To test the predictive ability claimed for the Milloy Assessment of Praxis
(MAP), four children were reassessed six years after the last administra
tion of the procedure. Results indicate that the claim is justified: children
diagnosed after three administrations of MAP at six-monthly intervals,
either continue to present with characteristics of developmental articula
tory dyspraxia or show the expected improvements predicted for
immature articulatory praxis. Speech therapy intervention programmes
in each case are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anthony, A., Bogle, D. and McIsaac, M.W.1971: Edinburgh Articulation Test, Edinburgh : Livingstone.
2.
Darley, F.W., Aronson, A.E. and Brown, J.R.1975: Motor speech disorders, London: Saunders.
3.
Fawcus, R.1980: The treatment of phonological disorders. In Jones, F. M., editor, Language disability in children, Lancaster: M.T.P. Press .
4.
Ferry, P.C., Hall, S.M. and Hicks, J.L.1975: 'Dilapidated' speech: developmental verbal dyspraxia. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology17, 749-56.
5.
Grunwell, P.1985: Phonological Assessment of Child Speech (PACS), London: NFER-Nelson.
6.
Milloy, N.R.1985: The assessment and identification of developmental articulatory dyspraxia and its effect on phonological development. Unpublished thesis, Leicester Polytechnic.