Although the benefits of bootstrapping are widely known, decreasing returns to venture growth from this strategy are less understood; falls in returns. Decreasing returns may result from limited scalability and increased costs resulting from reduced legitimacy among stakeholders. Using a sample of high-technology firms, this article tests the non-linear relationship between bootstrapping and venture growth and the moderating effects of alliances on this non-linear relationship. We find that bootstrapping has an inverted-U relationship with venture growth; however, alliance diversity enhances the positive effects of bootstrapping while mitigating its negative effects on venture growth.
AguinisHWeiss (1995) Statistical power with moderated multiple regression in management research. Journal of Management21(6): 1141–1158.
2.
ApplebaumKMMalloyEJEisenEA (2007) Reducing healthy worker survivor bias by restricting date of hire in a cohort study of Vermont granite workers. Occupational and Environmental Medicine64(10): 681–687.
3.
AthertonA (2009) Rational actors, knowledgeable agents. International Small Business Journal27(4): 470–495.
4.
BatjargalBLiuM (2004) Entrepreneurs’ access to private equity in China: The role of social capital. Organization Science15(2): 159–172.
5.
BaumJACCalabreseTSilvermanBS (2000) Don’t go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups’ performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal21(3): 267–294.
6.
BhideA (1992) Bootstrap finance: The art of start-ups. Harvard Business Review70(6): 109–117.
7.
BlechmanBJLevinsonJC (1991) Guerrilla Financing: Alternative Techniques to Finance Any Small Business. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
8.
BrownSJGoetzmannWIbbotsonRGRossSA (1992) Survivorship bias in performance studies. Review of Financial Studies5(4): 553–580.
9.
BrowneMWCudeckR (1993) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Testing Structural Equation Models154: 136–162.
10.
BurgelmanRARosenbloomRS (1989) Technology strategy: An evolutionary process perspective. In: RosenbloomRSBurgelmanRA (eds) Research on Technological Innovation, Management and Policy, Vol. 4. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1–23.
11.
CarpenterREPetersenBC (2002) Is the growth of small firms constrained by internal finance?Review of Economics and Statistics84(2): 298–309.
12.
CarrollGRHannanMT (2000) The Demography of Corporations and Industries. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13.
CassarG (2004) The financing of business start-ups. Journal of Business Venturing19(2): 261–283.
14.
ChurchillNCLewisVL (1983) The five stages of business growth. Harvard Business Review61(3): 30–50.
15.
CohenJ (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16.
CohenJ (2003) Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17.
CoreJEHolthausenRWLarckerDF (1999) Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics51(3): 371–406.
18.
DasTKTengBS (2000) A resource-based theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management26(1): 31–61.
19.
DavidssonPAchtenhagenLNaldiL (2007) What do we know about small firm growth? In: ParkerS (ed.) Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research: The Life Cycle of Entrepreneurial Ventures, Vol. 2. New York: Springer, 361–398.
20.
DussaugePGarretteBMitchellW (2000) Learning from competing partners: Outcomes and durations of scale and link alliances in Europe, North America and Asia. Strategic Management Journal21(2): 99–126.
21.
EbbenJJohnsonA (2006) Bootstrapping in small firms: An empirical analysis of change over time. Journal of Business Venturing21(6): 851–865.
22.
EckhardtJTShaneSDelmarF (2006) Multistage selection and the financing of new ventures. Management Science52(2): 220–232.
23.
EgelnJLichtGSteilF (1997) Firm foundations and the role of financing constraints. Small Business Economics9(2): 137–150.
24.
EkanemI (2005) Bootstrapping: The investment decision-making process in small firms. British Accounting Review37(3): 299–318.
25.
EkanemISmallboneD (2007) Learning in small manufacturing firms. International Small Business Journal25(2): 107–129.
26.
FreearJWetzelWE (1990) Who bankrolls high-tech entrepreneurs?Journal of Business Venturing5(2): 77–89.
27.
FreearJSohlJEWetzelWEJr (1995) Who bankrolls software entrepreneurs? In: BygraveWDBirdBJBirleySChurchillNCHayMKeeleyRHWetzelWEJr (eds) Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Wellesley, MA: Babson College, 394–406.
28.
GeorgeG (2005) Slack resources and the performance of privately held firms. Academy of Management Journal48(4): 661–676.
29.
GeroskiPA (1995) What do we know about entry?International Journal of Industrial Organization13(4): 421–440.
30.
Gomez-MejiaLRLarraza-KintanaMMakriM (2003) The determinants of executive compensation in family-controlled public corporations. Academy of Management Journal46(2): 226–237.
31.
HagedoornJ (1993) Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences. Strategic Management Journal14(5): 371–385.
32.
HannanMTFreemanJ (1989) Organizational Ecology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33.
HarriganKR (1988) Strategic alliances and partner asymmetries. Management International Review28: 53–72.
34.
HarrisonRTMasonCM (1997) Entrepreneurial growth strategies and venture performance in the software industry. Paper presented at the Babson College Entrepreneurship Research Conference, Wellesley, MA, 17–19 April.
35.
HarrisonRTMasonCMGirlingP (2004) Financial bootstrapping and venture development in the software industry. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development16(4): 307–333.
36.
HayekFA (1945) The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review35(4): 519–530.
37.
HilbeJM (2007) Negative Binomial Regression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38.
HillRCHellriegelD (1994) Critical contingencies in joint venture management: Some lessons from managers. Organization Science5(4): 594–607.
39.
HogartyKYHinesCVKromreyJDFerronJMMumfordKR (2005) The quality of factor solutions exploratory factory analysis: The influence of sample size, communality and overdetermination. Educational and Psychological Measurement65(2): 202–226.
40.
JedidiKJagpalHSDeSarboWS (1997) Finite-mixture structural equation models for response-based segmentation and unobserved heterogeneity. Marketing Science16(1): 39–59.
41.
JonesOJayawarnaD (2010) Resourcing new businesses: Social networks, bootstrapping and firm performance. Venture Capital12(2): 127–152.
42.
KatzJGartnerWB (1988) Properties of emerging organizations. Academy of Management Review13(3): 429–441.
43.
LevinthalDA (1997) Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Science43(7): 934–950.
44.
LubkeGHMuthénB (2005) Investigating population heterogeneity with factor mixture models. Psychological Methods10(1): 21–39.
45.
MacCallumRCWidamanKFPreacherKJHongS (2001) Sample size in factor analysis: The role of model error. Multivariate Behavioral Research36(4): 611–637.
46.
MaddalaGSNelsonF (1975) Switching regression models with exogenous and endogenous switching. In: Proceedings of the American Statistical Association (Business and Economics Section), 423–426.
47.
MeyerMHTertzakianPUtterbackJM (1997) Metrics for managing research and development in the context of the product family. Management Science43(1): 88–111.
48.
MyersSCMajlufNS (1984) Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of financial Economics13(2): 187–221.
49.
NelsonRRWinterSG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
50.
NohriaNGarcia-PontC (1991) Global strategic linkages and industry structure. Strategic Management Journal12(supp.1): S105–S124.
51.
NohriaNGulatiR (1996) Is slack good or bad for innovation?Academy of Management Journal39(5): 1245–1264.
52.
ParkheA (1991) Interfirm diversity organizational learning and longevity in global strategic alliances. Journal of International Business Studies22(4): 579–601.
53.
PodsakoffPMOrganDW (1986) Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management12(4): 531–544.
54.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBLeeJYPodsakoffNP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology88(5): 879–903.
55.
RajanRGZingalesL (1995) What do we know about capital structure? Some evidence from international data. Journal of Finance50(5): 1421–1460.
56.
ReynoldsPDWhiteSB (1997) The Entrepreneurial Process. Economic Growth, Men, Women and Minorities. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
57.
ShaneSCableD (2002) Network ties, reputation and the financing of new ventures. Management Science48(3): 364–381.
58.
SinghJV (1986) Performance, slack and risk taking in organizational decision-making. Academy of Management Journal29(3): 562–585.
59.
SmithD (2009) Financial bootstrapping and social capital: How technology-based start-ups fund innovation. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management10(2): 199–209.
60.
StevensonHHJarilloJC (1990) A paradigm of entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial management. Strategic Management Journal11(5): 17–27.
61.
StiglitzJEWeissA (1981) Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information. American Economic Review71(3): 393–410.
62.
StuartTEHoangHHybelsRC (1999) Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly44(2): 315–318.
63.
ThurstonePH (1959) Systems and Procedures Responsibility. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
64.
UdellA (1998) The economics of small business finance: The roles of private equity and debt markets in the financial growth cycle. Journal of Banking and Finance22(6–8): 613–673.
65.
Van AukenH (2005) Differences in the usage of bootstrap financing among technology-based versus nontechnology–based firms. Journal of Small Business Management43(1): 93–103.
66.
WalterJLechnerCKellermannsFW (2008) Disentangling alliance management processes: Decision making, politicality and alliance performance. Journal of Management Studies45(3): 530–560.
67.
WinborgJLandströmH (2001) Financial bootstrapping in small businesses: Examining small business managers’ resource acquisition behaviors. Journal of Business Venturing16(3): 235–254.
68.
WindmeijerFAGSantos SilvaJMC (1997) Endogeneity in count data models: An application to demand for health care. Journal of Applied Econometrics12(3): 281–294.
69.
XuHRuefM (2004) The myth of the risk-tolerant entrepreneur. Strategic Organization2(4): 331–355.
70.
ZahraSACovinJG (1993) Business strategy, technology policy and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal14(6): 451–478.
