Orthographic processing – the ability to perceive, access, differentiate, and manipulate orthographic knowledge – is essential when learning to recognize words. Despite its critical importance in literacy acquisition, the field lacks a tool to assess this essential cognitive ability. The goal of this study was to design a computer-based assessment of orthographic processing and investigate its psychometric properties. The rationale for designing specific items was discussed, methods used to separate orthographic processing from word recognition and spelling ability were presented, and item suitability was examined. Person separation reliability was .91 for this assessment. Validity evidence was gathered and reported.
Abu-RabiaS. (2001). Testing the interdependence hypothesis among native adult bilingual Russian–English students. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 437–455. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010425825251
2.
AdamsM. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. MIT Press.
3.
AdamsR. J.KhooS. T. (1996). Quest. Australian Council for Educational Research.
4.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). The standards for educational and psychological testing (2nd ed.). American Educational Research Association.
5.
ApelK. (2009). The acquisition of mental orthographic representations for reading and spelling development. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 31(1), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525740108325553
ApelK.Thomas-TateS.Wilson-FowlerE. B.BrimoD. (2011). Acquisition of initial mental graphemic representations by children at risk for literacy development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(2), 365–391. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716411000403
8.
Arab-MoghaddamN.SénéchalM. (2001). Orthographic and phonological processing skills in reading and spelling in Persian/English bilinguals. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 25, 140–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650250042000320
9.
BerningerV. W.CartwrightA. C.YatesC. M.SwansonH. L.AbbottR. D. (1994). Developmental skills related to writing and reading acquisition in the intermediate grades. Reading and Writing, 6, 161–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01026911
10.
BerningerV. W.YatesC.LesterK. (1991). Multiple orthographic codes in reading and writing acquisition. Reading and Writing, 3, 115–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00420030
11.
BondT. G.FoxC. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (3rd ed.). Routledge.
12.
BooneW. J.StaverJ. R.YaleM. S. (2014). Rasch analysis in the human sciences. Springer.
13.
BurtJ. S. (2006). What is orthographic processing skill and how does it relate to word identification in reading?Journal of Research in Reading, 29, 400–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2006.00315.x
14.
CarrollD. W. (1999). Psychology of language. Brooks/Cole.
15.
CassarM.TreimanR. (1997). The beginnings of orthographic knowledge: Children’s knowledge of double letters in words. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 631–644. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.4.631
ChalmersK. A.BurtJ. S. (2008). Phonological and semantic information in adults’ orthographic learning. Acta Psychologica, 128, 162–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.12.003
18.
Chalhoub-DevilleM. (2016). Validity theory: Reform policies, accountability testing, and consequences. Language Testing, 33, 453–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532215593312
19.
ChenY.-J. I.CunninghamA. E.Rabe-HeskethS.HinshawS. P.IreyR. C. (2019). The effect of orthographic neighbors on second-grade students’ spelling acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.291
20.
ColtheartM. (2005). Modeling reading: The dual-route approach. Blackwell.
21.
CommissaireE.DuncanL. G.CasalisS. (2011). Cross-language transfer of orthographic processing skills: A study of French children who learn English at school. Journal of Research in Reading, 34, 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01473.x
22.
ConradN. J.HarrisN.WilliamsJ. (2012). Individual differences in children’s literacy development: The contribution of orthographic knowledge. Reading and Writing, 26(8), 1223–1239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9415-2
23.
CummingsD. W. (1988). American English spelling. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins Press.
24.
CunninghamA. E. (2006). Accounting for children’s orthographic learning while reading text: Do children self-teach?Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 95, 56–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2006.03.008
25.
CunninghamA. E.NathanR. G.RaherK. S. (2011). Orthographic processing in models of word recognition. In KamilM. L.PearsonP. D.MojeE. B.AfflerbachP. P. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research IV (pp. 259–285). Routledge.
26.
CunninghamA. E.PerryK. E.StanovichK. E. (2001). Converging evidence for the concept of orthographic processing. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 549–568. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011100226798
27.
CunninghamA. E.StanovichK. E. (1990). Assessing print exposure and orthographic processing skill in children: A quick measure of reading experience. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 733–740. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.4.733
28.
DeaconS. H.CommissaireE.ChenX.PasquarellaA. (2012). Learning about print: The development of orthographic processing and its relationship to word reading in first grade children in French immersion. Reading and Writing, 26, 1087–1109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9407-2
EhriL. C. (2005). Development of sight word reading: Phases and findings. In SnowlingM.HulmeC. (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 135–154). Blackwell.
31.
EhriL. C. (2014). Orthographic mapping in the acquisition of sight word reading, spelling memory, and vocabulary learning. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.819356
32.
HagiliassisN.PrattC.JohnstonM. (2006). Orthographic and phonological processing in reading. Reading and Writing, 19, 235–263. https://doi.org/10.10007/s11145-005-4123-9
33.
HarmM. W.SeidenbergM. S. (1999). Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: Insights from connectionist models. Psychological Review, 106(3), 491–528. https://doi.org/10.1038/301419a0
34.
KaneM. (2006). Validation. In BrennanR. (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 17–64). American Council on Education and Praeger.
KaneM. (2013). Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50, 1–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12000
37.
KaufmanA. S.KaufmanN. L. (2014). Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement–Third Edition (KTEA-3). Pearson.
38.
LeungC. B.SilvermanR.NandakumarR.QianX.HinesS. (2011). A comparison of difficulty levels of vocabulary in first grade basal readers for preschool dual language learners and monolingual English learners. American Educational Research Journal, 48(2), 421–461. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831210382890
LiuX.MarchisL.DeBiaseE.BreauxK. C.CourvilleT.PanX., et al. (2017). Do cognitive patterns of strengths and weaknesses differentially predict errors on reading, writing, and spelling?Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 35(1–2), 186–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282916668996
41.
LongfordN. T.HollandP. W.ThayerD. T. (1993). Stability of the MH D-DIF statistics across populations. In HollandP. W.WainerH. (Eds), Differential item functioning (pp. 67–113). Lawrence Erlbaum.
42.
MayerR. E. (1996). Learners as information processors: Legacies and limitations of educational psychology’s second metaphor. Educational Psychologist, 31, 151–161.
43.
McClungN. A.O’DonnellC. R.CunninghamA. E. (2012). Orthographic learning and the development of visual word recognition. In Visual word recognition (pp. 173–195). London: Psychology Press.
44.
McGrewK. S.SchrankF. A.WoodcockR. W. (2007). Technical manual: Woodcock-Johnson III normative update. Riverside.
45.
OlsonR.WiseB.ConnersF.RackJ.FulkerD. (1989). Specific deficits in component reading and language skills: Genetic and environmental influences. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 339–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221948902200604
PerfettiC. A.LandiN.OakhillJ. V. (2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension skill. In SnowlingM. J.HulmeC. (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 227–247). Blackwell.
RaschG. (1980). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests (Expanded ed.). University of Chicago Press.
50.
SeidenbergM. S.McClellandJ. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96(4), 523–568. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.13.1.14
ShareD. L. (1999). Phonological recoding and orthographic learning: A direct test of the Self-Teaching Hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72, 95–129. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1998.2481
53.
ShareD. L. (2004). Orthographic learning at a glance: On the time course and developmental onset of self-teaching. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 87, 267–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2004.01.001
54.
StanovichK. E.SiegelL. S. (1994). Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 24–53. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.86.1.24
55.
StanovichK. E.WestR. F. (1989). Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 402–433.
56.
TreimanR. (1993). Beginning to spell: A study of first-grade children. Oxford University Press.
WagnerR. K.BarkerT. A. (1994). The development of orthographic processing ability. In BerningerV. W. (Ed.), The varieties of orthographic knowledge, 1: Theoretical and developmental issues. (pp. 243–276). Kluwer.
59.
WangM.ParkY.LeeK. R. (2006). Korean–English biliteracy acquisition: Cross-language phonological and orthographic transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 148–158. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.148
WilsonM. (2005). Constructing measures: A item response modeling approach. Routledge.
62.
WoodcockR. W.McGrewK. S.MatherN. (2007) Woodcock-Johnson III tests of achievement. Riverside.
63.
WrightB. D.StoneM. H. (1979). Best test design. Mesa.
64.
WuM.AdamsR.WilsonM.HaldaneS. (2007). ACER ConQuest version 2.0: Generalised item response modeling software [Computer software and manual]. ACER Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
