This research explored the extent to which people use deception to initiate a date with opposite-sex prospects who varied in facial physical attractiveness. Participants reviewed profiles of prospective dates varying in facial attractiveness, described their own personal characteristics to the prospective dates (study 1), and rated their willingness to lie to make themselves appear to be more desirable to each prospect (study 2). Both men and women deceptively altered their self-presented expressivity and love attitudes to more attractive prospects (study 1), and reported being more willing to lie about their personal appearance, personality traits, income, past relationship outcomes, career skills and intelligence to prospective dates who were higher in facial physical attractiveness, compared with prospective dates who were lower in facial physical attractiveness (study 2). No sex-differences in the willingness to use deceptive self-presentational tactics were found. A strong positive correlation was found between people’s willingness to lie about a specific personal dimension and the extent to which physically attractive individuals differed from other people on that dimension. Thus, it appears that people endeavor to lie to physically attractive people in ways that maximize their similarity with the attractive target.
Ajzen, I. , & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice–Hall.
2.
Bell, K. L. , & DePaulo, B. M. (1996). Liking and lying. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 18, 243–266.
3.
Benson, P. L. , Karabenick, S. A., & Lerner, R. M. (1976). Pretty pleases: The effects of physical attractiveness, race, and sex on receiving of help. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 409–415.
4.
Bernstein, W. M. , Stephenson, B. O., Snyder, M. L., & Wicklund, R. A. (1983). Causal ambiguity and heterosexual affiliation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 78–92.
5.
Berscheid, E. , Dion, K. K., Walster (Hatfield), E., & Walster, G. W. (1971). Physical attractiveness and dating choice: A test of the matching hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7, 173–189.
6.
Brooks, P. , & Arnold, D. (1989). Reid report examiner’s manual (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: Reid Psychological Systems.
7.
Burns, G. L. , & Farina, A. (1992). The role of physical attractiveness in adjustment. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 118, 157–194.
8.
Buss, D. M. (1988). The evolution of human intrasexual competition: Tactics of mate attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 616–628.
9.
Buss, D. M. , & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.
10.
Byrne, D. (1997). An overview (and underview) of research and theory within the attraction paradigm. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14, 417–431.
11.
Cunningham, M. R. , Roberts, A. R., Barbee, A. P., Druen, P. B., & Wu, C. (1995). ‘Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours’: Consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 261–279.
12.
DePaulo, B. M. , & Kashy, D. A. (1998). Everyday lies in close and casual relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 63–79.
13.
DePaulo, B. M. , Kashy, D. A., Kirkendol, S. E., Wyer, M. W., & Epstein, J. A. (1996). Lying in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 979–995.
14.
DePaulo, B. M. , Stone, J. I., & Lassiter, G. D. (1985). Telling ingratiating lies: Effects of target sex and target attractiveness on verbal and nonverbal deceptive success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1191–1203.
15.
DePaulo, B. M. , Tang, J., & Stone, J. I. (1987). Physical attractiveness and skill at detecting deception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 177–187.
16.
Downey, G. , & Feldman, S. I. (1996). Implications of rejection-sensitivity for intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1327–1343.
17.
Druen, P. B. , Cunningham, M. R., Barbee, A. P., & Yankeelov, P. (1998). Deception, honesty, and the illusion of conformity: The dilemma of clashing expectations between romantic partners. In preparation.
18.
Eysenck, H. J. , & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1963). Eysenck Personality Inventory. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Services.
19.
Fehr, B. (1988). Prototype analysis of the concepts of love and commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 557–579.
20.
Feingold, A. (1992). Good-looking people are not what we think. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 304–341.
21.
Folkes, V. S. (1982). Forming relationships and the matching hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 631–636.
22.
Greer, A. , & Buss, D. M. (1994). Tactics for promoting sexual encounters. Journal of Sex Research, 5, 185–201.
23.
Hendrick, C. , & Hendrick, S. (1986). A theory and method of love. Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 50, 392–402.
24.
Huston, T. (1973). Ambiguity of acceptance, social desirability, and dating choice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9, 32–42.
25.
Major, B. , Carrington, P. I., & Carnevale, P. J. D. (1984). Physical attractiveness and self-esteem: Attributions for praise from an opposite-sex evaluator. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 43–50.
26.
McCornack, S. A. , & Parks, M. R. (1990). What women know that men don’t: Sex differences in determining the truth behind deceptive messages. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 107–118.
27.
Metts, S. (1989). An exploratory investigation of deception in close relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6, 159–179.
28.
Miller, G. R. , Mongeau, P. A., & Sleight, C. (1986). Fudging with friends and lying to lovers: Deceptive communication in personal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 3, 495–512.
29.
Millar, K. , & Tesser, A. (1987). Deceptive behavior in social relationships: A consequence of violated expectations. Journal of Psychology, 122, 263–273.
30.
Paulhus, D. L. , & Reid, D. B. (1991). Enhancement and denial in social desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 301–317.
31.
Rowatt, W. C. , Cunningham, M. R., & Druen, P. B. (1998). Deception to get a date. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1228–1241.
32.
Rowatt, W. C., Cunningham, M. R., Rowatt, T. J. & Druen, P. B. (1999). Deceptive tactics that people use and suspect other people use to initiate a dating relationship. Manuscript submitted for publication.
33.
Schachter, S. (1951). Deviation, rejection, and communication. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 190–207.
34.
Shanteau, J. , & Nagy, G. F. (1979). Probability of acceptance in dating choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 522–533.
35.
Sigall, H. , & Michela, J. (1976). I’ll bet you say that to all the girls: Physical attractiveness and reactions to praise. Journal of Personality, 44, 611–626.
36.
Simpson, J. A. & Gangestad, S. W. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 870–883.
37.
Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 526–537.
38.
Speed, A. , & Gangestad, S. (1997). Romantic popularity and mate preferences: A peer-nomination study. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 928–935.
39.
Spence, J. T. , & Helmreich, R. T. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents. Austin: University of Texas Press.
40.
Sroufe, R. , Chaikin, A., Cook, R., & Freeman, V. (1977). The effects of physical attractiveness on honesty: A socially desirable response. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3, 59–62.
41.
Tooke, W. , & Camire, L. (1991). Patterns of deception in intersexual and intrasexual mating strategies. Ethology and Sociobiology, 12, 345–364.
42.
Walster (Hatfield), E. , Aronson, V., Abrahams, D., & Rottman, L. (1966). Importance of physical attractiveness in dating behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 508–516.
43.
Walters, S. , & Crawford, C. B. (1994). The importance of mate attraction for intra-sexual competition in men and women. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15, 5–30.
44.
West, S. G. , & Brown, T. J. (1975). Physical attractiveness, the severity of the emergency and helping: A field experiment and interpersonal simulation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 531–538.
45.
White, G. L. (1980). Physical attractiveness and courtship progress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 660–668.
46.
Zanna, M. P. , & Pack, S. J., (1975). On the self-fulfilling nature of apparent sex-differences in behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 583–591.
