Alderson, J.C. & Hamp-Lyons, L. ( 1996). TOEFL preparation courses: A study of washback . Language Testing, 13(3), 280—297.
2.
Bejar, I., Douglas, D., Jamieson, J., Nissan, S., & Turner, J. ( 2000). TOEFL 2000 listening framework: A working paper. TOEFL Monograph Series, MA — 19. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
3.
Chapelle, C. A., Enright, M. K., & Jamieson, J. M. (Eds) (2008). Building a validity argument for the Test of English as a Foreign Language. New York: Routledge.
4.
Cohen, A.D. & Upton, T.A. ( 2006). Strategies in responding to the new TOEFL reading tasks. TOEFL Monograph Series, MS — 33. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
5.
Ealta (2006). Guidelines for good practice. Available at http://www.ealta.eu.org/guidelines.htm . Last accessed March 22, 2009.
6.
Enright, M.K. & Quinlan, T. ( 2009). Complementing human judgment of essays written by English language learners with e-rater® scoring. Manuscript submitted for publication, Educational Testing Service.
7.
ETS (2007). TOEFL iBT tips. How to prepare for the TOEFL iBT. Available at http://www.ets.org/Media/Tests/TOEFL/pdf/TOEFL_Tips.pdf . Last accessed March 9, 2009.
8.
ETS (2008a). 2008—09 TOEFL iBT Bulletin. Information and registration for Internet-based testing (iBT) . Available at http://www.ets.org/Media/Tests/TOEFL/pdf/toefl_ibt_bulletin_08_09.pdf .
9.
ETS (2008b). Validity evidence supporting the interpretation and use of TOEFL iBT scores. Available at http://www.ets.org/Media/Tests/TOEFL/pdf/TOEFL_iBT_Validity.pdf .
10.
ETS (2008c). Reliability and comparability of TOEFL iBT scores. Availableat http://www.ets.org/Media/Tests/TOEFL/pdf/TOEFL_iBT_Reliability.pdf .
11.
Jamieson, J.M., Eignor, D., Grabe, W., & Kunnan, A.J. ( 2008). Frameworks for a new TOEFL. In Chapelle et al. (Eds), Building a validity argument for the Test of English as a Foreign Language (pp. 55—95). New York : Routledge.
12.
Sawaki, Y., Stricker, L.J., & Oranje, A.H. ( 2009). Factor structure of the TOEFL Internet-based test . Language Testing, 26(1), 5—30.
13.
Taylor, C. & Angelis, P. ( 2008). The evolution of the TOEFL. In Chapelle et al. (Eds), Building a validity argument for the Test of English as a Foreign Language (pp. 27—54). New York : Routledge.
14.
Toulmin, S.E. ( 1958) The uses of argument. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
15.
Wall, D. & Horák, T. ( 2006) The impact of changes in the TOEFL examination on teaching and learning in Central and Eastern Europe: Phase 1, The baseline study. TOEFL Monograph Series, MS — 34. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
16.
Wall, D. & Horák, T. ( 2008a). The impact of changes in the TOEFL examination on teaching and learning in Central and Eastern Europe: Phase 2, Coping with change. TOEFL iBT Research Report, TOEFLiBT-05. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
17.
Wall, D. & Horák, T. ( 2008b). The impact of changes in the TOEFL examination on teaching and learning in a sample of countries in Europe: Phase 3, The role of the coursebook. Phase 4, Describing change. Manuscript submitted for publication , Lancaster University.
18.
Zhang, Y. ( 2008). Repeater analyses for TOEFL iBT. Research Memorandum ETS RM-08—05. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.