We test theoretical arguments developed by Hazan and Diamond (2000) suggesting that attachment theory presents a more parsimonious theory of mate selection than Buss’ sexual strategies theory. We hypothesized that physical attractiveness and indicators of attachment anxiety and avoidance would be related to mate choice variables (e.g., number of first dates, and the probability of entering into an exclusive relationship in a 32-week period). We used a sample (N = 242) of Latter-day Saint (LDS) young single adults. In general, our results support the idea that both physical attractiveness and attachment dimensions are important for understanding romantic relationship formation and dating processes. Physical attractiveness is generally the strongest predictor, and is more meaningful for females. Implications for theory are discussed.
BogleKathleen A. (2008). Hooking up: Sex, dating, and relationships on campus. New York: New York University Press.
2.
BowlbyJ. (1973). Attachment and loss: Vol. 2. Separation: Anxiety and anger. New York: Basic Books.
3.
BusbyD. M.HolmanT. B.TaniguchiN. (2001). RELATE: Relationship evaluation of the individual, family, culture, and couple contexts. Family Relations, 50, 308–316.
4.
BussD. M. (1985). Human mate selection. American Scientist, 73, 47–51.
5.
BussD. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49.
6.
BussD. M. (1995). Evolutionary psychology: A new paradigm for psychological science. Psychological Inquiry, 6(1), 1–30.
7.
BussD. M.SchmittD. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.
8.
CereD. (2000). The experts’ story of courtship. New York: Institute for American Values.
9.
ChadwickB. A.TopB. L.McClendonR.JuddM.SmithL. (2007). Hanging out or hooking up: The culture of courtship at BYU. In WoodgerM. J.HolmanT. B.YoungK. A. (Eds.), Latter-day Saint courtship patterns: Studies in religion and the social order (pp. 13–38). Lanham, Maryland: University Press of America.
10.
ChappellK. D.DavisK. E. (1998). Attachment, partner choice, and perception of romantic partners: An experimental test of the attachment-security hypothesis. Personal Relationships, 5(3), 327–342.
11.
CreaseyG.JarvisP. (2008). Attachment theory and research: A special focus on relationship initiation. In SprecherS.WenzelA.HarveyJ. (Eds.), Handbook of relationship initiation (pp. 75–94). New York: Psychology Press.
12.
EastwickP. W.FinkelE. J. (2008a). The attachment system in fledgling relationships: An activating role for attachment anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 628–647.
13.
EastwickP. W.FinkelE. J. (2008b). Sex Differences in mate preferences revisited: Do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(2), 245–264.
14.
FisherH. E. (1989). Evolution in human serial pair bonding. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 73, 331–354.
15.
GlennN.MarquardtE. (2001). Hanging out, hooking up, and hoping for Mr. Right: College women on dating and mating today. New York: Institute for American Values.
16.
HazanC.DiamondL. M. (2000). The place of attachment in human mating. Review of General Psychology, 4(2), 186–204.
17.
HazanC.ShaverP. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511–524.
18.
HazanC.ZeifmanD. (1994). Sex and the psychological tether. Advances in Personal Relationships, 5, 151–177.
19.
HazanC.ZeifmanD. (1999). Pair bonds as attachments: Evaluating the evidence. In CassidyJ.ShaverP. R. (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 336–354). New York: Guilford Press.
20.
HeatonT. B.GoodmanK. L.HolmanT. B. (1994). In search of a peculiar people: Are Mormon families really different? In CornwallM.HeatonT. B.YoungL. A. (Eds.), Contemporary Mormonism: Social science perspectives (pp. 88–114). Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
21.
HoffmanJ. P. (2004). Generalized linear models: An applied approach. Boston, MA: Pearson.
22.
HolmanT. B. (1996). Commitment making: Mate selection processes among active Mormon American couples. In D. J. Davies, Mormon identities in transition (pp. 126–132). London: Cassell.
23.
HolmanT. B.HardingJ. R. (1996). The teaching of nonmarital sexual abstinence and members’ sexual attitudes and behaviors: The case of Latter-day Saints. Review of Religious Research, 38(1), 51–60.
24.
KlohnenE. C.LuoS. (2003). Interpersonal attraction and personality: What is attractive—self, similarity, ideal similarity, complementarity or attachment security?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(4), 709–7222.
25.
MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (2003). The attachment behavioral system in adulthood: Activation, psychodynamics, and interpersonal processes. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 35). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
26.
MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood. New York: Guilford Press.
27.
PietromonacoP. R.CarnelleyK. B. (1994). Gender and working models of attachment: Consequences for perceptions of self and romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 1, 63–82.
28.
RegnerusM.UeckerJ. (2011). Premarital sex in America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
SanfordK. (1997). Two dimensions of adult attachment: Further validation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14, 133–143.
30.
SchaaljeB. C.HolmanT. B. (2007). Courtship statistics for BYU students. In WoodgerM. J.HolmanT. B.BellK. (Eds.), Latter-day Saint courtship patterns (pp. 41–58). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
31.
SchindlerI.FagundesC. P.MurdockK. W. (2010). Predictors of romantic relationship formation: Attachment style, prior relationships, and dating goals. Personal Relationships, 17(1), 97–105.
32.
SimpsonJ. A.RholesV. S.PhillipsD. (1996). Conflict in close relationships: An attachment perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(5), 899–914.
33.
StataCorp (2009). Stata Statistical Software: Release 11. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.
34.
SugiyamaL. S. (2005). Physical attractiveness in adaptationist perspective. In BussD. M. (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 292–343). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
35.
ZeifmanD.HazanC. (2000). A process model of adult attachment formation. The Social Psychology of Personal Relationships, 3, 38–54.
