This article examines the failure path of newly-incorporated companies and determines the impact of founder director/board characteristics on survival. Hypotheses are tested regarding director characteristics within a discrete-time hazard model which controls for macro-economic conditions, recursive relationships and all non-insolvency exits. Regarding the estimation method, analysis of the variables’ average marginal effects is helpful in unravelling the subtleties of these effects, being used to confirm the magnitude and economic significance of the results. The study utilises a unique dataset of more than 5.8m company-year observations (near population) of newly-incorporated companies and early-stage board characteristics. Results suggest that the background, experience, networking, gender diversity and composition of new boards are important in determining the trajectory of success or failure of new firms.
AdamsRBFerreiraD (2009) Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics94(2): 291–309.
2.
AdamsRFunkP (2010) Beyond the glass ceiling: Does gender matter? Finance Working Paper Series No. 273/2010. Brussels: European Corporate Governance Institute.
3.
AdamsRBHermalinBEWeisbachMS (2010) The role of boards of directors in corporate governance: A conceptual framework and survey. Journal of Economic Literature48(1): 59–108.
4.
AltmanESabatoGWilsonN (2010) The value of non-financial information in SME risk assessment. Journal of Credit Risk6(2): 1–33.
5.
AndersonRReebDUpadhyayAZhaoW (2011) The economics of director heterogeneity. Financial Management40(1): 8–38.
6.
AudretschDBMahmoodT (1995) New firm survival: New results using a hazard function. Review of Economics and Statistics77(1): 97–103.
7.
BarberBMOdeanT (2001) ‘Boys will be boys’: Gender overconfidence and common stock investment. Quarterly Journal of Economics116: 261–292.
8.
BarneyJB (2001) Is the resource-based ‘view’ a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes. Academy of Management Review26(1): 41–56.
9.
BeckNKatzJNTuckerR (1998) Taking time seriously: Time-series cross-section analysis with a binary dependent variable. American Journal of Political Science42(4): 1260–1288.
10.
BoschmaRErikssonRLindgrenU (2009) How does labour mobility affect the performance of plants? The importance of relatedness and geographical proximity. Journal of Economic Geography9(2): 169–190.
11.
BrammerSMillingtonAPavelinS (2009) Corporate reputation and women on the board. British Journal of Management20(1): 17–29.
12.
BrunningeONordqvistMWiklundJ (2007) Corporate governance and strategic change in SMEs: The effects of ownership, board composition and top management teams. Small Business Economics29(3): 295–308.
13.
ByrnesJPMillerDCSchaferWD (1999) Gender differences in risk-taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin125(3): 367–383.
14.
CarterNMWilliamsMReynoldsPD (1997) Discontinuance among new firms in retail: The influence of initial resources, strategy and gender. Journal of Business Venturing12(2): 125–145.
15.
ChuaJHChrismanJJKellermannsF (2011) Family involvement and new venture debt financing. Journal of Business Venturing26(4): 472–488.
16.
CoadA (2013) Death is not a success. International Small Business Journal. Epub ahead of print 25February2013. DOI: 10.1177/0266242612475104
17.
CohenJ (1992) A power primer. Psychological Bulletin112(1): 155–159.
18.
CopeJ (2003) Entrepreneurial learning and critical reflection: Discontinuous events as triggers for ’higher-level’ learning. Management Learning34(4): 429–450.
19.
DavidssonPHonigB (2003) The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing18(3): 301–331.
20.
De CleynSHBraetJKlofstenM (2011) How do human and social capital contribute to the early development of academic spin-off ventures?Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research31(17), Article 3. Available at: http://digitalknowledge.babson.edu/fer/vol31/iss17/3 (accessed July 2012).
21.
DelmarFShaneS (2004) Legitimating first: Organizing activities and the survival of new ventures. Journal of Business Venturing19(3): 385–410.
22.
DelmarFShaneS (2006) Does experience matter? The effect of founding team experience on the survival and sales of newly-founded ventures. Strategic Organization4(3): 215–247.
23.
FichEMSlezakSL (2008) Can corporate governance save distressed firms from bankruptcy? An empirical analysis. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting30(2): 225–251.
24.
FichmanMLevinthalDA (1991) Honeymoons and the liability of adolescence: A new perspective on duration dependence in social and organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review16(2): 442–468.
25.
FilatotchevITomsS (2003) Corporate governance, strategy and survival in a declining industry: A study of UK cotton textiles companies, Journal of Management Studies40(4): 895–920.
26.
FiolCMLylesMA (1985) Organizational learning. Academy of Management Review10(4): 803–813.
27.
FlorinJLubatkinMSchulzeW (2003) A social capital model of high-growth ventures. Academy of Management Journal463): 374–384.
28.
GabrielssonJHuseM (2004) Context, behavior and evolution: Challenges in research on boards and governance. International Studies of Management and Organization34(2): 11–36.
29.
GabrielssonJ (2007) Boards of directors and entrepreneurial posture in medium size companies: Putting the board demography approach to a test. International Small Business Journal25(5): 511–537.
30.
GaskillLVan AukenHManningR (1993) A factor analytic study of the perceived causes of small business failure. Journal of Small Business Management31(4): 18–31.
31.
GimenoJFoltaTBCooperACWooCY (1997) Survival of the fittest? Entrepreneurial human capital and the persistence of underperforming firms. Administrative Science Quarterly42(4): 750–783.
32.
HeaddB (2003) Redefining business success: Distinguishing between closure and failure. Small Business Economics21(1): 51–61.
33.
HermalinBEWeisbachMS (2003) Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution: a survey of the economic literature, Economic Policy Review No. 1. New York: Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
34.
HjulA (2009) Balancing the board. Edge-Institute of Leadership and Management (August): 37–41.
35.
HudsonJ (1986) An analysis of company liquidations. Applied Economics18(2): 219–235.
36.
HudsonJ (1987) The age, regional and industrial structure of company liquidations. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting14(2): 199–213.
37.
HuseM (1998) Researching the dynamics of board–stakeholder relations. Long Range Planning31(2): 218–226.
38.
HuseM (2000) Boards of directors in SMEs: A review and research agenda. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development12(4): 271–290.
39.
HuseMNielsenSHagenIM (2009) Boards of directors, codetermination and women directors: Societal and business case CSR illustrations from Norway, Journal of Business Ethics89(4): 581–597.
40.
JehnKANorthcraftGBNealeMA (1999) Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly44(4): 741–763.
41.
JensenMC (1993) The modern industrial revolution, exit and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance48(3): 831–880.
42.
JohansonJVahlneJ (2009) The Uppsala Internationalization Process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies40: 1411–1431.
43.
KallebergALLeichtKT (1991) Gender and organizational performance: Determinants of small business survival and success. Academy of Management Journal34(1): 131–161.
44.
KeplerEShaneS (2007) Are male and female entrepreneurs that different?. Small Business Administration Office of Advocacy Research Summary No. 309, September. Available at: http://purl.access.gpo.gov/GPO/LPS96776 (accessed November 2012).
45.
LoveJHRoperSHewitt-DundasN (2010) Service innovation, embeddedness and business performance: Evidence from Northern Ireland. Regional Studies44(8): 983–1004.
46.
LussierRN (1995) A nonfinancial business success versus failure prediction model for young firms. Journal of Small Business Management33(1): 8–20.
47.
McGrathRG (1999) Falling forward: Real options reasoning and entrepreneurial failure. Academy of Management Review24(1): 13–30.
48.
MeulemanMWrightM (2010) Cross-border private equity syndication: Cultural barriers, legal context and learning. Journal of Business Venturing26(1): 35–48.
49.
NamCWKimTSParkNJ and Lee HL (2008) Bankruptcy prediction using a discrete-time duration model incorporating temporal and macroeconomic dependencies. Journal of Forecasting27(6): 493–506.
50.
Pe’erAVertinskyI (2008) Firm exits as a determinant of new entry: Is there evidence of local creative destruction?Journal of Business Venturing23(3): 280–306.
51.
ReuberARFischerE (2005) The company you keep: How young firms in different competitive contexts signal reputation through their customers. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice29(1): 57–78.
52.
SchulzeWSGedajlovicER (2010) Whither family business?Journal of Management Studies47(2): 191–204.
53.
SheppardJPChowdhurySD (2005) Riding the wrong wave: Organizational failure as a failed turnaround. Long Range Planning38(3): 239–260.
54.
ShepherdDA (2003) Learning from business failure: Propositions of grief recovery for the self-employed. Academy of Management Review28(2): 318–328.
55.
ShepherdDADouglasEJShanleyM (2000) New venture survival: Ignorance, external shocks and risk reduction strategies. Journal of Business Venturing15(5): 393–410.
56.
ShumwayT (2001) Forecasting bankruptcy more accurately: a simple hazard model. Journal of Business74(1): 101–124.
57.
StinchcombeAL (1965) Social structure and organizations. In: MarchJG (ed.) Handbook of Organizations. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally & Company, pp.142–193.
58.
UcbasaranDWestheadPWrightM (2009) The extent and nature of opportunity identification by experienced entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing24(2): 99–115.
59.
UcbasaranDWestheadPWrightM (2010) The nature of entrepreneurial experience, business failure and comparative optimism. Journal of Business Venturing25(6): 541–555.
60.
UngerJMRauchAFreseM and Rosenbusch N (2011) Human capital and entrepreneurial success: A meta-analytical review. Journal of Business Venturing26(3): 341–358.
61.
VafeasN (1999) Board meeting frequency and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics53(1): 113–142.
62.
VälikangasLHoeglMGibbertM (2009) Why learning from failure isn’t easy (and what to do without it): Innovation trauma at Sun Microsystems. European Management Journal27(4): 225–233.
63.
van EesHvan der LaanGPostmaTJBM (2008) Effective board behaviour in The Netherlands. European Management Journal26(2): 84–93.
64.
WatsonJ (2007) Modeling the relationship between networking and firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing22(6): 852–874.
65.
WatsonJEverettJ (1993) Defining small business failure. International Small Business Journal11(3): 35–48.
66.
WestheadPUcbasaranDWrightM (2003) Differences between private firms owned by novice, serial and portfolio entrepreneurs: implications for policy-makers and practitioners. Regional Studies37(2): 187–200.
67.
WiesenfeldBMWurthmannKAHambrickDC (2008) The stigmatization and devaluation of elites associated with corporate failures: A process model. Academy of Management Review33(1): 231–251.
68.
ZahraSFilatotchevIWrightM (2009) How do threshold firms sustain corporate entrepreneurship? The role of boards and absorptive capacity. Journal of Business Venturing24(3): 248–260.
69.
ZhaoLAramJD (1995) Networking and growth of young technology-intensive ventures in China. Journal of Business Venturing10(5): 349–370.
