Withdrawal, meaning emotional disengagement or the “silent treatment,” compromises couple relationship satisfaction and well-being. In contrast, intimate interactions between partners —characterized by self-disclosure and understanding — promote warmth, mutual knowledge, and satisfaction. The benefits of intimacy may thereby reduce partners’ tendencies to withdraw after a conflict. Both partners in 217 committed, cohabiting couples (434 individuals) completed 14-day diaries reporting whether they had a conflict each day, intimacy in their interactions, and the extent to which either partner withdrew after conflict. Couples who experienced more intimacy, whether on days with conflict or on average during the study, withdrew less after their conflicts. Of intimacy’s two dimensions, understanding was a stronger predictor of reduced withdrawals than self-disclosure. Lastly, couples withdrew more following serious conflict. However, the more intimacy they experienced during the study, the less they withdrew. Particularly, more intimate couples remained less withdrawn even when conflict expanded beyond the initial problem (but not after contemptuous communication). Overall, the findings underscore the benefits of intimate communication in sustaining partners’ emotional availability in the face of conflict by reducing partners’ withdrawals.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage Publications.
2.
BaucomB. R.DickensonJ. A.AtkinsD. C.BaucomD. H.FischerM. S.WeusthoffS. T.HahlwegK.ZimmermannT. (2015). The interpersonal process model of demand/withdraw behavior. Journal of Family Psychology: JFP: journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43), 29(1), 80–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000044
3.
BaucomD. H.EpsteinN. B.LaTailladeJ. J.KirbyJ. S. (2008). Cognitive-behavioral couple therapy. In GurmanA. S. (Ed.), Clinical handbook of couple therapy (4th ed., pp. 31–72). The Guilford Press.
4.
BirnbaumG. E.ReisH. T.MizrahiM.Kanat-MaymonY.SassO.Granovski-MilnerC. (2016). Intimately connected: The importance of partner responsiveness for experiencing sexual desire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(4), 530–546. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000069
5.
BoonS. D.DeveauV. L.AlibhaiA. M. (2009). Payback: The parameters of revenge in romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26(6-7), 747–768. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407509347926
6.
BowlbyJ. (1969). Attachment and loss (1). Hogarth Press.
7.
BusbyD. M.ChristensenC.CraneD. R.LarsonJ. H. (1995). A revision of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale for use with distressed and nondistressed couples: Construct hierarchy and multidimensional scales. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 21(3), 289–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1995.tb00163.x
8.
ChristensenA.HeaveyC. L. (1990). Gender and social structure in the demand/withdraw pattern of marital conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(1), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.59.1.73
9.
ChristensenA.ShenkJ. L. (1991). Communication, conflict, and psychological distance in nondistressed, clinic, and divorcing couples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(3), 458–463. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006x.59.3.458
10.
ClovenD. H.RoloffM. E. (1991). Sense‐making activities and interpersonal conflict: Communicative cures for the mulling blues. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 55(2), 134–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570319109374376
11.
CrenshawA. O.LeoK.ChristensenA.HoganJ. N.BaucomK. J. W.BaucomB. R. W. (2021). Relative importance of conflict topics for within-couple tests: The case of demand/withdraw interaction. Journal of Family Psychology: JFP: journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43), 35(3), 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000782
12.
CummingG. (2009). Inference by eye: Reading the overlap of independent confidence intervals. Statistics in Medicine, 28(2), 205–220. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3471
13.
DerlegaV. J.ChaikinA. L. (1975). Sharing intimacy: What we reveal to others and why. Prentice-Hall.
14.
DindiaK. (1994). The intrapersonal-interpersonal dialectical process of self-disclosure. In DuckS. (Ed.), Dynamics of relationships. (pp. 27–57): Sage.
15.
EldridgeK. A.SevierM.JonesJ.AtkinsD. C.ChristensenA. (2007). Demand-withdraw communication in severely distressed, moderately distressed, and nondistressed couples: Rigidity and polarity during relationship and personal problem discussions. Journal of Family Psychology: JFP: journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43), 21(2), 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.21.2.218
16.
FinchamF. D. (2003). Marital conflict: Correlates, structure, and context. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(1), 23–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.01215
17.
FinchamF. D.BeachS. R. (1999). Conflict in marriage: Implications for working with couples. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 47–77. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.47
18.
FinkenauerC.RighettiF. (2011). Understanding in close relationships: An interpersonal approach. European Review of Social Psychology, 22(1), 316–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2011.633384
19.
ForgasJ. P. (1994). Sad and guilty? Affective influences on the explanation of conflict in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(1), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.66.1.56
20.
GistelinckF.LoeysT.DecuyperM.DewitteM. (2018). Indistinguishability tests in the actor–partner interdependence model. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, 71(3), 472–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12129
21.
GossettJ. T.DavisC. W.PragerK. J.ParsonsJ. A.HoussonM. M. (2018). In LewisJ. M. (Ed.) Lewis foundation couple and family evaluation scales: A rater training guide. M.D. Mental Health Research Foundation.
22.
GottmanJ. M. (1994). What predicts divorce? The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
23.
GottmanJ. M.CoanJ.CarrereS.SwansonC. (1998). Predicting marital happiness and stability from newlywed interactions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/353438
24.
GottmanJ. M.DriverJ. L. (2005). Dysfunctional marital conflict and everyday marital interaction. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 43(3-4), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1300/j087v43n03_04
25.
GottmanJ. M.LevensonR. W. (1988). The social psychophysiology of marriage. In NollerP.FitzpatrickM. A. (Eds.), Perspectives on marital interaction (pp. 182–200). Multilingual Matters.
26.
GottmanJ. M.LevensonR. W. (2000). The timing of divorce: Predicting when a couple will divorce over a 14‐year period. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(3), 737–745. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00737.x
27.
GreeffA. P.MalherbeH. L. (2001). Intimacy and marital satisfaction in spouses. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 27(3), 247–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/009262301750257100
28.
HeaveyC. L.ChristensenA.MalamuthN. M. (1995). The longitudinal impact of demand and withdrawal during marital conflict. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63(5), 797–801. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006x.63.5.797
29.
HolleyS. R.HaaseC. M.ChuiI.BlochL. (2018). Depression, emotion regulation, and the demand/withdraw pattern during intimate relationship conflict. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35(3), 408–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517733334
30.
JohnsonM. D.HorneR. M.HardyN. R.AndersonJ. R. (2018). Temporality of couple conflict and relationship perceptions. Journal of Family Psychology: JFP: journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43), 32(4), 445–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000398
31.
JohnsonS. M. (2008). Emotionally focused couple therapy. In GurmanA. S. (Ed.) Clinical handbook of couple therapy (4th ed. pp. 107–137). The Guilford Press.
32.
KennyD.KashyD.BolgerN. (1998). Data analysis. The handbook of social psychology: Vols. 1 and 2 (pp. 233–265). McGraw-Hill.
33.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A.CookW. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. Guilford Publications.
34.
Kiecolt-GlaserJ. K.NewtonT.CacioppoJ. T.MacCallumR. C.GlaserR.MalarkeyW. B. (1996). Marital conflict and endocrine function: Are men really more physiologically affected than women?Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64(2), 324–332. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006x.64.2.324
35.
KirchlerE. (1988). Marital happiness and interaction in everyday surroundings: A time-sample diary approach for couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5(3), 375–382.
36.
KurdekL. A. (1995). Predicting change in marital satisfaction from husbands’ and wives’ conflict resolution styles. Journal of Marriage and Family, 57(1), 153–164. https://doi.org/10.2307/353824
37.
LaurenceauJ. P.BarrettL. F.RovineM. J. (2005). The interpersonal process model of intimacy in marriage: A daily-diary and multilevel modeling approach. Journal of Family Psychology: JFP: journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43), 19(2), 314–323. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.19.2.314
38.
LaurenceauJ. P.RiveraL. M.SchafferA. R.PietromonacoP. R. (2004). Intimacy as an interpersonal process: Current status and future directions. In In Handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 61–78). Routledge.
39.
LewisJ. M.GossettJ. T.HoussonM. M.TreschM. O. (1997). Timberlawn couple and family evaluation scales: A rater training guide. Timberlawn Research Foundation.
40.
McNultyJ. K.RussellV. M. (2010). When “negative” behaviors are positive: A contextual analysis of the long-term effects of problem-solving behaviors on changes in relationship satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(4), 587–604. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017479
41.
MitchellA. E.CastellaniA. M.HerringtonR. L.JosephJ. I.DossB. D.SnyderD. K. (2008). Predictors of intimacy in couples' discussions of relationship injuries: An observational study. Journal of Family Psychology: JFP: journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43), 22(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.22.1.21
42.
NicholsN. B.Backer-FulghumL. M.BoskaC. R.SanfordK. (2015). Two types of disengagement during couples’ conflicts: Withdrawal and passive immobility. Psychological Assessment, 27(1), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000045
43.
NijmanS. W. J.GroenhofT. K. J.HooglandJ.BotsM. L.BrandjesM.JacobsJ. J.MoonsK. G. M.DebrayT. P. (2021). Real-time imputation of missing predictor values improved the application of prediction models in daily practice. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 134, 22–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.01.003
44.
NollerP.FeeneyJ. A.RobertsN.ChristensenA. (2005). Withdrawal in couple interactions: Exploring the causes and consequences. In RiggioR. E.FeldmanR. S. (Eds.), Applications of nonverbal communication (pp. 195–213). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
45.
PoucherJ.PragerK. J.ShirvaniF.ParsonsJ.PatelJ. (2022). Intimacy, attachment to the partner, and daily well-being in romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 39(6), 1574–1601. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211060392
46.
PragerK. J.BuhrmesterD. (1998). Intimacy and need fulfillment in couple relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(4), 435–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407598154001
47.
PragerK. J. (1995). The psychology of intimacy. Guilford Press.
48.
PragerK. J. (2014). The dilemmas of intimacy: Conceptualization, assessment, and treatment. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
49.
PragerK. J.PoucherJ.ShirvaniF. K.ParsonsJ. A.AllamZ. (2019). Withdrawal, attachment security, and recovery from conflict in couple relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(2), 573–598. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517737387
50.
PragerK. J.ShirvaniF.PoucherJ.CavallinG.TruongM.GarciaJ. J. (2015). Recovery from conflict and revival of intimacy in cohabiting couples. Personal Relationships, 22(2), 308–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12082
51.
RauerA.SabeyA. K.ProulxC. M.VollingB. L. (2020). What are the marital problems of happy couples? A multimethod, two‐sample investigation. Family Process, 59(3), 1275–1292. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12483
52.
ReisH. T. (1990). The role of intimacy in interpersonal relations. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1990.9.1.15
53.
ReisH. T.Lemay JrE. P.FinkenauerC. (2017). Toward understanding understanding: The importance of feeling understood in relationships. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11(3), Article e12308. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12308
54.
ReisH. T.ShaverP. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In DuckS.HayD. F.HobfollS. E.IckesW.MontgomeryB. M. (Eds.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions (pp. 367–389). John Wiley & Sons.
55.
RidleyC. A.WilhelmM. S.SurraC. A. (2001). Married couples' conflict responses and marital quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18(4), 517–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407501184005
56.
RobertsL. J. (2000). Fire and ice in marital communication: Hostile and distancing behaviors as predictors of marital distress. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(3), 693–707. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00693.x
57.
RyjovaY.GoldA. I.TimmonsA. C.HanS. C.ChaspariT.PettitC.KimY.BealeA.KazmierskiK. F. M.MargolinG. (2024). A day in the life: Couples’ everyday communication and subsequent relationship outcomes. Journal of Family Psychology: JFP: journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43), 38(3), 453–465. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0001180
58.
SanfordK. (2003). Problem-solving conversations in marriage: Does it matter what topics couples discuss?Personal Relationships, 10(1), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6811.00038
59.
SanfordK.GraceA. J. (2011). Emotion and underlying concerns during couples' conflict: An investigation of within‐person change. Personal Relationships, 18(1), 96–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01317.x
60.
SasakiE.OverallN. (2021). Partners’ withdrawal when actors behave destructively: Implications for perceptions of partners’ responsiveness and relationship satisfaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(2), 307–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220926820
61.
SchudlichT. D. D. R.StettlerN. M.StouderK. A.HarringtonC. (2013). Adult romantic attachment and couple conflict behaviors: Intimacy as a multi-dimensional mediator. Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 7(1), 26–43. https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.v7i1.107
62.
SimpsonJ. A.RholesW. S.PhillipsD. (1996). Conflict in close relationships: An attachment perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(5), 899–914. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.5.899
63.
SpanierG. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and Family, 38(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/350547
64.
SpanierG. B. (1989). Dyadic adjustment scale: Multi-Health Systems.
65.
TashiroT.FrazierP. (2007). The causal effects of emotion on couples' cognition and behavior. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54(4), 409–422. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.54.4.409
66.
VogelD. L.Werner-WilsonR. J.LiangK.CutronaC. E.SeemanJ. C.HacklerA. H. (2008). The relationship of physiological arousal with demand and withdraw behavior: Examining the accuracy of the escape-conditioning hypothesis. Sex Roles, 59(11-12), 871–879. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9490-7
67.
WilliamsonH. C.HannaM. A.LavnerJ. A.BradburyT. N.KarneyB. R. (2013). Discussion topic and observed behavior in couples' problem-solving conversations: Do problem severity and topic choice matter?Journal of Family Psychology: JFP: journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43), 27(2), 330–335. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031534
68.
WoodinE. M. (2011). A two-dimensional approach to relationship conflict: meta-analytic findings. Journal of Family Psychology: JFP: journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43), 25(3), 325–335. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023791
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
