This study examines elicited imitation (EI) both as a measure of implicit grammatical knowledge and more global semantic and syntactic knowledge. It also examines whether length affects the difficulty of EI tests when they contain both grammatical and ungrammatical items. Fifty language learners took an EI test and an oral narrative task. The data were analyzed once for the accuracy of a single target structure, third person ‘-s’, and then for the global semantic and syntactic accuracy. Moderate correlations were recorded between the learners’ third person accuracy scores on the oral narrative task and the grammatical and ungrammatical items of the EI test (r = 0.62 and r = 0.66 respectively). A moderate correlation was also found between the learners’ global semantic and syntactic scores on the EI test and the oral narrative task (r = 0.51). Furthermore, unlike the grammatical items, no significant correlation was recorded between length and the performance of the learners on the ungrammatical items. The findings underscore the need to validate EI against other tests of productive skills especially when EI is used as a measure of global language proficiency. Suggestion is made to explore structural-specific factors that contribute to difficulty level of EI tests.
AndersonJ. R.LebiereC. (1998). The atomic components of thought. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
Bernstein RatnerN. (2000). Elicited imitation and other methods for the analysis of trade-offs between speech and language skills in children. In MennL.Bernstein RatnerN. (Eds.), Methods for studying language production (pp. 291–331). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
BialystokE. (1982). On the relationship between knowing and using linguistic forms. Applied Linguistics, 3(2), 181–206.
4.
Bley-VromanR.ChaudronC. (1994). Elicited imitation as a measure of second language competence. In TaroneE.GassS.CohenA. (Eds.) Research methodology in second-language acquisition (pp. 245–261). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
ChaudronC. (2003). Data collection in SLA research. In DoughtyC. J.LongM. H. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 762–828). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
6.
ChristensenC.HendricksonR.LonsdaleD. (2010). Principled construction of elicited imitation tests. In CalzolariN.ChoukriK.MaegaardB.MarianiJ.OdijkJ.PiperidisS.RosnerM.TapiasD. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’10) (pp. 233–238). European Language Resources Association (ELRA), Valetta, Malta. Retrieved May, 2012, from: http://hnk.ffzg.hr/bibl/lrec2010/pdf/672_Paper.pdf.
7.
EllisN. C. (2005). At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 305–352.
8.
EllisR. (2004). The definition and measurement of L2 explicit knowledge. Language Learning, 54(2), 227–275.
9.
EllisR. (2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 141–172.
10.
EllisR. (2006). Modeling learning difficulty and second language proficiency: The differential contributions of implicit and explicit knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 27(3), 431–463.
11.
EllisR. (2007). The differential effects of corrective feedback on two grammatical structures. In MackeyA. (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies (pp. 339–360). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
EllisR. (2009). Implicit and explicit knowledge and instruction. In EllisR.LoewenS.ElderC.ErlamR.PhilpJ.ReindersH. (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (pp. 3–-25). Bristol: Multilingual mattersMatters.
13.
EllisR.LoewenS.ErlamR. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and learning of L2 Grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(2), 339–368.
14.
EpsteinA. G. (1978). Sprogmangler hos børn. Copenhagen: Dansk VidenskabsForlag.
15.
ErlamR. (2006). Elicited imitation as a measure of L2 implicit knowledge: An empirical validation study. Applied Linguistics, 27(3), 464–491.
16.
FoulyK.CzikoG. (1985). Determining the reliability, validity and scalability of the graduated dictation test. Language Learning, 35(5), 555–566.
17.
GallimoreR.TharpR. G. (1981). The interpretation of elicited sentence imitation in a standardized context. Language Learning, 31(2), 369–392.
18.
GeersA. E.MoogJ. S. (1978). Syntactic maturity of spontaneous speech and elicited imitations of hearing impaired children, Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 43, 380–391.
19.
GrahamC. R.McGheeJ.MillardB. (2010). The role of lexical choice in elicited imitation item difficulty. In PriorM. T.WatanabeY.LeeS. (Eds). Selected Proceedings of the 2008 Second Language Research Forum (pp. 57–72). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
20.
HameyerK. (1980). Testing oral proficiency via elicited imitation. Revue de phonetique appliquée, 53(1), 11–24.
21.
HenningG. (1983). Oral proficiency testing: Comparative validities of interview, imitation, and completion methods. Language Learning, 33(3), 315–332.
22.
HulstijnJ. H. (2005). The theoretical and empirical issues in the study of implicit and explicit second language acquisition: Introduction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 129–140.
23.
LoewenS.ErlamR.EllisR. (2009). The incidental acquisition of 3rd person -s as L2 implicit and explicit knowledge. In EllisR.LoewenS.ElderC.ErlamR.PhilpJ.ReindersH. (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (pp. 262–280). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
24.
LoseyJ. (1986). The relationship between elicited imitation and spontaneous language and between elicited imitation and auditory memory span. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Oklahoma.
25.
McDadeH.SimpsonM.LambD. (1982). The use of elicited imitation as a measure of expressive grammar: A question of validity. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47(1), 19–24.
26.
MacroryG.StoneV. (2000). Pupil progress in the acquisition of the perfect tense in French: The relationship between knowledge and use. Language Teaching Research, 4(1), 55–82.
27.
McNamaraT. (1996). Measuring second language performance. London: Longman.
28.
MunnichE.FlynnS.MartohardjonoG. (1994). Elicited imitation and grammaticality judgment tasks: What they measure and how they relate to each other. In TaroneE.GassS.CohenA. (Eds.), Research methodology in second language acquisition (pp. 227–245). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29.
OrtegaL.IwashitaN.RabieS.NorrisJ. M. (1999). A multi-language comparison of measures of syntactic complexity. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.
30.
PerkinsK.BruttenS. R.AngelisP. J. (1986). Derivational complexity and item difficulty in a sentence repetition task. Language Learning, 36(2), 125–141.
31.
PruttingC. A.GallagherT. M.MulacA. (1975). The expressive portion of the NSST compared to a spontaneous language sample. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 40(1), 40–48.
32.
SchmidtR. (2001). Attention. In RobinsonP. (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). New York: Cambridge University Press.
33.
SmithC. S. (1970). An experimental approach to children’s linguistic competence. In HayesJ. R. (Ed.), Cognition and the development of language (pp. 109–133). New York: John Wiley.
34.
SuzukiM. (2012). Are predictor variables for item difficulty of L2 sentence repetition consistent between English and Chinese?Paper presented at Language Testing Research Colloquium (LTRC), Princeton, NJ.
35.
SwainM.NaimanN.DumasG. (1974). Alternatives to spontaneous speech: Elicited translation and imitation as indicators of second language competence. Working Papers on Bilingualism: Special Issue on Language Acquisition Studies, 3, 68–79.
TomitaY.SuzukiW.JessopL. (2009). Elicited imitation: Toward valid procedures to measure implicit second language grammatical knowledge. TESOL Quarterly, 43(2), 345–350.
38.
Van MoereA. (2012). A psycholinguistic approach to oral language assessment. Language Testing, 29(3), 325–344.
39.
Van PattenB. (2004). Processing instruction: Theory, research and commentary. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40.
VintherT. (2002). Elicited imitations: A brief review. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 54–73.
41.
WuS.-L.OrtegaL. (2013). Measuring global oral proficiency in SLA research: A new elicited imitation test of L2 Chinese. Foreign Language Annals, 46(4), 680–704.
42.
ZoblH. (1995). Converging evidence for the ‘acquisition-learning’ distinction. Applied Linguistics, 16(1), 35–56.
