles of social interaction that result in the NED changing from an effective agent acting rationally on behalf of the company to an ineffective agent acting subjectively on behalf of the MD. Inherent tensions exist during this change of role and trust relations that threaten the self-esteem of both parties. NEDs being part of a peer network, serving for a fixed term and succession planning are proposed to counter these detrimental effects.
BoxerRJ (2010) Differing Perceptions of Non-Executive Directors’ Roles in Privately-Owned United Kingdom Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Brighton.
10.
BoxerRJBerryAJPerrenL (2012) Differing perceptions of non-executive directors’ roles in UK SMEs: Governance conundrum or cultural anomaly?Accounting Forum (Special Issue: Restructuring, reform and regulation: Transformation possibilities after the crisis) 36(1): 38–50.
11.
BoxerRJPerrenLBerryAJ (2013) SME Top Management Team and Non-Executive Director Cohesion: Precarious equilibrium through information asymmetry. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development20(1): 55–79.
12.
BrodbeckFCKerschreiterRMojzischA. (2007) Group decision making under conditions of distributed knowledge: The information asymmetries model. Academy of Management Review32(2): 459–479.
ChellEPittawayL (1998) The Social Construction of Entrepreneurship. Paper presented at the ISBA National Small Firms Conference, Durham University, 18–20 November.
17.
DailyCMDaltonDR (1993) Boards of directors leadership and structure: Control and performance implications. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice17(3): 65–81.
18.
DanermarkBEkstromMJakobsenL. (2002) Explaining Society: Critical Realism in the Social Sciences. London: Routledge.
19.
DyerLMRossCA (2007) Advising the small business client. International Small Business Journal25(2): 130–151.
20.
EastonG (2010) Critical realism in case study research. Industrial Marketing Management39(1): 118–128.
FiskeSTTaylorSE (2010) Social Cognition: From Brains to Culture (International edn). New York: McGraw-Hill.
23.
GabrielssonJ (2007) Boards of directors and entrepreneurial posture in medium-sized companies. International Small Business Journal25(5): 511–537.
24.
GiddensA (1986) The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
25.
GillJJohnsonP (1997) Research Methods for Managers (2nd edn). London: Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd.
26.
GladwellM (2000) The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
27.
GodfreyPCHallCWL (1995) The problem of unobservables in strategic management research. Strategic Management Journal16: 519–533.
28.
GoelSKarriR (2006) Entrepreneurs, effectual logic, and over-trust. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice30(4): 477–493.
29.
GortonM (2000) Overcoming the structure–agency divide in small business research. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research6(5): 276–292.
30.
GossD (2005) Schumpeter’s legacy? Interaction and emotions in the sociology of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice29(2): 205–218.
31.
GrantPPerrenL (2002) Small business and entrepreneurial research: Meta-theories, paradigms and prejudices. International Small Business Journal20(2): 185–211.
32.
GreenburyR (1995) Directors’ Remuneration: Report of a Study Group Chaired by Sir Richard Greenbury. London: Gee.
33.
HampelR (1998) Committee on Corporate Governance: Final Report. London: Gee.
34.
HiggsD (2003) Review of the Role and Effectiveness of Non-Executive Directors. London: Department of Trade & Industry.
35.
HuseM (2000) Boards of directors in SMEs: A review and research agenda. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development12: 271–290.
36.
HuseM (2005) Accountability and creating accountability: A framework for exploring behavioural perspectives of corporate governance. British Journal of Management16(Special edn): S65–S79.
KimPHDirksKTCooperCD. (2006) When more blame is better than less: The implications of internal vs. external attributions for the repair of trust after a competence- vs. integrity-based trust violation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process99(1): 49–65.
McAllisterDJ (1997) The second face of trust: Reflections on the dark side of interpersonal trust in organizations. Research on Negotiation in Organizations6: 87–111.
41.
McNultyTRobertsJStilesP (2002) Creating accountability within the board: The work of the effective non-executive director. A report for review of the role and effectiveness of non-executive directors conducted by Mr Derek Higgs, Leeds University Business School; Judge Institute of Management, University of Cambridge.
42.
MaslowAH (1970) Motivation and Personality (3rd edn). New York: Harper Collins.
43.
MayerRCDavisJHSchoormanFD (1995) An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review20(3): 709–734.
44.
MilehamP (1996) Boardroom leadership: Do small and medium companies need non-executive directors?Journal of General Management22(1): 14–27.
45.
MoleKFMoleM (2010) Entrepreneurship as the structuration of individual and opportunity: A response using a critical realist perspective. Comment on Sarason, Dean and Dillard. Journal of Business Venturing25(2): 230–237.
46.
MölleringG (2001) The nature of trust: From Georg Simmel to a theory of expectation. Interpretation and Suspension Sociology35(2): 403–420.
NooteboomB (2002) Trust: Forms, Foundations, Functions Failures and Figures. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
50.
ParsonsT (1951) The Social System. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.
51.
PettigrewAMcNultyT (1998) Sources and uses of power in the boardroom. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology7(2): 197–214.
52.
PhelpsRAdamsRBessantJ (2007) Life cycles of growing organizations: A review with implications for knowledge and learning. International Journal of Management Reviews9(1): 1–130.
53.
RamsdenMBennettRJ (2005) The benefits of external support to SMEs: ‘Hard’ versus ‘soft’ outcomes and satisfaction levels. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development12(2): 227–243.
54.
RobertsJMcNultyTStilesP (2005) Beyond agency conceptions of the work of the non-executive director: Creating accountability in the boardroom. British Journal of Management16(Special edn): S5–S26.
55.
SalesA (2012) A reappraisal of agency-structure theories to understand social change. In: SalesA (ed.) Sociology Today: Social Transformations in a Globalizing World, chap 2. London: Sage.
56.
SarasonYDeanTDillardJF (2006) Entrepreneurship as the nexus of individual and opportunity: A structuration view. Journal of Business Venturing21(3): 286–305.
57.
SarasonYDeanTDillardJF (2010) How can we know the dancer from the dance?Journal of Business Venturing25(2): 238–243.
58.
SayerA (2000) Realism and Social Science. London: Sage.
59.
ScheinEH (1985) Organisational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
60.
TurnbullN (1999) Internal Control: Guidance for Directors on the Combined Code. London: Financial Reporting Council.
61.
WalkerD (2009) A Review of Corporate Governance in UK Banks and Other Financial Industry Entities: Final Recommendations. London: HM Treasury. Available at: www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/d/walker_review_261109.pdf
62.
WeinerB (1985) An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review92(4): 548–573.
63.
WeinerB (2000) Intrapersonal and interpersonal theories of motivation from an attributional perspective. Educational Psychology Review12(1): 1–14.
64.
WelterF (2012) All you need is trust? Critical review of the trust and entrepreneurship literatureInternational Small Business Journal30(3): 193–212.
65.
YinRK (1994) Case Study Research: Design and Methods (2nd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
66.
ZahraSANeubaumDOHuseM (2000) Entrepreneurship in medium-size companies: Exploring the effects of ownership and governance systems. Journal of Management26(5): 947–976.
67.
ZahraSAWrightMAbdelgawadSG (2014) Contextualization and the advancement of entrepreneurship research. International Small Business Journal32(5): 479–500.
