There has been little systematic empirical research to date concerning women's choices to change or keep their surnames upon marriage. This study of 110 women employs a dialectical perspective to explore women's decisions concerning their surnames. Specifically, we identify the issues involved in making this decision, examine associations between the surname chosen and relational qualities (satisfaction, love, commitment, intimacy) and interpret the meanings of the surname in association with meanings of marriage for these women. A combination of open-ended questions and scale measures was used. The results show that while name changers, name keepers and name combiners consider different issues when making their decisions, there are no significant differences in the three groups' relational characteristics. However, the meanings of marriage for these three groups clearly differ. The authors suggest avenues for further research.
Atkinson, D.L. (1987) `Names and Titles: Maiden Name Retention and the Use of Ms', Women and Language10: 37.
4.
Bakhtin, M.M. (1981) The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M.M. Bakhtin, Ed. M. Holquist, Trans. C. Emerson & M. Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.
5.
Baxter, L.A. (1988) `A Dialectical Perspective on Communication Strategies in Relationship Development', in S.W. Duck (ed.) Handbook of Personal Relationships. New York: Wiley.
6.
Baxter, L.A. (1990) `Dialectical Contradictions in Relationship Development', Journal of Social and Personal Relationships7: 69-88.
7.
Baxter, L.A. (1992) `Root Metaphors in Accounts of Developing Romantic Relationships', Journal of Social and Personal Relationships9: 253-275.
8.
Baxter, L.A. (1994) `A Dialogic Approach to Relationship Maintenance', in D.J. Canary & L. Stafford (eds) Communication and Relational Maintenance. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
9.
Baxter, L.A. & Simon, E.P. (1993) `Relationship Maintenance Strategies and Dialectical Contradictions in Personal Relationships', Journal of Social and Personal Relationships10: 225-242.
10.
Berscheid, E. & Peplau, L.A. (1983) `The Emerging Science of Relationships', in H.H. Kelley, E. Berscheid, A. Christensen, J.H. Harvey, T.L. Huston, G. Levinger, E. McClintock, L.A. Peplau & D.R. Peterson (eds) Close Relationships. New York: Freeman.
11.
Braithwaite, D.A. & Baxter, L. (1995) ` "I Do" Again: The Relational Dialectics of Renewing Marriage Vows', Journal of Social and Personal Relationships12: 177-198.
12.
Brightman, J. (1994) `Why Hillary Chooses Rodham Clinton', American Demographics16: 9-10.
13.
Canary, D.J. & Stafford, L. (1992) `Relational Maintenance Strategies and Equity in Marriage', Communication Monographs59: 243-267.
14.
Carbaugh, D. (1994) `The Game of the Name: Cultural Codes of Naming upon Marriage', Journal of Communication and Culture1: 28-43.
Chua-Eoan, H.G. (1989) `It Hyphened One Night', Time (17 Apr.): 78.
17.
Dainton, M. , Stafford, L. & Canary, D.J. (1994) `Maintenance Strategies and Physical Affection as Predictors of Love, Liking, and Satisfaction in Marriage', Communication Reports7: 88-98.
18.
Doyle, J.A. & Paludi, M.A. (1995) Sex and Gender: The Human Experience, 3rd edn.Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark.
19.
Dralle, P.W.A. & Mackiewicz, K. (1981) `Psychological Impact of Women's Name Change at Marriage: Literature Review and Implication for Further Study', American Journal of Family Therapy9: 50-55.
Gilman, C.P. (1919) `Do Women Need Names?', Baltimore Sun (4 Dec.): 4.
25.
Harré, R. (1984) Personal Being: A Theory for Individual Psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
Intons-Peterson, M.J. & Crawford, J. (1985) `The Meanings of Marital Surnames', Sex Roles12: 1163-1171.
27.
Kramarae, C. (1981) Women and Men Speaking. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
28.
Miller, R.S. & Lefcourt, H.M. (1982) `The Assessment of Intimacy', Journal of Personality Assessment46: 514-518.
29.
Moore, L.J. (1988) `A Name Is a Name Is a Name...', US News and World Report (11 July): 65.
30.
Norton, R. (1983) `Measuring Marital Quality: A Critical Look at the Dependent Variable', Journal of Marriage and the Family45: 141-151.
31.
O'Keefe, B.J. (1993) `Against Theory', Journal of Communication43: 75-82.
32.
Perlman, D. & Fehr, B. (1987) `The Development of Intimate Relationships', in D. Perlman & S.W. Duck (eds) Intimate Relationships: Development, Dynamics, and Deterioration. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
33.
Perry, J.M. & Birnbaum, J.H. (1993) `Hillary Clinton Turns the First Lady Role into a Powerful Post', Wall Street Journal (20 Jan.): 1, 16.
34.
Rubin, Z. (1970) `Measurement of Romantic Love', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology16: 265-273.
35.
Rubin, Z. (1973) Liking and Loving. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
36.
Rusbult, C.E. (1983) `A Longitudinal Test of the Investment Model: The Development (and Deterioration) of Satisfaction and Commitment in Heterosexual Involvements', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology45: 101-117.
37.
Rusbult, C.E. , Drigotas, S.M. & Verette, J. (1994) `The Investment Model: An Interdependence Analysis of Commitment Processes and Relationship Maintenance Phenomena', in D.J. Canary & L. Stafford (eds) Communication and Relational Maintenance. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
38.
Sabetelli, R.M. & Cecil-Pigo, E.F. (1985) `Relational Interdependence and Commitment in Marriage', Journal of Marriage and the Family47: 931-937.
39.
Scanzoni, L.D. & Scanzoni, J. (1988) Men, Women, and Change. New York: McGraw-Hill.
40.
Scheuble, L. & Johnson, D.R. (1993) `Marital Name Change: Plans and Attitudes of College Students', Journal of Marriage and the Family55: 747-754.
41.
Sontag, S. (1985) `The Snags in Keeping a Surname', New York Times (6 July): 44.
42.
Stafford, L. & Dainton, M. (1995) `Parent-Child Interaction within the Family System', in T.J. Socha & G. Stamp (eds) Parents, Children, and Communication: Frontiers of Theory and Research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
43.
Stanton, E.C. , Anthony, S.B. & Gage, M.J. (1969) History of Woman Suffrage, I. New York: Arno & the New York Times.
44.
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
45.
Thom, M. , ed. (1987) Letters to Ms.: 1972-1987. New York: Henry Holt.
46.
Werner, C.M. & Baxter, L.A. (1994) `Temporal Qualities of Relationships: Organismic, Transactional, and Dialectical Views', in M.L. Knapp & G.R. Miller (eds) Handbook of Interpersonal Communication, 2nd edn.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
47.
Wood, J.T. (1995) `Feminist Scholarship and the Study of Relationships', Journal of Social and Personal Relationships12: 103-120.
