AldersonJ. C.UrquhartA. H. (1985). The effect of students’ academic discipline on their performance on ESP reading tests. Language Testing, 2, 192–204.
2.
BachmanL. F.CohenA. D. (Eds.). (1998). Interfaces between second language acquisition and language testing research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
CarrollJ. B. (Ed.). (1956). Language, thought and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4.
CriperC.DaviesA. (1988). IELTS validation project report. ELTS Research Reports1(1). London: The British Council and UCLES.
5.
DaviesA. (1997). Demands of being professional in language testing. Language Testing, 14(3), 328–339.
6.
DaviesA. (2003). Three heresies of language testing. Language Testing, 20(4), 355–368.
7.
GumperzJ. J.LevinsonS. C. (1996). Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
HanZ. H. (2004). To be a native speaker means not to be a nonnative speaker. [Review of the books The native speaker in applied linguistics and The native speaker: Myth and reality]. Second Language Research, 20(2), 166–167.
9.
PrestonD. (1989). Sociolinguistics and second language acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell.
10.
ShohamyE. (2000). The relationship between language testing and second language acquisition revisited. System, 28(4), 541–553.
11.
SlobinD. (1996). From ‘thought and language’ to ‘thinking for speaking’. In GumperzJ. J.LevinsonS. C., Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 70–96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
TylerL. E. (1971). Tests and measurements (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
13.
WhorfB. L. (1956). Language, thought and reality. New York: John Wiley and Sons and the Technology Press of MIT.