Objective: Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) is an effective cariostatic agent, although staining associated with treatment is a significant impediment to its acceptability. Basic Research Design: A cross-sectional study of Syrian refugees to identify acceptance of SDF treatment. Methods: Information was collected on: sociodemographics, medical/dental child history, dental status (dmft/DMFT), andperceptions of photographs of SDF-treated teeth. Associations between clinical findings and the acceptability were assessed. Results: Of 258 parents or guardians, 37.8% accepted SDF treatment for their children. Acceptance was related to the location and type of teeth, being higher for primary than permanent teeth, and posterior than anterior teeth in both dentitions. Uncooperative behavior during previous dental treatment, the presence of dental discoloration, history of child dental pain, and number of filled teeth were all associated with better parental acceptance. Acceptance was also related to parental age, level of education, and their relation to the child. Conclusion: Parents’ acceptance of SDF treatment is low. However, staining on posterior teeth was more acceptable than staining on anterior teeth and on primary more than permanent teeth.
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. (2018): Use of Silver Diamine Fluoride for Dental Caries Management in Children and Adolescents, Including Those with Special Health Care Needs. Pediatric Dentistry40, 152-161.
2.
ArmalaiteJ.JarutieneM.VasiliauskasA.SidlauskasA.SvalkauskieneV.SidlauskasM.SkarbaliusG. (2018): Smile aesthetics as perceived by dental students: a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health18, 225.
3.
BagherS.M.SabbaghH.J.AljohaniS.M.AlharbiG.AldajaniM.ElkhodaryH. (2019): Parental acceptance of the utilization of silver diamine fluoride on their child’s primary and permanent teeth. Patient Preference and Adherence13, 829-835.
4.
BelottiL.CittyL.S.GomesA.M.M. (2016): The applicability of the silver diamine fluoride in children from 4 to 10 years old in the odonto-pediatrics clinic in the Federal University of the Espírito Santo, Brazil. Journal of Health Sciences18, 5-12.
5.
ChuC.H.LoE.C.LinH.C. (2002): Effectiveness of silver diamine fluoride and sodium fluoride varnish in arresting dentin caries in Chinese pre-school children. Journal of Dental Research81, 767-770.
6.
ClemensJ.GoldJ.ChaffinJ. (2018): Effect and acceptance of silver diamine fluoride treatment on dental caries in primary teeth. Journal of Public Health Dentistry78, 63-68.
7.
CrystalY.O.JanalM.N.HamiltonD.S.NiedermanR. (2017): Parental perceptions and acceptance of silver diamine fluoride staining. Journal of the American Dental Association148, 510-518.e4.
8.
HolanG.RahmeM.A.RamD. (2009): Parents’ attitude toward their children’s appearance in the case of esthetic defects of the anterior primary teeth. The Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry34, 141-145.
9.
HolsingerD.M.WellsM.H.ScarbeczM.DonaldsonM. (2016): Clinical Evaluation and Parental Satisfaction with Pediatric Zirconia Anterior Crowns. Pediatric Dentistry38, 192-197.
10.
HuebnerC.E.MilgromP.Cunha-CruzJ.ScottJ.SpiekermanC.LudwigS.MitchellM.AllenG.DysertJ.ShirtcliffR.M. (2020): Parents’ Satisfaction with Silver Diamine Fluoride Treatment of Carious Lesions in Children. Journal of Dentistry for Children87, 4-11.
11.
KumarA.CernigliaroD.NorthridgeM.E.WuY.TroxelA.B.Cunha-CruzJ.BalzerJ.OkujiD.M. (2019): A survey of caregiver acculturation and acceptance of silver diamine fluoride treatment for childhood caries. BMC Oral Health19, 228.
12.
LopezJ.AndradeG. (2011): El tratamiento restaurador atraumático (TRA) como parte de un paquete básico de servicios de salud oral en el área rural de Bolivia. Global Health Promotion18, 146-148.
13.
MagnoM.B.SilvaL.FerreiraD.M.Barja-FidalgoF.Fonseca-GonçalvesA. (2019): Aesthetic perception, acceptability and satisfaction in the treatment of caries lesions with silver diamine fluoride: A scoping review. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry29, 257-266.
14.
NaingL.WinnT.RusliB.N. (2006): Practical Issues in Calculating the Sample Size for Prevalence Studies. Archives of Orofacial Sciences1, 9-14.
15.
NelsonT.ScottJ.M.CrystalY.O.BergJ.H.MilgromP. (2016): Silver Diamine Fluoride in Pediatric Dentistry Training Programs: Survey of Graduate Program Directors. Pediatric Dentistry38, 212-217.
16.
PaniS.C.SaffanA.A.AlHobailS.Bin SalemF.AlFuraihA.AlTamimiM. (2016): Esthetic Concerns and Acceptability of Treatment Modalities in Primary Teeth: A Comparison between Children and Their Parents. International Journal of Dentistry2016, 3163904.
17.
PetersenP. E. (2003): The World Oral Health Report 2003: continuous improvement of oral health in the 21st century--the approach of the WHO Global Oral Health Programme. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 31 Suppl1, 3–23.
18.
Salaryexplorer.com. (2021): Average Salary in Jordan 2021 - The Complete Guide [Internet]. Available from: http://www.salaryexplorer.com/salary-survey.php?loc=109&loctype=1#disabled.
19.
SalimN.A.TiwariT. (2021): Migrant and refugee Oral Health. Community Dental Health38, 3-4.
20.
SalimN.A.ElSa’aidehB.B.MaaytaW.A.HassonaY.M. (2020a): Dental services provided to Syrian refugee children in Jordan: A retrospective study. Special Care in Dentistry40, 260–266.
21.
SalimN.A.MaaytaW.ElSa’aidehB.B. (2020b): The oral health of refugees: Issues and challenges arising from a case series analysis. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology48, 195-200.
22.
SalimN.A.MaaytaW.A.HassonaY.HammadM. (2021a). Oral health status and risk determinants in adult Syrian refugees in Jordan. Community Dental Health38, 53-58.
23.
SalimN.A.ShainiF.J.SartawiS.Al-ShboulB. (2021b): Oral health status and dental treatment needs in Syrian refugee children in Zaatari camp. Journal of Refugee Studies feaa133.
24.
SchwendickeF. (2017): Contemporary concepts in carious tissue removal: A review. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry29, 403-408.
25.
ShanahanD.O’NeillD. (2017): Barriers to dental attendance in older patients. Irish Medical Journal110, 548.
26.
SheihamA. (2005): Oral health, general health and quality of life. Bulletin of the World Health Organization83, 644.
27.
SlaytonR.L.UrquhartO.AraujoM.FontanaM.Guzmán-ArmstrongS.NascimentoM.M.NovýB.B.TinanoffN.WeyantR.J.WolffM.S.YoungD.A.ZeroD.T.TampiM.P.PilcherL.BanfieldL.Carrasco-LabraA. (2018): Evidence-based clinical practice guideline on nonrestorative treatments for carious lesions: A report from the American Dental Association. Journal of the American Dental Association (1939)149, 837-849.e19.
28.
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) Operational Data Portal (ODP). (2019): Fafo: The living conditions of Syrian refugees in Jordan- Results from the 2017-2018 survey of Syrian refugees inside and outside camps [Internet]. Available from: https://data2.unhcr.org/en/documents/details/67914.
29.
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). (2020): Situation Syria Regional Refugee Response [Internet]. Available from: https://data2.unhcr.org/en/situations/syria.
30.
World Health Organization. (1997): Oral health Surveys: Basic Methods. 4th ed.Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
31.
ZimmermanJ.A.FeigalR.J.TillM.J.HodgesJ.S. (2009): Parental attitudes on restorative materials as factors influencing current use in pediatric dentistry. Pediatric Dentistry31, 63–70.
