Future research should include a fuller range of relationships than have been studied to date. Investigating diverse relationships would increase understanding of specific human associations and would advance development and testing of broad theories of relationships.
Cupach, W.R. & Spitzberg, B.H. (1994) The Dark Side of Interpersonal Communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
Duck, S.W. (1994) `Strategems, Spoils, and a Serpent's Tooth: On the Delights and Dilemmas of Personal Relationships', in W. Cupach & B.H. Spitzberg (eds) The Dark Side of Interpersonal Communication, pp. 3-24. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
Duck, S.W. & Wood, J.T. (1995) `For Better, For Worse, For Richer, For Poorer: The Rough and Smooth of Relationships', in S.W. Duck & J.T. Wood (eds) Confronting Relationship Challenges (Understanding Relationship Processes, 5) pp. 1-24. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
Epstein, C.F. (1988) Deceptive Distinctions: Sex, Gender, and the Social Order. New Haven: Yale University Press.
5.
Hopson, D.S. & Powell-Hopson, D. (1994) Friends, Lovers, and Soulmates: A Guide to Better Relationships Between Black Men and Women. New York: Simon & Schuster.
6.
Huston, M. & Schwartz, P. (1995) `Relationships of Lesbians and Gay Men', in J.T. Wood & S.W. Duck (eds) Understudied Relationships: Off the Beaten Track (Understanding Relationship Processes, 6) pp. 89-121. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
Keller, E.F. (1985) Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
8.
Keller, E.F. (1992) Secrets of Life, Secrets of Death: Essays on Language, Gender, and Science. New York: Routledge.
9.
Nardi, P.M. & Sherrod, D. (1994) `Friendship in the Lives of Gay Men and Lesbians', Journal of Social and Personal Relationships11: 186-200.
10.
Swain, S. (1989) `Covert Intimacy: Closeness in Men's Friendships', in B.J. Risman & P. Schwartz (eds) Gender and Intimate Relationships, pp. 71-86. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Brooks-Cole.
11.
Wood, J.T. (1993a) `Engendered Relations: Interaction, Caring, Power, and Responsibility in Intimacy', in S.W. Duck (ed.) Social Context and Relationships (Understanding Relationship Processes, 3) pp. 26-54. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12.
Wood, J.T. (1993b) `Enlarging Conceptual Boundaries: A Critique of Research in Interpersonal Communication', in S.P. Bowen & N.J. Wyatt (eds) Transforming Visions: Feminist Critiques in Communication Studies, pp. 27-53. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
13.
Wood, J.T. (1994) Who Cares?: Women, Care, and Culture. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
14.
Wood, J.T. (1995) `Feminist Scholarship and the Study of Relationships', Journal of Social and Personal Relationships12(1): 103-200.
15.
Wood, J.T. & Duck, S.W. (1995) Understudied Relationships: Off the Beaten Track (Understanding Relationship Processes, 6)Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
Wood, J.T. & Inman, C.C. (1993) `In a Different Mode: Masculine Styles of Communicating Closeness', Journal of Applied Communication Research21: 279-295.
