The power of words: Exploring the impacts of derogatory discourse on cognition and social relationships of intersex individuals

Abstract

In today’s evolving world, discourse functions as a powerful tool that shapes our perceptions and attitudes towards different social groups. The discourse surrounding intersex individuals in heteronormative societies like Quetta not only reflects but also disseminates their discrimination and marginalization. In this study, the researcher intended to analyze the impacts of derogatory discourse on both the cognition and social relationships of intersex individuals. By drawing upon ‘socio-cognitive theory’ proposed by Van Dijk (2015), and employing ‘snow-ball’ sampling technique, the researcher conducted 11 interviews with intersex individuals who were the residents of Quetta, Baluchistan. Considering the cognitive impacts of derogatory discourse, the data revealed that intersex individuals suffered from ‘internalized inferiority’, ‘over-thinking’, and so forth; while, in terms of social relationships, they experienced strained relationships in workplace dynamics, and educational settings, etc. Moreover, the researcher not only emphasized the use of inclusive discourse with intersex individuals but also presented some recommendations for policy-makers in order to bring relief in their lives.

Keywords

Cognition discourse intersex social relationship socio-cognitive approach

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahmad

M. M. A.

Abdullah

I. H. T.

Sulaiman

W. A. T. W.

Mohamad

W. M. F. W.

Razli

M. Z. F. A.

Karim

R. S. H. R.

(2024). Exploring workplace discrimination: Shedding light on social and cultural dynamics. In Khamis

Buallay

(Eds.), AI in business: Opportunities and limitations (Vol. 516, pp. 211–220). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49544-1_18

Ahsan

Minhas

Z. N.

(2023). A critical discourse analysis of the linguistic experiences of the transgender in Lahore, Pakistan. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 6(5), 5. https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v6i5.1138

Bjarkadóttir

B. E.

(2024). Final project: “A phenomenological study on the lived experiences of intersex individuals in Iceland”. The Shame. https://skemman.is/handle/1946/47475

Brömdal

Zavros-Orr

Lisahunter Hand

Hart

(2021). Towards a whole-school approach for sexuality education in supporting and upholding the rights and health of students with intersex variations. Sex Education, 21(5), 568–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2020.1864726

Burford‐Rice

Augoustinos

(2018). ‘I didn’t mean that: It was just a slip of the tongue’: Racial slips and gaffes in the public arena. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(1), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12211

Butler

(2011). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of sex (0 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203828274

Cervone

Augoustinos

Maass

(2021). The Language of derogation and hate: Functions, consequences, and reappropriation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 40(1), 80–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X20967394

Channa

Panezai

(2019). Top-down English policy and bottom-up teacher take: An interview-based insight from the Balochistan province of Pakistan. Qualitative Report, 24(9), 2281–2296. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2019.3841

Crocetti

Garland

Griffiths

D. A.

Monro

Mhuirthile

T. N.

Roen

Singh

Suess-Schwend

(2024). Editorial introduction to centring intersex issues: Global and local dimensions. Social Sciences, 13(11), 602. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13110602

10.

Croom

A. M.

(2013). How to do things with slurs: Studies in the way of derogatory words. Language & Communication, 33(3), 177–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2013.03.008

11.

Dalke

K. B.

Baratz

A. B.

Greenberg

J. A.

(2020). Protecting children with intersex traits: Legal, ethical, and human rights considerations. In The plasticity of sex (pp. 207–224). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815968-2.00010-4

12.

Davidson

Warmsley

Macy

Weber

(2017). Automated hate speech detection and the problem of offensive language. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 11(1), 512–515. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v11i1.14955

13.

Divan

Cortez

Smelyanskaya

Keatley

(2016). Transgender social inclusion and equality: A pivotal path to development. Journal of the International AIDS Society, 19(3S2), 20803. https://doi.org/10.7448/IAS.19.3.20803

14.

Dornyie

(2007). Research methods in applied Linguistics. Oxford University Press. https://thuvienso.hoasen.edu.vn/handle/123456789/14893

15.

Etikan

Alkassim

Abubakar (2016). Comparision of snowball sampling and sequential sampling technique. Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.15406/bbij.2016.03.00055

16.

Fairclough

(2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Routledge. https://api.taylorfrancis.com/content/books/mono/download?identifierName=doi&identifierValue=10.4324/9781315834368&type=googlepdf

17.

Farhat

S. N.

Abdullah

M. D.

Hali

S. M.

Iftikhar

(2020). Transgender law in Pakistan: Some key issues. Polish Perspectives, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.13169/polipers.17.1.0007

18.

Forscher

P. S.

Cox

W. T. L.

Graetz

Devine

P. G.

(2015). The motivation to express prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(5), 791–812. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000030

19.

Gill-Peterson

(2024). A short history of trans misogyny. Verso Books.

20.

Gul

Mukhtar

(2024). View of breaking barriers: Unveiling transgender A critical study on transgenderism and the ever-forgotten rights of intersex. 04(01), 8–14.

21.

Halai

(2007). Making use of bilingual interview data: Some experiences from the field. Qualitative Report, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2007.1621

22.

Hart

Shakespeare-Finch

(2022). Intersex lived experience: Trauma and posttraumatic growth in narratives. Psychology & Sexuality, 13(4), 912–930. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2021.1938189

23.

Henningham

Jones

(2021). Intersex students, sex-based relational learning & isolation. Sex Education, 21(5), 600–613. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2021.1873123

24.

Hussain

A. R.

(2021). Overthinking in producing Arts and crafts: A metacognitive analysis. Art and Design Review, 09(03), 284–290. https://doi.org/10.4236/adr.2021.93023

25.

Jorge

J. C.

Valerio-Pérez

Esteban

Rivera-Lassen

A. I.

(2021). Intersex care in the United States and international standards of human rights. Global Public Health, 16(5), 679–691. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2019.1706759

26.

Keating

Lehtonen

(2022). Intersex traits and variations of sex characteristics in education: A Finnish context. University of Helsinki.

27.

MacGillivray

M. H.

Mazur

(2005). Intersex. Advances in Pediatrics, 52, 295–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yapd.2005.04.004

28.

Manan

S. A.

(2018). Silencing children’s power of self-expression: An examination of coercive relations of power in English-medium schools in Pakistan. L1: Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 18(Running Issue(Running Issue)), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.17239/L1ESLL-2018.18.01.14

29.

Mestre

(2022). The human rights situation of intersex people: An analysis of Europe and Latin America. Social Sciences, 11(7), 317. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11070317

30.

Monro

Carpenter

Crocetti

Davis

Garland

Griffiths

Hegarty

Travis

Cabral Grinspan

Aggleton

(2021). Intersex: Cultural and social perspectives. Culture, Health and Sexuality, 23(4), 431–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2021.1899529

31.

Mukhtar

Sharif

Imran

(2024). Narratives of inclusion and exclusion: Experiences of intersex. Competitive Social Science Research Journal, 2(4), 4.

32.

Mustafa

Rehman

Raja

Mughal

(2023). From Mandarin to mendicant: Violence and transgender bodies in urban Pakistan. Gender, Place & Culture, 30(6), 812–834. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2022.2069685

33.

Nawaz

(2024). Protection of the rights of inter-sex: A legal study of reforms and failures in Pakistan. Buitems Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(1), 1. https://bjssh.buitms.edu.pk/index.php/content/article/view/37

34.

Nazir

Zahara

S. R.

Akhtar

Balti

G. A.

Bashir

(2021). Linguistic and paralinguistic analysis of the text produced by Hijra (transgender) community located in Lahore, Pakistan. 18(10), 3068–3077.

35.

Owen

W. F.

(1984). Interpretive themes in relational communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70(3), 274–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638409383697

36.

Pikramenou

(2019). Intersex rights: Living between sexes. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27554-9

37.

Redding

J. A.

(2019). The Pakistan transgender persons (protection of rights) act of 2018 and its impact on the law of gender in Pakistan. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3339759

38.

Reis

(2005). Impossible hermaphrodites: Intersex in America, 1620–1960. Journal of American History, 92(2), 411. https://doi.org/10.2307/3659273

39.

Reis

(2007). Divergence or disorder? The politics of naming intersex. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 50(4), 535–543. https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.2007.0054

40.

Rukmono

B. A.

Prakosa

J. B. H.

(2024). The struggle in Quetta, Pakistan: The political, cultural, and theological consequences. MELINTAS An International Journal of Philosophy and Religion (MIJPR), 40(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.26593/mel.v40i1.8640

41.

Ruslin

Mashuri

Sarib

Alhabsyi

(2022). Semi-structured interview: A methodological reflection on the development of a qualitative research instrument in educational studies Ruslin. ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-1201052229

42.

Rye

B. J.

Merritt

O. A.

Straatsma

(2019). Individual difference predictors of transgender beliefs: Expanding our conceptualization of conservatism. Personality and Individual Differences, 149, 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.05.033

43.

Saddique

Gang

Mirbehar

Batool

Ahmad

(2017). Transgender issues in Pakistani community. European Academic Research, 4(10).

44.

Schneider

(2013). An insight into respect for the rights of trans and intersex children in Europe. Council of Europe Strasbourg.

45.

Shaban Abdullah Hussein

(2017). The self/other representation in western media: A socio cognitive approach. مجلة کلیة الآداب جامعة الفیوم, 16(16), 765–792. https://doi.org/10.21608/jfafu.2017.63512

46.

Shook

A. G.

Tordoff

D. M.

Clark

Hardwick

St Pierre Nelson

Kantrowitz Gordon

(2022). Trans youth talk back: A Foucauldian discourse analysis of transgender minors’ accounts of healthcare access. Qualitative Health Research, 32(11), 1672–1689. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323221114801

47.

Shulika

(2018). Protecting intersex human right of self-determination. 1(4).

48.

Smitherman

van Dijk

(1988). Discourse and discrimination. Wayne State University Press. https://books.google.com/books/about/Discourse_and_Discrimination.html?id=h47tVI20OMC

49.

Souza

A. S. L. de

Canguçu-Campinho

A. K.

(2019). Intersexuality and discrimination: Silence as family violence. In Sexuality, oppression and human rights. Brill.

50.

Spencer

L. G.

(2016). Intersex: Considerations for language and invitations to further research. EBSCOhost, 39(1), 19. https://openurl.ebsco.com/contentitem/gcd:120565635?sid=ebsco:plink:crawler&id=ebso:gcd:120565635

51.

Spilioti

(2019). From transliteration to trans-scripting: Creativity and multilingual writing on the internet. Discourse, Context & Media, 29, 100294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2019.03.001

52.

Sun

M.-K.

Alkon

D. L.

(2014). Stress: Perspectives on its impact on cognition and pharmacological treatment. Behavioural Pharmacology, 25(5 and 6), 410–424. https://doi.org/10.1097/FBP.0000000000000045

53.

Tracy

S. J.

(2024). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. John Wiley & Sons.

54.

van Dijk

T. A.

(2009). Critical discourse studies: A sociocognitive approach.

55.

Van Dijk

T. A.

(Ed.), (2014). Discourse-cognition-society. Current state and prospects of the socio-cognitive approach to discourse Contemporary critical discourse studies (1st ed., pp. 121–146). Bloomsbury Publishing Plc. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472593634

56.

Van Dijk

T. A.

(2015). Critical discourse analysis. In Tannen

Hamilton

H. E.

Schiffrin

(Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (1st ed., pp. 466–485). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194.ch22

57.

Vingerhoets

A. J. J. M.

Cornelius

R. R.

Van Heck

G. L.

Becht

M. C.

(2000). Adult crying: A model and review of the literature. Review of General Psychology, 4(4), 354–377. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.4.4.354

58.

Walters

Brown

Wiedlitzka

(2016). Causes and motivations of hate crime. https://sussex.figshare.com/articles/report/Causes_and_motivations_of_hate_crime/2343408/1

59.

Wolff

Rubin

D. A.

Swarr

A. L.

(2022). The intersex issue. TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly, 9(2), 143–159. https://doi.org/10.1215/23289252-9612767

60.

Zaeema

Sana

Hira

(2021). Knowledge and attitudes regarding transgender and intersex individuals among medical students and health care providers of Karachi, Pakistan. Liaquat National Journal of Primary Care. https://doi.org/10.37184/lnjpc.27073521.3.4

61.

Zeeman

Aranda

(2020). A systematic Review of the health and healthcare inequalities for people with intersex variance. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(18), 6533. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186533

62.

Zelayandia-Gonzalez

(2023). The growing visibility of intersex demands at the united nations: A Review of the treaty bodies’ concluding observations. Social Sciences, 12(2), 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12020073