This research note analyses the investment harvest expectations of a large Canadian angel group. These angels co-finance large high-tech deals; on average, greater than CAN$1.2m. Canadian low listing requirements and the junior stock market make the initial public offering a possible exit mode. However, angels prefer a trade sale, consistent with the proposition that large acquirers can fully and rapidly exploit innovations and offer better exit values. Securities regulation impedes initial public offering exit; reluctance to pursue this exit strategy however, increases with angel experience. The classical funding escalator, including venture capitalists, no longer appears to be a dominant model.
AmatucciFSohlJ (2006) Business angels: Investment processes, outcomes and current trends. In: ZacharkisASpinelliS (eds) Entrepreneurship: The Engine of Growth, Vol 2: The Process. Westport, CA: Praeger: pp.87–104.
2.
AminiSKeaseyKHudsonR (2012) The equity funding of smaller growing companies and regional stock exchanges. International Small Business Journal30(8): 832–849.
3.
BrutonGDChahineSFilatotchevI (2009) Founders, private equity investors, and underpricing in entrepreneurial IPOs. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice33(4): 909–928.
4.
CarpentierCSuretJ-M (2012) Entrepreneurial equity financing and securities regulation: An empirical analysis. International Small Business Journal30(1): 41–64.
5.
CarpentierCL’HerJ-FSuretJ-M (2010) Stock exchange markets for new ventures. Journal of Business Venturing25(4): 403–422.
6.
CollewaertV (2012) Angel investors’ and entrepreneurs’ intentions to exit their ventures: A conflict perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice36(4): 753–779.
7.
DeGennaroRP (2012) Angel investors and their investments. In: CummingD (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Entrepreneurial Finance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.392–423.
8.
FreearJSohlJ (2012) Angles on angels and venture capital. In: KotvalZWhiteS (eds) Financing Economic Development in the 21st Century (2nd edn). New York: M.E. Sharpe, pp.224–244.
9.
GaoXRitterJRZhuZ (2012) Where have all the IPOs gone? SSRN Working Paper. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1954788 (accessed 13 October 2013).
10.
GoldfarbBDHobergGKirschD, et al. (2012) Does angel participation matter? An analysis of early venture financing. R. H. Smith School Research Paper No. 06–072. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1024186 (accessed 13 October 2013).
11.
GrayN (2011) Present Business Angel Thinking on Exits. Glasgow: LINC Scotland.
12.
GregsonGMannSHarrisonR (2013) Business angel syndication and the evolution of risk capital in a small market economy: Evidence from Scotland. Managerial and Decision Economics34(2): 95–107.
13.
HarrisonRTDonGJohnstonKG. (2010) The early-stage risk capital market in Scotland since 2000: Issues of scale, characteristics and market efficiency. Venture Capital12(3): 211–239.
14.
HellmannTFThieleV (2013) Friends or foes? The interrelationship between angel and venture capital markets, working paper. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2323553 (accessed 13 October 2013).
15.
IbrahimDM (2011) Should angel-backed start-ups reject venture capital? University of Wisconsin Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1170. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1919139 (accessed 13 October 2013).
16.
IPO Task Force (2011) Rebuilding the IPO on-ramp: Putting emerging companies and the job market back on the road to growth.Report presented to U.S. Department of the Treasury. Available at: www.sec.gov/info/smallbus/acsec/rebuilding_the_ipo_on-ramp.pdf (accessed 28 November, 2013).
17.
MasonC (2011a) Investment Activity by Canadian Angel Groups. Toronto: National Angel Capital Organization.
18.
MasonC (2011b) Trends in IPO listings by SMEs in the EU. Report prepared for the City of London Corporation and The City. City of London: City of London Economic Development.
19.
MasonCMHarrisonRT (2006) After the exit: Acquisitions, entrepreneurial recycling and regional economic development. Regional Studies40(1): 55–73.
20.
MasonCMBotelhoTHarrisonRT (2013) The transformation of the business angel market: Evidence from Scotland, working paper. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2306653 (accessed 13 October 2013).
21.
MerrillSA (2009) Investor exits, innovation, and entrepreneurial firm growth: Questions for research, Committee on Investor Exit Strategies and Entrepreneurial Firm Growth. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
22.
National Angel Capital Organization (2013) Report on Angels Investing Activity in Canada in 2012. Toronto: National Angel Capital Organization.
23.
OesterleDA (2006) The high cost of IPOs depresses venture capital in the United States. Entrepreneurial Business Law Journal1(2): 369–380.
24.
PetersB (2009) Early Exits: Exit Strategies for Entrepreneurs and Angel Investors (But Maybe not Venture Capitalists)Coquitlam, BC: Meteor Bytes Data Management.
25.
PierrakisYMasonC (2008) Shifting sands: The changing nature of the early stage venture capital market in the UK, discussion paper. London: NESTA.
26.
RitterJR (2011) Equilibrium in the initial public offering market. Annual Review of Financial Economics3: 347–374.
27.
RitterJR (2013) Re-energizing the IPO market. In: BaileyMHerringR (eds) Restructuring to Speed the Economic Recovery. Washington, DC: Brookings Press.
ShaneSA (2005) Angel investing: A report prepared for the Federal Reserve Banks of Atlanta, Cleveland, Kansas City, Philadelphia and Richmond. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1142687 (accessed 13 October 2013).
30.
SohlJ (2012) The changing nature of the angel market. In: LandströmCMasonM (eds) Handbook of Research on Venture Capital, Vol 2. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp.17–41.
WiltbankRE (2009) Siding with the angels: Business angel investing – promising outcomes and effective strategies. Research report for National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts and British Business Angels Association. London: NESTA.
