The evolution of the small business and entrepreneurship field: A bibliometric investigation of articles published in the International Small Business Journal *
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online June, 2015
The evolution of the small business and entrepreneurship field: A bibliometric investigation of articles published in the International Small Business Journal *
This article analyses the evolution of the small business management and entrepreneurship fields as reflected in articles published in its premier journal, the International Small Business Journal. It investigates the evolution of the fields through bibliometric examination of all 660 articles published between 1982 and 2012. While small business management has remained the main focus of the journal, there has been a significant growth in the number of articles focusing specifically on entrepreneurship. Also identified in this analysis are the rise of theoretical studies and the relative decline of descriptive work. Parallel to a clear improvement in the rigour of the articles published, the field of small business and entrepreneurship has relied on a multidisciplinary foundation which offers a diverse and multifaceted engagement. Despite this increasing diversity, it appears that small business and entrepreneurship have unique characteristics that distinguish this field from the broader economics and or management discipline.
AlvarezSABarneyJB (2013) Epistemology, opportunities and entrepreneurship: Comments on Venkataraman et al. (2012) and Shane (2012). Academy of Management Review38(1): 154–157.
2.
AyyagariMDemirguc-KuntAMaksimovicV (2011) Small vs. young firms across the world: Contribution to employment, job creation and growth, policy research working paper 5631, Washington, DC: World Bank.
3.
BirchD (1979) The job generation process. MIT Programme on Neighbourhood and Regional Change, March. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
4.
BlackburnRStokesD (2000) Breaking down the barriers: Using focus groups to research small and medium-sized enterprises. International Small Business Journal19(1): 44–67.
5.
BouckenoogheDDe ClerkDWillemA. (2007) An assessment of validity in entrepreneurship research. Journal of Entrepreneurship16(7): 147–171.
6.
BrushCGDuhaimeIGartnerW. (2003) Doctoral education in entrepreneurship. Journal of Management29(3): 309–311.
7.
BruyatCJulienPA (2001) Defining the field of research in entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing16(2): 165–180.
8.
BusenitzLPage WestGShepherdD. (2003) Entrepreneurship research in emergence: Past trends and future directions. Journal of Management29(3): 285–308.
9.
CarlandJHoyFBoultonW. (1984) Differentiating entrepreneurs from small business owners: A conceptualization. Academy of Management Review9(2): 354–359.
10.
CorleyKGioiaD (2011) Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution?Academy of Management Review36(1): 12–32.
11.
CummingsSDaellenbachU (2009) A guide to the future of strategy? The history of long range planning. Long Range Planning42(2): 234–263.
12.
CurranJ (2006) Specificity and denaturing the small business. International Small Business Journal24(2): 205–210.
13.
CurranJBlackburnR (2001) Researching the Small Enterprise. London: Sage.
14.
D’AmboiseGMuldowneyM (1988) Management theory for small business: Attempts and requirements. Academy of Management Review13(2): 226–240.
15.
DavisSJHaltiwangerJSchuhS (1996) Small business and job creation: Dissecting the myth and reassessing the facts. SmallBusiness Economics8(4): 297–315.
16.
De BakkerFGroenewegenPDen HondF (2005) A bibliometric analysis of 30 years of research and theory on corporate social responsibility and corporate social performance. Business and Society44(3): 283–317.
17.
Drakopoulou DoddSJackSLAndersonA (2002) Scottish entrepreneurial networks in the international context. International Small Business Journal20(2): 213–219.
18.
European Commission (1993) European Observatory for SMEs: First Annual Report. Brussels: European Commission.
19.
European Commission (2005) The New SME Definition: User Guide And Model Declaration. Brussels: Enterprise and Industry Publications.
20.
GartnerWB (2001) Is there an elephant in entrepreneurship? Blind assumptions in theory development. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice25(4): 27–39.
21.
GartnerWB (2013) Creating a community of difference in entrepreneurship scholarship. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development25(1): 5–15
22.
GibbA (1996) Entrepreneurship and small business management: Can we afford to neglect them in the twenty-first century business school?British Journal of Management7(4): 309–321.
23.
GibbA (2000) SME policy, academic research and the growth of ignorance, mythical concepts, myths, assumptions, rituals and confusions. International Small Business Journal18(3): 13–35.
24.
GrantPPerrenL (2002) Small business and entrepreneurial research: Meta-theories, paradigms and prejudices. International Small Business Journal20(2): 185–211.
25.
HeaddBSaadeR (2008) Do Business Definition Decisions Distort Small Business Research Results?Washington, DC: SBA Office of Advocacy, U.S. Small Business Administration.
26.
JulienPAMarchesnayM (1998) La petite entreprise. Paris: Vuibert.
27.
KatzJA (2008) Fully mature but not fully legitimate: A different perspective on the state of entrepreneurship education. Journal of Small Business Management46(4): 550–566.
28.
LandströmHHarirchicGÅströmF (2012) Entrepreneurship: Exploring the knowledge base. Research Policy41(7): 1154–1181.
29.
LieschPHåkansonLMcGaugheyS. (2011) The evolution of the international business field: A scientometric investigation of articles published in its premier journal. Scientometrics88(1): 17–42.
30.
MartinezMAYangTAldrichHE (2011) Entrepreneurship as an evolutionary process: Research progress and challenges. Entrepreneurship Research Journal1(4): 62–78.
31.
MeredithG (1984) Redirecting management education and training resources: An Australian view. International Small Business Journal2(3): 10–18.
32.
MillerD (2007) Paradigm prison, or in praise of atheoretic research. Strategic Organisation5(2): 177–184.
33.
MillerDGreenwoodRPrakashR (2009) What happened to organisation theory?Journal of Management Inquiry18(4): 273–279.
34.
MottiarZIngleS (2007) Broadening the entrepreneurial perspective: Interpreneurship in an Irish furniture region. International Small Business Journal25(6): 667–680.
35.
MuglerJ (2005) Grundlagen der BWL der Klein- und Mittelbetriebe. Vienna: Facultas.
36.
MullenMRBudevaDGDoneyPM (2009) Research methods in the leading small business entrepreneurship journals: A critical review with recommendations for future research. Journal of Small Business Management47(3): 287–307.
37.
NagRHambrickDCChenMJ (2007) What is strategic management, really? Inductive derivation of a consensus definition of the field. Strategic Management Journal28(9): 935–955.
38.
NooteboomB (1983) Trading hours and economy of scale in retailing. International Small Business Journal1(2): 57–62.
39.
Ramos-RodríguezARRuíz-NavarroJ (2004) Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: A bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal 1980–2000. Strategic Management Journal25(10): 981–1004.
40.
RosaPJ (2013) Recent trends in leading entrepreneurship research: The challenge for European researchers. Entrepreneurship Research Journal3(1): 35–43.
41.
SarasvathySDVenkataramanS (2011) Entrepreneurship as method: Open questions for an entrepreneurial future. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice35(1): 113–135.
42.
SchaperMVoleryTWeberP. (2014) Entrepreneurship and Small Business: A Pacific Rim Perspective (4th edn). Milton: John Wiley & Sons.
43.
SchildtHZahraSSillanpääA (2006) Scholarly communities in entrepreneurship research: A co-citation analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice30(3): 399–415.
44.
ShafiqueM (2013) Thinking inside the box? Intellectual structure of the knowledge base of innovation research (1988–2008). Strategic Management Journal34(1): 62–93.
45.
ShaneS (2003) A General Theory of Entrepreneurship: The Individual-Opportunity Nexus. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
46.
ShaneS (2012) Reflections on the 2010 AMR Decade award: Delivering on the promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review37(3): 10–20.
47.
ShaneSVenkataramanS (2000) The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review25(1): 217–226.
48.
SmithAHumphreysM (2006) Evaluation of unsupervised semantic mapping of natural language with Leximancer concept mapping. Behavior Research Methods38(2): 262–279.
49.
StanworthJBlytheSGrangerB. (1989) Who becomes an entrepreneur?International Small Business Journal8(1): 11–22.
50.
StoreyD (1994) Understanding the Small Business Sector. London: Routledge.
51.
TorrèsOJulienPA (2005) Specificity and denaturing of small business. International Small Business Journal23(4): 355–375.
52.
VankataramanS (1997) The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research. In: KatzJ (ed.) Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth. Greenwich: JAI Press, pp.119–138.
53.
VerheulIRisseeuwPBartelseG (2002) Gender differences in strategy and human resource management. International Small Business Journal20(4): 443–476.
54.
Watkins-MathysLLoweS (2005) Small business and entrepreneurship research: The way through paradigm incommensurability. International Small Business Journal23(6): 657–677.
55.
WatsonTJ (1995) Entrepreneurship and professional management: A fatal distinction. International Small Business Journal13(2): 34–46.
56.
WelshJAWhiteJF (1981) A small business is not a big business. Harvard Business Review59(4): 18–32.
57.
WestheadPUcbasaranDWrightM (2009) Information search and opportunity identification: The importance of prior business experience. International Small Business Journal27(6): 659–680.
58.
WhettenDA (1989) What constitutes a theoretical contribution?Academy of Management Review14(4): 490–495.
