This paper discusses a project on the completion of a database of socio-economic indicators across the European Union for the years from 1990 onward at various spatial scales. Thus the database consists of various time series with a spatial component. As a substantial amount of the data was missing a method of imputation was required to complete the database. A Markov Chain Monte Carlo approach was opted for. We describe the Markov Chain Monte Carlo method in detail. Furthermore, we explain how we achieved spatial coherence between different time series and their observed and estimated data points.
BoxGEPJenkinsGM (1970) Time Series Analysis Forecasting and Control, San Francisco: Holden-Day.
2.
BrownRL (1994) Efficacy of the indirect approach for estimating structural equation models with missing data: A comparison of five methods. Structural Equation Modelling: A Multidisciplinary Journal1: 287–316.
3.
Chatfield C (1989) The Analysis of Time Series. Boca Ration, FL, USA: Chapman and Hall, p.1.
4.
CookRJZengLYiGY (2004) Marginal analysis of incomplete longitudinal binary data: A cautionary note on LOCF imputation. Biometrics60: 820–828.
5.
Eaton ML (1983) Multivariate Statistics: A Vector Space Approach. New York: John Wiley and Sons, pp.116–117.
6.
EndersCK (2010) Applied Missing Data Analysis, New York: Guilford Press.
7.
EndersCKBandalosDL (2001) The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modelling: A Multidisciplinary Journal8: 430–457.
EU (2008) Consolidated versions of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union, Council of the European Union, 6655/08, Brussels.
10.
EU (2013) European Territorial Cooperation Regulation, Council of the European Union, 1299/2013, Brussels.
11.
FordBL (1983) An overview of hot-deck procedure. In: MadowWGOlkinIRubinDB (eds) Incomplete Data in Sample Surveys, New York: Academic Press, pp. 185–207.
12.
GelmanARubinDB (1992) Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Statistical Sciences7: 457–511.
13.
GleasonTCStaelinR (1975) A proposal for handling missing data. Psychometrika40: 229–252.
14.
Knuth DE (1973) Fundamental Algorithms, The Art of Computer Programming, Volume 1. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, p.305.
15.
LittleRJA (1992) Regression with missing X’s: A review. Journal of the American Statistical Association87: 1227–1237.
LiuGGouldAL (2002) Comparison of alternative strategies for analysis of longitudinal trials. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics12: 207–226.
18.
Lunn D, Spiegelhalter D, Thomas A, et al. (2009) The BUGS project, evolution, critique and further directions. Statistics in Medicine 28: 3049–3067.
19.
Lunn D, Jackson C, Best N, et al. (2012) The BUGS Book: A Practical Introduction to Bayesian Analysis. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press.
20.
MarshHW (1998) Pairwise deletion for missing data in structural equation models: Nonpositive definite matrices, parameter estimates, goodness of fit, and adjusted samples sizes. Structural Equation Modelling: A Multidisciplinary Journal5: 22–36.
PeughJLEndersCK (2004) Missing data in educational research: A review of reporting practices and suggestions for improvement. Review of Educational Research74: 525–556.
