Social support is one of the most reliable predictors of well-being. One of its facets, received social support (RSS), pertains to social interactions that provide actual assistance. Cultural context is important in appreciating RSS; however, existing conceptualizations are based on western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic (WEIRD) contexts. This mixed methods study aimed to explore the concept of RSS in the Philippine context. Study 1 aimed to describe the characteristics of Filipino RSS through a qualitative survey. Five themes were generated from the responses of 424 Filipino adults. Study 2 examined the dimensions of RSS. Items were constructed using themes generated in Study 1 and RSS facets in the current literature (i.e., emotional, instrumental, informational). A total of 198 participants completed an online survey which asked them to rate the frequency at which they have received the specified supportive behaviors. Exploratory factor analysis surfaced six facets of received social support that cover behaviors that (1) provide encouragement and increase one’s sense of efficacy and self-worth; (2) provide a sense of emotional relief through empathy and companionship; (3) facilitate a sense of community; (4) provide information, guidance, and instruction on how to solve one’s problems; (5) provide timely practical support; and, (6) provide relief to the recipient by backing them up when they fail to deal with their problems successfully. Findings indicated that while Filipino received social support facets do not significantly differ from Euro-American-centric conceptualizations, they are infused with cultural aspects that focus on social relationships and social harmony, and self-efficacy.
AlampayL. P. (2024). Cultural values, parenting and child adjustment in the Philippines. International Journal of Psychology: Journal International de Psychologie, 59(4), 568–577. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.13117
2.
Austria-YoungJ. D. (2012). Tungo sa kultura ng pakikisangkot: Isang pagninilay sa pagpapalakas ng mga katutubong pamayanan gamit ang lente ng antropolohiya. Agham Tao, 21, 87–111.
3.
AyresC.MahatG.AtkinsR. (2013). Testing theoretical relationships: Factors influencing positive health practices (PHP) in Filipino college students. Journal of American College Health: J of ACH, 61(2), 88–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2012.753889
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2022). Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology, 9(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000196
7.
CastilloT. C.ResurreccionR. (2019). The recovery experience: Stress, recovery capital, and personal views on addiction and recovery in posttreatment addiction recovery. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 52(1), 103–126. https://doi.org/10.31710/pjp/0052.01.04
8.
CervantesC. L. G. (2023). Kaluluwa, kapwa, and kalikasan: Mental health implications of Filipino folk beliefs. In: Spirituality in clinical practice. APA.
9.
ChancellorS.HuA.De ChoudhuryM. (2018). Norms matter: Contrasting social support around behavior change in online weight loss communities. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Montreal, Canada, April 21-26, (pp. 1–14). https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174240
10.
ChangJ. (2015). The interplay between collectivism and social support processes among Asian and Latino American college students. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 6(1), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035820
11.
ChenJ. M.KimH. S.MojaverianT.MorlingB. (2012). Culture and social support provision: Who gives what and why. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211427309
12.
ChuP. S.SaucierD. A.HafnerE. (2010). Meta-analysis of the relationships between social support and well-being in children and adolescents. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 29(6), 624–645. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2010.29.6.624
CoyneJ. C.DeLongisA. (1986). Going beyond social support: The role of social relationships in adaptation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54(4), 454–460. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.54.4.454
16.
CukurC. S.De GuzmanM. R. T.CarloG. (2004). Religiosity, values, and horizontal and vertical individualism—collectivism: A study of Turkey, the United States, and the Philippines. The Journal of Social Psychology, 144(6), 613–634. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.144.6.613-634
17.
CutronaC. E. (1990). Stress and social support—in search of optimal matching. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1990.9.1.3
18.
DecenteceoE. T. (1999). The Pagdadala model in counseling and therapy. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 32(2), 89–104.
19.
EnriquezV. (1992). From colonial to liberation psychology: The Philippine experience. University of the Philippines Press.
20.
EnriquezV. G. (1978). Kapwa: A core concept in Filipino social psychology. Philippine Social Sciences and Humanities Review, 42(1–4), 100–108.
21.
FernandezK. G. (2012). Support means direct help: Filipino adolescents’ multidimensional conceptualization of social support. Psychological Studies, 57(3), 251–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-011-0129-3
22.
GalanoC. P. (2017). Ang loob at pakikipagkapwa sa kagandahang-loob: Pagsusuri sa pagpapakahulugan at mga pagpapahalaga ng kabataan. DIWA E-Journal, 5, 108–125.
GuerreroS. H. (2010). Filipino notions of responsibility: The shared identity of the self and the other. In SizooE. (Ed.), Responsibility and cultures of the world: Dialogue around a collective challenge (pp. 167–184). P.I.E. Peter Lang.
25.
GuilaranJ.de TerteI.KaniastyK.StephensC. (2018). Psychological outcomes in disaster responders: A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effect of social support. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 9(3), 344–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-018-0184-7
26.
GuilaranJ.de TerteI.KaniastyK.StephensC. (2020). Social adjustment in New Zealand and philippine emergency responders: A test of main and moderating effects of received social support. Australasian Journal of Disaster and Trauma Studies, 24(2), 77–88.
27.
GuilaranJ.de TerteI.KaniastyK.StephensC. (2021). Received social support and post-traumatic stress symptoms in New Zealand and Philippine emergency responders. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 40(2), 153–174. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2021.40.2.153
28.
HaberM. G.CohenJ. L.BaltesB. B. (2007). The relationship between self-reported received and perceived social support: A meta-analytic review. American Journal of Community Psychology, 39(1–2), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-007-9100-9
29.
HarandiT. F.TaghinasabM. M.NayeriT. D. (2017). The correlation of social support with mental health: A meta-analysis. Electronic Physician, 9(9), 5212–5222. https://doi.org/10.19082/5212
HobfollS. E.StokesJ. P. (1988). The process and mechanics of social support. In DuckS.HayD. F.HobfollS. E.IckesW.MontgomeryB. M. (Eds.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions (pp. 497–517). John Wiley & Sons.
32.
IvankovaN. V.CreswellJ. W. (2009). Mixed methods. In HeighamJ.CrokerR. A. (Eds.), Qualitative research in applied linguistics: A practical introduction. Palgrave Macmillan.
33.
JASP Team. (2024). JASP Version Version 0.18.3. Computer Software.
34.
JohnsenM. C. (2001). Social support measurement and intervention: A guide for health and social scientists. Psychiatric Services, 52(10), 1404. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.52.10.1404
35.
KaniastyK. (2012). Predicting social psychological well-being following trauma: The role of postdisaster social support. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 4(1), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021412
36.
KaniastyK.NorrisF. H. (1993). A test of the social support deterioration model in the context of natural disaster. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(3), 395–408. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.3.395
37.
KaniastyK.NorrisF. H. (2009). Distinctions that matter: Received social support, perceived social support, and social embeddedness after disasters. In NeriaY.GaleaS.NorrisF. H. (Eds.), Mental health and disasters (pp. 175–200). Cambridge University Press.
38.
Kent De GreyR. G.UchinoB. N.TrettevikR.CronanS.HoganJ. N. (2018). Social support and sleep: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology: Official Journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 37(8), 787–798. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000628
39.
KimH. S.ShermanD. K.TaylorS. E. (2008). Culture and social support. American Psychologist, 63(6), 518–526. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X
40.
LaborP. D. P.Gastardo-ConacoM. C. C. (2021). Viewing your kapwa: Elaboration of a social-relational construct through language. Philippine Social Science Journal, 4(4), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.52006/main.v4i4.418
41.
LiK.WangH.SiuO.-L.YuH. (2024). How and when resilience can boost student academic performance: A weekly diary study on the roles of self-regulation behaviors, grit, and social support. Journal of Happiness Studies, 25(4), 36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-024-00749-4
42.
MacaraegJ.BersamiraC. S. (2024). Intersecting kapwa, resilience, and empowerment: A case study of Filipinos in Hawai‘i during the COVID-19 pandemic. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 15(4), 342–354. https://doi.org/10.1037/aap0000348
MargolisM.AustinJ.WuL.ValdimarsdottirH.StantonA. L.RowleyS. D.MunshiP. M.RiniC. (2019). Effects of social support source and effectiveness on stress buffering after stem cell transplant. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 26(4), 391–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-019-09787-2
45.
MartinezA. B.CoM.LauJ.BrownJ. S. L. (2020). Filipino help-seeking for mental health problems and associated barriers and facilitators: A systematic review. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 55(11), 1397–1413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-020-01937-2
46.
MeadeA. W.CraigS. B. (2012). Identifying careless responses in survey data. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 437–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028085
47.
MelroseK. L.BrownG. D. A.WoodA. M. (2015). When is received social support related to perceived support and well-being? When it is needed. Personality and Individual Differences, 77, 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.12.047
48.
MendozaS. L.PerkinsonJ. (2003). Filipino “kapwa” in global dialogue: A different politics of being-with the “other.”. Intercultural Communication Studies, XII(4), 277–293.
49.
MinkovM.KaasaA. (2022). Do dimensions of culture exist objectively? A validation of the revised minkov-hofstede model of culture with world values survey items and scores for 102 countries. Journal of International Management, 28(4), Article 100971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2022.100971
50.
MoeiniB.BaratiM.FarhadianM.AraM. H. (2018). The association between social support and happiness among elderly in Iran. Korean Journal of Family Medicine, 39(4), 260–265. https://doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.17.0121
51.
MontoyaA. K.EdwardsM. C. (2021). The poor fit of model fit for selecting number of factors in exploratory factor analysis for scale evaluation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 81(3), 413–440. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164420942899
52.
NurullahA. S. (2012). Received and provided social support: A review of current evidence and future directions. American Journal of Health Studies, 27(3), 173–188.
53.
Pe‐PuaR.Protacio‐MarcelinoE. A. (2000). Sikolohiyang Pilipino (Filipino psychology): A legacy of virgilio G. Enriquez. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3(1), 49–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-839X.00054
54.
PratiG.PietrantoniL. (2010). An application of the social support deterioration deterrence model to rescue workers. Journal of Community Psychology, 38(7), 901–917. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20404
RiniC.Dunkel SchetterC. (2010). The effectiveness of social support attempts in intimate relationships. In SullivanK.DavilaJ. (Eds.), Support processes in intimate relationships (pp. 26–67). Oxford University Press.
57.
RiniC.Dunkel SchetterC.HobelC. J.GlynnL. M.SandmanC. A. (2006). Effective social support: Antecedents and consequences of partner support during pregnancy. Personal Relationships, 13(2), 207–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00114.x
58.
SalangaM. G. C.YabutH. C. (2017). Ang pangkaraniwang pagpapakahulugan at behavioral na manipestasyon ng pakikisama. DIWA E-Journal, 5, 93–107.
59.
San JuanE. (2006). Toward a decolonizing indigenous psychology in the Philippines: Introducing sikolohiyang Pilipino. Journal for Cultural Research, 10(1), 47–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/14797580500422018
60.
SantiagoC. E.EnriquezV. G. (1976). Tungo sa maka-Pilipinong pananaliksik. Sikolohiyang Pilipino: Mga Ulat at Balita, 1(4), 3–10.
61.
SuY. (2022). Networks of recovery: Remittances, social capital and post-disaster recovery in Tacloban City, Philippines. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 67, Article 102641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102641
62.
TaylorS. E.ShermanD. K.KimH. S.JarchoJ.TakagiK.DunaganM. S. (2004). Culture and social support: Who seeks it and why?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(3), 354–362. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.354
TriandisH. C.MalpassR. S.DavidsonA. R. (1973). Psychology and culture. Annual Review of Psychology, 24(1), 355–378.
67.
WangH.WuS.LiuY. (2003). Association between social support and health outcomes: A meta‐analysis. The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences, 19(7), 345–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70436-X
68.
WangQ. (2016). Why should we all Be cultural psychologists? Lessons from the study of social cognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 11(5), 583–596. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616645552
69.
WongC. C. Y.LuQ. (2017). Match between culture and social support: Acculturation moderates the relationship between social support and well-being of Chinese American breast cancer survivors. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 26(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1362-y
70.
YacatJ. (2013). Filipino psychology (sikolohiyang Pilipino). The Encyclopedia of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2, 551–556.
