Scholars typically have conceptualized loyalty (and its opposite, betrayal) as a manifestation of individual dispositions of a state-like or trait-like nature. By contrast, the present study takes a dialectical perspective, arguing that loyalty is a social experience in which relationship parties face a cross-current of competing and oppositional loyalty demands. As a consequence, when parties are loyal to one relational expectation they simultaneously are likely to be disloyal to another expectation. Two-hundred and seventy-three informants provided accounts of everyday competing loyalties of two kinds for a friendship and for a romantic relationship: external competing loyalties in which one faces a dilemma between the relationship and some other demand outside the boundary of the dyad; and internal competing loyalties in which one faces a dilemma between one relational expectation and another within the boundary of the dyad. We analyzed the 1092 accounts using the constant comparative method, resulting in nine kinds of external competing loyalty dilemmas and six kinds of internal competing loyalty dilemmas. In addition, findings address how relationship parties managed the dilemmas.
Altman, I. , Vinsel, A. & Brown, B. (1981) `Dialectic Conceptions in Social Psychology: An Application to Social Penetration and Privacy Regulation', in L. Berkowitz (ed.) Advanced in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 14, pp. 107-160. New York: Academic Press.
2.
Aron, A. , Aron, E.N. & Smollan, D. (1992) `Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the Structure of Interpersonal Closeness', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology63: 596-612.
3.
Argyle, M. & Henderson, M. (1985) `The Rules of Relationships', in S.W. Duck & D. Perlman (eds) Understanding Personal Relationships: An Interdisciplinary Approach, pp. 63-84. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
4.
Baxter, L.A. (1988) `A Dialectical Perspective on Communication Strategies in Relationship Development', in S.W. Duck (ed.) Handbook of Personal Relationships, pp. 257-273. New York: Wiley.
5.
Baxter, L.A. (1990) `Dialectical Contradictions in Relationship Development', Journal of Social and Personal Relationships7; 69-88.
6.
Baxter, L.A. (1993) `The Social Side of Personal Relationships: A Dialectical Perspective', in S.W. Duck (ed.) Social Context and Relationship, pp. 139-165. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7.
Baxter, L.A. (1994) `A Dialogic Approach to Relationship Maintenance', in D.J. Canary & L. Stafford (eds) Communication and Relational Maintenance, pp. 233-254. New York: Academic Press.
Baxter, L.A. & Widenmann, S. (1993) `Revealing and Not Revealing the Status of Romantic Relationships to Social Networks', Journal of Social and Personal Relationships10: 321-338.
10.
Billig, M. , Condor, S., Edwards, D., Gane, M., Middleton, D. & Radley, A. (1988) Ideological Dilemmas: A Social Psychology of Everyday Thinking. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11.
Bulmer, M. (1979) `Concepts in the Analysis of Qualitative Data', Sociological Review27: 651-677.
12.
Dey, I. (1993) Qualitative Data Analysis: A User-Friendly Guide for Social Scientists. London: Routledge.
13.
Duck, S.W. (ed.) (1993) Social Contexts and Relationships. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14.
Fehr, B. (1993) `How Do I Love Thee? Let Me Consult my Prototype', in S.W. Duck (ed.) Individuals in Relationships, pp. 87-120. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15.
Fletcher, G.P. (1993) Loyalty: An Essay on the Morality of Relationships. New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
Goldsmith, D. (1990) `A Dialectical Perspective on the Expression of Autonomy and Connection in Romantic Relationships', Western Journal of Speech Communication54: 537-556.
17.
Johnson, M.P. & Leslie, L. (1982) `Couple Involvement and Network Structure: A Test of the Dyadic Withdrawal Hypothesis', Social Psychology Quarterly45: 34-43.
18.
Jones, W.H. & Burdette, M.P. (1994) `Betrayal in Relationships', in A.L. Weber & J.H. Harvey (eds) Perspectives on Close Relationships, pp. 243-262. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
19.
Jones, W.H. , Sanchez, D. & Merrell, J. (1989) `Explanations of Betrayal Accounts', paper presented at the meeting of the Southwestern Psychological Association, Houston, TX.
20.
Metts, S. (1994) `Relational Transgressions', in W.R. Cupach & B.H. Spitzberg (eds) The Dark Side of Interpersonal Communication, pp. 217-240. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21.
Milardo, R.M. , Johnson, M.P. & Huston, T.L. (1983) `Developing Close Relationships: Changing Patterns of Interaction Between Pair Members and Social Networks', Joumal of Personality and Social Psychology44: 964-976.
22.
Montgomery, B.M. (1993) `Relationship Maintenance Versus Relationship Change: A Dialectical Dilemma', Journal of Social and Personal Relationships10: 205-224.
23.
Parks, M.R. & Eggert, L.L. (1991) `The Role of Social Context in the Dynamics of Personal Relationships', in W.H. Jones & D. Perlman (eds) Advances in Personal Relationships, Vol. 2, pp. 1-34. London: Jessica Kingsley.
24.
Rawlins, W.K. (1983a) `Negotiating Close Friendship: The Dialectic of Conjunctive Freedoms', Human Communication Research9: 255-266.
25.
Rawlins, W.K. (1983b) `Openness as Problematic in Ongoing Friendships: Two Conversational Dilemmas', Communication Monographs50: 1-13.
26.
Rawlins, W.K. (1989) `A Dialectical Analysis of the Tensions, Functions, and Strategic Challenges of Communication in Young Adult Friendships', Communication Yearbook12: 157-189.
27.
Rawlins, W.K. (1992) Friendship Matters: Communication, Dialectics, and the Life Course. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
28.
Rawlins, W.K. (1994) `Being There and Growing Apart: Sustaining Friendships During Adulthood', in D.J. Canary & L. Stafford (eds) Communication and Relational Maintenance, pp. 275-296. New York: Academic Press.
29.
Rusbult, C.E. , Drigotas, S.M. & Verette, J. (1994) `The Investment Model: An Interdependence Analysis of Commitment Processes and Relationship Maintenance Phenomena', in D.J. Canary & L. Stafford (eds) Communication and Relational Maintenance, pp. 115-140. New York: Academic Press.
30.
Sampson, E.E. (1993) Celebrating the Other: A Dialogic Account of Human Nature. San Francisco: Westview Press.
31.
Siegel, S. & Castellan, N.J., Jr. (1988) Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn.New York: McGraw-Hill.
32.
Spradley, J.P. (1979) The Ethnographic Interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
33.
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research. Newbury, CA: Sage.
34.
Surra, C.A. & Milardo, R.M. (1991) `The Social Psychological Context of Developing Relationships: Interactive and Psychological Networks', in W.H. Jones & D. Perlman (eds) Advances in Personal Relationships, Vol. 3, pp. 1-36. London: Jessica Kingsley.
35.
Turner, J.H. (1986) The Structure of Sociological Theory, 4th edn.Chicago, IL: Dorsey Press.
36.
Werner, C.M. & Baxter, L.A. (1994) `Temporal Qualities of Relationships: Organismic, Transactional and Dialectical Views', in M.L. Knapp & G.R. Miller (eds) Handbook of Interpersonal Communication, 2nd edn, pp. 323-379. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
37.
Wright, P.H. (1985) `The Acquaintance Description Form', in S.W. Duck & D. Perlman (eds) Understanding Personal Relationships: An Interdisciplinary Approach, pp. 39-62. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
