First-generation college graduates (FGCGs) are inherently different from their family members, due to their unique educational achievement (i.e. having graduated from college). FGCGs may experience family member marginalization, or the communication of difference, disapproval, or exclusion to one or more family members due to their status as “different” from the rest of the family. This study aims to understand the role of family member marginalization in FGCGs’ perceptions of resilience and flourishing in adulthood. Participants (N = 275, 51.6% men, 69.8% White) were based in the U.S. Findings indicate that FGCGs’ perceptions of resilience mediated the negative relationship between family member marginalization and flourishing. Moreover, perceptions of friend support availability moderated the relationship between family member marginalization and resilience, but community support did not. Despite the negative role family member marginalization seems to play, on average FGCGs reported high levels of both resilience and flourishing. Theoretical implications for scholars interested in resilience and family distancing are discussed along with practical implications for FGCGs, student support services, and family members.
AshforthB.MaelF. (2004). Social identity theory and the organization. In HatchM. J.SchultzM. (Eds.), Organizational identity: A reader. Oxford University Press.
2.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Prentice-Hall.
3.
BarnhartS.BodeM.GearhartM. C.Maguire-JackK. (2022). Supportive neighborhoods, family resilience and flourishing in childhood and adolescence. Children, 9(4), 495. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9040495
4.
BeckS. J.MillerA. N.FrahmW. A. (2011). An alternative approach to family communication. Annals of the International Communication Association, 35(1), 93–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2011.11679113
5.
BethellC. D.GombojavN.WhitakerR. C. (2019). Family resilience and connection promote flourishing among US children, even amid adversity. Health Affairs, 38(5), 729–737. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05425
6.
BronfenbrennerU. (1994). Ecological models of human development. In International encyclopedia of education (2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 37–43). Elsevier.
7.
BurgerA.NaudeL. (2019). Success in higher education: Differences between first-and continuous-generation students. Social Psychology of Education, 22(5), 1059–1083. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-019-09513-6
CataldiE. F.BennettC. T.ChenX. (2018). First-generation students: College access, persistence, and postbachelor’s outcomes. Stats in Brief. NCES 2018-421. National Center for Education Statistics.
CovarrubiasR.FrybergS. A. (2015). Movin’ on up (to college): First-generation college students’ experiences with family achievement guilt. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 21(3), 420–429. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037844
12.
DaileyR. M. (2006). Confirmation in parent–adolescent relationships and adolescent openness: Toward extending confirmation theory. Communication Monographs, 73(4), 434–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750601055432
13.
DebA. (2017). Flourishing among postgraduate students: The role of resilience, meaningfulness and grit. Indian Journal of Community Psychology, 13(1), 24.
14.
Demirciİ. (2022). Family harmony and flourishing in Turkey: The roles of interdependent happiness and harmony in life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 23(3), 985–1005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-021-00437-7
15.
DienerE.WirtzD.TovW.Kim-PrietoC.ChoiD.OishiS.Biswas-DienerR. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97(2), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y
16.
Dorrance HallE. (2017). The process of family member marginalization: Turning points experienced by “black sheep”. Personal Relationships, 24(3), 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12196
17.
Dorrance HallE. (2018). The communicative process of resilience for marginalized family members. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35(3), 307–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407516683838
18.
Dorrance-HallE.CampbellN.CarlisleM.LanceE.MaM.ScharpK. (2023). Development and validation of a family member marginalization measure (FM3): Difference, disapproval, and exclusion dimensions. Western Journal of Communication, 87(4), 509–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2022.2142917
19.
Dorrance-HallE.CampbellN.CarlisleM.SilverstoneJ.ImmelM.EarleK. (2023). Why family members st(r)ay: Marginalized family members’ commitment to family. Journal of Family Communication, 23(3-4), 274–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2023.2215232
20.
Dorrance HallE.WilsonS. R. (2021). Explicating dimensions of family marginalization and types of marginalized family members. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(7), 2099–2120. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211003981
21.
EngleJ.TintoV. (2008). Moving beyond access: College success for low-income, first-generation students. Pell Institute for the Study of Opportunity in Higher Education.
22.
FerencziN.MarshallT. C. (2016). Meeting the expectations of your heritage culture: Links between attachment orientations, intragroup marginalization and psychological adjustment. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33(1), 101–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407514562565
23.
GilchristJ. D.GohariM. R.BensonL.PatteK. A.LeatherdaleS. T. (2023). Reciprocal associations between positive emotions and resilience predict flourishing among adolescents. Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention in Canada: Research, Policy and Practice, 43(7), 313–320. https://doi.org/10.24095/hpcdp.43.7.01
24.
HayesA. F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (Vol. 3). The Guilford Press.
25.
HelgesonV. S. (1993). Two important distinctions in social support: Kind of support and perceived versus received. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23(10), 825–845. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1993.tb01008.x
26.
HirudayarajM.McLeanG. N. (2018). First-generation college graduates: A phenomenological exploration of their transition experiences into the corporate sector. European Journal of Training and Development, 42(1/2), 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-06-2017-0055
27.
HoggM. A. (2005). All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others: Social identity and marginal membership. In WilliamsK. D.ForgasJ. P.Von HippelW. (Eds.), The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying. CRC Press.
28.
HoggM. A.TerryD. I. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2000.2791606
29.
HoneL. C.JardenA.SchofieldG.DuncanS. (2014). Measuring flourishing: The impact of operational definitions on the prevalence of high levels of wellbeing. https://hdl.handle.net/10292/9331
30.
HorwitzB. N.ReynoldsC. A.NeiderhiserJ. M.CharlesS. T. (2014). Friend support and psychological distress in a US adult twin sample. Personal Relationships, 21(4), 570–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520410001682401
31.
HuberC. T. (2010). Social class experiences of working-class students: Transitioning out of college. (Publication No. 3022). [Doctoral dissertation, Indiana State University]. All-Inclusive List of Electronic Theses and Dissertations.
32.
IshitaniT. T. (2003). A longitudinal approach to assessing attrition behavior among first-generation students: Time-varying effects of pre-college characteristics. Research in Higher Education, 44(4), 433–449. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024284932709
33.
JeongH. J.KimS.LeeJ. (2023). Mental health, life satisfaction, supportive parent communication, and help-seeking sources in the wake of COVID-19: First-generation college students (FGCS) vs. non-first-generation college students (non-FGCS). Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 37(2), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/87568225.2021.1906189
34.
KamJ. A.Mendez MurilloR.CornejoM.MendozaN. (2022). The importance of norms and efficacy in predicting undocumented college students’ intentions to talk to an on-campus mental health professional. Health Communication, 37(2), 230–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1834208
35.
KaufmanV. A.PerezJ. C.ReiseS. P.BradburyT. N.KarneyB. R. (2022). Friendship network satisfaction: A multifaceted construct scored as a unidimensional scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 39(2), 325–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211025639
36.
KimY. K.SaxL. J. (2009). Student–faculty interaction in research universities: Differences by student gender, race, social class, and first-generation status. Research in Higher Education, 50(5), 437–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-009-9127-x
37.
KwongT. Y.HayesD. K. (2017). Adverse family experiences and flourishing amongst children ages 6–17 years: 2011/12 national survey of children’s health. Child Abuse & Neglect, 70(1), 240–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.06.016
38.
LearyM. R.SpringerC. A. (2001). Hurt feelings: The neglected emotion. In KowalskiR. M. (Ed.), Behaving badly: Aversive behaviors in interpersonal relationships (pp. 151–175). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10365-006
MarianM.DarabaneanuD.ChirodeaF.TocaC. (2022). Analysis of social support as an argument for the sustainable construction of the European Community space. Sustainability, 14(12), 7448. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127448
41.
McCarronG. P. (2022). First and flourishing? An exploration of how first-generation college students make meaning of their well-being through purpose, relationships, and multiple identities. Journal of First-Generation Student Success, 2(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/26906015.2021.2018269
42.
NasiriM.KarsaziH.EsmaeilpourF.BeyramiM. (2015). The role of meaning in life, mindfulness and resilience in the flourishing of students. Positive Psychology Research, 1(3), 21–32.
43.
OngA. D.BergemanC. S.BokerS. M. (2009). Resilience comes of age: Defining features in later adulthood. Journal of Personality, 77(6), 1777–1804. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00600.x
44.
OrbeM. P. (2004). Negotiating multiple identities within multiple frames: An analysis of first‐generation college students. Communication Education, 53(2), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520410001682401
45.
Padilla-WalkerL. M.NelsonL. J. (2017). Flourishing in emerging adulthood: Positive development during the third decade of life. Oxford University Press.
46.
PalbusaJ. A.GauvainM. (2017). Parent-student communication about college and freshman grades in first-generation and non-first-generation students. Journal of College Student Development, 58(1), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2017.0007
47.
RicksJ. R.WarrenJ. M. (2021). Transitioning to college: Experiences of successful first-generation college students. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 11(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.5590/JERAP.2021.11.1.01
48.
RiversA. S.SanfordK. (2020). When we say “perceived support,” what do we mean? Contexts and components of support among people with serious medical conditions. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 37(10-11), 2758–2778. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407520937350
49.
SarasonI. G.SarasonB. R.ShearinE. N. (1986). Social support as an individual difference variable: Its stability, origins, and relational aspects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(4), 845–855. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.4.845
50.
ScharpK. M.Dorrance HallE. (2019). Reconsidering family closeness: A review and call for research on family distancing. Journal of Family Communication, 19(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2018.1544563
51.
ScharpK. M.WangT. R.WolfeB. H. (2022). Communicative resilience of first-generation college students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Human Communication Research, 48(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqab018
52.
SmithB. W.DalenJ.WigginsK.TooleyE.ChristopherP.BernardJ. (2008). The brief resilience scale: Assessing the ability to bounce back. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 15(3), 194–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705500802222972
53.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An intergrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47): Brooks/Cole.
54.
TannerJ. L. (2011). Emerging adulthood. In LevesqueR. J. R. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of adolescence (pp. 818–825). Springer.
55.
ThomasP. A.Williams-FarrellyM. M.SauerteigM. R.FerraroK. F. (2022). Childhood stressors, relationship quality, and cognitive health in later life. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 77(7), 1361–1371. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbac007
56.
TorresV.HernandezE. (2007). The influence of ethnic identity on self-authorship: A longitudinal study of Latino/a college students. Journal of College Student Development, 48(5), 558–573. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2007.0057
57.
WagnildG. M.YoungH. M. (1993). Development and psychometric. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 1(2), 165–178.
WangT. R.NuruA. K. (2017). “He wanted me to achieve that for our family and I did, too”: Exploring first-generation students’ experiences of turning points during the transition to college. Journal of Family Communication, 17(2), 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2016.1264401
60.
WhitakerR. C.Dearth-WesleyT.HermanA. N. (2021). Childhood family connection and adult flourishing: Associations across levels of childhood adversity. Academic Pediatrics, 21(8), 1380–1387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2021.03.002
61.
WhiteJ. P. (2011). Exploring well-being in schools: A guide to making children’s lives more fulfilling. Taylor & Francis.
62.
WolfeB. H.MaM.KuchL.ZhangY.CuiX.EdwardsA. L.WatsonO.Dorrance-HallE. (2025). A mixed-methods analysis of memorable messages received by first-generation college students from parents at graduation. Journal of Family Communication. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2025.2451237
63.
WoszidloA.KunkelA. D. (2018). Social learning theory: An emphasis on modeling in parent-child relationships. In BraithwaiteD.SuterE.FloydK. (Eds.), Engaging theories in family communication: Multiple perspectives (2nd ed.). Routledge.
64.
YildirimM.BelenH. (2019). The role of resilience in the relationships between externality of happiness and subjective well-being and flourishing: A structural equation model approach. Journal of Positive Psychology and Wellbeing, 3(1), 62–76.
65.
ZimetG. D.DahlemN. W.ZimetS. G.FarleyG. K. (1988). The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
