At European level, the different methodologies used for the classification of urban areas rely on the spatial allocation of population to 1 km2 grid cells, failing therefore to identify small-sized settlements that play an important role in urban systems mostly composed by small towns, such as the Portuguese. This paper reports the development of alternative methodologies which overcome the problem stated, successfully enabling the automated recognition and delimitation of small-sized urban settlements – the prime goal of this work.
Two alternative methodologies (A and B) were developed and later compared. The settlements identified by A are clusters of census tracts, previously classified using an urban–rural typology proposed by the authors. In B an adaptation of the Urban Morphological Zones methodology published by the European Environment Agency was used, whereby settlements are clusters of specific Land Use/Land Cover classes combined with the urbanised areas defined by Municipal Master Plans.
BorrusoG (2003) Network density and the delimitation of urban areas. Transactions in GIS7(2): 177–191.
2.
Cantarino I, Goerlich FJ and Reig E (2012) Population grid uses in the context of regional rural/urban typology. An application to Spain. In: International conference on regional science the challenge of regional development in a world of changing hegemonies: Knowledge, competiveness and austerity. Spain, Bilbao, 22–23 November 2012.
3.
ChaudhryOMackanessW (2008) Automatic identification of urban settlement boundaries for multiple representation databases. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems32(2): 95–109.
4.
CohenJ (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement20(1): 37–46.
DomingosAPortasNSá MarquesT (2007) Portugal: Urban policies or policies with an urban incidence. In: Van den BergLBraunEVan der MeerJ (eds) National Policy Responses to Urban Challenges in Europe, England: Ashgate Publishing Ltd, pp. 311–332.
FerreiraJACondessaBAlmeidaJCet al. (2010) Urban settlements delimitation in low-density areas—An application to the municipality of Tomar (Portugal). Landscape and Urban Planning97(3): 156–167.
11.
GallegoFJ (2010) A population density grid of the European Union. Population and Environment31(6): 460–473.
12.
GueroisMBretagnolleAGiraudTet al. (2012) A new database for the cities of Europe? Exploration of the Urban Morphological Zones (CLC2000) from three national database comparisons (Denmark, France, Sweden). Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design39(3): 439–458.
13.
INE (2004) Atlas das Cidades de Portugal, vII, Lisboa: Instituto Nacional de Estatística.
NUREC (1994) Atlas of Agglomerations in the European Union, Part of an Integrated Observation System, vol. I–III. Duisburg: Network on Urban Research in the European Community.
16.
RamosR ARSilvaA NR (2007) A spatial analysis approach for the definition of metropolitan regions—The case of Portugal. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design34(1): 171–185.
17.
Roychowdhury K, Taubenbok H and Jones S (2011) Delineating urban, suburban and rural areas using Landsat and DMSP-OLS night-time images. Case Study of Hyderabad, India. In: JURSE 2011 – Joint Urban Remote Sensing Event (eds U Stilla, P Gamba, C Juergens, et al.), Germany, 11–13 April 2011, pp.33–36.
18.
Servillo L, Atkinson R, Smith I, et al. (2014) TOWN, small and medium sized towns in their functional territorial context. ESPON Final Report, Luxembourg.
19.
Simon A, Fons J and Milego R (2010) Urban Morphological Zones version F2v0 – Definition and procedural steps. European Topic Centre Land Use and Spatial Information. European Environment Agency.
20.
TannierCThomasIVuidelGet al. (2011) A fractal approach to identifying urban boundaries. Geographical Analysis43(2): 211–227. DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-4632.2011.00814.x.
21.
Weber C (2001) Urban agglomeration delimitation using remote sensing. In: Donnay J, Barnsley M and Longley P (eds) Remote Sensing and Urban Analysis. European Science Foundation GISDATA 9. London and New York: Taylor & Francis, pp.131–145.
