The multitude of interwoven spatial scales and their relevance for urban systems has been of interest to the complexity science of cities since its conception. Today, we are well aware that urban environments are being simultaneously shaped and organised through actions at all levels. However, the fundamental question of how to reveal and quantify the interdependence of processes in between various spatial and temporal scales is less often addressed. Deepening our theoretical understanding of the multiscale spatiotemporal complexity of urban systems demands a transdisciplinary framework and the deployment of novel and advanced mathematical models. This article performs a multiscale analysis of urban structures using a large dataset of rent price values in the Ruhr area, Germany. We argue that, due to their many interacting degrees of freedom, urban systems exhibit similar features as other strongly correlated systems, for example, turbulent flows, notably the occurrence of extreme small-scale fluctuations. This analogy between urban and turbulent systems, which we support by empirical evidence, allows for the modelling of spatial structures on the basis of concepts and methods from turbulence theory. We demonstrate how by identifying the main turbulence-borrowed characteristics of an arbitrary two-dimensional urban field, it can be fully reproduced with a small number of prescribed points. Our findings have theoretical implications in the way we quantify and analyse scales in urban systems, model small-scale urban structures as well as potential policy relevance on understanding the evolution and spatial organisation of cities.
AlbeverioSAndreyDGiordanoP, et al. (2007) The Dynamics of Complex Urban Systems: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
2.
AllenPM (2012) Cities and Regions as Self-Organizing Systems: Models of Complexity. London, UK: Routledge.
3.
BattyM (2005) Agents, cells, and cities: new representational models for simulating multiscale urban dynamics. Environment and Planning A37(8): 1373–1394.
4.
BattyM (2013) The New Science of Cities. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
BattyMLongleyPA (1994) Fractal Cities: A Geometry of Form and Function. Cambridge, MA: Academic press.
7.
BettencourtLM (2013) The origins of scaling in cities. Science340(6139): 1438–1441.
8.
BretagnolleAPaulusFPumainD (2002) Time and Space Scales for Measuring Urban Growth. Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography.
9.
CarraGBarthelemyM (2019) A fundamental diagram of urbanization. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science46(4): 690–706.
10.
ChenYJiangS (2010) Modeling fractal structure of systems of cities using spatial correlation function. International Journal of Artificial Life Research (IJALR)1(1): 12–34.
11.
ChenYWangJ (2013) Multifractal characterization of urban form and growth: the case of Beijing. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design40(5): 884–904.
12.
ChengJMasserI (2003) Modelling urban growth patterns: a multiscale perspective. Environment and Planning A35(4): 679–704.
13.
CottineauCHatnaEArcauteE, et al. (2017) Diverse cities or the systematic paradox of urban scaling laws. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems63: 80–94.
14.
CressieN (1990) The origins of kriging. Mathematical Geology22(3): 239–252.
15.
DelhommeJ (1978) Kriging in the hydrosciences. Advances in Water Resources1(5): 251–266.
FriedrichJ (2021) Non-perturbative Methods in Statistical Descriptions of Turbulence. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
19.
FriedrichJGallonSPumirA, et al. (2020) Stochastic interpolation of sparsely sampled time series via multipoint fractional Brownian bridges. Physical Review Letters125(17): 170602.
20.
FriedrichJPeinkeJPumirA, et al. (2021) Explicit construction of joint multipoint statistics in complex systems. J. Phys. Complexity2(4): 045006. DOI: 10.1088/2632-072x/ac2cda.
21.
FriedrichRPeinkeJ (1997) Description of a turbulent cascade by a Fokker–Planck equation. Physical Review Letters78(5): 863–866. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.863.
22.
FriedrichRPeinkeJSahimiM, et al. (2011) Approaching complexity by stochastic methods: From biological systems to turbulence. Physics Reports506(5): 87–162.
23.
FrischU (1995) Turbulence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24.
GetisA (2007) Reflections on spatial autocorrelation. Regional Science and Urban Economics37(4): 491–496.
25.
GhashghaieSBreymannWPeinkeJ, et al. (1996) Turbulent cascades in foreign exchange markets. Nature381(6585): 767–770.
26.
GrebenkovDSBelyaevDJonesPW (2015) A multiscale guide to Brownian motion. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical49(4): 043001.
27.
HaagG (2017) Modelling with the Master Equation. New York, NY: Springer International Publishing.
28.
HaagGWeidlichW (1984) A stochastic theory of interregional migration. Geographical Analysis16(4): 331–357.
29.
HakenHPortugaliJ (1995) A synergetic approach to the self-organization of cities and settlements. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design22(1): 35–46.
30.
HayekUWEfthymiouDFarooqB, et al. (2015) Quality of urban patterns: spatially explicit evidence for multiple scales. Landscape and Urban Planning142: 47–62.
31.
HuSChengQWangL, et al. (2012) Multifractal characterization of urban residential land price in space and time. Applied Geography34: 161–170.
KadanoffLP (1971) From simulation model to public policy: an examination of Forrester’s Urban Dynamics. Simulation16(6): 261–268.
34.
KardanFBaverelOAgelFP (2018) Assessment of rans turbulence models in urban environments: cfd simulation of airflow around idealized high-rise morphologies. In: Humanizing Digital RealityNew York, NY: Springer, pp. 259–269.
35.
KolmogorovAN (1962) A refinement of previous hypotheses concerning the local structure of turbulence in a viscous incompressible fluid at high Reynolds number. Journal of Fluid Mechanics13: 82–85.
36.
LagariasAPrastacosP (2020) Comparing the urban form of South European cities using fractal dimensions. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science47(7): 1149–1166.
37.
LaureMK (2000) Modelling combat using fractals and the statistics of scaling systems. Military Operations Research5: 47–58.
38.
LemoyRCarusoG (2020) Evidence for the homothetic scaling of urban forms. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science47(5): 870–888.
39.
LengyelJFriedrichJ (2020) Multiscale urban modeling. In: Neue Dimensionen der Mobilität. Berlin, Germany: Springer, pp. 387–408.
40.
LengyelJFriedrichJ (2021) Multiscale Urban Analysis and Modelling for Local and Regional Decision-Makers. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 567–579.
41.
LiYRybskiDKroppJP (2019) Singularity Cities. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science48: 2399808319843534.
42.
LiuXDerudderBWangM (2018) Polycentric urban development in China: a multi-scale analysis. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science45(5): 953–972.
43.
MaDOmerIOsaragiT, et al. (2019) Why topology matters in predicting human activities. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science46(7): 1297–1313.
RoussetBBonnayPDiribarneP, et al. (2014) Superfluid high Reynolds von Kármán experiment. Review of Scientific Instruments85(10): 103908.
55.
RybskiDArcauteEBattyM (2019) Urban scaling laws. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science46(9): 1605–1610.
56.
SoulhacLSalizzoniPCiercoFX, et al. (2011) The model SIRANE for atmospheric urban pollutant dispersion; part i, presentation of the model. Atmospheric Environment45(39): 7379–7395.
TannierCPumainD (2005) Fractals in Urban Geography: A Theoretical Outline and an Empirical Example. Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography.
59.
ThomasIFrankhauserPFrenayB, et al. (2010) Clustering patterns of urban built-up areas with curves of fractal scaling behaviour. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design37(5): 942–954.
60.
WehlingHW (2014) Organized and disorganized complexities and socio-economic implications in the Northern Ruhr Area. In: Understanding Complex Urban Systems: Multidisciplinary Approaches to Modeling. Berlin, Germany: Springer, pp. 87–101.
61.
WeidlichW (1999) From fast to slow processes in the evolution of urban and regional settlement structures. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society3(2–3): 137–147.
62.
WeidlichW (2005) Thirty years of sociodynamics.: an integrated strategy of modelling in the social sciences: applications to migration and urban evolution. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals24(1): 45–56.
63.
WeidlichW (2017) Computability and instability in sociodynamics. In: Berechenbarkeit der Welt?Berlin, Germany: Springer, pp. 305–310.
64.
WeidlichWHaagG (1999) An Integrated Model of Transport and Urban Evolution: With an Application to a Metropole of an Emerging Nation. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
