While ethical and moral philosophy underpins core concepts in language testing, few publications in the field engage with moral philosophy in a sustained or systematic way. A notable exception is the International Language Testing Association’s (ILTA) Code of Ethics (COE), ratified in 2000, which continues to guide professional practice. As ILTA initiates a revision of the COE, this paper examines the objectives and philosophical foundations of the original COE. Drawing on the document itself and key writings by its principal author, Alan Davies, and contemporary authors, we offer an analysis that reveals both the strategic rationale behind the Code and the unresolved tensions within it. Our aim is to deepen the field’s understanding of the ethical frameworks that have shaped the language testing profession as ILTA traces a way forward in revising the COE.
AdelsteinJ.CleggS. (2016). Code of ethics: A stratified vehicle for compliance. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(1), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2591-9
AlthusserL. (2001). Lenin and philosophy and other essays. NYU Press.
4.
American Educational Research Association. (1992). Ethical standards of the American Educational Research Association. Educational Researcher, 21(7), 23–26. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1176359
5.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.
BachmanL. F.PalmerA. S. (2010). Language assessment in practice. Oxford University Press.
9.
BagehotW. (1872). The English constitution. H. S. King & Company.
10.
BaileyA. L.ButlerF. A. (2004). Ethical considerations in the assessment of the language and content knowledge of U.S. school-age English learners. Language Assessment Quarterly, 1(2–3), 177–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2004.9671784
11.
BaumanZ. (1993). Postmodern ethics. Blackwell.
12.
BeauchampT. L.ChildressJ. F. (1979). Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford University Press.
BlackledgeA. (2009). “As a country we do expect”: The further extension of language testing regimes in the United Kingdom. Language Assessment Quarterly, 6(1), 6–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434300802606465
15.
BourdieuP. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Harvard University Press.
16.
BoydK.DaviesA. (2002). Doctors’ orders for language testers: The origin and purpose of ethical codes. Language Testing, 19(3), 296–322. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532202lt231oa
CarlsonR.van GinnekenN.PettigrewL.DaviesA.BoydK.WebbD. (2007). The three official language versions of the Declaration of Helsinki: What’s lost in translation?Journal of Medical Ethics, 33(9), 545–548. https://jme.bmj.com/content/33/9/545
19.
Chalhoub-DevilleM.O’SullivanB. (2020). Validity: Theoretical development and integrated arguments. British Council.
20.
CronbachL. J. (1976). Equity in selection: Where psychometrics and political philosophy meet. Journal of Educational Measurement, 13(1), 31–42. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1434490
21.
DavidsonF.AldersonJ. C.DouglasD.HuhtaA.TurnerC.WylieE. (1995). Report of the Task Force on Testing Standards to the International Language Testing Association. International Language Testing Association.
DaviesA. (2008). Ethics, professionalism, rights and codes. In HornbergerN. H. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and education (pp. 2555–2569). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30424-3_191
DaviesA. (2012a). Ethical codes and unexpected consequences. In FulcherG.DavidsonF. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language testing (pp. 455–468). Routledge.
DaviesA. (2013). Fifty years of language assessment. In KunnanA. J. (Ed.), The companion to language assessment (pp. 1–21). Wiley-Blackwell.
31.
DeweyJ. (2004). Reconstruction in philosophy. Courier Corporation.
32.
DeygersB. (2017). Just testing: Applying theories of justice to high-stakes language tests. ITL—International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 168(2), 143–162. https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.00001.dey
33.
DeygersB. (2019). Fairness and social justice in english language assessment. In GaoX. (Ed.), Second handbook of english language teaching (pp. 541–569). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02899-2_30
34.
DeygersB. (2026). Fairness and justice in language assessment. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
KaneM. T. (2013). Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50(1), 1–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12000
55.
KantI. (2016). Fundamental principles of the metaphysic of morals (AbbottT. K. Trans.). CreateSpace. (Original work published 1785).
56.
KhanK.McNamaraT. (2017). Citizenship, immigration laws, and language. In CanagarajahS. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of migration and language (pp. 451–467). Routledge.
57.
KunnanA. J. (2000). Fairness and justice for all. In KunnanA. J. (Ed.), Fairness and validation in language assessment (pp. 1–13). Cambridge University Press.
58.
KunnanA. J. (2014). Fairness and justice in language assessment. In KunnanA. J. (Ed.), The companion to language assessment (Vol. 3, pp. 1–17). Wiley-Blackwell.
59.
KunnanA. J. (2018). Evaluating language assessments. Routledge.
60.
LathamH. (1877). On the action of examinations considered as a means of selection. Deighton, Bell & Co.
61.
LockeJ. (1980). Second treatise of government (MacphersonC. B., Ed.). Hackett Publishing Company. (Original work published 1689).
LyotardJ.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge (BenningtonG.MassumiB. Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.
65.
ManningC. D.RaghavanP.SchützeH. (2008). Introduction to information retrieval. Cambridge University Press.
66.
MasonE. (2009). What is consequentialism?Think, 8(21), 19–28.
67.
MathewR. (2004). Stakeholder involvement in language assessment: Does it improve ethicality?Language Assessment Quarterly, 1(2–3), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2004.9671780
68.
McNamaraT. (2019). Language and subjectivity. Cambridge University Press.
69.
McNamaraT.RyanK. (2011). Fairness versus justice in language testing: The place of English literacy in the Australian citizenship test. Language Assessment Quarterly, 8(2), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2011.565438
70.
MessickS. (1989a). Meaning and values in test validation: The science and ethics of assessment. Educational Researcher, 18(2), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018002005
71.
MessickS. (1989b). Validity. In LinnR. L. (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13–103). American Council on Education/Macmillan.
72.
MillJ. S. (2015). On liberty, utilitarianism and other essays (PhilpM.RosenF., Eds.). Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1861).
73.
NagelT. (1979). Mortal questions. Cambridge University Press.
74.
RachelsJ.RachelsS. (2012). The elements of moral philosophy (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
75.
RawlsJ. (1971). A theory of justice. Harvard University Press.
76.
RawlsJ. (2001). Justice as fairness: A restatement. Belknap Press.
77.
ReathA. (2004). Language analysis in the context of the asylum process: Procedures, validity, and consequences. Language Assessment Quarterly, 1(4), 209–233. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15434311laq0104_2
78.
ReedD. J.StansfieldC. W. (2004). Using the Modern Language Aptitude Test to identify a foreign language learning disability: Is it ethical?Language Assessment Quarterly, 1(2–3), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2004.9671783
79.
SchildtL.DeygersB. (2023). A call for methodological reflexivity in researching language testing and migration. Applied Linguistics, 45(2), 397–405. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amad058
ShohamyE. (2022). Critical language testing, multilingualism and social justice. TESOL Quarterly, 56(4), 1445–1457. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3185
83.
SpolskyB. (1981). Some ethical questions about language testing. In Klein-BraleyC.StevensonD. (Eds.), Practice and problems in language testing (pp. 5–30). Peter Lang.
SpolskyB. (2013). The influence of ethics in language assessment. In KunnanA. J. (Ed.), The companion to language assessment (pp. 1–15). Wiley-Blackwell.
86.
StansfieldC. W. (1993). Ethics, standards, and professionalism in language testing. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 189–206.
87.
ThrasherR. (2004). The role of a language testing code of ethics in the establishment of a code of practice. Language Assessment Quarterly, 1(2–3), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2004.9671782
88.
WoodA. W. (2008). Kantian ethics. Cambridge University Press.
89.
World Medical Association. (1997). World Medical Association declaration of Helsinki: Recommendations guiding physicians in biomedical research involving human subjects. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 277(11), 925–926. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.277.11.925
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
