This article examines the determinants of the value-added contribution offered by advisors to entrepreneurs seeking venture capital (VC) funding. It hypothesizes that the contribution of advisors is particularly helpful in addressing problems of asymmetric information and uncertainty. The study develops seven hypotheses derived from agency theory using data from questionnaire responses given by entrepreneurs that used advisors to acquire VC. The results indicate that advisor value-added contributions are substantial when entrepreneurs have limited experience in dealing with venture capitalists (VCs). Other determinants are stage of venture development, level of innovation and the entrepreneur’s industry sector experience.
ArthursJDBusenitzLW (2003) The boundaries and limitations of agency theory and stewardship theory in the venture capitalist/entrepreneur relationship. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice28(2): 145–162.
4.
BarneyJ (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management17(1): 99–120.
5.
BenjaminGMargulisJ (2005) Angel Capital: How to Raise Early-stage Private Equity Financing. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
6.
CableDMShaneS (1997) A prisoner's dilemma approach to entrepreneur–venture capitalist relationships. Academy of Management Review22(1): 142–176.
7.
ChrismanJJMcMullanE (2000) A preliminary assessment of outsider assistance as a knowledge resource: The long-term impact of new venture counselling. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice24(3): 41–57.
8.
ChuaJHWoodwardRS (1993) Splitting the firm between the entrepreneur and the venture capitalist with the help of stock options. Journal of Business Venturing8(1): 43–58.
9.
CummingD (2006) Adverse selection and capital structure: Evidence from venture capital. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice30(2): 155–183.
10.
CummingDFischerE (2012) Publicly funded business advisory services and entrepreneurial outcomes. Research Policy41(2): 467–481.
11.
De ClercqDGouletPKKumpulainenMMäkeläM (2001) Portfolio investment strategies in the Finnish venture capital industry: A longitudinal study. Venture Capital3(1): 41–62.
12.
DenisDJ (2004) Entrepreneurial finance: An overview of the issues and evidence. Journal of Corporate Finance10(2): 301–326.
13.
DyerLMRossCA (2007) Advising the small business client. International Small Business Journal25(2): 130–151.
14.
EisenhardtKM (1989) Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review14(1): 57–74.
15.
FietJO (1995) Reliance upon informants in the venture capital industry. Journal of Business Venturing10(3): 195–223.
16.
HairJFAndersonRETathamRLBlackWC (1998) Multivariate Data Analysis (5th edn). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
17.
HigónDA (2011) The impact of ICT on innovation activities: Evidence for UK SMEs. International Small Business Journal. Epub ahead of print, 14 Mar 2011. DOI: 10.1177/0266242610374484.
18.
HolmströmB (1979) Moral hazard and observability. Bell Journal of Economics10(1): 74–91.
19.
HusteddeRJPulverGC (1992) Factors affecting equity capital acquisition: The demand side. Journal of Business Venturing7(5): 363–374.
20.
KaplanSNStrömbergP (2004) Characteristics, contracts, and actions: Evidence from venture capitalist analyses. Journal of Finance59(5): 2177–2210.
21.
KnightR (1994) Criteria used by venture capitalists: A cross-cultural study. International Small Business Journal13(1): 26–37.
22.
LehtonenOLahtiT (2009) The role of advisors in the venture capital investment process. Venture Capital11(3): 229–254.
23.
MacMillanISiegelRNarasimhaPNS (1985) Criteria used by venture capitalists to evaluate new venture proposals. Journal of Business Venturing1(1): 119–128.
24.
MasonCM (2009) Public policy support for the informal venture capital market in Europe: A critical review. International Small Business Journal27(5): 536–556.
25.
MasonCMHarrisonRT (2001) ‘Investment readiness’: A critique of government proposals to increase the demand for venture capital. Regional Studies35(7): 663–668.
26.
MasonCMStarkM (2004) What do investors look for in a business plan? A comparison of the investment criteria of bankers, venture capitalists and business angels. International Small Business Journal22(3): 227–248.
27.
MurrayGWrightM (1996) Management's search for venture capital in smaller buy-outs: The role of intermediaries and industry marketing implications. International Journal of Bank Marketing14(2): 14–25.
28.
NortonE (1995) Venture capital as an alternative means to allocate capital: An agency-theoretic view. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice20(2): 19–29.
29.
NortonETenenbaumBH (1993) Specialization versus diversification as a venture capital investment strategy. Journal of Business Venturing8(5): 431–442.
30.
ReidGCSmithJA (2001) How do venture capitalists handle risk in high technology ventures? Summary. In: BygraveWDBrushCGDavidssonPFietJGreenePGHarrisonRTetal. (eds) Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Wellesley, MA: Babson College, p.565.
31.
SapienzaHJAmasonAC (1993) Effects of innovativeness and venture stage on venture capitalist–entrepreneur relations. Interfaces23(6): 38–51.
32.
SapienzaHJGuptaAK (1994) Impact of agency risks and task uncertainty on venture capitalist–CEO interaction. Academy of Management Journal37(6): 1618–1632.
SapienzaHJKorsgaardMA (1996) Procedural justice in entrepreneur–investor relations. Academy of Management Journal39(3): 544–574.
35.
SapienzaHJManigartSVermeirW (1996) Venture capitalist governance and value added in four countries. Journal of Business Venturing11(6): 439–469.
36.
ShavellS (1979) Risk sharing and incentives in the principal and agent relationship. Bell Journal of Economics10(1): 55–73.
37.
SmartGH (1999) Management assessment methods in venture capital: An empirical analysis of human capital valuation. Venture Capital1(1): 59–82.
38.
SträtlingRWijbengaFGrahamD (2011) The impact of contracts on trust in entrepreneur–venture capitalist relationships. International Small Business Journal. Epub ahead of print, 18 Feb 2011. DOI: 10.1177/0266242610388822.
39.
TyebjeeTTBrunoAV (1984) A model of venture capitalist investment activity. Management Science30(9): 1051–1066.
40.
Van OsnabruggeM (1998) The financing of entrepreneurial firms in the UK: A comparison of business angel and venture capitalist investment procedures, PhD thesis, Oxford, Hertford College.
41.
WhettenD (1989) What constitutes a theoretical contribution?Academy of Management Review14(4): 490–495.
42.
WrightMRobbieKEnnewC (1997) Venture capitalists and serial entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing12(3): 227–249.
43.
ZacharakisALMeyerGD (1998) A lack of insight: Do venture capitalists really understand their own decision process?Journal of Business Venturing13(1): 57–76.
