This paper describes the process of designing, administering, and assessing a language-sensitive and culture-specific lexical test of Labrador Inuttitut (a dialect of Inuktitut, an Eskimo-Aleut language). This process presented numerous challenges, from choosing citation forms in a polysynthetic language to dealing with a lack of word frequency data. Twenty heritage receptive bilinguals (RBs) with very limited production skills in Inuttitut (their first language) and a comparison group of eight fluent bilinguals (FBs) participated in our study. Since the RBs lacked production skills in Inuttitut, the lexical test required participants to translate a carefully compiled list of Inuttitut nouns and verbs into English. The results revealed that RBs had good comprehension of basic vocabulary (85% accuracy), but differed significantly from FBs, mostly because the RBs had a number of partially accurate translations. The three lowest scoring RBs had the highest number of such translations as well as inaccurate translations based on phonological associations, as is common in emergent lexicons. This lexical test correlates with grammatical proficiency measures, pointing to its potential value as a quick placement and diagnostic test in revitalization programs for Inuttitut as well as other languages in a language loss situation.
Aksu-KoçA.SlobinD. I. (1985). The acquisition of Turkish. In SlobinD. I. (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition (pp. 839–878). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
AndersenA.KalleoW.WattsB. (2007). Labradorimi Ulinnaisiugutet: An Inuktitut-English dictionary of Northern Labrador dialect (with an English–Inuktitut index). Nain, NL: Torngâsok Cultural Centre.
3.
BatesE.GoodmanJ. C. (1999). On the emergence of grammar from the lexicon. In MacWhinneyB. (Ed.), The emergence of language (pp. 29–79). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
BauerL.NationI. (1993). Word families. International Journal of Lexicography, 6(3), 1–27.
5.
BenmamounE.MontrulS.PolinskyM. (2010). White paper: Prolegomena to heritage linguistics. Ms., Harvard University, USA.
6.
ClarkE.HechtB. (1983). Comprehension, production, and language acquisition. Annual Review of Psychology, 34, 325–349.
7.
ComptonR. (2011). Adjectives and adverbs as distinct lexical categories in Inuktitut. Proceedings of WSCLA XVI: The Sixteenth Workshop on Structure and Constituency in Languages of the Americas, 11–21. UBC Working Papers in Linguistics.
8.
ComptonR.PittmanC. (2010). Word formation by phase in Inuit. Lingua, 120(9), 2167–2192.
9.
CragoM.AllenS. E. M. (1999). Acquiring Inuktitut. In TaylorO. L.LeonardL. (Eds.), Language acquisition across North America: Cross-cultural and cross-linguistic perspectives (pp. 245–279). San Diego, CA: Singular.
10.
CraikF. I. M. (2002). Levels of processing: Past, present … and future?Memory, 10, 305–318.
11.
De la FuenteM. (2002). Negotiation and oral acquisition of L2 vocabulary: The roles of input and output in the receptive and productive acquisition of words. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(1), 81–112.
12.
DoraisL.-J. (1990). Inuit uqausiqatigiit: Inuit languages and dialects. Iqaluit: Arctic College.
13.
DoraisL.-J. (2010). The language of the Inuit: Syntax, semantics, and the society in the Arctic. Montreal/Kingston: McGill-Queen University Press.
14.
DronjicV.Helms-ParkR. (2014). Fixed-choice word association tasks as L2 lexical tests: What native-speaker performance reveals about their potential weaknesses. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35(1), 193–221.
15.
FitzpatrickT.IzuraC. (2011). Word association in L1 and L2: An exploratory study of response types, response times and interlingual mediation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33(3), 373–398.
16.
FortescueM. (1980). Affix ordering in West Greenlandic derivational processes. International Journal of American Linguistics, 46(4), 259–278.
17.
FortescueM. (1984). West Greenlandic. Croom Helm.
18.
GreidanusT.BeksB.WakelyR. (2005). Testing the development of French word knowledge by advanced Dutch and English speaking learners and native speakers. Modern Language Journal, 89, 221–233.
19.
HayashiY.MurphyV. (2011). An investigation of morphological awareness in Japanese learners of English. Language Learning Journal, 39(1), 105–120.
20.
Helms-ParkR. (2000). Two decades of heritage language education. In TexeiraJ.Da RosaV. (Eds.), The Portuguese in Canada (pp. 127–144). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
21.
Helms-ParkR.DronjicV. (2015). Cross-linguistic lexical influence: Cognate facilitation. In AlonsoR. (Ed.), Cross-linguistic influence in second language acquisition. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
22.
HoffE.NaiglesL. (2002). How children use input to acquire a lexicon?Child Development, 73(2), 418–433.
JiangN. (2000). Lexical representation and development in a second language. Applied Linguistics, 21(1), 47–77.
25.
JohnsA. (1995). On some mood alternations in Labrador Inuttut. In BurgessC.DziwirekK.GerdtsD. (Eds.), Grammatical relations: Theoretical approaches to empirical questions (pp. 131–151). Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University.
26.
JohnsA.MazurkewichI. (2001). The role of the university in the training of Native language teachers. In HintonL.HaleK. (Eds.), The green book of language revitalization in practice, (pp. 355–366). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
27.
KrollJ.TokowiczN. (2001). The development of conceptual representation for words in a second language. In NicolJ. L. (Ed.), One mind, two languages: Bilingual language processing (pp. 49–71). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
28.
LauferB. (1998). The development of passive and active vocabulary in a second language: Same or different?Applied Linguistics, 12, 255–271.
29.
MearaP.BuxtonB. (1987). An alternative to multiple choice vocabulary tests. Language Testing, 4, 142–154.
30.
NationP. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. New York: Newbury House.
31.
PolinskyM. (2006). Incomplete acquisition: American Russian. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 14, 191–262.
32.
PullumG. K. (1991). The great Eskimo vocabulary hoax and other irreverent essays on the study of language. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
33.
ReadJ. (2004). Plumbing the depths: How should the construct of vocabulary knowledge be defined? In BogaardsP.LauferB. (Eds.), Vocabulary in a second language: Selection, acquisition and testing (pp. 209–227). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
34.
ReadJ.ChapelleC. (2001). A framework for second language vocabulary assessment. Language Testing, 18(1), 1–32.
35.
SadockJ. (2003). A grammar of Kalaalisut (West Greenlandic Inuttut). Languages of the World/Materials: Vol. 162. Munich: Lincom Europa.
36.
SchmittN. (2000). Vocabulary in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
Sherkina-LieberM. (2011). Comprehension of Labrador Inuttitut functional morphology by receptive bilinguals. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (Accession Order No. AAT NR78022).
38.
Sherkina-LieberM. (2015). Tense, aspect, and agreement in heritage Labrador Inuttitut: Do receptive bilinguals understand functional morphology?Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism.
39.
Sherkina-LieberM.Perez-LerouxA.JohnsA. (2011). Grammar without speech production: The case of Labrador Inuttitut heritage receptive bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14(3), 301–317.
40.
SodermanT. (1989). Word associations of foreign language learners and native speakers: A shift in response type and its relevance for a theory of lexical development. Scandinavian Working Papers on Bilingualism, 8, 114–121.
SwadeshM. (1952). Lexico-statistic dating of prehistoric ethnic contacts. Proceedings of American Philosophical Society, 96, 452–463.
43.
WerkerJ. (2012) Perceptual foundations of bilingual acquisition in infancy. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: The Year in Cognitive Neuroscience, 1251, 50–61.
44.
ZarevaA. (2007). Structure of the second language lexicon: How does it compare with the native speakers’ lexical organization. Second Language Research, 23(2), 123–152.
