One of the most common relativization techniques in life sciences quantifies body condition based on residuals from the linear regression in the log–log plot of body mass against a linear measure of size. Given the network-based analogy between organisms and cities, the method is applied to comparative urban studies to formulate relativized allometric measures based on the allometry to size of metric and topological measures of street networks. The analysis of a sample of 70 cities from a confined region considered in three historical stages demonstrates that the more allometric scaling of a measure to size diverges from the linear, the more allometric measures show discrepancy to the existing relativization methods that are based on mean measures and ratios between measures. Allometric measures reflect the dynamics of specific regional samples of cities and therefore also differ from relativization methods that relate measures that grow exponentially with size against static theoretical yardsticks. The comparison involving two additional samples of cities from other regions suggests that the proposed allometric measures can be used to approximate size-invariant measures for cities with unknown allometry more reliably than existing relativization measures. The method can be applied to formulate relativized indices for any measure that displays allometry to size in various scales of the built environment.
AlberchPGouldSJOsterGF (1979) Size and shape in ontogeny and phylogeny. Paleobiology5(3): 296–317.
2.
AlbrechtGGelvinBHartmanS (1993) Ratios as size adjustment in morphometrics. American Journal of Physical Anthropology91(4): 441–468.
3.
BarthélemyMBordinPBerestyckiH (2013) Self-organization versus top-down planning in the evolution of a city. Scientific Reports3(2153): 1–7.
4.
BattyM (2005) Cities and Complexity: Understanding Cities with Cellular Automata, Agent-Based Models, and Fractals, Cambridge, MA; London: MIT Press.
5.
BattyM (2008) Size, scale and shape of cities. Science319: 769–771.
6.
BattyM (2013) The New Science of Cities, Cambridge, MA; London: MIT Press.
7.
Berghauser PontMHauptP (2010) Spacematrix: Space, Density and Urban Form, Rotterdam: NAi Publishers.
8.
BettencourtLMA (2013) The origins of scaling in cities. Science340(6139): 1438–1441.
9.
BettencourtLMALoboJHelbingD (2007) Growth, innovation, scaling and the pace of life in cities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences104(17): 7301–7306.
10.
BettencourtLMAWestGB (2010) A unified theory of urban living. Nature467(7318): 912–913.
11.
BooksteinFL (1978) The Measurement of Biological Shape and Shape Change. Lecture Notes in Biomathematics 24, New York: Springer.
12.
BranchM (1997) An Atlas of Rare City Maps: Comparative Urban Design, 1830–1842, New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
13.
Carvalho R and Penn A (2004) Scaling and universality in the micro-structure of urban space. Physica A 332: 539–547.
14.
Conroy-DaltonRDaltonN (2007) Applying depth decay functions to space syntax network graphs. In: KubatAS (ed.) Proceedings of the 6th International Space Syntax Symposium, Istanbul: ITU Faculty of Architecture, pp. 089.1–089.14.
15.
DaltonN (2005) New measures for local fractional angular integration or towards general relativisation in space syntax. In: van NessA (ed.) Proceedings of the 5th International Space Syntax Symposium, Delft: Techne Press, pp. 103–115.
16.
de SimoneGDevereuxRBDanielsSR (1995) Effect of growth on variability of left ventricular mass: Assessment of allometric signals in adults and children and their capacity to predict cardiovascular risk. Journal of the American College of Cardiology25(5): 1056–1062.
17.
GAI and IGM (1955) Aerial photograph, Gruppo Aeronautico Italiano and IGM flight, quote 6000, 270-30A-8128, Istituto Geografico Militare Firenze.
18.
García-BerthouE (2001) On the misuse of residuals in ecology: Testing regression residuals vs. the analysis of covariance. Journal of Animal Ecology70(4): 708–711.
19.
GoetheJW (1817) Zur Naturwissenchaft überhaupt, besonders zur. Morphologie1(1): 7–11.
20.
GouldSJ (1975) Allometry in primates, with emphasis on scaling and evolution of the brain. In: SzalayFS (ed.) Approaches to Primate Paleobiology, Contributions to PrimatologyVol. 5, Basel, München, Paris, London, New York, Sydney: S. Karger, pp. 244–292.
21.
GreenAJ (2001) Mass/length residuals: measures of body condition or generators of spurious results?Ecology82(5): 1473–1483.
22.
HafleyWL (1969) Calculation and miscalculation of the allometric equation reconsidered. BioScience19(11): 974–983.
23.
HarveyPHPagelMD (1991) The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
HeusnerAA (1982) Energy metabolism and body size I. Is the 0.75 mass exponent of Kleiber’s equation a statistical artifact?Respiration Physiology48: 1–12.
25.
HillierB (1989) The architecture of the urban object. Ekistics, Special Issue on Space Syntax Research56(334/335): 5–21.
26.
HillierB (1993) Specifically architectural knowledge. The Harvard Architecture Review9: 8–27.
27.
HillierBBurdettRPeponisJ (1987) Creating life: Or, does architecture determine anything?Architecture et Comportement/Architecture and Behaviour3(3): 233–250.
28.
HillierBHansonJ (1984) The Social Logic of Space, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
HillierBLeamanAStansallP (1976) Space syntax. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design3: 147–185.
30.
HillierBPennAHansonJ (1993) Natural movement: Or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design20(1): 29–66.
31.
HillierBPennA (2004) Rejoinder to Carlo Ratti. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design31(4): 501–511.
32.
HuxleyJS (1932) Problems of Relative Growth, London: Methuen.
33.
JacobsA (1996) Great Streets, Boston, MA: MIT Press.
34.
JakobEMMarshallSDUetzGW (1996) Estimating fitness: A comparison of body condition indices. Oikos77(1): 61–67.
35.
JacobsJ (1961) The Death and Life of Great American Cities, New York: Random House.
36.
Jiang B (2007) A topological pattern of urban street networks: Universality and peculiarity. Physica A 384: 647–655.
37.
Jiang B and Claramunt C (2004) Topological analysis of urban street networks. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 31: 151–162.
38.
KleiberM (1932) Body size and metabolism. Hilgardia: A Journal of Agricultural Science6(11): 315–353.
39.
Kronmal RA (1993) Spurious correlation and the fallacy of the ratio standard revisited. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society) 156(3): 379–392.
40.
KrügerM (1989) On node and axial grid maps, distance measures and related topics. European Conference on the Representation and Management of Urban Change, London: Unit for Architectural Studies, University College London, pp. 1–34.
41.
KrügerMVieiraAP (2012) Scaling relative asymmetry in space syntax analysis. Journal of Space Syntax3(2): 194–203.
MarchLSteadmanP (1971) The Geometry of Environment: An Introduction to Spatial Organization and Design, London: RIBA Publications.
44.
Medeiros V (2006) Urbis Brasiliae: ou Sobre Cidades do Brasil. PhD Dissertation, University of Brasilia.
45.
Mohajeri N, Gudmundsson A and French JR (2015) CO2 emissions, street network configuration, and city size. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 35: 116–129.
46.
NarollRSvon BertalanffyL (1956) The principle of allometry in biology and social sciences. General Systems1: 76–89.
47.
NevillAMHolderRL (1995) Scaling, normalizing, and per ratio standards: An allometric modeling approach. Journal of Applied Physiology79(3): 1027–1031.
48.
OstwaldMJ (2011) The mathematics of spatial configuration: Revisiting, revising and critiquing justified plan graph theory. Nexus Network Journal13(2): 445–470.
49.
PennA (2003) Space syntax and spatial cognition: Or why the axial line?Environment and Behavior35(1): 30–65.
50.
PeponisJ (1985) The spatial structure of factories. Human Relations38: 357–390.
51.
PeponisJBafnaSZhangZ (2008) The connectivity of streets: Reach and directional distance. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design35(5): 881–901.
52.
PeponisJHadjinikolaouELivieratosC (1989) The spatial core of urban culture. Ekistics334–335: 43–55.
53.
Peponis J, Shpuza E and Rashid M (2000) Comparative spatial analysis of historical cities, Unpublished raw data, Georgia Institute of Technology.
54.
Portugali J, Meyer H, Stolk E, et al. (eds) (2012) Complexity Theories of Cities Have Come of Age. Heidelberg: Springer.
55.
RattiC (2004) Space syntax: Some inconsistencies. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design31(4): 487–499.
56.
ReistJD (1986) An empirical evaluation of coefficients used in residual and allometric adjustment of size covariation. Canadian Journal of Zoology64(6): 1363–1368.
57.
RodePKeimCRobazzaG (2014) Cities and energy: Urban morphology and residential heat-energy demand. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design41(1): 138–162.
58.
RohrerF (1921) Der Index der Körperfülle als Maß des Ernährungszustandes (the index of corpulence as measure of nutritional state). Münchener Medizinische Wochenschrift68: 580–582.
59.
SamaniegoHMosesM (2008) Cities as organisms: Allometric scaling of urban road networks. Journal of Transport and Land Use1(1): 21–39.
60.
Schulte-HosteddeAIMillarJSHicklingGJ (2001) Evaluating body condition in small mammals. Canadian Journal of Zoology79(6): 1021–1029.
61.
ShpuzaE (2011) A coupled configurational description of boundary shape based on distance and directionality. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing25: 357–374.
62.
ShpuzaE (2014) Allometry in the syntax of street networks: Evolution of Adriatic and Ionian coastal cities 1800–2010. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design41(3): 450–471.
63.
SiksnaA (1997) The effect of block size and form in North American and Australian city centers. Urban Morphology1: 19–33.
64.
SmithRJ (1984) Determination of relative size: The “criterion of subtraction” problem in allometry. Journal of Theoretical Biology108(1): 131–142.
65.
SouthworthMOwensPM (1993) The evolving metropolis: Studies of community, neighborhood, and street form at the urban edge. Journal of the American Planning Association59: 271–286.
66.
SteadmanP (1979) The Evolution of Designs: Biological Analogy in Architecture and the Applied Arts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
67.
SteadmanP (1983) Architectural Morphology: An Introduction to the Geometry of Building Plans, London: Pion.
68.
SteadmanP (2004) Developments in space syntax. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design31(4): 483–486.
69.
SteadmanP (2014) Density and built form: Integrating ‘Spacemate’ with the work of Martin and March. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design41(2): 341–358.
70.
SteadmanPMitchellL (2010) Architectural morphospace: Mapping worlds of built form. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design37(2): 197–220.
71.
StewartJQ (1947) Empirical mathematical rules concerning the distribution and equilibrium of population. Geographical Review37(3): 461–485.
72.
TannerJM (1949) Fallacy of per-weight and per-surface area standards, and their relation to spurious correlation. Journal of Applied Physiology2(1): 1–15.
73.
TeklenburgJAFTimmermansHJPvan WagenburgAF (1993) Space syntax: Standardized measures and some simulations. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design20(3): 347–357.
74.
ThompsonDAW (1961) On Growth and Form abridged by JT Bonner from the 1917 edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
75.
TurnerA (2010) UCL Depthmap: Spatial Network Analysis Software v. 8.04.18b, London: University College London.
76.
von BertalanffyL (1951) Theoretische Biologie Vol. II, Stoffwechsel, Wachstum, 2nd ed. Bern: Francke.
77.
WhiteREngelenGUljeeI (1997) The use of constrained cellular automata for high-resolution modelling of urban land-use dynamics. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design24(3): 323–343.
78.
ZarJH (1968) Calculation and miscalculation of the allometric equation as a model in biological data. BioScience18(12): 1118–1120.
