A new paradigm to inform inter-professional learning for integrating speech and language provision into secondary schools: a socio-cultural activity theory approach
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online June, 2008
A new paradigm to inform inter-professional learning for integrating speech and language provision into secondary schools: a socio-cultural activity theory approach
The paper presents a new way of understanding and investigating inter-professional learning across agencies for children and young people with speech, language and communication needs (SLCN) in schools in England. It considers specifically speech and language therapy staff and school staff learning to work together and working to learn together in secondary mainstream provision. Concepts and analysis of learning to work collaboratively are orientated by socio-cultural activity theory. In addition, evidence of learning for risk-taking and resilience are presented which are not readily analysed by the theory. The paper argues for considering collaborative working as organizational learning predicated on collective, rather than individual, engagement.
Allan, J.2003: Productive pedagogies and the challenge of inclusion , British Journal of Special Education30, 4, 175-79.
2.
Blacker, F., Crump, N. and McDonald, S.2000: Organizing processes in complex activity networks , Organization7, 2, 277-300.
3.
Damasio, A.R.2000: The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. London: Vintage .
4.
Daniels, H.2001: Vygotsky and pedagogy. London : RoutledgeFalmer.
5.
Daniels, H., Leadbetter, J. and Warmington with Edwards, A., Martin, D., Middleton, D., Popova, A., Apostolov, A. and Brown, S.2007: Learning in and for multi-agency working. Oxford Review of Education33, 4, 521-38.
6.
Department for Education and Skills2004: Every child matters: change for children. London : Department for Education and Skills.
7.
Department for Education and Skills2005: Extended schools: access to opportunities and services for all. London: Department for Education and Skills .
8.
Department of Health1998: Partnership in action: new opportunities for joint working between health and social services . London: Department of Health .
9.
Dessent, T.1996: Meeting special educational needs: Options for partnership between health, social and educational services. Tamworth : National Association for Special Educational Needs .
10.
Dockrell, J. and Lindsay, G.2001: Children with specific speech and language difficulties: The teachers' perspective, Oxford Review of Education27, 3, 369-94.
11.
Dunsmuir, S., Clifford, V. and Took, S.2006: Collaboration between educational psychologists and speech and language therapists: barriers and opportunities, Educational Psychology in Practice22, 2, 125-40.
12.
Edwards, A. and D'Arcy, C.2004: Relational agency and disposition in sociocultural accounts of learning to teach, Educational Review56, 2, 147-55.
13.
Engeström, Y.1995: Voice as communicative action, Mind, Culture and Activity, 2, 192-214.
14.
Engeström, Y.1999: Innovative learning in work teams: analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice In Y. Engeström , R. Miettinen and R-L. Punamki (eds) 1999: Perspectives on activity theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Engeström, Y.2001: Expansive learning at work: toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization, Journal of Education and Work14, 1, 133-56.
16.
Engeström, Y.2007: Putting Vygotsky to work: the Change Laboratory as an application of double stimulation. In H. Daniels , M. Cole, and J.V. Wertsch (eds) Cambridge companion to Vygotsky. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Engeström, Y., Brown, K., Christopher, L.C. and Gregory, J.1997: Co-ordination, co-operation and communication in the courts: expansive transitions in legal work. In M. Cole, Y. Engestrom and O. Vasquez (eds) Mind, culture and activity , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Engeström, Y.,Miettinen, R. and Punamki, R-L. (eds) 1999: Perspectives on activity theory, New York: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Forbes, J.2001: Teacher/therapist collaboration policy: an analysis , Child Language Teaching and Therapy17, 3, 195-205.
20.
Forbes, J.2003: Grappling with collaboration: would opening up the research `base' help? British Journal of Special Education30, 3, 150-155.
21.
Glisson, C. and Hemmelgarn, A.1998: The effects of organizational climate and interorganizational coordination on the quality and outcomes of children's service systems, Child Abuse and Neglect22, 5, 401-421.
22.
Ivanic, R.2006: Language, learning and identification. In R. Kiely, P. Rea-Dickins , H. Woodfield and G. Clibbon (eds) Language, culture and identity in applied linguistics. London: British Association for Applied Linguistics, with Equinox.
23.
Kerosuo, H. and Engeström, Y.2003: Boundary crossing and learning in creation of new work practice, Journal of Workplace Learning15, 7/8, 345-51.
24.
Lacey, P.2000: Multidisciplinary work: challenges and possibilities . In H. Daniels (ed.) Special education re-formed: beyond rhetoric?London: Falmer Press.
25.
Law, J., Lindsay, G., Peacey, N., Gascoigne, M., Soloff, N., Radford, J. and Band, S.2000: Provision for children with speech and language needs in England and Wales. London: Department for Education and Employment.
26.
Law, J., Lindsay, G., Peacey, N., Gascoigne, M., Soloff, N., Radford, J. and Band, S.2002: Consultation as a model for providing speech and language therapy in schools: a panacea or one step too far? Child Language Teaching and Therapy18, 2, 145-65.
27.
Leadbetter, J.2006: New ways of working and new ways of being: multiagency working and professional identity, Educational and Child Psychology23, 4, 47-59.
28.
McCartney, E., MacKay, G., Cheseldine, S. and McCool, S.1998: The development of a systems analysis approach to small-scale educational evaluation, Educational Review50, 1, 65-73.
29.
McCartney, E. (ed.) 1999a: Speech/language therapists and teachers working together. London: Whurr.
30.
McCartney, E.1999b: Barriers to collaboration: an analysis of systemic barriers to collaboration between teachers and speech and language therapists , International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders34, 4, 431-40.
31.
McCartney, E., Boyle, J., Bannatyne, S., Jessiman, E., Campbell, C., Kelsey, C., Smith, J. and O'Hare, A.2003: Becoming a manual occupation?The construction of a therapy manual for use with language impaired children in mainstream primary schools International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders39, 1, 135-48.
32.
National Evaluation of Sure Start (NESS).2005: Early impacts of Sure Start local programmes on children and families, Report 13. London: DfES.
33.
Pugh, G.2007: Every child matters: the implications for service integration in England. In J. Forbes (ed.) How service integration is operating in practice in the Scotland , Northern Ireland and England and Wales policy contexts: ESRC seminar 2 proceedings, School of Education, University of Aberdeen .
34.
Rinaldi, W.2000: Pragmatic comprehension in secondary school-aged students with specific developmental language disorder, International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders35, 1, 1-30.
35.
Rinaldi, W.2001: Social Use of Language Programme (SULP), revised. Windsor: NFER-Nelson.
36.
Roaf, C.2002: Coordinating services for included children: joined up action, Buckingham: Open University .
37.
Roulstone, S., Owen, R. and French, L.2005: Speech and language therapy and the Knowles Edge Standards Fund Project: an evaluation of the service provided to a cluster of primary schools, British Journal of Special Education32, 2, 78-85.
38.
Stroggilos, V. and Xanthacou, Y.2006: Collaborative IEPs for the education of pupils with profound and multiple learning difficulties, European Journal of Special Needs Education21, 3, 339-49.
39.
Tett, L.2001: Parents as problems or parents as people? Parental involvement programmes, schools and adult educators, International Journal of Lifelong Education20, 3, 188-98.
40.
Tollerfield, I.2003: The process of collaboration within a special school setting: an exploration of the ways in which skills and knowledge are shared and barriers are overcome when a teacher and speech and language therapist collaborate , Child Language Teaching and Therapy19, 1, 67-86.
41.
Unesco1994: The UNESCO Salamanca Statement. Paris: UNESCO.
42.
Victor, B. and Boynton, A.C.1998: Invented here: maximizing your organization's internal growth and profitability. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
43.
Vygotsky, L.1978: Mind in society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44.
Vygotsky, L.1987: Thought and language, Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
45.
Warmington, P., Daniels, H., Edwards, A., Leadbetter, J., Martin, D., Popova, A. and Apostolov, A.2006: Learning in and for interagency working, TLRP Annual Progress Report, available from the Centre for Socio-cultural Activity Theory , University of Bath.
46.
Warmington, P., Daniels, H., Edwards, A., Leadbetter, J., Martin, D., Middleton, D., Brown, S., Popova, A. and Apostolov, A.2007: Learning leadership in multiagency work for integrating services into schools. In J. Forbes (ed.) How service integration is operating in practice in the Scotland , Northern Ireland and England and Wales policy contexts: ESRC seminar 2 proceedings, School of Education, University of Aberdeen.
47.
Wright, J.1996: Teachers and therapists: the evolution of a partnership , Child Language Teaching and Therapy12, 1, 3-16.
48.
Wright, J. and Kersner, M.1999: Teachers and speech and language therapists working with children with physical disabilities: implications for inclusive education , British Journal of Special Education26, 4, 201.
