This study examined the comprehension of third person singular /s/ as a number
agreement marker in children speaking Mainstream American English (MAE). Sixty-two
MAE-speaking children aged 3-6 years were presented with a comprehension task where
they had to focus on the verb as a clue to number agreement. Overall, results showed
that only the 5- and 6-year olds were sensitive to third person singular /s/ as an
index of subject number in comprehension, despite their earlier command in
production. The implications for development of agreement are discussed.
Bobaljik, J. D.
(2001). Realizing inflection: Why morphology does not drive
syntax. Unpublished manuscript,
University of McGill
.
2.
Brown, R.
(1973). A first language: The early stages.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
.
3.
Carlson, G. N.
&
Pelletier, F. J.
(Eds) (1995). The generic book.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press
.
4.
Chomsky, N.
(1995). The minimalist program.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
.
5.
de Villiers, J. G.
&
de Villiers, P. A.
(1973).
A cross sectional study of the acquisition of grammatical morphemes in
child speech
. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2,
267-278
.
6.
Enç, M.
(1990). On the absence of the present tense morpheme in
English. Unpublished manuscript,
University of Wisconsin, Madison
.
7.
Fraser, C.
,
Bellugi, U.
&
Brown, R.
(1963).
Control of grammar in imitation, comprehension, and production
. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 2,
121-135
.
8.
Gerken, L. A.
&
McIntosh, B. J.
(1993).
The interplay of function morphemes and prosody in early language
. Developmental Psychology, 29,
448-457
.
9.
Gerken, L.
&
Shady, M. E.
(1996). The picture selection task. In
D. McDaniel
,
C. McKee
&
H. Smith Cairns
(Eds), Methods for assessing children’s syntax: Language,
speech and communication (pp. 125-145).
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
.
10.
Myhill, J.
&
Harris, W. A.
(1986). The use of the verbal -s inflection in
BEV. In
D. Sankoff
(Ed.), Diversity and diachrony (pp. 25-31).
Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins
.
11.
Radford, A.
(1990). Syntactic theory and the acquisition of English
syntax.
Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell
.
12.
Rice, M. L.
&
Wexler, K.
(2002). Test of early grammatical impairment.
San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation
.
13.
Rickford, J. R.
(1999). African American vernacular English: Features,
evolution, educational implications.
Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers
.
14.
Santelmann, L.
&
Jusczyk, P.
(1998).
Sensitivity to discontinuous dependencies in language learners: Evidence
for limitations in processing space
. Cognition, 69,
105-134
.
15.
Sauerland, U.
(2002).
The present tense is vacuous
. Snippets, 6,
12-13
.
16.
Seymour, H. N.
,
Roeper, T.
&
de Villiers, J.
(2003). The diagnostic evaluation of language
variation.
San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation
.
17.
Smolensky, P.
(1996).
On the comprehension/production dilemma in child language
. Linguistic Inquiry, 27,
720-732
.
18.
Soderstrom, Wexler, K.
&
Jusczyk, P.
(2002).
English-learning toddlers’ sensitivity to agreement morphology in
receptive grammar
. In
B. Skarabela
,
S. Fish
&
A. H.-J. Do
(Eds), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Boston University Conference on
Language Development, 2,
643-652
.
19.
Theakston, A. L.
,
Lieven, E. V. M.
&
Tomasello, M.
(2003).
The role of the input in the acquisition of third person singular verbs in English
. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research,
46,
863-877
.
